Author Archives: Rookh Kshatriya

Scorched Earth Tactics: Forcing the Matrix to Battle

The Matrix attempted to turn one retiree’s dalliances with legal hookers into the crime of the century – but it backfired

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

The outrageous mistreatment of American tourist ‘Cuba Dave’ Strecker for the ‘crime’ of posting a few pictures of his sexual escapades with Costa Rican hookers online (‘promoting sex tourism’, apparently), is not just a scandal; it also represents an opportunity.

Strecker enjoyed sex with thousands of warm, willing prostitutes across Latin America, far from the repressive plantation that is the United States. After posting a few pictures of his adventures on his Facebook account, a new and controversial Costa Rican law was brought into play. Found guilty of promoting sex tourism and tarnishing the country’s image (say what?), Strecker was soon serving a five-year term in a Costa Rican prison. Happily, his conviction was recently overturned and our hero is once more a free man. Predictably, prize Anglobitch Hillary Clinton and her feminist cronies were ultimately behind the ludicrous ‘anti-trafficking’ laws leading to Strecker’s illegal incarceration. But that should come as no surprise.

Although Cuba Dave’s treatment was disgraceful, many important lessons can be drawn from the case. First, it demonstrates that our message is hitting home. The Anglo-Feminist Matrix is desperately worried that RF’s nomadic lifestyle – fleecing the Anglospere economy to fund exotic furloughs in warmer climes – will take off in a big way among North American men. It must stop this nomadic hedonism proliferating by any means necessary, simply because true male liberation threatens its very existence. Poor Strecker was just a cog in the vast culture war the Anglo-Feminist Matrix is waging against Pan-Anglosphere Dissidence and men in general.

Secondly, and even more important, the case of Cuba Dave suggests the Matrix is being provoked into making serious mistakes. From a tactical standpoint, it was suckered into fighting a battle in less than auspicious circumstances. This lumbering, vindictive (and ultimately unsuccessful) attack on a working class, middle aged white dude reminded me of a famous battle: Hastings. Readers might wonder what modern men can learn from the great conflicts of history. I would answer, much: we are in the midst of a culture war between awakened men and the Anglo-Feminist Matrix; therefore, understanding the warrior archetype is of vital importance to our cause.

In September 1066, Duke William of Normandy landed on the south coast of England with a large army to wrest the crown from the Anglo-Saxon usurper, Harold. Although William’s Army had more advanced tactics and equipment, he was faced with a serious dilemma. Maintaining a large army in Medieval England was impossible over the long, hard winter months. All Harold had to do was wait him out and the Norman army would melt away before the spring. Simply put, William had to provoke a decisive battle before winter came.

He did this by becoming more energetic and destructive. He knew that raiding the countryside for more food and supplies, burning towns and generally harrying the civilian population would force Harold to intervene. And it did. William guessed that Harold’s proud dynamism would never let him rest while part of his kingdom was burning. In sum, William provoked his enemy into a fatal mistake by upping the ante and forcing him to fight, a course fraught with fatal risk.

Harold quickly gathered his army and marched south to Hastings to give battle. There, as everyone knows, he perished. William’s plan had worked perfectly and he was crowned King in Westminster Abbey a few months later.

In exactly the same way, the punitive and disproportionate measures against Cuba Dave suggest our Red Pill subculture is provoking the Matrix into rash decisions. Our energetic dissidence, rejection of Plantation existence (note how I do not dignify it with the word ‘life’) and economic/reproductive withdrawal are having exactly the same effect as William’s ruthless scorched earth policy. And the system is hurting. Like William, we are luring our foe into the open where it is more vulnerable, like a worm on a motorway. Yes, the Matrix has great power but it will be noted that in this case, like Harold, it was soundly defeated. As Cuba Dave’s website says:

‘On Friday, Dave Strecker walked out of a prison in Costa Rica, a free man, acquitted by a trial court in San Jose. When Dave was originally arrested in September of 2015, Judicial authorities issued a press release with photos of his computer and cell phone as alleged evidence. Authorities also made a video of his arrest at the Juan Santamaría airport. However, since the acquittal the Ministerio Público has remained silent.’

Outside the Anglosphere, the Anglo-Feminist Matrix is a relatively toothless force. Yet it chose to fight in a Latin country where misandrist legalism holds far less sway (a local lawyer took up Strecker’s case for free). Its lumbering intervention was not only rebutted, but tens of thousands of men have now been alerted to its hostile intentions towards their sexual freedom. Like King Harold, the Matrix played into its enemy’s hands and lost.

Our scorched earth tactics are clearly working. The Anglo-Feminist Matrix is like a stricken giant lashing this way and that, desperate to quell our Red Pill resistance, frantic to crush our visions of boundless freedom. Since our methods are bearing fruit, we must pursue them with redoubled passion and intensity. Like William’s beleaguered army, we must become even more provocative and energetic. So let us push our minimalism to superhuman levels; let us shun all contact with Anglo-American women; let us buy nothing inessential to our basic survival needs; let us refuse all political and cultural participation in the Matrix; above all, let us seek the delights of foreign shores like heroes mad for life.

Eventually, the Matrix will be forced to give us the battle we crave. Provoked beyond endurance, its blundering fist will strike. And we must be ready.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.


Sexualized Frigidity: Anglo Women Paint their Faces for a Reason

Just as clowns, women also paint their faces – and now, their eyes

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

The Anglo-American Manosphere routinely exaggerates women’s cognitive prowess. It sees feminism as some complex, multi-level plan designed to strip men of status and influence. In reality, the average woman could not organize a trip to the toilet. It is easy to confuse society defending women in every circumstance with female strategic intelligence – after all, the outcomes are identical. In reality, they are totally different things. Although female feminists adopt ‘revolutionary’ postures, their rhetoric is ultimately sanctioned by the Anglo-American cultural Establishment.

Of course, this is because Anglo-American countries retain a Puritanical world-view and exalt women as sexless angels while demonizing men for possessing sexual impulses. In real terms, ‘revolutionary’ Anglo-American feminism could only exist with the backing of their nominal ‘Tradcon’ opponents in politics, law and the media. Once this is understood, feminism is seen for what it truly is: unchallenged female infantilism condoned by a misandrist, gynocentric culture convinced that women are essentially perfect whatever they do or say.

Anglo feminism has advanced to its present state not because women are especially smart, but because the prevailing culture has accommodated and nurtured their whimsical delusions and ingrained tendencies to social atavism.


A Canadian “model” has blinded herself by trying to tattoo her eye

Consider how men dominate the various distractions post-feminist women waste their money on. For example, the sexualized ‘Bad Girl’ persona so powerful in the Anglo media – as exemplified by Sex and the City, nymphomaniac pop music and the entire fashion industry – are largely created and realized by gay men. Females are just spokespeople, clothes horses and figureheads in these lucrative enterprises because they lack the intelligence, organizational prowess and creative talent that gay men bring to the show.

In sum, frigid Anglo women dress in a sexualized manner because their ‘culture’ is a creation of highly creative and intelligent gay men; who mistakenly project their sexual desires onto Anglo women, explaining the ‘sexualised frigidity’ paradox that disfigures all females in the Anglosphere.

A key part of male enlightenment involves men hardening their views of women and seeing them for what they really are. They are not cunning cultural strategists or tacticians; they are boring, entitled clowns living on marble pedestals provided by the misandrist Anglo-American Establishment. Squandering time, thought or money on them is unworthy of the enlightened man. To drive the point home, consider the fate of this imbecile, as reported by the Daily Mail:

A model from Canada has lost the sight in her right eye after an eye tattoo procedure went horribly wrong. Catt Gallinger from Ottawa is recovering slowly but steadily over the past month following her decision to get a sclera tattoo, which colors in the whites of the eye.

Calling the decision a ‘massive mistake,’ Gallinger shared the horrifying results of the procedure on social media, according to The Sun.  The images, posted to her Facebook wall, shows the 24-year-old former pet nutritionist in various stages of recovery following a visit to the hospital last month when she complained of purple discharge oozing from her eye.

Medical professionals administered antibiotics drops to the affected area and sent Gallinger home.

But shortly after receiving the treatment, her eye became swollen shut. Doctors then gave Gallinger steroid drops to alleviate her symptoms, but after three weeks the purple tattoo began to congeal around her cornea, blurring her vision and causing intense discomfort.

Gallinger told The Sun newspaper that she has had to spend hundreds of dollars on prescriptions so far and says that her modeling career is on hold for the time being.

In speaking with the publication, she cautioned others to first ‘look into not just the artist and their portfolio, but to talk to some of their clients, talk to other artists about them and get experiences beforehand’.

Asked why she wanted a sclera tattoo to begin with, Gallinger said the modification would help ‘make me feel more at home in my body’.

Physicians told Gallenger that her eye has sustained permanent damage and will either have to ‘go completely or stay a blurry mess’.

All is not lost – she will be able to model eye-patches for many years to come, while feeling ‘at home’ in her body (whatever that means). What a clown – Stephen King’s Pennywise must be looking to his laurels.

Still, Gallinger serves as a stellar example of unadulterated female idiocy. She reminds us that feminism has advanced due to patronization by Anglo-American elite males, not the strategic intelligence of its female adherents.  And if we are honest, the post-feminist chaos engulfing the Anglosphere is in large part the result of female stupidity. Their idiocy has two principal components: solipsism and the herd instinct.

Solipsism is the keystone of the female mind: an inability to test theory against reality or think empathetically, especially with regard to men. This solipsism finds expression in a crushing, all-pervasive lack of self-awareness: which is why many a post-Wall woman with sagging tits and a flabby ass still acts like she’s ‘one helluva gorgeous chick’. The second root of female stupidity is the herd instinct – something that feminism has been quick to capitalise on.

Solipsism is stupid because it prevents individuals learning from others’ mistakes; even animals such as chimps, crows or parrots are capable of this. Solipsism makes women blunder through the same poor lifestyle choices over and over again: overlooking stable men for sociopathic thugs, wallowing in hyper-hypergamy during their prime years, pursuing unrealistic career choices and, above all, exaggerating their own abilities at the insistence of their beta toadies.


Witness, the less than stellar results of an eye tattoo

The follies of female solipsism are well-described in psychology and literature, not just the Manosphere. Ultimately, allowing the gender incapable of objectivity to monopolize 70% of college places will overturn the long-standing Anglo-American status in STEM, together with the Anglosphere’s military and economic standing.

Meanwhile, the herd instinct makes a virtue of sheer stupidity. Virtually all Western women have jumped on the feminist bandwagon – women of every race, class and age unthinkingly label themselves ‘feminist’, a potent example of the female herd instinct. However, social psychology has shown that ‘herd-think’ leads to individuals taking needless risks and reaching erroneous conclusions from limited premises – two traits we see over and over again among Anglo-American women.

These females are lost in a swirl of ‘you go girl!’ delusions which lead only to misery, singleness and childlessness, merely because ‘everyone else’ is pursuing them. Indeed, highly educated women are particularly prone to feminist ‘herd-think’ – a curious paradox given all the rhetoric about the ‘transformative’ power of education bandied around the Anglosphere.

In sum, women are idiots. Don’t be fooled by Manosphere writers who talk about their rapacious intelligence and strategic cunning. Anglo-American women aren’t Mongol warlords, just overgrown children with indulgent minders. Even their ‘culture’ is not their own but largely the creation of gay men.

Women wear all that make-up for a reason. Clowns wear make-up, too.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Lessons from Genghis Khan and Subedei: Tech-Nomadism, Minimalism and The New Modern Man

Genghis Khan conquered much of the world, in part through the power of minimalism

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

Relampago Furioso’s blog focuses on improving men’s lives in a practical way. The minimalist lifestyle is one of the most interesting concepts explored here – reducing living expenses to a bare minimum opens up enormous opportunities for men dissatisfied with Anglo-American life. From a recreational standpoint, the money saved by minimalist living can fund stimulating jaunts to man-friendly societies. And with persistence the enlightened man can ultimately relocate for good, as so many of us wish to do. There to taste soft, laughing lips and loving smiles on golden foreign shores…

While there are some interesting minimalist books and videos available, it must be said that far more inspiring models of applied minimalism can be found in the pages of history. For example, Genghis Khan conquered the largest land empire ever known. His army achieved this using extreme minimalism augmented by mobility and firepower. Each Mongol warrior was a one man army: he carried sixty arrows, a sword, his bow and even a needle and thread. He could live off mare’s milk and horse blood if no food was available, obviating the need for a costly supply train. And anything else he required could be acquired on the march by raid and rapine. Genghis Khan himself despised the hoarding of wealth or possessions, finding pleasure in only sex and conquest: one in every two hundred men alive today is his descendant, an astonishing genetic achievement.

The legendary General Subedei, one of Genghis Khan’s Four Dogs of War, was the ultimate embodiment of nomadic minimalism. His final campaign against Europe in 1241 involved marching thousands of miles before outwitting and destroying Europe’s finest warriors in a brilliant sequence of battles using rockets, creeping barrages and smoke screens – none of which the West had seen before. Subedei had been commanding troops since his teens and most of his officers had campaigned with him in many lands. The renowned Hungarian cavalry were crushed at Mohi on the Sajo River after decisive European defeats at Legnica and Transylvania. Only the death of the Great Khan Ogedei prevented the total subjugation of Europe at Subedei’s hands. Like his master Genghis Khan, the great general was buried in an unmarked grave now lost to history. For what mattered to these men was a glorious life, not raising futile monuments over rotting bones. Although derided as unlettered and barbaric, the Mongols had a tragic self-awareness far beyond that of their ‘sophisticated’ neighbours; for ultimately, everything is pointless in the face of eternity.

Yes, the modern world is corrupt and insipid; but if he chooses, a man can walk in the footsteps of ancient heroes. And since the rise of the Internet, nomadic minimalism has become a perfect lifestyle for the enlightened man. Today, all anyone needs for survival is a phone/tablet/laptop linked to the Internet, an online bank account, a place to crash (any motel will do) and a motor vehicle. Whores and food can be ordered as necessity requires. Thus equipped, the modern tech-nomad has all the far-ranging mobility of his Mongol forebears. Liberated from place and circumstance, he spits on the sheeple and their sedentary lifestyle as the Mongols despised their ‘civilized’ neighbours. And having no ties or responsibilities makes him impossible to coerce or corral, as modern authorities are finding to their cost. The instantaneous nature of the Internet allows him to move money, search out opportunities and communicate with the flick of a finger. He is the supreme minimalist, completely impervious to marketing, advertising and other consumerist brainwashing.

No wonder the Matrix trembles before us.

However, the Mongols offer lessons beyond radical minimalism. Their empire incorporated nations from the eastern Mediterranean to the Pacific, yet ruled them all effectively. This short-lived ‘Pax Mongolica’ linked east and west for the first time ever; some even call it the world’s first global civilization. And it was largely achieved by developing a flexible, internationalist outlook. Learning to think beyond one’s birth country and indeed, the Anglosphere itself, is vitally important for the Enlightened Man. The Anglo-American Matrix insinuates that nothing of note exists beyond its confines – or worse, that only Anglosphere countries have legal protections for their citizens (when the US locks up a huge percentage of its male population). Foreign travel quickly breaks down these lame assumptions; and bilingualism allows one to think outside the Matrix and build a lifestyle beyond it.

Beyond that, clear similarities between Thirteenth Century Asia and the contemporary Anglosphere make the Mongol revolution a valid lifestyle model for enlightened men. Both regions were/are ruled by weary, discredited elites ripe for overthrow. Both cultures were/are brittle, defined by alienated citizens, exalted women and low trust relationships. Both regions were/are living on past glories, folk memories of a lost golden age which can never return. These weaknesses make the contemporary Anglosphere ideal for exploitation using nomadism, minimalism and other Mongol methods. Like the vast Khwaresmian Empire shattered by Genghis Khan and Subedei, it is a lumbering giant easy to outwit.

Be about it.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Enlightened Men Don’t Owe Everyone the Truth

Not every man has the ability to be enlightened by Red Pill wisdom

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

If you had a hot share tip for the NYSE or FTSE, would you wander the streets offering it to everyone? If you were a scientist and had just discovered some Nobel Prize winning law, would you start telling the local bums in the subway about it? If you were a freelance engineer, would you give your latest invention to someone who might patent it? If you discovered a secret island full of comely women offering free sex, would you share its location with anyone but trusted friends?  Of course not; important knowledge should only be shared with those who can appreciate it – and, more important, people who will not compromise it. Similarly, we enlightened men are not obliged to share our truths about Anglo-American women, minimalist living (or anything else) with the broad masses of humanity.

If we consider powerful people like the Rothschilds, it becomes immediately apparent that they possess knowledge of finance that most people do not possess; and more, that this esoteric knowledge is the source of their power. While there is a deeply-ingrained Western instinct to resent those who hoard knowledge, it must be conceded that secrecy can be a highly effective life-strategy. In ancient Greece, for example, the various Pankration moves were jealously guarded by clans and families: in a fight, why risk being killed by one’s own techniques?  Similarly, duelling masters in Renaissance Europe only imparted their lethal fencing moves to the wealthiest clients. In Maritime England, sailors would only reveal the secret of an obscure knot if their students first swore never to share it without permission. In feudal Japan, the secrets of Ninjutsu were never divulged to anyone outside a tiny circle of adepts. Even today lawyers only dispense their expertise in exchange for lucrative fees, never for free. Above all, the story of Jesus shows the danger of freely imparting esoteric knowledge to the broad masses – betrayal by a fickle mob, followed by torture and execution.

The last example is the most powerful of all. Whatever the objective ‘truth’ of Christianity, it is a forest of instruction for the enlightened man. The Average Frustrated Chump is an AFC because that is his natural state, more often than not; the condition he deserves. Like the mob which betrayed Jesus, he will not thank the man who attempts to alleviate his misery and ignorance. Ultimately, such a poltroon has no wish to be shown his true condition and no desire to change it; he prefers to wallow unchallenged in his Never-Never Land of self-delusion and sexual false consciousness. In short, he is beyond redemption.

The astute reader can sense where this is going. There is a certain current in the Anglo-American Manosphere which tries to rouse ‘all men’ to resist their benighted state: a kind of gendered communism, if you will. For the reasons outlined above, I despise this tendency. The average Anglo-American male is a deluded White Knight chump who wants to be ‘saved’ by an Anglobitch; he truly believes that the ‘sacrament’ of poor-quality sex with an ugly, overweight woman will redeem all his misfortunes and transform his life. Why should such an oaf be ‘rescued’ from himself? Why offer him options, therapy or counselling? Why not let him simply pay the price for his own stupidity?

W B Yeats’s poem ‘To a wealthy man who promised a second subscription to the Dublin Municipal Gallery if it were proved the people wanted pictures’, shows the scathing attitude of Renaissance gentlemen to mass opinion:

What cared Duke Ercole, that bid
His mummers to the market place,
What th’ onion-sellers thought or did
So that his Plautus set the pace
For the Italian comedies?
And Guidobaldo, when he made
That grammar school of courtesies
Where wit and beauty learned their trade
Upon Urbino’s windy hill,
Had sent no runners to and fro
That he might learn the shepherds’ will.
And when they drove out Cosimo,
Indifferent how the rancour ran,
He gave the hours they had set free
To Michelozzo’s latest plan
For the San Marco Library,
Whence turbulent Italy should draw
Delight in Art whose end is peace,
In logic and in natural law
By sucking at the dugs of Greece.

Similarly, we enlightened men should remain resolutely indifferent to the plight of divorced White Knights, AFCs and other Blue-Pilled Anglo-American males. They are weak-minded onion-sellers, nothing more. Indeed, we should take a certain perverse pleasure in their various predicaments – a man should pay for the choices he makes. By extension, we should deliberately keep our valuable knowledge from them – for that knowledge gives us a decisive edge. Besides, courting the average Anglo male will only sully our riches: as Nietzsche said, ‘Life is a well of delight; but where the rabble also drink, there all fountains are poisoned’.

For example, the fact that women outside the Anglosphere are generally thinner, more pleasant and attractive than their Anglo-American counterparts should only be shared with enlightened men on fora like this: men self-selected for self-awareness and intelligence. Proclaiming these facts from the rooftops will only lead to an exodus of frustrated White Knights and ugly incels to our chosen lands, poisoning their wells of pleasure. The Caribbean, Latin America, Eastern and Southern Europe: these are erotic playgrounds for men who truly deserve them, not drooling neckbeards seeking ‘traditional’ wives to take back to Idaho. At its worse, drawing public attention to our message might lead to legal persecution for ‘hate speech’ or some other absurd charge. It is far wiser to keep ‘this thing of ours’ an elusive sanctum for men who can truly profit by it.

The Savage Pilgrimage, Pan-Anglosphere Dissidence, The Savage Lifestyle – call it what you will – has more in common with some eastern philosophies than contemporary western thought. Properly pursued, it presumes a certain disinterest in the ‘plight’ of the unenlightened even as it shuns commitment to people, possessions and institutions. The existential chains of Anglo-American civilization – marriage, children, careers, houses and material goods – are consciously discarded for a life of maximized experience. The journey becomes the goal, not arrival; the present moment is all; and personal knowledge supplants received opinion as the touchstone of decision. By definition, only an elite minority of self-aware and intelligent males can understand such concepts; while saving (or trying to save) the sheeple is fraught with thankless peril.

You owe them nothing, least of all truth. Be water, my friends.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Why is America so Receptive to Male Dissidence?


A sex negative, misandrist culture has backed men into a corner

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

If we consider the contemporary manosphere, it must be said that the United States is the Anglo-American nation most receptive to the ‘male dissidence’ message. This is not merely due to its size or ethnic diversity, but rather because America’s distinctive puritanical history coupled with sex-negative feminism have created a society uniquely hostile to men.

America was founded by religious fanatics – people who fled England in the Seventeenth Century because it wasn’t repressed enough.  It was said that English puritans wanted to ban bear baiting not because it gave pain to the bear, but because it gave too much pleasure to the spectators. Even today, the United States is the only Anglosphere nation with mass religious belief, high levels of church attendance, and so on. Although new cultural currents have arisen, these are still defined by sexual repression and institutionalized misandry (liberalism and feminism being good examples).

Because of its secular puritanism and a ‘mythical’ media which sets women on pedestals, the gap between male expectations and reality is greater in the United States than any equivalent nation. American men are conditioned by movies, rock music and TV shows to believe all women are slim, beautiful, articulate goddesses offering free sex to everybody. As children, they are led to think they will be sleeping with models and actresses the minute they hit sixteen. This makes the reality – obese, ugly, selfish, man-hating harridans exclusively obsessed by billionaires and mass murderers – all the harder to take. Instead of enjoying free sex with models every night, American men find themselves paying their hard-earned bucks to watch the few slim, attractive American women cavort in sordid strip clubs: so much for the ‘sexual revolution’.

Society works because its members are prepared to ‘take hits for the team’. For the past 50 years, men have been expected to take all the hits while women take none. Men do all the most dangerous jobs, get shafted in no-fault divorce settlements, are arbitrarily imprisoned in pseudo-correctional rape factories, have little control over their reproductive labour, live shorter and less healthy lives, are far more prone to suicide and homelessness – yet Anglo-American society still expects them to ‘man up’ and take all the hits while giving nothing back in return.

Well fuck that, Mr Han Man…

Relampago Furioso deftly describes the situation in words fit for the ages:

Traditionally, for our peaceful participation in society and going along with its schemes, men have been awarded control and decision-making status over women, family and society. This has been loosely defined as a social contract in civilized societies from Greece and Rome to present day Western society. The crucial part of this “social contract” that statists are so fond of referring to, was that for participating in society, being subjected to its legal demands, and supporting it, men received certain incentives. These incentives include:

  • Culturally and legally enforced female monogamy
  • Guaranteed paternity
  • Decision making authority as the head of the household
  • Exclusive sexual access to a wife, i.e. a virgin bride
  • As house-band (husband) culturally and legally enforced obligation for wives to remain in the relationship (i.e. no flightiness or “finding herself”)
  • Culturally and legally enforced responsibility for women to be good mothers
  • As defined in the Christian bible, the responsibility of a woman to respect and obey her husband

In exchange for these accommodations, men were expected to give their lives and their labor for the protection and benefit of their wives, families, and communities. However, since feminism the incentives for men to go along with the deal have been removed, while the demands for men to sacrifice their lives and their labor for the benefit of society have increased.

There it is, in a nutsack. And the key difference between the old social contract and the new is the presence/absence of religious belief. While the old religious Puritanism granted men a certain intrinsic status for being fashioned in God’s image, they have no standing at all in the new secular Puritanism. Anglo feminists expect men to accept their traditional obligations, even while they practice witchcraft, lust over criminal thugs and murder their own babies. Disney is the darkest embodiment of this new ideology – an endless celebration of asexual, pedestalized princesses in a homosocial, lesbian world of boundless ‘empowerment’. Similarly, the Roe-Wade case granted women omnipotent reproductive power while reducing men to ephemeral sperm doners and disposable ATM machines. Then there is America’s ongoing war against prostitution – transsexuals can ‘transition’ on the public purse but consenting adults exchanging sex for money are hunted like sick pariahs. But aside from secular Puritanism and its manifold evils, can any other factors explain America’s emerging ‘gender crisis’?

Over the past forty years, it seems that America has fallen into line with other industrial countries in terms of social inequality, intergenerational mobility and so on. Somehow, the American Dream has come undone and America now resembles ‘old’ countries like France or Britain, not the energetic America of the twenties, fifties or eighties. A socialist like Bernie Sanders would have been arrested for Un-American Activities a few generations ago; now he is hailed as a serious presidential candidate. Similarly, the plight of ‘the White Working Class’ is now a topic of mainstream political discussion – unthinkable in the Reagan era. Films like ‘Manchester by the Sea’ could have been shot in class-bound Britain – indeed, the film’s very title invokes the British working class and their lives of cheerless toil. In sum, American Exceptionalism has ground to a halt and Americans are behaving more like other peoples as a result.

This ‘Brazilification’ of American society during the 1980s granted a cartel of narcissistic oligarchs ever more wealth, status and power, while systematically shrinking the middle class. The halcyon post-War days when a factory worker could buy a house, run a car and send two kids to college are long gone. It is no surprise that feminism has waxed since Brazilification began, while male fortunes have waned. In simple terms, any elite has to keep women ‘onside’ in order for society to reproduce itself; but no such tender mercies are afforded low-status men, whom the elite see as dangerous fodder. And since Anglo-American Brazilification began in earnest, ordinary American males predictably find themselves enslaved by the divorce courts and the prison-industrial complex in unprecedented numbers. Of course, MGTOW and other forms of male dissidence represent the inevitable ‘fight-back’ against this gendercidal programme.

Another anti-male factor specific to the Anglosphere nations in general (and America in particular) is a dysfunctional, non-selective state education system. Most European countries have selective secondary education, which reduces the psychological and emotional damage done to clever children by jail-bound morons. In America, intelligent males typically emerge deeply alienated from the social order because of their school experiences – just consider Klebold and Harris, not to mention a host of other school shooters.

The foregoing discussion explains why the United States is ready for male revolt above all equivalent nations. Puritanical repression and male alienation are like nitric acid and glycerol – a lethal mix of discordant elements ready to explode.

Amidst all this woe, can we extract anything positive from America’s burgeoning male dissidence? Of course: America’s unique tradition of liberty gives American men greater psychological autonomy than men in other nations. Together with its rich entrepreneurial heritage, this thirst for freedom has already created an online resistance movement which the authorities hate and fear. In sum, the American male will never be wholly subdued by the Anglo-Feminist Matrix – many of the Founding Fathers were genuine radicals, and the ‘freedom memes’ they planted in their young nation will never perish. Similarly, American cultural pluralism presents an insurmountable problem for the Matrix: although the original Anglo-Puritan elite tried to define America in its own joyless, workaholic image, the alternative cultural traditions introduced by later migrants remain strong and resilient.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

« Older Entries