Should Men Sue for Dating Expenses and Hookup Lies?

You are so beautiful to me!

Are women entitled to free meals, free vacations, and other forms of cash and prizes for agreeing to spend time with men?

Taking a page out of the feminist playbook and performing a long overdue role reversal, a Russian man is suing his ex-girlfriend for the expenses he incurred while dating her. Due to the inherent misandry and anti-male disposition of Western culture, which could spark a backlash, the attorney/ex-boyfriend wishes to remain anonymous but he did tell an interviewer:

She can’t prove that we were even in a relationship. I never said that I was giving her a present or a free ride. Is it immoral to go to court? Am I expected to give money to every woman on the street?

Let’s reframe this issue from the “outdated” thinking of generations past. Indeed, the female expectation – that women are entitled to cash and prizes from men for going on dates and providing sexual favors tells us women view dating as a sophisticated form of prostitution. In other words, for attention and sex during the relationship, she is entitled to “stuff” and the man is entitled to the bill. That mentality is evident in this case. After taking Nina Zgurskaya on a romantic vacation in Crimea, a 12-day holiday she suggested the couple embark on, she walked out on him because she did not get the proposal she wanted. Nina describes her flighty behavior in an interview:

We went to Fedosia, Crimea, for 12 days and agreed that it was a romantic trip where he will propose to me. But it didn’t happen. So I left. We’ve been in court since October 2015. He filed two suits against me, for money transfers to me and for the holiday. He had receipts.

Just an opinion, but this sounds like she was trying to worm her way into exploiting the young lawyer’s money, status, and power by sexing him up on an exotic vacation. She was already in his wallet as he was wiring her money. She thought she could get a proposal out of the deal to entitle herself to half his income and possibly more in divorce court, and the manipulation blew up in her face.

In turn, Nina received court papers a few weeks later demanding she refund flower, restaurant and café expenses her ex-boyfriend incurred while dating her. The court dismissed his first claim, but he filed a second one. (Bravo, man!) Her ex boyfriend is demanding around $700 in expenses, which does not seem like much to ask, considering the circumstances. Men are regularly expected to pay hundreds of dollars a month to ex-wives in alimony payments, even though today’s liberated women supposedly Don’t Need a Man™. If women are demanding equal pay, why do they need a man to pay for anything? She should happily refund his money.

The man claims he never agreed to be her boyfriend and had nothing more than a “working relationship” with Nina. Legal experts said the man had little chance of winning the case because he did not make Nina sign the receipts. Moreover, men are viewed as little more than sperm donors and meal tickets in the court system. However, the case speaks volumes about a change in mentality men are having worldwide.


Expecting entitlement to a man’s money in exchange for dates and sexual favors is little more than sophisticated prostitution

Lessons Learned

The plaintiff’s actions should be applauded by Red Pill men everywhere as we work towards men’s liberation from sexist, feminist ideology that says men should be merry walking wallets who pay for everything from meals to vacations in Crimea, with women able to walk out on the relationship at anytime, even after debts and other financial obligations have been made fulfilling their desires. We should be happy for the use and abuse, in other words.

Even though this is a hopeless case to win, it is causing stress for Nina in that she has to go to court and explain everything to a judge. If thousands, no, millions of men worldwide banded together and did the same thing a change could be forced on both the court system and women’s condescension of men, treating us a little more than utilities to be exploited until our usefulness runs out.

The puss pass needs to be revoked in order to achieve equality. Recouping expenses incurred in failed relationships, especially if men starting keeping receipts and records would set a precedent that should be followed everywhere: women no longer get special privileges only because of their sex.

We can also glean yet another example of predatory female behavior and victim card playing from this case. Nina expected a proposal for offering herself up for a vacation, and when she didn’t get what she wanted she walked out, more than likely expecting the young attorney to chase after like a lost puppy dog. However, an unpleasant surprise arrived in her mailbox a few weeks later when a summons showed up. What does she do? Go play the victim for getting sued.


In another case, a wealthy film producer is being sued for not disclosing she had herpes to a Tinder hookup partner

Tinder Hookup Herpes

In an unrelated, amusing case of men using the legal system game against women instead of the other way around, a Las Vegas man is suing a girl he met on Tinder for giving him herpes. The man, who is anonymously referred to in court documents as John Doe, said the woman gave him herpes after she explicitly requested he not use a condom because she was a “good Jewish mother.”

His claims against the single mom include fraud, battery, willful misconduct, gross negligence and infliction of emotional distress. He is seeking $10,000 in damages for medical care expenses and loss of life enjoyment, as well as an unknown amount for punitive damages.

After waking up with painful herpes blisters, John Doe contacted his Tinder hookup. The woman, who is as reported by news sources a wealthy film producer, described having many hookups with men to the plaintiff on Tinder, then later told John Doe she “had no idea” her herpes could be transmitted even without an outbreak after he confronted her. Indeed, Tinder and its gay equivalent Grindr, have been connected with the spread of STDs and in creating a “dating apocalypse” in an already degenerate American culture. Charles Prince of Vegas Matchmakers, an offline dating agency, told interviewers:

On her end of the scale, she should have been honest, but his decision to pursue instant gratification is going to affect him the rest of his life. They both went on the site, they both knew what they were getting into: they were looking for a quick night of fun, a good time. Now he’s paying the price and he doesn’t like it.

Prince’s comment represents willingness to give the producer the puss pass again. If the case had been reversed, the likelihood a man would be so easily forgiven for knowingly passing an STD to a women is very low.

If the only way to deal with the consequences of today’s increasingly petty and degenerate dating market is to pursue legal recourse in the court system, more power to the men who use it to their advantage rather than allowing themselves to be eternal defendants. Women have been manipulating the legal system to their advantage a long ime. If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.


  • The nice thing about the guy suing for damages from the herpes is that she will face severe penalties in the future if she does it again. Next time, it will be willfully giving another an incurable disease, which I think is a felony in most places. That lawsuit will not be for 10000 in damages. He should try to subpoena her phone records to contact previous men she has been with to see if they too contracted the disease and if she knew already about others. That would establish proof that she deliberately gave him herpes in his case and prompt law suits by the other men as well. The court would see her as a criminal and menace to society it it would expose her to felony criminal prosecution.

    I know a girl that gave a guy herpes at work and I use an anonymous email system through an anonymous proxy to email men at work that show interest in her. The email simply says ” has herpes.”

    For those guys out there paying women’s way on dates – please stop. You’re literally her John and all she’s after is either your current assets and income or all that plus your future assets and income (marriage/divorce/asset division/alimony/child support). It is just a more sophisticated form of prostitution. In other words, you’re just being used for wealth transfer. That’s why so many women won’t marry a guy with less money and education. In marriage – women’s primary interest is in what they get financially asset/cash-wise in exchange for sex – before, during and after the marriage has ended.


    • Relampago Furioso

      I’ve often heard it said marriage is legalized prostitution. Hard not to see it that way when Johnny Depp is being cleaned out for $20 million for temporary sex from that blonde harlot who is divorcing him. She easily falls from a 7 SMV to a 5 SMV without her makeup, IMHO. Women claim to be strong and independent until they go to divorce court. The laws were written to protect women, assuming they’d be destitute and were the victims in divorces. What strong, independent women needs a settlement in divorce court? I’ll tell you why they want a settlement. Just like any street hooker, they want to be paid for the sex they provide.


Join the Discussion | Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s