Revolutionary Words from Indian Author as Censorship Looms

censorship-610101_1280

As censorship looms, important words from an Indian author enlighten us

It seems we in this corner of the manosphere are not the only ones getting fed up with the current system of corporate masters, their paid for government servants, and citizen serfs. Check out these words from Indian author Arundhati Roy, words that could have been written by any Traditionalist or MGTOW. They define Going Galt.

Our strategy should be not only to confront empire, but to lay siege to it. To deprive it of oxygen. To shame it. To mock it. With our art, our music, our literature, our stubbornness, our joy, our brilliance, our sheer relentlessness – and our ability to tell our own stories. Stories that are different from the ones we’re being brainwashed to believe.

The corporate revolution will collapse if we refuse to buy what they are selling – their ideas, their version of history, their wars, their weapons, their notion of inevitability.

Remember this: We be many and they be few. They need us more than we need them.

Another world is not only possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing.

Indeed, there is reason for hope as long as we can communicate freely. However, free speech is under seige online as corporate webmasters (emphasis on masters) scramble to find some way to censor and shut us up.

In the past week, Google just started posting True and False rankings for news stories at the top of its search results. Who’s fact checking everyone? Why Snopes, whose proprietors are some shady motherfuckers in the opinion of TNMM. Check out this investigative reporting by Chateau Heartise posted last December that puts The New York Slimes “investigators” to shame.

Our Snopes story took a darkly humorous turn, when news from America’s foremost paper of record recently surfaced that David Mikkelson divorced his first wife and is accused of embezzling $100K from his company to spend on prostitutes and on his second wife, a chubby ho who is (still!) an escort and a former porn star, (“star” being used loosely here… literally loosely).

Even Daily Mail questioned Snopes legitimacy:

Now a DailyMail.com investigation reveals that Snopes.com’s founders, former husband and wife David and Barbara Mikkelson, are embroiled in a lengthy and bitter legal dispute in the wake of their divorce.

He has since remarried, to a former escort and porn actress who is one of the site’s staff members.

They are accusing each other of financial impropriety, with Barbara claiming her ex-husband is guilty of ’embezzlement’ and suggesting he is attempting a ‘boondoggle’ to change tax arrangements, while David claims she took millions from their joint accounts and bought property in Las Vegas.

But there’s much more than just the character assassination this mainstream newspaper is attempting:

David Mikkelson told the Dailymail.com that Snopes does not have a ‘standardized procedure’ for fact-checking ‘since the nature of this material can vary widely.’ He said the process ‘involves multiple stages of editorial oversight, so no output is the result of a single person’s discretion.’

He also said the company has no set requirements for fact-checkers because the variety of the work ‘would be difficult to encompass in any single blanket set of standards.’

Bottom line, Snopes are shills for the New World Order. But now they get to “fact check” everything for the evil empire known as Google. Facebook and Disqus are also taking their own stabs at the jugular of free speech. Disqus is even going so far as to design software that preemptively censors thoughtcrimes. In an effort to combat what it calls “toxicity” Disqus revealed it plans to unveil:

Toxic content detection through machine learning. We are working on a feature to help publishers identify hate speech and other toxic content and then handle this more effectively.

Ergo, censorship by software. Censoring you as the words get typed.

How does one combat such a beast? By starving it to death. This is a technique well-known in Congress. Don’t want massive government? Don’t want intrusion into your life? Starve it of its lifeblood, funding.

Our Congressman and Senators are supposed to do that. But, they stopped listening to us a long time ago, as anyone who watched Trump cow to the military-industrial complex and Neocons knows after last week’s Syrian cruise missile incident. (Trump previously Tweeted this type of military intervention was a bad idea. But that was when he was Candidate Trump and not President Trump residing in The Puppet House.)

Increasingly, it appears trying to vote our way to reform is not working.

That said, citizens can starve the beast by refusing to go along and get along at the corporate plantation. They can downshift to lives of minimalism and live on less. This means less of their productivity will be available to be used against them. Ms. Roy is right. The system needs us more than we need them.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Advertisements

3 comments

  • X@mailinator.com

    Hey there. Great article. Disqus is active in censorship now as well. I kept warning people that a move to disqus would result in betrayal of trust and increased censorship. I don’t think I’ve ever been personally censored this much in my entire life. Disqus does not just allow censorship for one time, it allows retroactive censorship and promotes something akin to the new chinese person score. Disqus is bad news and I can’t believe that people are continuing to support a business who’s business is censorship. It won’t be long now until a great retroactive purge is applied to an increasingly wider and wider array of specific word and topic censorship. People are fools for having a login to disqus in the first place, I refuse to post unless I can post as guest. Have to swap this IP again I suppose but what’s the point of keeping up with disgus when they certainly are engaging and promoting such heavy handed censorship. There is no clear rules for the censorship they engage in, and they justify it via feelings and some cartoon of a stick figure being shown the door. My free speech does not end when your feelings are hurt. Disqus is like a saboteur, purposefully censoring whole groups of people based on ideology, while simultaneously selling the service of censorship as something new. flashy, and time saving for web managers. Allow open commentary or do not allow open commentary. Disqus has blurred the line between spammers and human commenters, it’s become a major problem overnight. Why is every new tech upgrade resulting in more censorship and more monetization of something that used to be free? When disqus finally drops the hammer and runs retroactive censorship and full range text filtration, it may very well be the largest purge of free speech content in the history of this world. With great power comes great responsibility and I can’t say enough bad things about Disqus’s approach to auto and retroactive censorship. Here, I’m going to give an example of why they censor me. Ron Paul. Was that so offensive my voice needs censored?

    Like

  • How can Americans not SEE this?! It’s being done right under their noses, for cryin’ out loud!

    Like

  • Exactly .. strangle the beast!

    Like

Join the Discussion | Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s