Mob Violence: Astonishing Media Bias on Display Once Again


Leftists egged and attacked Trump supporters while the legacy media figuratively cheered them on

After supposedly peace-loving leftists once again turned violent in San Jose last week as they have at several Trump campaign rallies this year, rather than taking them to task for trying to squelch free speech and free assembly the ridiculous legacy media wrote up headlines like these:

  • Protesters take to streets after Trump rally in San Jose (CNN)
  • Anti-Trump Voices Amplify on Internet, With Violent Results (New York Times)
  • Mexican Flag, Seen at Trump Protests, Has Long History in US (ABC)
  • Clinton says Trump made violence at his rallies acceptable (Daily Mail)

The deck is obviously being stacked by the media, but luckily nobody with a modicum of intelligence believes them anymore. What was on display in San Jose and the media response is Racial Bolshevism, plain and simple, designed to turn anyone of European descent into the enemy and anyone not of European descent into people who possess Bertrand Russell’s Fallacy of the Superior Virtue of the Oppressed. In a his personal correspondence, Russell wrote:

People seem good while they are oppressed, but they only wish to become oppressors in their turn: life is nothing but a competition to be the criminal rather than the victim.

It has been amazing to watch the transformation the left has undergone from supposed oppressed victims to foaming at the mouth criminals, with aims at shutting white people and their opinions up. It is fascism, pure and simple. Michael Savage calls them the equivalent of the brown shirts in Germany in the 1930s. Leftist Vox did a hit piece on the entire white race, with a mocking, taunting tone running throughout the entire article. Just imagine, before reading the excerpt, if whites were forcing another ethnic group to become a minority in their own nation how different the tone would be:

Supporters of Donald Trump know that white Americans are, at some point in the not-too-distant future, projected to become a minority of the US population. Some racial conservatives see this as simple realpolitik — other ethnic groups are looking out for their interests, and white people need to step up and do the same. (This is the perspective of the alt-right, for example.) Others see it as a consequence of “identity politics” — that by identifying themselves with their ethnic heritage, people are putting their American-ness second. But they agree that, right now, white people are the losers.

In other words, to Vox, because they are so evil white people deserve what is happening to them. Rather than discrediting multiculturalism as a failed experiment as people of all races stubbornly continue to exhibit tribal behavior, and blaming the protestors for inciting violence as was the case when a Muslim man from Somalia tackled a Trump supporter, bragged about it on Twitter, then retweeted congratulations from people, Vox once again laid the blame on Trump supporters rather than the Communists.

As recently as this spring, the victims of physical violence at Trump rallies were overwhelmingly protesters; the people engaging in physical violence were overwhelmingly Trump supporters. The protesters themselves were acting in a manner you’d generally call “nonviolent” — they were standing or chanting or holding signs. To Trump supporters, that wasn’t the point. Protesters were assertive, and more importantly disruptive; that made their actions unacceptable and justified whatever had to be done to stop them.

Even though an ABC journalist Tom Llamas tweeted this account about the incident as it was happening, charges have yet to be filed against the attacker Somalian attacker:

Outside Trump rally protestors chased down this kid and tackled him.

Claims Trump supporters were responsible were made by Vox and virtually all of the left-wing, legacy press even though video and photo accounts and excerpts from journalists on the scene show quite the opposite behavior. Imagine if the situation had been reversed, and a white person had tackled a person from another ethnic background at a Hillary rally. This thought experiment shows us how insane the narrative has become in Anglo America. Another question is how is this type of behavior not labeled domestic terrorism? Breitbart Disqus commenter Holden had this to say about how the U.S. government labels some groups terrorists and looks the other way when others perform terrorist acts:

Political violence. Physically attacking people. Damaging personal property. Burning national symbols. And they’re “protesting?” How is this not considered terrorism?

By refusing to call these acts terror, scapegoating whites, and publishing a false account of what happened, the legacy media have committed treason against the public they’re supposed to serve. The media are also ignoring reports of Craigslist ads paying $16 an hour for “Rent-a-Mobs” such as this one. Political guru Roger Stone says:

[The protesters] are paid for mostly by George Soros and and pushed by David Brock at Media Matters for America.

If this is the case, why isn’t the Department of Homeland Security investigating, as the security for a Presidential Candidate is supposed to be at the top of the list of government functions. The public should know the truth, it should know the mobs are being hired, and it should know why these acts are not considered terrorism. Does this mean Trump supporters can go to Hillary rallies and jump on cars, wave ethnic flags, throw eggs at supporters, burn Mexican flags and be treated the same way by the press?


Despite documentary evidence proving leftist mobs were inciting violence, the legacy media is once again blaming Trump and his supporters for the actions of street thugs

Left Makes Right Play Defense, Once Again

It should be pointed out these riots represent the rabble-rousing tendencies of the Communist left and do not represent the more moderate opinions and attitudes of most people in the country – from all ethnic backgrounds. The riots are a product of racial identity politics. Rather than encouraging people from different backgrounds to get along and downplay differences, leftist demagogues use divide and conquer tactics, marginalizing and demonizing those of European descent while duplicitously taking the moral high road with in their official statements and speeches.

By pushing a false narrative of what happened first, that the protestors are saints and cannot be criticized for blocking roads to campaign events, throwing eggs at, and tackling Trump supporters, the legacy media is using their time-tested tactic of putting the right on defense. The right then has to explain itself, while leftists continue to level claims of everything from racism to the crime of whiteness against Trump supporters. As has been pointed out before, this is the wrong tactic in the Culture War. The right has to stop constantly playing defense when the left race baits. It needs to reframe the issue, making leftists, who are supposedly peace-loving defend their violent, mob behavior.

What results from race baiting is the worst behavior in the human species, when the tribal instincts of all ethnicities are unleashed on each other. It is an astonishing display of the failure of multiculturalism happening before our very eyes. Even though many people are moderate, there is always going to be a segment of every ethnic group that wants to dominate the other groups. This is why nations have borders, and this is why people self-segregate in communities across America.

Further, showing us once again their breathtaking hypocrisy, leftists flee racial diversity once demographics change as reported by The Sunday Times.

Liberals are as likely to flee diversity as conservatives, according to new research by Prof Eric Kaufmann for Demos. The tendency of white liberals not to practice the diversity they preach dates back to the 1960s at least.

The hypocrisy of leftists is nothing new. Realize, the violence by design. Racial Bolshevists believe the Socialist Utopia cannot come about without the elimination of white people, and especially white males, first from all positions of power and authority in society, and later on it may be the case the very existence of white men can no longer be tolerated. The excerpt from the Vox article above is loaded with this insinuation. This is straight up Communism. Americans thought they won the Cold War only to find themselves in the midst of a Socialist Revolution a generation later. I can only watch in horror as this unfolds but I can’t say I’m surprised. The media and politicians in America are race-obsessed, constantly pouring salt into the wounds of grievances people have against European Americans.

The insinuation that one group is supposed to fall back, not express their opinions, and that any opinions that differ from those of the left are evil, racist, or some other “-ist” is absurd, and reeks of authoritarianism. In the Soviet Union, people were killed, tossed into prison, or put into psychiatric wards for not agreeing the Communist system was the best political system the world had ever devised. How is this attitude any different today among the leftists inciting violence at campaign rallies? To them, anyone who doesn’t agree with their policies of multiculturalism and Marxism must be sanctioned. It is history repeating itself.

Personally, some of the best friends I have ever had are of other ethnicities than my own. This makes this series of events all the more tragic. But, I do not believe white people are not entitled to their own self-interest. The real tragedy is encouraging protesters to scapegoat an entire race for political gain, then expecting those being scapegoated to stand down. It is insanity. It is Communism. And, unchecked it will lead to a Civil War.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

One comment

  • I’m afraid there will be some sort of large scale upheaval in the near future. I don’t know if we’ll have a civil war, but I’m not going to discount that possibility. The animosity is growing at a fevered pitch and the left has made it blatantly clear they do not care about the First Amendment. I don’t see a way to resolve this without resorting to a brutal clash. Like the terrorists, violence and superior force is the only thing these protestors understand. I’ve said it before, but I think it bears repeating, Trump supporters need to be prepared for violence; inflicting violence on the protestors. I don’t say that with a light heart. I shy away from violence unless necessary, but in this case, I truly believe it might be the only option left.

    The media is placing all the blame for this violence on Trump and his supporters even though they are the victims. The protestors are trying to keep Trump and his supporters from exercising their First Amendment right to peaceably assemble. This is the precise reason we have the Second Amendment; to protect the First. The media is against us, the police won’t protect us, and the left wants to destroy us. No one is going to swoop in to save the day. It’s up to us to stamp out this madness.

    If anyone has any other ideas, I welcome them.


Join the Discussion | Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s