It is Legally Impossible for a Woman to Rape a Man in England


Possession of a penis literally determines legal culpability in rape charges

Just when you think Anglo society can’t possibly be any more anti-male than it already is, along come facts which force you to downgrade your opinion of the situation. Apparently, it is legally impossible for a woman to rape a man in Merry Old England. Bastian Lloyd Morris, a legal firm in the UK shows us how the very sexist English legal system targets men, and specifically targets them for the crime of having a penis. Paging Dr. Freud…

Physically, a woman cannot rape a man because of the how the offense is defined in law. Rape, in English law, requires a penis to be inserted into a woman’s vagina, anus or mouth without her consent and knowing that she does not so consent.

If we’ve said it once, we’ve said it a thousand times, Freud’s Penis Envy theory is constantly proven correct by feminism and Anglo society’s treatment of men. How else can one explain insane legal codes like this? The penis itself is targeted by the law!

This requirement has caused some criminologists to describe the law as being ‘phallocentric’ or ‘phallogenic’. Whilst inserting an object or another part of the body into one of the aforementioned orifices is a serious sexual assault, it is not classified as rape.

Stick a dildo in a woman and that doesn’t classify as rape. Stick a penis in her, evil piece of anatomy that it is, and that does classify as rape. Get it?

Props to the lawyers for inventing a term (phallocentric) that is right at home with the leftist proclivity to invent word jumbles when marketing and whining over their “oppression.” So, what happens when gender confusion sets in and a transgender man decides to have his member chopped off or a transgender woman decides to have a rape device (i.e. penis) installed?

Only men can commit the offense of rape as a principal. Interestingly, preoperative male transgenders can commit the offense because they are still legally male, whereas post-operative female transgenders cannot commit the offense because they are still legally female.

Having a penis is a serious crime, but only if your born with it. When you live on Orwell’s Animal Farm some animals are more equal than other animals. Women > Men in Anglo Society.

It is not apparent why the law focuses on the requirement that a penis is needed to commit the offense of rape. It is fairly easy to construct a theoretical argument where a woman could use her vagina to ‘rape’ a man. If she, for example, tied his arms and legs to a bed and then placed his penis in her vagina against his will, it is difficult to see why that is less offensive than the converse.

Indeed, it is strange to think rationally about why a woman raping a man is less offensive in the justice system. Especially since the female “nature’s credit card” is often used to commit the worst, most life-altering form of rape there is – financial rape.

It is conceivable (no pun intended) a woman could literally tie a man down, rape him, get pregnant (literally physically raping him but not in the eyes of the law) then proceed to financially rape him as so many modern women do these days.


Is financial rape no less devastating to a person’s well-being than physical rape?

Financial Rape

Interestingly, a pamphlet from the National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV) warns women (ever the victims) about financial abuse from men. The irony that divorce in the modern day court system results in the same sort of “financial abuse” (financial rape is a better term) for men is apparently lost on those presuming to have the Superior Virtue of the Oppressed.

Financial abuse is a common tactic used by batterers to control and isolate their partner. It can have far-reaching and devastating consequences. 

If ever one needed proof every second of a relationship with an Anglo woman has become a legal nightmare for men, there it is. We now have a whole new narrative forming around financial abuse. In other words, open up your purse strings and let her waste your money or you are now financially abusing a woman, in addition to your other long list of crimes for existing.

In supreme irony, a Predatory Female can eat a man’s entire financial life for lunch and bring “far-reaching and devastating consequences” to his life. But of course, the society is incapable of seeing it this way, and this type of treatment will never been seen as financial abuse or financial rape by society.

The NNEDV pamphlet goes on to enforce the narrative that women are victims when men don’t turn themselves into check writing pushovers.

Financial abuse is a tactic used to control relationships by preventing access, use or maintenance of money or other financial resources. It might include: ˆ

  • Controlling all decisions of how money is spent
  • Withholding money or “giving an allowance” ˆ
  • Withholding basic living resources, medication or food ˆ
  • Not allowing their partner to work or earn money ˆ
  • Stealing their partner’s identity, money, credit or property ˆ
  • May justify behavior as cultural or religious

It can be difficult for couples to navigate the complexities of family finances and almost all couples have arguments about money.

Interestingly, all of the above bullet points termed “abuse” by the NNEDV occur when there’s financial rape in a divorce.

  • All decisions of how a many’s income is spent come under the discretion of a judge.
  • He is “given an allowance” to live on, which can be less than he needs to avoid bankruptcy and living under a bridge if the alimony payments + child support payments are high enough.
  • Basic living resources and access to medication and food can be crippled by alimony and child support payments, but nobody gives a damn when this happens to a man.
  • A man’s ability to work or earn money at another employer or at a lower paying but less stressful job is crippled by indentured servitude in the court system. It’s either pay or go to jail in the current system of male slavery.
  • A man’s money, credit and property can be seized by a judge even if a woman was having trains run on her by the local football team leading to the divorce.
  • Anglo culture justifies this behavior with the fallacious reasoning that woman are morally infallible.

To top it off, women constantly pat themselves on the back for being Strong, Independent Women™ who Don’t Need a Man™ while literally cleaning a man out financially. Well-off women routinely accept obscene divorce settlements, because they’re holders of the Magic Vagina.

Even amongst the proles, we don’t see too many women turning down divorce settlements or cash and prizes handed out by a judge at the expense of their discarded meal ticket. (It’s often said women have no sense of justice or no sense of remorse for a discarded Beta male.)

Making the financial rape situation more hilarious and sickening at the same time, only 3% of woman pay alimony nationwide. But those women are so enraged by paying it they’re making more waves than the 97% of provider module males have. Ken Neumann of the Academy of Professional Family Mediators told the press:

It’s unfair for men to pay it, and unfair for women to pay it. But women are much more outraged by it.

These women are demanding an end to this payments. And it should come as no surprise that 3% of women are being listened to while the 97% of men are ignored.

As always, whether it be physical rape or financial rape, when women get a taste of their own medicine they get outraged by it. But that inhuman bag of meat that’s subject to punishment for a crime you can’t commit under the eyes of the law, or paying your bills to the detriment of his own well-being, well that kind of treatment is just fine for him.

Once again, as we scratch the veneer of a society that seems balanced and like one the rest of the world should aspire to from the outside, the facade crumbles to reveal a society that has a deep chasm between its treatment of the sexes. It displays remarkable biases against men and towards women, but nobody gives a fuck as women benefit from it. It is a society that is fundamentally hateful and disrespecting to the male gender. After all, who told you to be born with that penis?

Support this bullshit with my tax money and my life savings? Ummm, no.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.


  • Everything in this article is gold. Males truly are oppressed by the system, yet Feminists try to state that it is women who are instead, usually by crafting nonexistent boogeymen that immediately disappear once any research is done. Is there still individual cases of misogyny? Yes, of course. I doubt anyone would claim otherwise. But systemic sexism? That is almost entirely misandric in nature. Traditional women/society is no better though. While the Feminists try to create female superiority, tradcons already believe in it.

    A truly unsexist woman treats her man exactly as she wants to be treated: as a fellow human being, not an automatic provider or protector.


  • The UK won’t even punish women who rape young boys in attempts to get pregnant. Had she succeeded there’s every likelihood that she’d be able to get child support from her victim.

    Note the treatment of her by the courts and media reporting it. In an instance of sexual impropriety any woman involved is a victim by default, even when they are the perpetrator.


  • Feminism is a total joke and the biggest con game of all time. The entire movement is based on cherry picked historical circumstances used to demonize men, the never ending victimhood of women and the total manipulation of reality. Millions upon millions of men have been destroyed through hyper-gynocentrism (feminism) and tens upon tens of thousands of men take their lives every year due to the anti-male policies and laws it produces.

    The good thing about it all is that men are waking up. Red Pill, MGTOW and MRA are spreading far faster than feminism ever dreamed thanks to the internet. In a few short years, the manosphere has grown extensively and has already dwarfed feminism in popularity among men.

    Ultimately – feminism has/will backfire in a big way – resulting in the end of marriage and hence the end of forced wealth transfer from men to women through alimony, asset division child support and civil suit payouts following false accusations. The end to the slavery of men to women through marriage is nigh.

    Gynocentrism is male disposability + cultural misandry – hence the male-only draft, why women only demand quotas for the top jobs and the primary reason for the countless millions of men’s lives sacrificed at the alter of the women first mentality.

    By telling half the story – feminists have screwed themselves and have become the greatest worldwide cancer in earth’s history. How? Because the real truth is coming to the fore – all thanks to modern technology created by men. Since the advent of feminism – marriage rates and birth rates have declined precipitously for many decades – which means millions upon millions of men in the future will not know the life destruction that follows marriage and family in our hyper-gynocentric, man hating culture.

    In a lot of ways, I’m thankful for feminism. Ultimately, it will lead to the end of centuries of gynocentrism and an entirely new world of men’s freedom from culturally embedded man hate.

    Thank you, feminists. You truly do help men, too.


  • I’m sorry for the guys who’ve gotten screwed one way or another. Check that, I’m sorry for the 35 and up crowd. The programming was so total that none of them could be blamed for being blue pill. Younger than that? Sorry you were dumb. The information is out there.

    Aside from the victims, I say celebrate and thank feminists daily for the misandry. It’s what has set you free. It’s what got you those silver dollars in Brazil and those perfect white asses in China. It’s what led you to minimalism and mobility and a lifetime of young ass. It’s what has led you to the true male imperative. This kind of obscenely obvious misandry is a godsend. Had women made any attempt to conceal their nature, then back to the fifties we go. Most of us would have fallen for it. The same slavery for the same 5-10 lays a year from the same tired out body. We would have never known that our agreeable 170 pounder was playing us for a fool the whole time. They showed their hand, thank God. Most of us would have been duped otherwise. But their outrageous cuntitude has led me to Asian ass. So I thank feminists from the bottom of my soul. I mean it.


Join the Discussion | Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s