Category Archives: Big Daddy Government

Red Pill Money: Modern Dreams of Retirement Are Another Ponzi Scheme


Even a cursory look at the numbers tells us the dream of a happy retirement will come to an end in the next couple of generations

America is full of myths that are being exposed as mirages in the early 21st century. One of the biggest promises that got broken was the promise of a decent life for those who go through the enormous expense of college, as well as spending 4 to 6 of the best years of their lives studying rather than enjoying their youth. College graduates are now woefully underemployed, and that’s if they’re lucky enough to get a job at all. That’s one bubble waiting to pop.

But the broken promises will only get worse as the nation is sold out by globalists and their prostitutes, otherwise known as politicians. Retirement is the next big mirage on the horizon. The illusion of the happy retirement looks increasingly like another corporate-government complex Ponzi scheme. The current Social Security and 401k retirement plans fit the definition of Ponzi scheme perfectly:

A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investing scam promising high rates of return with little risk to investors. The Ponzi scheme generates returns for older investors by acquiring new investors.

Isn’t that the very definition of the fantasy currently being sold to workers by cleverly amoral government bureaucrats and investment company PR flacks? Even Forbes magazine is noticing Social Security looks a lot like a Ponzi scheme.


Shifting from pensions to 401k plans was a massive corporate tax dodge according to one analyst

Moving Away from Pensions to 401k Plans

Pensions, long funded by companies to give their employees a modicum of decency in their Twilight Years, died in the 1980s to be replaced by 401k plans, which boldly claim that if people tuck away 5% of their income for their entire lives, the miracle of the stock market will make them millionaires when they turn 65. Meantime, we aren’t supposed to look at our 401ks and notice the growth just isn’t there. Helaine Olen, author of Pound Foolish: Exposing the Dark Side of the Personal Finance Industry explains the end of pensions came about as yet another selling out of the working class:

What essentially happens is that the 401(k) comes in in the late ’70s, early ’80s. It starts as a corporate tax dodge, basically. It’s if you’re a high earner, you’re going to put some of your money aside. Nobody ever thought that this was going to apply to the rest of us. I mean, there was never any thought of that.

As Olen says, 401k plans were a system designed for high earners, not your average Joe making $43,000 a year or so and struggling to get by paying ever-soaring rents, taxes, and overall cost of living. As any rational person would expect, many people are finding their gains for retirement aren’t keeping pace with inflation, let alone making them rich when they go to cash out. Olen continues:

Most financial planners would say you need about $1 million to ensure a decent middle-class retirement. Absolutely almost no one is there right now.

So, just how badly is the new retirement scheme faring? The numbers are frightening. Most people will be able to retire at age 65 and hope they’re dead by age 67, assuming a retirement income of only $25,000 a year.

According to an EBRI  [Employee Benefit Research Institute] survey conducted last year, 66% of workers have saved less than $50,000 for their retirement. And 28% have saved less than $1,000. Good luck with that.

But that’s okay, Social Security will come along and save us, right? No, it won’t. Even though the system is funded with workers’ money and IS NOT a welfare program, it has turned into a welfare program because politicians have been raiding the Social Security Trust fund for decades. As Forbes reported:

“The Social Security trust fund is a fiction. In other words, the Social Security trust fund contains nothing.” The federal government has borrowed all of that trust fund money and spent it.  And the only way the trust fund can get some cash to pay Social Security benefits is if the federal government draws it from general revenues or borrows the money.

Quantitative easing, i.e. printing money out of thin air will only get you so far. We are already reaching the tipping point in America when it comes to the Social Security and program. Forbes warns:

The system is already bust. More money is going out in benefits and overhead ($714 billion a year) than is coming in from payroll taxes ($646 billion). For now, the government is covering the shortfall the way it pays for other things: by borrowing, collecting income tax and printing money.

Translation: Aunt Sam wasted the money it forcefully took from people, promising to pay their retirement in another of its grand socialist schemes. But, even the Social Security administration admits it won’t be able to pay benefits starting in only 20 years.

As a result of changes to Social Security enacted in 1983, benefits are now expected to be payable in full on a timely basis until 2037, when the trust fund reserves are projected to become exhausted. At the point where the reserves are used up, continuing taxes are expected to be enough to pay 76 percent of scheduled benefits.

In other words, the generations born after the Baby Boomers are fucked. MarketWatch is sounding the alarm now, but few people are paying attention as most Americans continue floating around like mindless blimps in food and football induced comas.

Everybody sensible knows we are facing a looming retirement crisis. Tens of millions of baby boomers are starting to retire. They are going to live in old age far longer than previous generations. Tomorrow’s grandma is going to need medical care and nursing care beyond the imagination of grandmothers of yore. Yet so few people or families have saved anywhere near enough. And our public safety net is poorly managed, ill-thought-out, and threadbare.

Waiting on the government to fix the situation amounts to insanity. The time to take action is now.


By its own admission, the Social Security Administration will be insolvent in only 20 short years -2037

Old and Broke

Summing up the ineptitude of the current 401k system and the Social Security Administration to provide reliable retirement for the average person born after the Baby Boomer generation, the frightful bottom line is given to us by Boston College.

Based on current projections, about half the country is at risk of being unable to maintain their standard of living in retirement. Among low-income workers that rises to 60%. But it’s 40% even among the higher-income workers.

So, it is utter insanity for men to keep paying into this system and expecting to receive a figurative gold watch and literal retirement at the end of their careers. The advice of The New Modern Man is to take action, and take action now if you’re still young enough to have a decade or more before retirement.

Don’t be the average idiot with no money in savings, living paycheck to paycheck, expecting Big Daddy Government to take care of them. It’s time to go minimalist, cut out out the fat from your budget, and relentlessly save and invest at least 50% of your income before the system begins falling apart. Once the masses start realizing Social Security is going to be insolvent in only 20 years and their 401k plans are not going to allow them to retire, there will be a financial crisis in the U.S. that will make the Greek austerity crisis look like a cake walk.

Combine that with a massive welfare state and a looming student loan crisis, the weight of the retirement crisis along with these other two forces will be enough to break the back of the U.S. economy. The smart men will start making preparations now instead of waiting on more false illusions and broken political promises to come to fruition.

Don’t expect the government to take care of you. Build up a massive nest egg, and be ready to cash out of the U.S. economy when the inevitable comes. Optimism is cowardice, and happy endings are for sappy Hollywood movies. Sometimes, things don’t come to a happy end when the economy and the human machines powering it are repeatedly sold out by elite puppet masters.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.


Video of the Week: Engineers and Architects Speak Out on 9/11

Taking the specter of government involvement in 9/11 much farther than some “crazy conspiracy theory” are thousands of high-rise engineers and architects who all say the official account of the collapse of the World Trade Center – both the Twin Towers and especially WTC Building 7 – makes absolutely no sense. They use the scientific method to deconstruct the narrative involving the disaster.

Never heard of these engineering and architectural experts? You can thank the media for blacklisting their compelling and very well-reasoned case, and labeling these giants in their field “truthers.” By the way, the shameless, lying American media recently attempted to coin the term “healthers” for those “crazy people” questioning Queen Hillary’s health until she dropped like a bag of bricks in video the mainstream media “missed” but eyewitnesses (lucky for us deplorables) were able to capture, changing the entire course of the 2016 campaign. She is sick, and the mainstream media owes the “healthers” a massive apology. So, the mainstream media’s myopic opinions and name-calling about so-called “conspiracy theories” have proven to have the same value as a steaming pile of excrement. The “truther” producers of the film write:

As millions of people are becoming aware that they haven’t gotten the whole story on 9/11, over 1,700 architects and engineers are leading the way at AE911TRUTH, with dozens of these professionals giving testimonials in this documentary, putting their careers on the line in their demand for a new independent investigation. High-rise architects, structural engineers, scientists, physicists, chemists, scholars, educators, firefighters, forensic fire engineers, demolition experts and others also testify in this ground-breaking scientific assessment of the events at the World Trade Center.

The sudden, complete collapse of the third skyscraper, WTC Building 7 at 5:20pm on 9/11 at free-fall acceleration, is now being seen around the world as “the smoking gun” which disproves the official story about 9/11. These experts also introduce additional “overwhelming evidence” for a controlled demolition hypothesis of the three World Trade Center highrises – which raises many disturbing questions.

The film does not speculate – but does empathize with viewers by also introducing the professional perspectives of eight psychologists who explain some of the reasons why it is so hard for people to face the scientific evidence. This is the most scientific and compelling 9/11 documentary film to date.

The physics don’t add up. The fact no highrise building in history has collapsed as the result of a fire doesn’t add up. The engineering doesn’t add up, as the Twin Towers were designed to withstand an impact from larger airliners than the ones that impacted them. Jet fuel and office fires don’t melt steel beams, as several engineers explain in the film. Eyewitness accounts don’t match the narrative. The government’s actions following the disaster don’t add up, particularly rounding up all the evidence and shipping it to China. The fact Donald Rumsfeld announced $2.3 trillion was missing from the Pentagon the day before 9/11 doesn’t add up.

Many Americans will dismiss government involvement offhand when one discusses this event. But one must ask, is this out of fear of reality people behave this way? Are myths really that powerful for the average person? As Carl Sagan told us:

The truth may be puzzling. It may take some work to grapple with. It may be counterintuitive. It may contradict deeply held prejudices. It may not be consonant with what we desperately want to be true. But our preferences do not determine what’s true.

I, more than anyone wish we didn’t have to consider government involvement in terrorist acts. But, considering Neoconservative philosophy and policy which provides motive, and compartmentalization of information which provides method, we must be skeptical of a government that has repeatedly lied to and deceived its citizens about…well…everything.

The film is highly recommended, as it provides insight into just how rotten the official account of the collapse of the World Trade Center towers is. When engineers with lifetimes of experience building the very type of buildings that collapsed call bullshit on the official account of the collapse, and illustrate how the buildings could not have fallen at freefall speed without the help of demolitions explosions, the official narrative gets blown up.

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth is our video of the week.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Operant Conditioning: Modern Governments Aim to Homogenize and Domesticate People


“If freedom is a requisite for human happiness, then all that’s necessary is to provide the illusion of freedom.” -B.F. Skinner

Not so long ago (on a geological timescale) your friendly dog’s ancestors were wild wolves. Through a process of selective breeding and domestication, the descendants of canis lupus have become everything from the great St. Bernard to the humble Chihuahua. This shows us the power of selective breeding to mold beasts into everything from service animals to rat-like pets. The principle behind selective breeding extends down to other mammals, namely H. Sapiens, or human beings.

When one looks at what world governments are doing to the human population in the modern age, pushing “diversity” as a means of mixing out differences in our species to ultimately only destroy true diversity in the human genome, one must wonder what other agendas are being pushed. The problem goes well beyond creating a “standardized” human being through sheer sexual force.

Modern Western governments also use B.F. Skinner’s principles of operant conditioning to help transform man into the equivalent of docile human livestock existing only to produce profit on the corporate plantation and government tax farm. Stefan Molyneux has detailed this concept in a brilliant thought piece titled The Story of Your Enslavement.

So, what is operant conditioning? Simply, it’s any procedure that delivers reinforcement to an organism according to some well-defined rule. It is what The Matrix refers to as “a prison for your mind.” The almighty state which creates the prison for our minds operates on two simple principles: reinforcement and punishment.


The same psychological principles used to control rat behavior also work on humans


Rats are often used to study medicine and how it will react with humans. Interestingly, studying rat behavior also gives us two clues as to how governments (with politicians who are bought and paid for by corporations) reinforce the type of behavior the elite want from the working classes and the those dependent on the welfare system.

As George Carlin said, the welfare class exists to scare the hell out of the working class. Follow the rules of the state, or you’ll end up just like them! Thereby, the working class is controlled by reinforcement. There are two types of reinforcement: positive and negative.

Positive reinforcement: This occurs when a behavior (response) is rewarding or the behavior is followed by another stimulus that is rewarding, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example, if a rat in a Skinner box gets food when it presses a lever, its rate of pressing will go up. This procedure is usually called simply reinforcement.

With this concept in mind, how can you get millions of young men and women to spend the best years of their lives learning, nay, being voluntarily brainwashed by Cultural Marxism and liberalism in the college education racket and smiling the entire time? While, at the same time making them take on the equivalent of a first mortgage as they pay for the privilege of being turned into compliant corporate worker bees suffering and average of $30,000 in educational debt bondage for the privilege of working? Why you give them positive reinforcement.

Much like a rat hitting a feeder bar to get a food pellet, human beings figuratively go hit the rubber stamp bar at State U in hopes of landing a better feeding position at the corporate trough. They need the better feeding position because of cultural memes that convince children from a very young age the only way to compete with others and to be competent adults is by practicing competitive consumption. This makes them live adult lives geared towards using materialism to measure their self-worth, and they’re told college will give them preference in the pecking order.

It then conditions them to accept the increasingly ridiculous demands of the system by taking the very essence of childhood away, as today’s kids spend less time outdoors than prisoners do. Meantime, the promise of a reward for time served and good behavior becomes nothing more than a bait and switch job. But, while they’re in the education system as long as they pursue the illusion students are rewarded with good grades and empty accolades.

And, of course, today’s massive police and regulatory state which micromanages virtually every aspect of the human livestock’s behavior from cradle to grave doles out its fair share of negative reinforcement as well.

Negative reinforcement: This occurs when a behavior (response) is followed by the removal of an aversive stimulus, thereby increasing that behavior’s frequency. In the Skinner box experiment, the aversive stimulus might be a loud noise continuously sounding inside the box; negative reinforcement would happen when the rat presses a lever, turning off the noise.

Removing a negative stimulus is the key to negative reinforcement. Licensing and insidious government over-regulation fall under this category. One can think of this as paying fees to the government to remove the threat of fines or imprisonment for activities that really shouldn’t need the consent of the government. Or, studying to avoid bad grades on tests. Or, going to work at a shitty job so you don’t end up with a social stigma like those on welfare.

Other examples: Not having sex because you don’t want one of those “dirty little babies” the media says you shouldn’t be having. Obeying speed limits to avoid speeding tickets and high insurance rates even though the autobahn proves speed limits aren’t necessary to have a perfectly safe road. Being forced to bake a cake for someone who challenges your religious principles. Sure, it goes against your belief system to bake a cake for a gay couple, but to remove the negative stimuli, media ridicule, SJW swarmings, hate mobs, and legal consequences one bakes the cake anyway.

Before long, you have an entire population that has no idea why they’re doing what they’re doing. They’re just doing it. And if reinforcement doesn’t work, the state proceeds to the punishment phase.


“The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.” -Tacitus


The U.S. government excels at punishment. As its already enormous legal code gets larger and larger, there’s just about nothing that isn’t a crime these days. In fact, libertarian lawyer Harvey Silverglate wrote a book entitled Three Felonies a Day, detailing the fact there are so many laws on the books today that if one got on the bad side of a government official or someone with political power a crime could be found to fit their behavior.

These laws make everything from faking a sick day at work a felony (Supreme Court Justice Scalia even pointed out how the law criminalizes this activity for a salaried employee) to making having an anonymous source as a journalist a felony. It’s all part of a program of punishment, of which there are also two types.

Positive punishment: (also referred to as “punishment by contingent stimulation”) This occurs when a behavior (response) is followed by an aversive stimulus, such as pain from a spanking, which results in a decrease in that behavior. Positive punishment is a rather confusing term, and usually the procedure is simply called “punishment.”

So-called “positive” punishment is merely adding a painful stimuli following a behavior. Just as a rat would be zapped with a mild electrical charge, humans get zapped with arrests and imprisonment.

Some examples include jail time for just about anything you can imagine as the per capita prison population in a “free” country far exceeds any other nation on earth. Most of those in jail are there for petty drug crimes, i.e. putting people in jail for possessing or selling chemicals or plants the government says they can’t have. (Meantime, we aren’t supposed to notice prescription drugs kill far more people than recreational drugs.) Refusing to pay taxes to your “king” and then being raided by IRS agents and put in jail is another example. Rather than “protecting and serving” you, the American police state protects and serves the interests of their patrons, namely the corporate-government complex.

Negative punishment (penalty) (also called “Punishment by contingent withdrawal”): Occurs when a behavior (response) is followed by the removal of a stimulus, such as taking away a child’s toy following an undesired behavior, resulting in a decrease in that behavior.

Negative punishment means taking away something the human livestock need or want. An example would include penalties for consuming plants the government deems inappropriate, i.e. taking away a person’s right to work because they smoked a single doobie one weekend in Colorado (detectable in the urine for 30 days and now in hair follicles for 3 months!), while consuming alcohol to excess the same night is not punished.

Other examples of negative punishment would include taking away a person’s business license or other privilege granted by the government for not accepting degeneracy promoted by social engineers who run the media. Then there’s social stigma for not following trends, fads, and ways of thinking deemed important by social engineers.


“I use emotion for the many and reserve reason for the few.” -Hitler

Scientific Dictatorship

In short, using the ideas of Skinner to manipulate the masses – along with many other psychological scientific principles – is how the faux democracy we live in does whatever it wants while convincing its subjects the state has the moral right and responsibility to control their behavior through reinforcement and punishment. The state no longer needs violence as it shifts towards figurative mind control of the sheeple through control of everything from media narratives to the education system.

The state legitimizes itself by eliminating competition, so it can be an entity with a monopoly on violence and kidnapping (arresting, imprisoning and executing people). Moreover, with the advent of widespread cultural Marxism it can eventually replace God as the moral entity in the average person’s life.

It’s all about molding the human species according to the whims of those at the top of the political and economic games. In Anglo America, this has resulted in the loss of culture and many of the simple pleasures of being alive so one can dedicate his life to producing profit in a never-ending game of material and consumer oneupmanship.

It produces an enormous amount of material wealth which is then shifted up the pyramid, out of the hands of those producing it. But, it ultimately destroys the cultural and social fabric of the society. The end goal is a completely homogenized and domesticated planet, in which men and women become little more than androgynous, interchangeable cogs in a perpetual motion, machine culture of profit making who do not move without permission from an authority figure.

Sadly, it seems many of our most innate behaviors have not evolved much beyond those of lower mammals. Worse, those at the top of the food chain have figured out a way to exploit this vulnerability through the use of science and psychology.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Child Support Laws and Jail Hurt Poor Men the Most


Financial indentured servitude is doled out daily in the American court system and disproportionately affects poor men

As yet more evidence women will do anything for a perceived Alpha male, including sharing him with other women, young football star Orenthius Perkins got 3 girls pregnant at age 17. Rather than blaming men all the time, where were these girls’ parents and where was any sense of responsibility on the girls’ part? How could they not have known he was having sex with other girls? Orenthius is paying for his irresponsibility, but the young women he knocked up are getting a check for the next 18 years. In any case, Perkins told the press he had to give up his football scholarship and go to work.

I wasn’t mentally ready. I got put on child support for all three at one time. At that time at school being young and wild, I wasn’t focused. It took a while to kick in, to understand that I had three kids, and a lot of responsibility.

Once again the federal and state government has imposed itself in the lives of its peons. Perkins often challenges the insanity of the child support system.

Why do I [have to] pay you when I can pay my child directly?

Interesting statistics show 70% of child support arrears are owed by men who make less than $10,000 a year. The predatory nature of this system is never brought up in the lamestream press. David Pate, a professor at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee says:

Twenty percent of the people in this system shouldn’t be in there because they’re too poor. Those $10,000 or even $20,000 earners. Jail is appropriate for someone who is actively hiding assets, not for someone who couldn’t pay child support in the first place.

Many poor men then get caught up on the teeth of the system, disparagingly referred to as “deadbeat dads” by the gynocentric press and the rent-seeking mothers of their children. The only sin of many of these men is not making enough money.

Once they get caught up in the cycle of going to jail for not being able to pay child support, it’s wash, rinse, and repeat. They cycle between jobs and when they’re unemployed long enough or don’t make enough money long enough, they end up back in jail.

As pointed out by The New Modern Man this is abject slavery being doled out in the family court system in a nation that brags incessantly about how much “freedom” it gives its tax farm human cattle.


The life of children has been reduced to a money fight and money problem by your government

Time To “Man Up”?

Walter Scott has been in and out of jail for getting behind on child support, even though he’s made a good faith effort to keep a job. His brother, Rodney says:

Every job he has had, he has gotten fired from because he went to jail because he was locked up for child support. He got to the point where he felt like it defeated the purpose.

Once he lost his job, all the circumstances tilted against him made Scott say to hell with it all and throw up his hands.

I got mad at everybody in the whole world because I just lost the best job I ever had. I just stopped doing everything.

In Anglo America, for men when these things happen – that’s life. For women, the government always asks, “How can we do more for you?” One lawyer says details the insult to injury being poor adds to also having your children stripped away from you.

Parents who are truly destitute go to jail over and over again for child support debt simply because they’re poor.

Let’s just call this what it is – Cultural Marxism designed to break down the family. One can marvel at all the Draconian legal teeth of the American family court system, in which such slave-driving tactics are imposed men who can’t pay:

  • Withholding up to 65% of a man’s paycheck
  • Seizing bank accounts
  • Seizing investments
  • Seizing tax refunds
  • Suspending driver’s licenses
  • Suspending professional licenses
  • Imposing jail time

The irony of suspending driver’s and professional licenses while imposing jail time then expecting men to wave a magic wand and make money appear is apparently lost on the system. Once a man has no means of transportation other than hitching a ride and no way to use his hard-earned credentials in a job search, with the added baggage of having an arrest on his record, a simple income issue quickly turns into a huge life issue.

Making matters worse, many states can even base child support payments on “imputed” income, or the amount of money a man should be able to make in the eyes of the system rather than that amount of money he is actually making. This means a child support payment this is a higher percentage of an already low-income man’s paycheck. The system apparently never considered the inability of men to pay, whether through disability, unemployment, health issues, or being thrown overboard by the system as the middle class is shrunken by yet more piss-poor government policy. Vicky Turetsky, commissioner of the federal Office of Child Support Enforcement says:

While every parent has a responsibility to support their kids to the best of their ability, the tools developed in the 1990s are designed for people who have money.

In some cases men can be forced to pay huge sums of child support, in one case $166,000, even though there is DNA evidence the child is not biologically the child support payer’s son or daughter.

As with many things in America, when it comes to child support the system is totally stacked against men. It’s either pay, or suffer the consequences. In an economy where people are working so hard to just get by, a man suffering a divorce may soon – literally – find himself living under a bridge even though the only thing he did wrong was getting involved with a predatory Anglo female in the first place. Any wonder Men are on Strike?

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Red Pill Money: The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Legalized Prostitution


From Mesoamerica to India all societies in the history of the world have had prostitution, and in most of them it has been legal until modern times

“If you expel prostitution from society, you will unsettle everything on account of lusts.” -Augustine of Hippo, early Christian philosopher.

Prostitution is the world’s oldest profession for a reason. Think of it as a safety valve for men who either don’t want to put up with women (Charlie Sheen famously said he doesn’t pay whores for sex, but to leave after it’s over) or are one of the 4 out of 5 incels, the sexually frustrated men in today’s skewed sexual market. How many hardworking men’s lives have been destroyed by an overbearing police state entrapping them for solicitation of prostitution and slapping them with a criminal record for trying to get some nookie? This is one of the many ways I cannot abide by the growing tyranny in Anglo America.

There have always been whores throughout history, and the argument can be made that marriage is merely sophistry applied to prostitution. The economic nature of the transaction is still there. Women “marry up” in economic status, not down. And, men are expected to be “providers” in marriage. Providers of what? Money and resources, of course! Regular old prostitution just takes the pretenses out of the deal.

Going back 5,000 years into the Old Testament, prostitution was commonplace as Genesis depicts the practice. From Jericho to Babylon there are prostitutes in the Bible, making women selling sexual favors far from unusual during the Bronze Age. Across the world, in Mesoamerica the practice was also common amongst the Incas and Aztecs. The practice of “controlled” areas where whoring is allowed remains to this day as there are “zonas de tolerancia” in Mexico where one pays a small fee ($2 to a police officer no less!) to enter and partake in the debauchery going on inside.

In Greece women engaged in prostitution, and these whores were sometimes influential women. There were brothels in Athens, however pimping was strongly prohibited. Prostitution in Rome was legal and widespread. Japan, India, and even Europe has a long history of the practice. The Catholic Church was even tolerant of prostitution because it said it prevented the greater evils of rape, sodomy, and masturbation. The church merely encouraged prostitutes to “repent.”

Interestingly, Communists have always opposed prostitution! Marx himself wrote it is “only a specific expression of the general prostitution of the laborer” and considered its abolition necessary to overcome capitalism! This is yet another way the American Empire plays it from both sides when it comes to Communism – it led a Cold War against it while adopting many Marxist tenets over the last 50 years!

In the United States, prostitution was originally legal, that is until the Women’s Christian Temperance Union came along and pushed laws outlawing it (and thus elevating the price of puss) between 1910-1915. It is still legal in parts of rural Nevada. The prohibition of the practice has led to the cluster of police hunting down Johns as public enemy #1 and often filming their entrapment by undercover police and arrest.


“I don’t understand why prostitution is illegal. Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. Why isn’t selling fucking legal? You know, why should it be illegal to sell something you can give away?” -George Carlin

Cost Benefit

What if the United States were to follow the lead of many countries in Europe and legalize prostitution or at least allow a few Red Light Districts? Legalizing prostitution does go against the advice of Cultural Marxists and Karl Marx himself, but in today’s society of supposedly empowered women not legalizing it because women are still victims is the height of hypocrisy.

Here’s a short list of costs, benefits and facts resulting from legalization of whoring:

  • Women wouldn’t have as much sexual leverage over men.
  • Spreading HIV by prostitution is a false argument, since the CDC’s own statistics say getting HIV through vaginal intercourse is nearly impossible.
  • It would reduce violence against women, i.e. no pimps and no shady business practices would be needed.
  • Prostitution is a victimless crime, i.e. everybody likes to fuck, so why not let them fuck.
  • Law enforcement would save resources by fighting real crime instead of policing everyone’s sex lives.
  • Prostitution will not end because of Prohibition.
  • Prohibition of prostitution only forces the practice underground into the black market.
  • Women get money, men get sex, both are happy.
  • Men can avoid unnecessary and often deceptive (on the female’s part) romantic entanglements with women, and get their sexual needs fulfilled without risk of alimony and child support enslavement, while becoming more productive and happier citizens by virtue of having sex on demand.
  • Most societies in history have been tolerant of the practice, but not Puritanical Anglo America.

So, there you have it. A starter in the argument for prostitution. The cost-benefit analysis clearly works out in favor of not criminalizing heterosexual behavior that has been part of the human species since biblical times and even before that. Marginalizing sex the way Anglo America does and pretending people are not going to do it anyway is evidence of just how debased from biology men and women are expected to become by their masters. Freud detailed in Civilization and Its Discontents how too much civilization and not enough biology would create problems for the West. Freud wrote:

It is impossible to overlook the extent to which civilization is built up upon a renunciation of instinct, how much it presupposes precisely the non-satisfaction (by suppression, repression or some other means?) of powerful instincts.

Sooner or later the suppression blows up when men are expected to be cucks and masturbators instead of virile males who enjoy sexual pleasure with women. Spengler also predicted the West would become increasingly detached from its life-giving biology as it tried to turn the entire society into a perpetual profit producing machine, ignoring its humanity. Clearly, the cost – having sex, the single most powerful driving force in the life of men and women – regulated and punished by the State is tantamount to insanity. The benefit, controlling sexual behavior, comes not to the individual but to the police and managerial state who profit from it as it forces many men into unhappy lives of incel simply because they don’t want to play the ridiculous games of relationships and marriage just to have sexual needs relieved.

Further, when it comes to money, men could save big if they didn’t have to support women’s materialism and consumerism under the guise of relationships and marriage. Women spend 90% more money than they make, and men only account for 20% of domestic spending even though we make nearly two-thirds of all money in the economy. Women get more money by playing the marriage and divorce game, which often ends in lifetime payments of alimony and 18 years of ridiculously high child support, which women are held unaccountable for when they spend it, or even ridiculously high divorce settlements as in the case of Johnny Depp and countless other used up men. That’s the real reason women will fight tooth and nail to keep prostitution from being legalized: It would mean they face real competition, and the relationship and marriage game would be rendered obsolete as women would actually have to bring more value than the Golden Vagina to the table.

In one example, a cucked Beta is being held responsible for $166,000 in fraudulent child support charges even though DNA testing proves he is not the father, and the mother’s actions show she likely knew he wasn’t the father the whole time. It would take a lot of whoring around to burn through $166,000 in prostitutes, which to this author would provide far more pleasure than being forced to pay $730 a month under threat of imprisonment to this fat pig. Clearly, rather than marrying the fat pig the man could have just hired some whores and done some lines of blow off their asses instead of letting a woman pretend to be married to him for 2 1/2 years, then walking away with a fortune in cash and prizes from the male-hating American court system.

This entire setup is ridiculous. It amazes me men put up with it. Some of us won’t put up with it, though. If we are participating in society’s ridiculous profit-producing games there better be some kind of reward and we better have some kind of autonomy to fuck when we want. End the Prohibition against pay for play. Remember this, American police state: “The highest result of education is tolerance.”

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

IRS Penalizes Married Couples, Rewards Unmarried Couples

Straight marriage and strong families are quickly becoming relics as far as the government is concerned

Straight marriage and strong families are quickly becoming relics as far as the government is concerned

The Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups has made headlines in recent years, but a “marriage penalty” targeting married couples and the nuclear family just got a little worse. In recent weeks, the IRS worsened the marriage penalty by offering a large reward for unmarried taxpayers who co-own a home – doubling the mortgage interest deduction available to the married taxpayer. The new rule applies as part of a lawsuit brought against the tyrannical agency.

In a case of first impressions decided last year, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court narrowly ruled the limits for mortgage interest deductions apply on a per-taxpayer basis, effectively allowing an unmarried couple to “double up” on their write-offs. Initially, the IRS intended to contest the decision, but now it has thrown up the white flag by issuing a formal acquiescence.

Of course, the KGB…er…IRS continues penalizing marriage by providing economic disincentives while the rest of government works to destroy it by imposing Marxist cultural norms along with welfare state gibsmedats for single moms and child support slavery for dads – even if they’re not genetically the father as The New Modern Man reported last week in the case of Colorado man Chris Atkins. Atkins has been held responsible for upwards of $166,000 in fraudulent child support charges, and is continuing to write checks of $730 a month under threat of imprisonment while “mom” seemingly knew the entire time the child wasn’t Atkins’.

The gross incompetence of and female preference in the court system is proof that by intent or incompetence the U.S. government is doing everything it its power to weaken and destroy strong, K-selected patriarchal families and replace them with r-selected matriarchal populations. Just take a look at the marriage penalty costing people who work and contribute to society just a little more:

Under these tax rates, two single people who each earned $87,850 would each file as “Single” and each would pay a marginal tax rate of 25%. However, if those same two people were married, their combined income would be exactly the same as before (2 * $87,850 = $175,700), but the “Married filing Jointly” tax brackets would push them into a higher marginal rate of 28%, costing them an additional $879 in taxes.

Not so bad, at first anyway. The more money the couple earns, the more they stand to lose when filing jointly.

In the most extreme case, two single people who each earned $400,000 would each pay a marginal tax rate of 35%; but if those same two people filed as “Married, filing jointly” then their combined income would be exactly the same (2 * $400,000 = $800,000), yet $350,000 of that income would be taxed as the higher 39.6% rate, resulting in a marriage penalty of $32,119 in extra taxes.

That’s more money lost to the government than I earned at my first full-time job out of college. So, we find the government codifying into law a tax plan that encourages men and women to keep their finances separate by being married but filing separately, and even by filing separately they lose more money than two “single” people cohabitating.

Either way, [married filing jointly or married filing separately] the married couple would receive less deductions than two otherwise identical single people with exactly the same income.

Whether it be tax law or targeting conservatives, or tyrannical laws to “protect us” that end up destroying the protections of several of the amendments in the Bill of Rights, the U.S. government has become an abomination to end all abominations. Less government and more freedom is desperately needed. But tax penalties are only part of its game. Wait until yousee what it does with the money.

Welfare Pays More Than Work

As recently reported on by the Cato Institute, the gigantic parasite known as the federal government not only provides disincentives people to marry and have families while providing generous incentives for women to become carousel-riding single moms, it does it in such a way that becoming a taker provides more money in benefits (funded by the Beta males of society) than having a job.

The current welfare system provides such a high level of benefits that it acts as a disincentive for work. Welfare currently pays more than a minimum-wage job in 35 states, even after accounting for the Earned Income Tax Credit. In 13 states welfare pays more than $15 per hour.

Women receive nearly two-thirds of these generous government benefits (not to mention preferences in everything from education to employment). The gynocentric federal government has become so big that half of all households receive some kind of government handout. In tandem with punishing the traditional, nuclear family, this strategy is straightforward evidence of the implementation of a Cloward-Piven strategy to destroy the current corporate-government complex in a bid to replace it with straight up Socialism.

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of “a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.”

Of course, this guaranteed annual income, or straight up Communism by any other name, will come with a very high price. Most likely, the price will be having a chip implanted and letting the federal government and banking cartels micromanage our financial lives electronically. The marionettes in the media have already been pushing “getting chipped” on the next generation of kids, so by they time they’re grown having an implant will seem normal.

So, don’t expect the IRS to start moving towards more incentives for heterosexual marriage again anytime soon. If anything, it will continue to drag down and beat the goose that lays the golden egg, the nuclear family headed up by a strong patriarch. Like sand being eroded, the foundation of the West is slowly being eroded by liberalism and the tax code slowly changes to reflect this.

If that’s not enough reason to Go Galt, nothing is. It’s either that or bend over, lube up, and let Big Daddy Government have his way. Women and the government are not going to like men upsetting the apple cart of freebies, but it’s either that or oblivion for the average Beta in society. Because as any man with common sense knows, once women get on the Hedonic Treadmill of free stuff at the expense of Beta males they hate, there’s no stopping the treadmill until the system breaks down.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

American Slavery: Man Paying Child Support for Another Man’s Kid


The court system continues destroying families and penalizing men

As if men needed any more evidence the American court system practices misandry, believes in the credo of gynocentrism and slavery still exists in America, Chris Atkins has spent 11 years paying for a daughter that is not his, and is still being forced by the court system to pay for another man’s daughter even though officials know the child isn’t his. Beyond the shame of being cucked, and “manning up” to marry a woman under false pretenses, now Atkins has to bear the burden of slavery until the girl reaches the age of his emancipation, which in Colorado is 19 years old.

Even though a DNA test has revealed the daughter is not his, Atkins is still on the hook. His child support payment is a whopping $730 a month, and he has to pay or go to jail only because his name is on the birth certificate. He cannot be taken off the birth certificate without the real father signing it. Making this story even worse, the genetic father of the child, a Mr. Lonnquist, refuses to sign the birth certificate for his own daughter so Atkins can be released from child support responsibility. And, the man who won’t claim responsibility for his own daughter is the man mom, Lori, wants to spend her life with.

Further proving how inept and ridiculous family court law is, Atkins has been denied contact with the girl for 4 years, but her genetic father has not been denied contact. Atkins told the press:

It doesn’t make any sense to me. I just want my daughter, but I can’t even see her, but yet I’m still paying child support. And the biological father has been found and he gets to spend time with her. I don’t get nothing.


Atkins will have paid $166,000 in fraudulent child support charges for sexual access to this prize, even though she cucked him and committed paternity fraud

This story is a classic cautionary tale of predatory Anglo women using Betas for bucks in the age of the Law of the Jungle after feminism. Atkins was dating his girlfriend (the fat slob at the left) for only a short time, when she ended up preggers. Not knowing his girlfriend Lori was pregnant with another man’s spawn, and crucially after she neglected to tell him she had been taking cum shots from another dude, he manned up and married her, then signed his name on the birth certificate and as far as the law is concerned, that was enough to enslave a man to pay for another man’s child – DNA tests and predatory female behavior be damned. Men aren’t anything but check writers and sperm donors to the American family court system, and to most women. After only a couple of years of marriage, Lori cashed her Beta meal ticket (Atkins) in for divorce court lottery winnings, and the poor bastard has been paying child support ever since.

Lori let the ruse that Atkins was the father go on over a decade – 11 years – before the couple had a spat and she decided to change the last name of her daughter to Lonnquist, the name of the man who she must have known was the father the entire time. Atkins recounts that incident made him suspicious.

So the alarms went off and we had a DNA test done and she’s not my biological daughter that I raised for 11 years.

Ya think, dude? You should have got suspicious when she ended up pregnant so quickly and wanted you to put a ring on it. This incident is entirely predictable in that women will trade 5 years of Beta for 5 minutes of Alpha. Cheating and lying is engrained into the very fabric of women in their dealings with men. She gets the Alpha seed and Beta boy gets to pay for it. Tragic? Yes. Entirely predictable? Yes. The 2006 book Sperm Wars details how women will often seek out two or more men during a single cycle. She is also drawn to seek out the more “Alpha” of the two men during her most fertile period. In this manner, it’s as though nature has psychologically and biologically designed women for Alpha Fux, Beta Bux trickery.

What is even more amazing is the family court system lets this behavior go on under the guise of protecting women and children, when the feminist narrative constantly berates men and screams women in the 21st century Don’t Need a Man™. Atkins said his motives for revealing this sordid story of cuckoldry and predatory female behavior are so people can know about the injustices being meted out in the court system today:

You know, I don’t want pity, I just want everybody to know this is happening. It’s not right, it is not right.

No, it’s not right which is why giving women all rights and privileges but no responsibilities amounts to cultural and societal suicide.


The Scorpion and The Frog

Potential Betas out there: equate this story with the tale of The Scorpion and the Frog. The fable is used to illustrate that fundamentally vicious natures cannot change, in this case the behavior of women towards Beta providers that they hate so much.

A scorpion asks a frog to carry it across a river. The frog hesitates, afraid of being stung, but the scorpion argues that if it did so, they would both drown. Considering this, the frog agrees, but midway across the river the scorpion does indeed sting the frog, dooming them both. When the frog asks the scorpion why, the scorpion replies that it was in its nature to do so.

Young men out there, think of women as the scorpion. It is their nature to use and abuse Beta providers. I have personally witnessed this time and time again in my life, and this case, sad as it is, comes as absolutely no surprise to me. You must be the Alpha male in today’s sexual market or you are signing yourself up for a lifetime of slavery and pain. Even the Bible warns men about the risks of dealing with women, but thanks to the lobotomy imposed by liberalism, this ancient wisdom has been forgotten.

This is such a disgusting case of financial rape and cuckoldry on so many levels in a society that insanely thinks women can do no wrong. If Lori had any sense of morality at all, she’d have the child support order dropped. Yet, in the lamestream media Lori has remained essentially blameless. The fact she pulled off this feat, robbing a man of over $166,000 (assuming $730 a month for 19 years) for a child that isn’t his screams women have no sense of morality. This is paternity fraud of the highest order.

If men can be held accountable for over $166,000 in a court system for children that aren’t theirs, women need to be held accountable for paternity fraud with jail time to back it up to balance the scales. In the age of DNA testing and Realtalk about women, this abuse of men by women and in the American court system must stop.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

« Older Entries Recent Entries »