Author Archives: Rookh Kshatriya

Paper Chase: Exploring the Links Between Feminism and Law

Sexuality is being warped and other assorted cultural insanity is now being unleashed by endless legalism

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

Despite the State’s unstinting legal support for false sexual abuse claims and misandrist divorce settlements, very few manosphere writers discuss the strong links between law and Anglo-American feminism. This is a startling omission, when one considers how many prominent feminists are lawyers, legal academics or politicians with legal backgrounds.

In fact, it must be said that law contains the intellectual ‘cream’ of the Anglo-feminist movement. Of course, the subaltern wing of academic feminism resides in the social ‘sciences’, with its non-patriarchal mathematics and other nonsense. The manosphere expends much (digital) ink discussing these poltroons, largely ignoring the legal wing of academic feminism. This is a pity, because the legal profession contains the best feminist minds; it is also the strongest feminist link to official institutions, the conduit through which feminism is imposed on the wider society.

Men always enquire, ‘How did this come about?’ whenever some misandrist agenda is arbitrarily applied to schools, public washrooms or sentencing procedures. More often than not, the answer is feminist legalism acting directly on ‘official’ institutions without reference to electoral processes.

Manosphere scholars seldom address feminist legalism for several reasons. First and most important, law is an obscure field full of specialist jargon. Second, manopshere scholars prefer easy conceptual victories against the (much weaker) arts-humanities wing of academic feminism. Third, the anti-Marxist fixation of the traditionalist manosphere blinds it to the intimate links between Anglo-American feminism and ‘traditional’ Anglo-Saxon culture. In this case the link is obvious, since ‘rule of law’ defines Anglo civilization. Indeed, law ‘rules’ Anglo-American society in a very literal way: think how many prominent Anglosphere politicians have a legal education or worked in the legal profession. In Continental Europe, a far higher proportion of politicians are scientists and economists (Angela Merkel is a scientist, for example).

Feminist legalism should therefore not surprise us, since the Anglosphere is defined by its legalism. The US is legalistic above all other nations; it has countless branches of law, all ever-growing like a vast tree. To pursue a biological analogy, if Anglo-American societies are the phenotype, law is their genotype; that is, they are regulated by pharisaic legalism above any other structural principle. Indeed, it might be said that the Anglosphere is law, in essence. Not only does Anglo-American feminism derive its legalistic character from this fact, it also derives much of its power from it. Curious, then, that the manosphere remains blind to feminist legalism and its power to engineer dramatic social change.

Some admiration is called for: dissident males in the Anglosphere raise a lot of rhetorical dust, while their feminist counterparts infiltrate the cultural genotype – namely, the legal system – and proceed to systematically fashion society in their own image. Equally important is their domination of legal education, since it will shape the next generation of lawyers, judges and judgements. Unlike the social ‘sciences’, law is one of the oldest and most prestigious of the university subjects: all elite universities have law departments and these attract high-status students who will become active members of the future ruling elite.

Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren and a host of other political feminists all trained at elite law schools. In sum, feminism has been wise to infiltrate Anglo-American jurisprudence, for whoever controls law has the true keys to power. Feminist sociology might be the yeast, but feminist jurisprudence is the finished loaf.

Law is the “teeth” of social engineering schemes, making entrenched feminists puppeteers

Legalism Begets Social Engineering

My research for this article unveiled a veritable hornet’s nest of feminist jurisprudence. Nearly every major law school in the Anglosphere has powerful feminist representatives, as we can see from the following website:

http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/

It is no surprise that the site unambiguously links law to social engineering. Since no one really understands law except for specialist experts, it is perfect for the underhand manipulation of society in this way. Even more disturbing is the close link between law and politics, a seamless association in the Anglosphere. RF and other American dissidents talk a lot about America’s lapse into a police state: Feminist Law Professors is where that process really begins. The following passage gives some idea of the kind of articles posted there:

The U.S. Feminist Judgments Project seeks contributors of judicial opinions rewritten to reflect a feminist perspective, and commentaries on the cases and rewritten opinions, for an edited book collection tentatively titled Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Torts Opinions.  This edited volume is part of a collaborative project among law professors and others to rewrite, from a feminist perspective, key judicial decisions in the United States.  The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. Stanchi, Linda L. Berger, and Bridget J. Crawford, was published in 2016 by Cambridge University Press.  Subsequent volumes in the series will focus on different areas of law and will be under review by Cambridge.

It is easy to see what these legal activists are doing: rewriting legal precedents in order to create a corpus of pseudo-precedent for future judgements. In so doing, the future will be theirs (for as long as this dysfunctional civilization lasts).

The Anglo-feminist domination of the legal profession is of seismic significance, when one considers the vast power of jurisprudence in the Anglosphere (not to mention its deep historical links to politics and social administration). Conversely, masculinist activism in the English-speaking world lacks any legal wing, let alone an organized one. Instead, it assumes being ‘right’ will automatically confer ‘victory’ over feminist lawyers and politicians; sublimely missing the point that law, not truth, is the key to the Anglosphere.

Perhaps the fact that most male rights activists are engineers and tradesmen explains their political impotence; after all, engineers and tradesmen do not create/interpret laws or become politicians. To be blunt, Anglo-feminists are winning all the battles because they fight on the right battlefield, namely the legal one. Unless the Anglo men’s movement adjust to this reality, they will always be marginalised and powerless.

Unless they leave the Anglo-American Matrix, of course.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Advertisements

The Riddle of Female Sexual False Consciousness

Anglo women think they’re sexually liberated, when in fact they’re as frigid and repressed as their grandmothers

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.


Male Sexual False Consciousness is a well-described phenomenon in our branch of the manosphere. Blue collar males in the midst of decade-long sexless ‘dry-spells’ talk and act as if they were bedding models every night. Nor is this mere bluster and persiflage; many celibate males really believe they are having sex with teenage pop singers and actresses, women who would not spit on them if they were burning. Male SFC is a product of Anglo-American reality avoidance, lamestream media manipulation, simple self-delusion and (concealed) shame. In any case, most males in the Anglosphere are so psychologically damaged by institutionalised misandry that they cannot think rationally about their sexual situation.

What about female SFC?

Women’s magazines, TV shows and books are full of sexual tips and spine-tingling accounts of multiple orgasms with alpha paragons. However, this priapic narrative contrasts hugely with serious research into female sexuality, most of which finds that a huge minority (around 40%) of Anglo-American women have little or no libido. At a practical level, the average Anglo-American woman presents as a classic ‘Anglobitch’ – frigid, arrogant, misandrist, entitled, snotty and generally a cunt. This holds as true for the ugly, obese and post-Wall variety as it does for young and attractive ones.

So much for the boundless ‘liberation’ endlessly extolled by the lamestream Anglo-American media.

Most Anglo women dress like ten-dollar whores, read and talk about sex all day, even consider themselves intensely sexualized – yet are, in truth, as frigid and repressed as their grandmothers. Young males are rightly baffled when young girls dress provocatively yet resent all expressions of sexual interest: they seem to inhabit a state of ‘sexualized frigidity’, flaunting sex yet hating it too. What are the best explanations for this glaring contradiction? Why do so many Anglo women strive to talk, dress and look ‘sexy’ while being volcel or even actively hostile to sex?

The answer is complex. Unlike male SFC, the female form of this condition derives from the specific vagaries of female psychology – namely solipsism, the herd instinct and greater psycho-sexual plasticity. However, the fact that priapic gay men design female ‘culture’ in their own image is also highly significant.

Anglo culture is rife with latent homosexuality

Latent Homosexuality in Anglo Culture

Many gay men adopt homosexual lifestyles in the repressive Anglosphere to gain easy access to sex – as a group, they are disproportionately self-selected for hyper-sexuality. In short, gays are the kind of males who will project sex onto everything they see. Since such men are largely responsible for female fashion, television, music and ‘culture’ in general, they inject these things with their own sexual obsessions. Lacking the merest shred of creative originality, women have yielded control of all these activities to infinitely more creative and intelligent gay men. And gay culture is suffused with – indeed, defined by – sex. Assuming women to be female versions of themselves, these men have plastered the bare wall of female sexuality with their own erotic obsessions – obsessions Anglo women almost completely lack. In this view, frigid women do not dress provocatively to attract elusive ‘alphas’ – they dress that way because hyper-sexualized gay men told them to. After all, the average Anglo woman derives no more pleasure from the concept of ‘man’ than she does from a dose of hives.

In many ways, this gay domination of female culture is at the root of female SFC. It surely explains the massive gulf between sexualized female rhetoric and the frigid, uptight and misandrist reality. Female sexuality seems to be a provocative simulation of gay male sexuality, a frigid caricature. However, there are deeper issues in play. The female herd instinct is also implicated, as is female solipsism. If some trendy magazine or television show tells its female audience that the moon is made of cream cheese, their default compliance to authority makes them automatically believe it. Moreover, their infantile solipsism impedes women’s ability to check such claims against reality; to a solipsist, reality is what one feels on any given day.

Solipsism distorts women’s views in another way. Because most women can get sex relatively easily, they assume the same must be true of most men. This is utterly bizarre when one considers the contempt Anglo-American women typically harbour towards most males; but being entirely self-absorbed, they never link their own sexual elitism to the reality of male experience. Hence, women quite readily assume both genders have equal access to sex, even as they mentally excise the vast majority of males as potential sexual partners.

So, while male SFC is largely a product of shame and insecurity, low self-awareness plays a much greater role in female SFC. As for the minority of sexualized Anglo-American women (yes, they do exist) – typically damaged, addicted, working class and Dark Triad (narcissistic, borderline and histrionic) – they are just as confused as their frigid sisters. Their SFC typically involves confusing abuse for love – something pimps, thugs and other male sociopaths are adept at exploiting. Essentially, sexualized Anglo women are so fucked in the head that true sexual false consciousness eludes them; they have no ‘real’ sexual identity to compromise. Their SFC concerns not sex itself, but a deluded interpretation of human relationships.

Female sexuality is a juggernaut that carries all before it, and even disabled women can still attract male attention. This is especially true in the repressive Anglosphere, where sex is a culturally restricted commodity. Consequently, while male SFC conceals sexual ‘inadequacy’ or inceldom, female SFC takes a more complex form. Unlike male SFC, it originates in female solipsism coupled with mental malleability, hyper-hypergamy and sheer hypocritical stupidity. Yet it has immense impact on men, since women regulate all sexual access in the post-feminist Anglosphere.

The only effective and rational responsive is planned departure to liberated, man-friendly shores.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

The Four Pillars of Anglosphere Dysfunction: Social Isolation, Materialism, Class Distinction and Puritanism

Materialism is a big contributor to Anglo American social isolation and breakdown

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

Having read all the articles and insightful commentary on this excellent site, it occurs to me that the Anglosphere’s misandrist agenda can be reduced to four broad conceptual fields or ‘pillars’. These interact in various ways and all are present in the Anglosphere nations, to a greater or lesser degree.

The first pillar is social isolation. In the Anglosphere, the individual develops in relative isolation and is expected to be self-motivated, socially combative and emotionally repressed from early childhood. Heartless schools and educational institutions take on many of the socialization duties normally provided by the (now defunct) nuclear family, which is why so many Anglo-Americans are damaged and enraged. Because they grow up in relative isolation, they are far more reliant on the mainstream media for identity formation than children in comparable societies. This explains why a massive proportion of Anglo-Americans suffer symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder, harbouring fantastical expectations culled from movies and TV shows.

Cultural dissidents like Winston Wu and Steve Hoca talk at length about the friendlier, more sociable attitudes that prevail outside the United States, even in countries with relatively low standards of living. They also talk about the obsessive focus on work that mars American social life (work does not have to eclipse everything else, as prosperous Scandinavian societies demonstrate).

Anglo-American culture is defined above all by its rapacious materialism – the second pillar of dysfunction. According to the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan, human personality is essentially a void ‘created’ by external associations in early childhood. Because of dysfunctional child rearing by narcissistic, self-absorbed parents, Anglo-American self-identity tends to be shaped by material objects rather than human interaction. This explains the voidlike sterility of Anglo culture, and its overriding fixation on material goods as ‘food’ for the needful self.

In fact, the Borderline Personality Disorder so rampant among Anglo-American women is perfectly adapted (some would say designed) to feed the rapacious Matrix and its consumerist hamster wheel. In particular, the United States is a gynocentric brothel wherein men acquire material junk to get sex from empty, frigid women in a culture which deliberately raises the scarcity value of sex to inhuman levels. The demerits of such a society for men are self-evident, and explain the existential disaffection so common among Anglo-American males.

The third pillar of Anglo-American dysfunction is the class system. Britain and the United States both have relatively low rates of social mobility compared to other industrialized democracies. Both countries are run by impermeable, self-contained socio-economic elites who attend private schools and frankly know little about mainstream experience or opinion. This is why Anglosphere populations are increasingly alienated from politics and think they have no control over their own lives. We have moved beyond a situation where people vote for competing parties to one where they are voting against the political class itself.

Of course, people are free to enjoy the fruits of their own labour and pass these advantages on to their families (or whoever they see fit). However, in the Anglosphere this has led to the formation of political dynasties and an inflexible Deep State which are essentially undemocratic and do not serve the interests of the majority. Weird trends in Anglo-American foreign policy (for example Britain giving foreign aid to countries with space programmes or hopeless American attempts to democratize Islamic nations) originate in the detached and eccentric nature of the Anglo-American elite. Not all Anglosphere countries are thus defined; Canada and Australia are among the most classless countries in the world. However, these countries are increasingly ruled by idiomatic elites and will soon resemble their older cousins.

Religious Puritanism has morphed into secular feminism in Anglo culture

Latent Puritanism Suffocates Anglo-America

The fourth factor is, of course, residual Puritanism. Although religion is not the force it once was, the distinctive Puritanism of the Anglo-Saxon countries persists as secular Puritanism or repressive political correctness. This is the definitive core of Anglo-American feminism and explains the institutional misandry which dominates the modern Anglosphere. The Sixties Sexual Revolution was a brief anomaly and misandrist feminism has largely restored Victorian morality to every public arena: a man risks imprisonment for even talking to a woman in many places.

Prostitution remains illegal in Britain and North America, and men who pay for sex are still morally and legally criminalized. Most males outside the top 20% in terms of looks, money and status will experience long periods of celibacy if they do not marry young (and even if they do). The lamestream media still tries to peddle the myth of the sexualized Anglo-American woman; however, this narrative is created and maintained by sex-obsessed gay men and bears little resemblance to reality.

In sum, Anglo feminism is now the major issue confronting males across the Anglosphere. Originally created to defend women’s ‘rights’, Anglo feminism has morphed into a puritanical Gorgon obsessed with stigmatizing heterosexual sex, excluding fathers from their children, pathologizing masculinity, promoting transexuality, driving men from higher education and… well, you know the score by now.

Together, these four factors cohere to make romantic life extremely difficult for most Anglo-American males. For example, class is closely linked to both materialism and sexual repression in the Anglo countries. The hyper-hypergamy of Anglo-American women – the assumption that they are divine angels too good for any man – obviously springs from this warped association. Opponents of the Manosphere ridicule its denizens as marginalised eccentrics – keyboard warriors and alienated deplorables. However, the Manosphere draws inspiration from lived experience in the Anglosphere and its four pillars of dysfunction. And its message has spread because of ‘truth marketing’: the experience of daily life in this culture simply supports its general arguments.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Exporting Frustration – War and Repression in Anglo America

The military-industrial complex is powered by men it views only as Matrix-style batteries

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

RF’s recent essay, ‘Maslow’s Hierarchy and the Marginalization of Sex in Anglo America’, was one of the most interesting pieces of manosphere writing I have read in many a year. His thesis cleverly linked Anglo-American sexual repression to our culture’s fatal obsession with consumerism and debt slavery. And yes, it is obvious that blue-pilled males slave their pointless lives away for branded commodities assembled in Third World sweat shops to ‘win’ (or try to win) some frosty Anglobitch tail.  Of course, both women and the Matrix have vested interests in maintaining this situation. Women get raised onto marble pedestals by their beta lackeys and the system at large; and by selling debt and dross to pussy-starved betas, the Matrix secures its existence for the foreseeable future. A win-win situation for both parties.

However, sexual repression in the Anglosphere serves an additional purpose: it creates a ready supply of frustrated cannon fodder useful for imposing Anglo matriarchy of other parts of the world. As well as making these deluded Gammas more reckless, prolonged sexual deprivation makes them exalt women as goddesses worth fighting and dying for. In sum, withholding sex from Anglo-American males not only serves the Matrix within the nation state; it helps the Matrix expand its gynocentric agenda beyond the Anglosphere.

The economic inequality fostered by every Anglo-Saxon nation produces a large, alienated underclass defined by low intelligence, limited horizons and cynical conformity. In the UK for example, one third of the population cannot divided 65 by 5 with pencil and paper and almost 20% are functionally illiterate. RF continually shows how clueless most Americans are about the wider world; only 1 in 3 Americans can find Great Britain on a map, for instance. With illiterate mobs coexisting alongside privileged elites, the major Anglosphere nations are more like Third World countries than progressive states such as Norway, Germany or Japan. However, this retarded Anglo underclass does serve one useful purpose: as willing fodder for the military-industrial complex.

For these bone-headed clowns join the military in droves – what other career, apart from criminality, is available to them? And this is where good ol’ Anglo sexual repression kicks in. Sexually disenfranchised males are far more likely to risk life or limb than males with a reproductive stake in the future. Widespread sexual repression not only makes the rabble take risks; it transforms women into semi-divine beings worthy of worship and self-sacrifice. Together, these factors create the perfect background noise to Anglo-American campaigns in ‘patriarchal’ regions.

And these ugly clowns are perfect cannon fodder, if nothing else. Blue collar males in the Anglosphere are deeply damaged by institutional misandry and gynocentric discrimination; they commit suicide in droves; almost 40% die single and childless; their lives are holes of self-loathing concealed by sexual false consciousness and infantile bluster. Largely deprived of the basic human need for sex, they constitute a reserve army of lemmings desperate to escape their tortuous celibacy; even a sniper’s bullet is preferable to that walking death.

Keeping these gammas in a constant state of sexual thirst thus serves the Matrix not only in economic terms (as RF so ably described) but in military terms, too. Being rabbit-brained shills and incapable of rational thought, Anglo women effortlessly conflate their own role in the military-industrial complex with the trendy liberal pacifism they picked up in college (perhaps it should be renamed the military-industrial-sexual complex – an interesting concept indeed).

MSM talking heads foist Anglosphere narratives onto the world

Enter The Talking Heads

Meanwhile, the lamestream media skews all international news with explicit feminist and misandrist narratives, further exciting our incel White Knights with chivalrous indignation. A good example would be Boko Haram, the African Islamist outfit whose massacres of boys are conveniently omitted in most western reportage. Instead we are treated to endless ‘Find Our Girls’ headlines calculated to stir the average Anglochump’s ‘protective’ instincts towards stainless damsels. And so we are left with an ignorant, sexually frustrated horde of unemployable dolts fired up by feminist propaganda to support whatever illegal invasion the Matrix dreams up next.

Truly, the Anglosphere sets all standards of economic, educational and social progress.

I am well-known for my cynicism about Men’s Right’s Activism. Not that their views are wrong – they are not – I just don’t think they can change anything. The reason is not wholly biological, although gender biology plays a role; it is rather that the Anglo-American Matrix is too resilient and well-organized, too integrated and efficient a system to be easily overthrown by AVfM and ‘gender justice’ groups of that ilk.

The Matrix can be compared to an organism which has successfully weathered centuries of evolutionary and environmental pressure and has developed countless defensive mechanisms to secure its own existence. It utilizes gender biology, mass psychology, media, technology, education, money and language to defend itself in ways that are beyond any individual human consciousness (including mine) to completely unravel.

So we in the manosphere need to transcend outmoded narratives of ‘justice’ and ‘fairness’, or the notion that being intellectually ‘right’ makes victory inevitable. We can be proven ‘right’ a thousand times but if nothing ever changes – and it never does – none of it matters. A more effective course for the enlightened man surely lies in self-development (separatism, minimalism, personal growth) and building a new life outside the Anglo-American Matrix.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

New Wine in Old Skins: Is the Manosphere’s Red Pill a Return to Traditional Elitism?

The manosphere has much in common with traditional Western thinking

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.


One of my favourite pastimes is putting historical meat on the bare bones of Manosphere theory. Although much Red Pill thought focuses on twenty-first century concerns (educational devaluation, student debt, minimalism, Game), the perspectives underlying it have a long and illustrious pedigree. Indeed, our outlook has much in common with a rich vein of elitist western thought that is centuries old.

German thinkers like Stirner, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Spengler, Italians like Vilfredo Pareto and Julius Evola as well as Britons like Hillaire Belloc and D.H. Lawrence were all united in contempt for mass society and its deluded assumptions. Due to American egalitarianism and legalistic puritanism, American elitists such as Ezra Pound and Henry Miller have long sought freedom in more enlightened societies.

Professor John Carey’s excellent study The Intellectuals and the Masses rounds up some of the core beliefs of the western creative intelligentsia:

  • Voting is a waste of time; electoral fanfare is a smokescreen to delude the masses into thinking they have a voice when all important decisions are really made by unelected elites
  • The mass media cannot be trusted; having to dumb down to the masses’ primitive levels of knowledge and understanding, it is inherently dishonest (Ezra Pound called the press ‘Liars for Hire’)
  • Elite rule is inevitable, even desirable; Pareto’s Iron Law of Oligarchy claimed that all social systems inevitably produce an elite, usually the most able people in any social group
  • Anglo-American culture is inferior; it has no roots in tradition and its egalitarian obsessions lead inevitably to the lowest common denominator in all things (this view is especially strong among English elitists such as D.H. Lawrence)
  • Women are defective herd creatures; allowing women to rule or pandering to their whims inevitably leads to societal collapse
  • History moves in cycles of growth and decay; the West is presently in its Autumn/Winter period, on the verge of complete collapse (also known as the Kali Yuga in Indian scripture)
  • Women want to be possessed by strong, dominant men; feminism is a smokescreen to deny this fact
  • The mass mind is inherently female; hence the mass desire to be dominated by hyper-masculine leaders who embody virility and strength (Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Kennedy, Trump)
  • Eastern spiritual culture is superior in most respects; while Western Christianity is weak, feminine and egalitarian, Hinduism and Buddhism are strong, manly and elitist. This view is especially strong among German elitists, who saw ‘feminine’ Protestant Christianity as central to Western decline (Schopenhauer, Spengler)
  • Solitude is desirable; the elite should live in lonely mountain areas, far from the masses dwelling in the valleys below. As Nietzsche put it, ‘Establish distances!’
  • Minimalism is desirable; indeed, a solitary life demands it. The philosopher Martin Heidegger spent most of his free time in a cabin in the Black Forest, chopping his own wood and scorning the trappings of civilization
  • Experiencing sensualist ‘Dionysian’ cultures is desirable; it liberates one from repressive Anglo-American culture, women and consumerism (D.H. Lawrence, Miller, Hemingway and many others followed this path, which Lawrence called the ‘The Savage Pilgrimage’)

It does not take Sherlock Holmes to see obvious links between these ideas and many of our own values. In fact, RF has combined such elitist concepts with American individualism to craft an exciting, vigorous lifestyle of great interest to enlightened American men. Minimalism, separatism, travel and social detachment are central to this lifestyle and all these values are associated with elitist thought.

Not only did these thinkers argue that modern democracy was a smokescreen concealing elite rule (the hypothetical ‘Deep State’), they also considered elitism the best social system. This belief is less common in the manosphere, and it is unlikely that Anglo-American Red Pillers will ever accede to it. However, is there anything they can learn from the traditional power elites in their own quest for autonomy, enlightenment and self-actualization?

Although many New Media celebrities like Alex Jones rail against the elite, the Anglosphere elites are themselves extremely Red Pilled. For one thing, they educate their children at private schools which stress individualism and self-reliance, not herd conformity. Mass culture never infects these schools which repel it with strict discipline, a classical curriculum and age old traditions.

The elites live in urban and rural enclaves, inoculated from the masses by high walls and hedges. While elite media moguls such as Rupert Murdoch disseminate prolefeed to the sheeple, the standards they expect from their own families are very high: ‘Charades’ in the Murdoch household made reference to plays by Aeschylus.

In sum, elites ARE elites because they shun the dysfunctional Blue Pill behaviours of the masses. In a couple of decades, the Rothschilds escaped from ghettos in central Europe to become the world’s bankers. Similarly, the Kennedys began life in America as despised Irish Catholics. Rather than hating on them, enlightened men should strive to learn from their example.

Only in one field is elite example irrelevant: mating. Simply put, elite tradition and family precedent generally deter their women from feeding the frivorce anarchy that has effectively killed marriage among other social strata. For men outside the elite, exotic foreign shores are the only answer.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Women, Unsecured Debt and the Woes of the Anglosphere

Feminism and the financial chaos left in its wake has proven women cannot remain solvent without men in their lives

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.


RF recently posted an interesting article (The Retail Collapse) on the decline of retail stores and shopping malls in the US. Let me point out that exactly the same phenomenon has beset Britain in recent years: C&A, Woolworths, BHS, Comet, Blockbuster and Phones4U have all ‘gone West’ since the Millennium. And other retailers have had to write-off hundreds of stores just to survive. RF’s plausible argument is that women – society’s inveterate shoppers – now lack the disposable wealth to indulge their dubious passion. The jobs they hold are generally not very remunerative; and men are no longer prepared to support their profligate ways.

This incisive analysis is also supported by the figures on female debt. Most Anglo-American debtors are women, by a considerable margin; and much of their debt arises from paying expensive college fees for worthless qualifications in the arts and humanities. From Fortune magazine:

Women are now the majority on college campuses across the United States—representing 56% of all students enrolled as of fall 2016. And according to a new report, they’re also shouldering the lion’s share of the nation’s student debt problem.

A report by the American Association of University Women (AAUW) found that on average, women hold $833 billion—or almost two-thirds—of the country’s $1.3-trillion student debt, compared to the $477 billion that men hold.

Overall, after completing a bach­elor’s degree, women’s average accrued student debt is about $1,500 greater than men’s. African American women take on more student debt than any other group of women, with an average of $30,000.

In the UK, most college loans are never repaid and most graduates get jobs they could have had after leaving high school. In sum, the majority of students pursue higher education out of snobbery (it is still mistakenly considered ‘middle class’), outmoded parental expectations and the (largely false) promise of hedonistic excess.

Reality soon bites, however. Newly armed with irrelevant qualifications, the average college graduate quickly learns that a line of computer code outweighs a million lines of poetry. Now, culture is a wonderful thing and yes, it should be studied and transmitted to succeeding generations. But do we really need half the population studying it? Besides, times were when the humanities were hardcore disciplines requiring mastery of ancient languages and intimate knowledge of the great canonical works of western civilization. Since the Sixties counter-culture infiltrated academia, those rigorous days are long gone; any clown can do Cultural Studies.

In many ways, the problem of student debt arises from a long-standing mismatch between reality and expectation. The western worldview is still rooted in the post-War era, an age of unprecedented prosperity and opportunity. In those days, going to college automatically made someone ‘middle class’ for life. Although that era ended in 1974, it continues to define the West’s general outlook – a legacy worldview, if you will. Even today, most middle aged people still assume that a college degree in any subject from any institution will confer privileged status on their offspring. Indeed, the whole ‘happy families’ narrative to which Tradcon politicians cling is also a legacy of those times. These mistaken beliefs are incredibly stubborn and persistent, something only fully apparent to someone from a non-western cultural heritage.

And in many ways the misty-eyed nostalgia for those golden years is understandable: they were times of unprecedented opportunity for ordinary Brits and Americans. However, this nostalgia has become problematic now the West faces tough competition from regions armed with higher IQs and the Confucian work ethic.

Anglosphere nations are so maladjusted to existing conditions that young people can no longer expect rational guidance from their elders. This is especially true for young men, whose parents told them ‘the right girl’ would happen along if they conformed to societal expectations; or that girls prefer ‘nice guys’ to criminal thugs. Indeed, the Manosphere in all its glory arose to fill this ‘advice gap’ that yawns like a crevasse in the lives of younger men.

But the post-War legacy hobbles women, too. Armed with pointless degrees in finger painting and Womyn’s Studies, they waste their prime years riding the thug carousel (or snarled in sterile hyper-hypergamy) and shuffling papers in a ‘beauty sinecure’ (most companies keep a few babes around as morale boosters, even today). When their Wall approaches, most ‘educated’ women hastily revert to the post-War Tradcon narrative: surely Prince Beta will ride up on his white charger, write off her debts and save her ageing ass with a wave of his credit card?

Sadly, it ain’t happening. Thanks to the Manosphere, Prince Beta knows the score. Besides, with sex tourism booming in South America, Slavic Europe and the Far East, he needs dusty Anglo tail like he needs a kick in the nuts. And so our crusty Anglobitch stumbles towards middle age, accruing ever more debt, her SMV sinking with each passing year. We know where this ends: a broken-down cat lady abusing opiates on Welfare, renting her rancid ass out to gammas for the price of her next fix. The economic repercussions will be seismic in the decades to come.

I don’t claim to be an economist but even I can see that if a huge proportion of women take out massive loans they can never repay, someone somewhere must be getting shafted. Limiting college access would probably go some way to fixing things, as would expanding intermediate technical education. However, that would greatly reduce female enrolment rates – complete anathema in the gynocentric Anglosphere. In any case, American women must believe they are ‘middle class’ – a superior caste – for the post-feminist narrative to work. Even if this ‘status’ is illusionary, the illusion has to be sustained to keep females ‘onside’; an absolute imperative in our gynocentric civilization.

Ultimately, it is hard not to link the rise of Anglo-American feminism to the Anglosphere’s economic woes. Permitting trillions of dollars of unsecured debt so that mediocre Anglo princesses can feel successful, superior and ‘middle class’ is totally irrational in the competitive twenty-first century. This mass pandering to women first began in the prosperous post-War era, and doubtless hastened its end.

Essentially, women are clowns; and building societies around their infantile whims is a recipe for disaster. By nature, women are not productive; they cannot create, build or innovate. Though many of them study the arts and humanities, their contributions to these fields amount to zero. Jurisprudence, the only ‘serious’ field where they outnumber men, predictably requires no imagination. However, law does allow women to indulge their atavistic yearnings for social destruction and systemized misandry, abetted by the Pharisaic Anglo-American obsession with punitive legalism.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Scorched Earth Tactics: Forcing the Matrix to Battle

The Matrix attempted to turn one retiree’s dalliances with legal hookers into the crime of the century – but it backfired

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

The outrageous mistreatment of American tourist ‘Cuba Dave’ Strecker for the ‘crime’ of posting a few pictures of his sexual escapades with Costa Rican hookers online (‘promoting sex tourism’, apparently), is not just a scandal; it also represents an opportunity.

Strecker enjoyed sex with thousands of warm, willing prostitutes across Latin America, far from the repressive plantation that is the United States. After posting a few pictures of his adventures on his Facebook account, a new and controversial Costa Rican law was brought into play. Found guilty of promoting sex tourism and tarnishing the country’s image (say what?), Strecker was soon serving a five-year term in a Costa Rican prison. Happily, his conviction was recently overturned and our hero is once more a free man. Predictably, prize Anglobitch Hillary Clinton and her feminist cronies were ultimately behind the ludicrous ‘anti-trafficking’ laws leading to Strecker’s illegal incarceration. But that should come as no surprise.

Although Cuba Dave’s treatment was disgraceful, many important lessons can be drawn from the case. First, it demonstrates that our message is hitting home. The Anglo-Feminist Matrix is desperately worried that RF’s nomadic lifestyle – fleecing the Anglospere economy to fund exotic furloughs in warmer climes – will take off in a big way among North American men. It must stop this nomadic hedonism proliferating by any means necessary, simply because true male liberation threatens its very existence. Poor Strecker was just a cog in the vast culture war the Anglo-Feminist Matrix is waging against Pan-Anglosphere Dissidence and men in general.

Secondly, and even more important, the case of Cuba Dave suggests the Matrix is being provoked into making serious mistakes. From a tactical standpoint, it was suckered into fighting a battle in less than auspicious circumstances. This lumbering, vindictive (and ultimately unsuccessful) attack on a working class, middle aged white dude reminded me of a famous battle: Hastings. Readers might wonder what modern men can learn from the great conflicts of history. I would answer, much: we are in the midst of a culture war between awakened men and the Anglo-Feminist Matrix; therefore, understanding the warrior archetype is of vital importance to our cause.

In September 1066, Duke William of Normandy landed on the south coast of England with a large army to wrest the crown from the Anglo-Saxon usurper, Harold. Although William’s Army had more advanced tactics and equipment, he was faced with a serious dilemma. Maintaining a large army in Medieval England was impossible over the long, hard winter months. All Harold had to do was wait him out and the Norman army would melt away before the spring. Simply put, William had to provoke a decisive battle before winter came.

He did this by becoming more energetic and destructive. He knew that raiding the countryside for more food and supplies, burning towns and generally harrying the civilian population would force Harold to intervene. And it did. William guessed that Harold’s proud dynamism would never let him rest while part of his kingdom was burning. In sum, William provoked his enemy into a fatal mistake by upping the ante and forcing him to fight, a course fraught with fatal risk.

Harold quickly gathered his army and marched south to Hastings to give battle. There, as everyone knows, he perished. William’s plan had worked perfectly and he was crowned King in Westminster Abbey a few months later.

In exactly the same way, the punitive and disproportionate measures against Cuba Dave suggest our Red Pill subculture is provoking the Matrix into rash decisions. Our energetic dissidence, rejection of Plantation existence (note how I do not dignify it with the word ‘life’) and economic/reproductive withdrawal are having exactly the same effect as William’s ruthless scorched earth policy. And the system is hurting. Like William, we are luring our foe into the open where it is more vulnerable, like a worm on a motorway. Yes, the Matrix has great power but it will be noted that in this case, like Harold, it was soundly defeated. As Cuba Dave’s website says:

‘On Friday, Dave Strecker walked out of a prison in Costa Rica, a free man, acquitted by a trial court in San Jose. When Dave was originally arrested in September of 2015, Judicial authorities issued a press release with photos of his computer and cell phone as alleged evidence. Authorities also made a video of his arrest at the Juan Santamaría airport. However, since the acquittal the Ministerio Público has remained silent.’

Outside the Anglosphere, the Anglo-Feminist Matrix is a relatively toothless force. Yet it chose to fight in a Latin country where misandrist legalism holds far less sway (a local lawyer took up Strecker’s case for free). Its lumbering intervention was not only rebutted, but tens of thousands of men have now been alerted to its hostile intentions towards their sexual freedom. Like King Harold, the Matrix played into its enemy’s hands and lost.

Our scorched earth tactics are clearly working. The Anglo-Feminist Matrix is like a stricken giant lashing this way and that, desperate to quell our Red Pill resistance, frantic to crush our visions of boundless freedom. Since our methods are bearing fruit, we must pursue them with redoubled passion and intensity. Like William’s beleaguered army, we must become even more provocative and energetic. So let us push our minimalism to superhuman levels; let us shun all contact with Anglo-American women; let us buy nothing inessential to our basic survival needs; let us refuse all political and cultural participation in the Matrix; above all, let us seek the delights of foreign shores like heroes mad for life.

Eventually, the Matrix will be forced to give us the battle we crave. Provoked beyond endurance, its blundering fist will strike. And we must be ready.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

« Older Entries