YouGoGrrl Squads Don’t Measure Up in Marine Combat Tests


Male Marines were pitted against female Marines in combat. Guess who came out on top?

The Anglosphere’s hatred of masculinity continues to produce oddities the likes of which the world has never seen. Even the military is not immune to the gender-bending, role-reversing, sex-confusing agendas of Neo-Puritan feminists and their ilk.

Under Comrade Barack Insane Obama, ‘Murica lifted its ban on women serving in combat. It was hailed as a watershed moment in women’s rights by raving lunatics who want to go back to the drawing board and reverse millions of years of evolution that have created unique talents meant to reinforce and strengthen the sexes when they cooperate, not compete, with each other.

But, The Anglo American Matrix will hear none of that. Leftists screech that women need to be on the battlefield, too. So, in response to the cultural insanity of a society that’s imploding, the military was forced to waste time and resources on another Utopian social experiment that tested the effectiveness of women in combat. The hilarious, and predictable results follow. The U.S. Marines pitted two combat teams – one all male combat team and a second populated with men and YouGoGrrls – against each other in simulated life and death situations and guess which one came out on top? The Federalist Papers writes:

The Corps’ summary of the experiment concludes that combat teams were less effective when they included women.

Yeah, the all male team creamed the team populated with women. Here’s how the test was set up.

[The test] took the form of a year-long experiment called the Ground Combat Element Integrated Task Force, in which 400 Marines — 100 of them female — trained for combat together and then undertook a simulated deployment, with every aspect of their experience measured and scrutinized.

Not surprisingly, men, who have evolved to work as a team and put drama aside when on the battlefield did better than women, who have in the last half-century let their Penis Envy get the best of them. The competition wasn’t even close.

Overall, the report says, all-male teams and crews outperformed mixed-gender ones on 69% of tasks evaluated (93 out of 134). All-male teams were universally faster “in each tactical movement.”

Women are also demonstrably more delicate and not as robust as men on the battefield, proving to be a liability to any fighting force.

The report also says that female Marines had higher rates of injury throughout the experiment.

Personally, I say let’s give the YouGoGrrls all the dangerous and dirty jobs men have done for millennia if they really want so-called gender equality, but let’s put that sentiment aside for one moment.

How long is this insanity going to go on? Why must Anglo America constantly try to reinvent the wheel when it comes to men and women and sex roles? Sex roles that have come about for a reason, because they play to the innate strengths of both man and woman. What the hell is wrong with this nation? Why is it trying to foist this insanity upon its citizens while comically labeling gender-bending “progress” even as the nation itself demographically, culturally, and socially crumbles?

Ladies, why on earth does having a family and taking care of children and making a house into a home repulse you so? Are social engineering and the confections you see in media (that have nothing to do with reality) really dominating your mind to such an extent that you won’t be happy until you’ve completely disgraced the legacies your ancestors (better women than you) left behind?

At this point, there’s really nothing a man can do but sit back and watch the toilet bowl swirl, as the diarrhea known as social engineering fills up the commode. The androgyny agenda is one of the myriad gateways to hell thrown open by liberalism, and the lava is already flowing like rivers of fire through Rome as it burns.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.


  • Interesting how inclusion of mere 25% women (100 out of 400 marines) drastically reduced performance… I imagine 100% woman unit would not even get ouf of the barracks for constant bickering.


  • As a US Submarine Veteran .. I never thought we would be so stupid and put’em in sub’s.

    In fact the number one problem they (duh wimminz) was from the wives of the sailors .. cuz .. that’s all they would be good for .. sex dolls / toys.


  • I suspect that the end goal of this insanity is not to force women into combat roles, but rather to neuter the U.S. military as a world-class fighting force, so America will stop intervening overseas in every piddly little conflict/battle/war. That may be a valid goal, but it certainly isn’t a very good long-term strategy for the survival of a superpower.


  • fuzziewuzziebear

    I see it from a different angle. The women that are pushing for this have no intention of being anywhere near combat. It is just that they hate men so much that they want to close another path for men to attain dignity.
    I had heard that, in 1948, Israel fielded mixed units. The men took suicidal chances to protect the women. No more mixed units.


  • Rookh Kshatriya

    A lot of the Anglo-American refusal to accept reality on issues like gender difference springs directly from residual puritanism. Simply put, puritanism (both religious and secular) has moved from disliking certain aspects of reality (its sexual and physical aspects, principally) to denying those aspects altogether. The gender confusion you describe is the ultimate expression of this tendency. Indeed, this culture’s apathetic attitude to the urgent problems we discuss here springs from the same Anglo desire to shun reality in favour of some unattainable fantasy world where all our innate differences can be wished away by a tick in a box. The very few politicians or commentators who dare to address these issues seriously are typically dismissed as madmen by an Anglo-American ‘mainstream’ which prefers to deny reality altogether.

    Denial of reality is a deeply embedded tendency in Anglo-American culture – think about Prohibition or the hysterical ‘wars’ on drugs, prostitution and now tobacco – essentially, self-delusion raised to the level of a science.


Join the Discussion | Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s