Government Employees Tampering with Temperature Data? Quelle Surprise!

forest-fire-432870_1280

We are mere seconds away from becoming Venus, according to government propaganda

Big Daddy Government wants you to believe it can control the weather by taxing you. It further wants to tighten the string it already has tethered to our backs to control our range of movement by making an element (carbon) on the periodic table – the element all life on earth is based on – seem evil in the minds of the sheeple.

Bureaucrats can then continue the narrative that traveling is evil because planes, trains, and automobiles are destroying the planet, so stay home, watch TV and be sure to buy plenty of consumer crap as if that’s not destroying the planet. Don’t go see any of those faraway cultures that haven’t been assimilated into the Anglo-American Matrix. (You might just discover how much of your humanity has been lost in America by discovering a culture of consumerism and Puritanism isn’t the be-all, end-all of human existence!)

The Global Warming Religion and carbon tax scheme is yet another example of everything in the Blue Pill world being a lie. It’s another Big Lie promulgated by self-annointed “Elites” to keep the commoners on track behaving as their told and producing profit. In support of this agenda, NOAA just published another batch of massaged (read: falsified) temperature data showing that we – surprise, surprise – are on our way to being just like Venus, soon. The event was hyped by Climate Central, a global warming alarmist blog:

In all likelihood, the U.S. is going to have its second-hottest year on record, trailing only 2012. Every state is slated to have a top 10 warmest year and even at the city level, unrelenting warmth has been the main story in 2016.

What the hell? The Deplorable Climate Science blog (heh) readily debunks this claim from climate “scientists” who are foaming at the mouth to create revenue (i.e. secure grants to “fight” the problem) rather than creating scientific advancement.

The first problem with their analysis is that the US had very little hot weather in 2016. The percentage of hot days was below average, and ranked 80th since 1895. Only 4.4% of days were over 95°F, compared with the long term average of 4.9%. Climate Central is conflating mild temperatures with hot ones.

Beyond the false narratives illuminated by The Deplorable Climate Science blog, NOAA surface temperature data is contaminated by islands of humanity and its pavement and concrete jungles. The planet is 70% water, and humanity’s reworking of the land to form towns and cities is but a thin film of civilization on the planet. Measuring temperature near human settlements is the planetary equivalent of measuring temperature in your house rather than outside, because temperature is only being measured where humans have reworked the land and there are LOCAL effects like urban heat islands, solar insolation reflecting off of asphalt, etc.

Even that’s not enough for NOAA, it further manipulates the data.

The problem with the NOAA graph is that it is fake data. NOAA creates the warming trend by altering the data. The NOAA raw data shows no warming over the past century.

Interestingly, the adjustments NOAA makes always show warming, curiously, the exact type of warming they keep warning us about even though satellite temperature measurements of the globe show we are actually cooling down. One NASA scientist says NOAA monkeying around with the data is scientific chicanery in the first place:

Gavin Schmidt at NASA explains very clearly why the US temperature record does not need to be adjusted. “You could throw out 50 percent of the station data or more, and you’d get basically the same answers.”

Then, Schmidt mentions a network of climate stations set up to combat the biases mentioned above that occur when weather stations are located near urban areas.

One recent innovation is the set up of a climate reference network alongside the current stations so that they can look for potentially serious issues at the large scale – and they haven’t found any yet.

It’s not surprising this data from a network of weather stations specially designed to measure the temperature of the overall planet rather than the microclimates of urban areas is not used by NOAA and its unpaid but fully baptized minions in the blogosphere, because it doesn’t support the polemic.

Here’s the bottom line about why this problem of “global warming” never goes away. In America, you have to create problems to create profit. Even though global warming and global cooling cycles are completely natural, you have to make them sound scary so government scientists can swoop in and save the day. It’s a plot so hackneyed it follows so many bad Hollyweird movies.

Expect the alarmists to become even more strident in their prognostications of doom as the global warming narrative continues to fall apart.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Advertisements

2 comments

  • There was a time when Americans believed in freedom.

    The US is dying from a million cuts. Part of the reason the USA is a nanny police state now is that whenever there is a problem, the kneejerk reaction in the US is to call for a new law.

    Nanny state laws are not the best solution, however. Nanny state laws lead to more laws, higher fines, and tougher sentences. Thirty years ago, DWI laws were enacted that led to DWI checkpoints and lower DWI levels. Seatbelt laws led to backseat seatbelt laws, childseat laws, and pet seatbelt laws. Car liability insurance laws led to health insurance laws and gun liability laws. Smoking laws that banned smoking in buildings led to laws against smoking in parks and then bans against smoking in entire cities. Sex offender registration laws led to sex offender restriction laws and violent offender registration laws.

    Nanny state laws don’t make us safer, either. Nanny state laws lead people to be careless since they don’t need to have personal responsibility anymore. People don’t need to be careful crossing the street now because drunk-driving has been outlawed and driving while using a cellphone is illegal. People don’t investigate companies or carry out due diligence because businesses must have business licenses now.

    The main point of nanny state laws is not safety. The main purposes of more laws are control and revenue generation for the state.

    Another reason laws are enacted is because corporations give donations to lawmakers to stifle competition or increase sales.

    Many laws are contradictory, too. Some laws say watering lawns is required, while other laws say watering lawns is illegal.

    Many nanny state laws that aim to solve a problem can be fixed by using existing laws. If assault is already illegal, why do we need a new law that outlaws hitting umpires?

    Nanny state laws are not even necessary. If everything was legal would you steal, murder, and use crack cocaine? Aren’t there other ways to solve problems besides calling the police? Couldn’t people educate or talk to people who bother them? Couldn’t people be sued for annoying behavior? Couldn’t people just move away? Even if assault was legal, wouldn’t attackers risk being killed or injured, too? Do people have consciences? Having no laws doesn’t mean actions have no consequences.

    If there is no victim, there is no crime.

    We don’t need thousands of laws when we only need 10.

    Freedom is not just a one way street. You can only have freedom for yourself if you allow others to have it.

    Should swimming pools be banned because they are dangerous? Hammers? Bottles? Rocks? Energy drinks? Pillows?

    Control freaks might get angry when a neighbor owns three indoor cats, but what did the neighbor take from them? Why should this be illegal? Is outlawing cats something a free country should do? Doesn’t banning everything sound like the opposite of freedom?

    Instead of getting mad at people who like freedom, why don’t people realize that freedom is a two way street?

    If you allow others to paint their house purple then you can, too.

    If you allow others to own a gun then you can, too.

    If you allow others to swear then you can, too.

    If you allow others to gamble then you can, too.

    Who wants to live in a prison?

    Think. Question everything.

    Like

  • It’s going to be interesting how the libs spin this “issue” if what I heard on the Phil Valentine show a few months back is correct. Apparently around 2020 the sun is supposed to go through a quiet cycle where there are less solar flares and surface activity. This means a significant and rather quick drop in Earth temperatures. I think they realize this which is why they’re trying to now change the term to “Global Climate Change” which can mean literally (Hitler) anything.

    Like

Join the Discussion | Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s