The Androgyny Agenda Strikes Again: Skirts Banned, Schoolgirls Must Wear Pants

Androgyny

Social engineers are hard at work using Freud’s Penis Envy theories to turn schoolgirls into schoolboys

TNMM has repeatedly alerted men to the grotesque androgyny agenda now being foisted upon the Anglosphere by social engineers tasked with figuratively, and later, literally de-sexing the human race. This spay and neuter humanity ideal or androgyny agenda is being rolled out in a number of different ways.

One of the first major pushes to introduce the androgyny agenda to the masses (as a proxy to manipulate humanity) was the transgenders and toilets fiasco which, by design, gained worldwide MSM attention. Of course, transgenders and toilets was a Trojan Horse designed to move the needle on the Overton Window, opening the doorway to the nefarious aims of the androgyny agenda by creating a narrative/fable about yet more “oppressed” people who need the iron fist of government to step in and set everyone else straight. In other words, the 99.7% of people who aren’t transgender must change their way of living to accommodate the 0.3% of people who are.

We are now seeing the androgyny agenda being deployed on middle school girls in England and America. Once again, the Hegelian Dialectic is at work as the velvet glove concealing the iron fist. Here’s how it works:

  • Elites agree upon a social engineering outcome (de-sexing humanity)
  • Their media introduce a “problem” that must be solved
  • The media and others who influence what people think shape the narrative so all preconceived solutions to the problem revolve around eliminating gender differences

Pay close attention to the quotations below to see these bullet points in action. Priory School in East Sussex, England is the first to experiment with turning girls into wannabe boys in this manner. (Predictably, we see Freud’s Penis Envy theory being used by Anglo social engineers who move to make girls dress like boys.) Here’s how The Telegraph, an establishment news rag framed the story. The manipulation of mass mind begins in the first paragraph.

A secondary school has banned girls from wearing skirts to accommodate the growing number of transgender pupils, and to deal with complaints over the “decency” of short skirts.

We now have the “problem” which is invented out of whole cloth. The school’s headmaster, Tony Smith, then told this whopper to the press:

Pupils have been saying why do boys have to where ties and girls don’t, and girls have different uniform to boys. So we decided to have the same uniform for everybody.

We now have the preconceived solution being sprung, like the trap it is. Smith is either knowingly a spokesmouth for the androgyny agenda or a useful idiot. Either way, it’s not good. Smith continued:

Another issue was that we have a small but increasing number of transgender students and therefore having the same uniform is important for them.

Notice how the narrative is being manipulated here. It’s very clever. Framing the issue this way helps set a crucial, social precedent that tiny minorities of the population can force everyone else to dance to their tune. We now have girls dressing like boys, as social engineers wanted.

There will be no end to the tyranny that can be unleashed on normal people once the masses are used to accommodating every deviant group and subgroup invented by social engineers and media propagandists. You heard it here first, this is exactly how the normalization of bestiality and pedophilia will be unleashed on the masses. Turning boys into girls and girls into boys is only the beginning.

Protests from parents, like this anonymous one, were of course ignored:

My daughter said she has got a gender and it’s female, so being gender neutral when she has got a gender is a big deal for her, as she proud to be a girl. I feel girls should be allowed to wear skirts if they want to.

Trying to blend male and female into one is one of the worst neuroses of Anglo culture. Human sexuality is literally being sold out, just like everything else in this money-worshiping culture.

England and America are truly, deeply sick nations. The aims of the androgyny agenda aren’t protecting rights or shaping society in a positive direction. The true aims are creating docile, sexless worker drones who don’t breed with each other or spend their time and energy creating families. Sexless humans that only go to work, sleep, then empty any money they’ve earned into pockets of the elite via preconceived profit-making schemes is the goal.

This is a dangerous agenda. It literally could lead to the extinction of H. Sapiens given enough time. Will humanity allow itself to be sterilized by the elite?

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Advertisements

9 comments

  • *Trying to blend male and female into one is one of the worst neuroses of Anglo culture*

    It is also one of the oldest, and began with the rise of Anglo-Saxon puritanism in the 16th -17th centuries. For example, Shakespeare’s plays and poems are full of sexual ambiguity and gender confusion (‘the master-mistress of my passion’). English private schools nurture a long-standing culture of sexual degeneracy – for example, in novels like ‘England Ho!’ young boys are typically described in terms normally applied to girls (‘limpid eyes’, ‘wine-wet lips’, ‘windy hair’). In sum, distrust of sexuality inevitably leads people into denying gender differences – their obvious physical expression – even exist. And sexually degeneracy of all kinds inexorably follows.

    Like

  • Manuel Transmission

    Communist cancer is spreading
    – What’s changed in Britain since same-sex marriage?
    https://www.spectator.com.au/2017/09/whats-changed-in-britain-since-same-sex-marriage/

    – Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia
    (free digital edition)
    https://www.upress.pitt.edu/BookDetails.aspx?bookId=35521

    Like

  • Just when you thought you’ve seen it ALL-SMH…

    Like

  • Next comes robots with “spare parts” which are inter-changeable. There is a solution to this sickness: contain the sanctuary cities(tm) and ban all travel from/to same. This way the populace that allow this to go on will have to deal with it. Of course, let the decent folks move from these cities. I remember the “Beautiful People” propaganda from a few decades ago. I would think to my self upon hearing this…”Beautiful People, so full of shit.”
    Another fine product brought to the world from the Boomers ™ directly or in subtle ways.

    Like

  • And shit gets more deranged… at this point I’m barely surprised by anything they do but I’m curious as to how far they will make it with their agendas.

    Like

  • While it is probably not the reason for this school adopting this policy, I can see authorities so frustrated with enforcing the dress code on girls and dealing with disputes arising from it, that they tossed it out and said it is the same for everyone. It is hard to get women and girls to adhere to dress codes, or, for that matter, any standards about anything. They are going to give you an argument.

    Like

    • Escape from the Anglosphere

      Isn’t this a private school? Why can’t the transgenders, the girls that don’t want to wear skirts, the boys that don’t want to wear ties, and their parents just choose to go to another school? This crap never happens at Islamic schools. I wonder why?

      As for Japan — and the other super industrialized Asian countries — even though the same BS agenda has infiltrated it’s tentacles into their society and laws at a certain point they put their foot down and say “Fuck No!” A lot of people in the west might not know this.

      LGBT in Asia

      – East Asia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Asia#East_Asia

      – South East Asia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Asia#Southeast_Asia

      Like

  • and in Japan girls are required to wear short skirts to school. funny how that happens in a culture that protects itself.

    Like

  • On selecting my daughters school uniform for her fist year of high school, was informed that the only shorts being offered were unisex? On closer inspection, found them to be a boys cut. Designed to accommadate a boys body. Last week my child was allowed to wear casual clothing, as a sign of support for same sex marriage.Hmm boys pants or casual clothing, ppfffttt, the masses followed the herd. My daughter wore her school dress. As she supports neither.

    Like

Join the Discussion | Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s