Category Archives: Divorce-Industrial Complex

5 Reasons Why Men Are Still Opting Out of Marriage and Relationshits

engagement-1718244_1280

Marriage rates are down once again, and men are wisely avoiding romantic entanglements with Anglobitches

Both marriage and long term relationshits continue a steep decline in a moribund Anglo culture. New statistics from the Census Bureau and Pew Research Center illustrate marriage hasn’t just died, it is a rotting corpse. This unfortunate reality reflects the ultimate success feminism was at achieving the Marxist goals of breaking up the family:

  • Last year, only 9% of 18-to-24 year olds in the U.S. were married, compared to 45% in 1960.
  • Only 45% of all households include a married couple.
  • 57% of adults got married ten years ago, but only 51% are getting married now.

But men aren’t just shunning marriage, they’re starting to shun relationshits altogether. It seems even the lure of the moist, pink anatomy is starting to lose its appeal. It could be because men know the average relationship isn’t going to last, anyway. From the Daily Mail:

A study looking into the impact of modern society on romantic lives has revealed that couples today are unlikely to last the distance that love birds in previous generations enjoyed.

New research reveals that couples are now most likely to end their relationships after just two years and nine months.

That’s the average. A man wouldn’t be wise to be in a relationshit that is statistically proven to be a passing fancy of overtly predatory women in today’s culture.

But why, on a deeper level, are both marriage and LTRs in decline as cock carouseling becomes the new, de-civilizing norm? We posit it is the unfathomably low quality of modern Western women. Men are getting wise to the game and the risks of the Divorce Industrial Complex. And they’re getting tired of taking shit from r-selected women. (Women in an r-selected environment become less feminine and less civilized with each passing generation.)

There are some very good reasons to avoid entanglements with fat, entitled, flighty, worthless American women. Here are 5 reasons men are wisely avoiding Anglobitches.

1. Anglobitches are total sluts. Women in modern culture aren’t just sluts, they’re proud sluts. This is, of course, a reversion to a primitive state of affairs in human mating rituals. Women are sluts and males are expendable ONLY in uncivilized societies. When women sleep around and a permanent pairbond isn’t the norm, men have no incentive to invest in either women or society. Ultimately, this will bankrupt the society as women are statistically proven to spend more than they can ever produce. It will also lead to problems with delinquency since single moms are proven to raise more criminals and deadbeats, as well as slutty daughters. (Carousel riders, just like mama.)

2. Anglobitch entitlement mentality and Princess Syndrome. Women who bring nothing but a laundry list of demands and a condescending attitude to the table expect to land Prince Charming who owns a McMansion and a Ferrari, giving her access to a large disposable income for her to waste on her flights of fancy and materialism. Tatted up, short-haired, damaged goods women don’t want to build a life with a “good” man, they want life in the lap of luxury to be handed to them by Richie Rich with no obligations. Until such time they get tired of him and want to monkey branch to one of his rich friends. Ergo, men are seen by women as nothing but expendable provider modules. She “deserves” it. Well, in her own mind she does.

3. Women have total power over men in today’s Anglo culture. The legal system in America is a complete joke. With nothing more than a passing whim, a woman can destroy a man legally and/or financially. Take your pick of risks: She can destroy him with fake rape claims. She can destroy him with a frivorce and endless all-the-money payments. She can enslave him with child support. Best not to become legally entangled with a proven predator of male utility value.

4. Men are pariahs in Anglo culture. The vitriol Anglo culture spits at men is astonishing to witness to those who have spent time in other cultures. Men are viewed as everything from rapists to sex fiends to simple-minded beasts by the altering eye that alters all in Anglo culture. It has even been said men are like dogs. To which the best response is, yes, we (like dogs) are loyal as fuck when someone treats us good. Unfortunately, the arrogant demeanor of Anglo women today makes them unapproachable to many men. Those men considered “unworthy” of a sniff of the golden vagina.

Here’s a personal anecdote about this oddity of Anglo culture: I was recently traveling through the South and found myself in the middle of a social gathering on a Saturday in Nashville, TN. As a pack of 20-ish females walked by, I got the sense of utter arrogance and contempt from these girls. They looked down at me and other men as pawns in their game of acquisition. No, I didn’t want to break through their bitch shields or pass any of their inevitable shit tests for a pale, flat piece of tail. I just wanted to get the fuck away from them.

5. Women aren’t worth it. As a man ages and acquires wisdom and experience with chicks, he begins to realize they simply aren’t worth it. Sex ends up costing him more than its worth. It took me going through 150+ women to realize they’re all pretty much the same, only with different packaging of same the lies they tell me. There is no magic unicorn. Women are always a losing investment. At some point, the risk will begin to outweigh the reward. What’s more, trying to appease women with materialism and consumerism is a surefire ticket to slavery. A minimalistic man can live an awesome life on $18,000 to $25,000 a year. This modest income affords plenty of travel, booze, and rendezvous with fast women if he manages his finances well and learns the trade of PUA. Why work double to play a losing game of “Keep the Anglobitch Up” when a man can work half and invest in himself and his own interests rather than some ungrateful hag?

Fuck ’em.

Women are drunk on their power for the time being. But, the day will come when the pied piper must be paid. Society will collapse because the current state of affairs is not culturally, socially, or financially sustainable.

J.D. Unwin showed us all past societies that loosened restraints on female sexuality eventually fell and crumbled to dust. Bedlam ensued afterwards, as civilization ended. What’s more, each Anglobitch currently runs a $100,000+ deficit on society over the course of her vain, narcissistic life. This deficit has traditionally been balanced by taxing Beta males. Once these men stop working themselves like dogs to pay abusively high taxes to support a system that robs them to make up for the deficit Anglobitches create, the entire house of cards will collapse. Bring it on.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Advertisements

Happy Father’s Day, Not Happy Single Mom’s Day

man-863085_1280

Nothing is more hated in the zoo that is a gynocentric society than civilizing fathers

A reminder to feminists and other tyrannical females out there: It’s Happy Father’s Day, not Happy Single Mom’s Day. Not happy Child Support Check Day. And not Happy Take the Kids and Run Day.

One of the most pressing issues springing from Anglo America’s hatred of all things male is the relegation of fathers to serf status legally and culturally. It seems this culture can never punish, denigrate, and disrespect men quite enough. It mocks them in the media. It vaunts females as some sort of divine creatures while males are viewed with nothing but devilish contempt. It gives men almost no legal rights with their own children.

Let’s stop the it’s always the man’s fault malarkey right here and right now.

Here’s how things usually happen. A relationship doesn’t work out because “mom” isn’t happy for one of an infinity of petty reasons, so naturally a gynocentric legal system accommodates her flightiness with laws crafted so she can continue to cash in on dad’s labor, while estranging him from his children and turning him into a financial slave who is then unable to spend quality time with his children because the fucker is broke.

However, while mom profits from having an 18-year annuity, dad loses everything and society as a whole loses as it begins to resemble a zoo. Children with child support checks instead of dads don’t turn out as well as those who have dads, and society begins to de-civilize. We are witnessing this happen in the West before our very eyes.

One of the biggest tragedies that came with the return to pre-civilization status brought on by feminism and the divorce-industrial complex is the negative effect unchecked female power is having on the next generation. The sexual and social zoo we are now witnessing unfold in the West descended like darkness upon the land because feminism is returning humanity to an animalistic state, to use Huxley’s term.

The insanity of disenfranchising fathers continues unabated, despite the fact that a mountain of evidence has piled up confirming traditionalists’ claims that children do better with a father in their life. This benefits society more in the long run than daddy being turned into a financial slave of both mommy dearest and a lawyer/rat in a black robe, i.e. a judge. However, since the 1960s Anglo society has been moving towards, and is now close to reaching its goal of turning fathers into little more than sperm donors and check writers.

Check out these bullet points from The Father’s Rights Movement, which spell out why children need BOTH their parents. Children with fathers:

  • Are LESS likely to drop out of school;
  • Are LESS likely to run away from home;
  • Are LESS likely to become Pregnant or have an abortion;
  • Are LESS likely to commit suicide;
  • Are LESS likely to seek, or create an abusive relationship;
  • Are LESS likely to commit crimes;
  • Are LESS likely to turn to drugs or alcohol;
  • ADJUST better to separation than children with one custodian;
  • Are MORE likely to have successful relationships;
  • Are MORE likely to have healthy sleep patterns and general health.

Perhaps that was the reason fathers were banished from the family in the first place by feminists, operating as useful idiots for social engineers. A society that sees all of the above problems arise as the result of banishing dads, and makes it convenient for already Predatory Females to dispose of fathers while profiting from it, is, at least temporarily a more lucrative society.

Men have to work harder than ever before to pay exorbitant child support slavery payments, running like a rat in a wheel while women are never held accountable for how the money is spent. This creates a tremendous amount of waste. Men being forced to fork over 20% to 50% of their incomes, above and beyond what the state already takes in sky high income taxes get turned into paupers, but their extracted productivity creates more mindless spending and consumption than if dad had 50/50 time with his children.

More money flows into the economy than if dad wasn’t under duress to pay a supposedly “equal” woman like the queen she isn’t. Put simply, women are consummate materialists who spend more money in the economy on their children than dads would, because men look for other, more intrinsic means of being happy outside the world of materialism and gathering things as female gatherers do.

The above bullet points also make money move in other ways.

Dropouts create state-funded “help groups” designed at stemming the crisis. A runaway crisis means more “help groups” can be formed. Teen pregnancies keep abortion mills like Planned Parenthood running. Suicides create even more “help groups” in dad’s absence.  Abusive relationships help the state pass more laws to “protect” women and intrude into family affairs. Crimes help the growing Police State and lawyers stay busy.

Of course, people with unhealthy relationships are more susceptible to propaganda from the media and to manipulation by advertisers. Unhappy and unhealthy people, just sick enough to be medicated but just healthy enough to go to work are profitable for the medical-pharmaceutical complex.

So, in the end getting rid of dad is initially quite profitable for a society that seeks to create as many problems as it can with citizens’ lives to produce new revenue streams. Not to mention, one of the stated goals of world Communism (the corporate-government complex is de facto Communism) is breaking up the family so the state can mold children into passive adults who know how to do nothing but follow instructions and consume.

But, the gravy train doesn’t last forever.

Men, when welcomed to the supper table of the human family are the most powerful civilizing force there is. Getting rid of dad eventually means the entire society loses, as it degenerates and eventually crumbles in his absence. It should come as no surprise to any person who has studied the rise and fall of high cultures that treating dads the way Anglo America does will lead society to a more primitive state.

Perhaps that was the goal of social engineers all along. Bring it all down, and shape the ensuing chaos into a New World Order reflecting their dreams, not ours.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Predatory Females at Work: Emmanuel Sanders’ Wife Files for Divorce Just as He is Set to Earn $10 Million Bonus

Sanders

Yet another episode of Frivorce Rape Lotto: Emmanuel Sanders vs. Gabriella

Here’s a case study in why the awakened man should never put himself into the compromised position of being married these days. This case is still winding its way through the vagina-worshiping court system, but it sounds a number of alarm bells to the man who would glean knowledge from its details.

The press is having a field day with the Emmanuel Sanders divorce. We will look at it from a Red Pill perspective, yet another cautionary tale of what putting your scrotum into a legal vice grip yields when your bitch gets ready to flush you down the toilet.

Here goes. (This is all just one man’s opinion, of course.)

Their second baby hadn’t even been born yet, and already Denver Broncos Wide Receiver Emmanuel Sanders’ wife Gabriella was positioning herself for the kill. She was ready to cash in on his ass as her divorce lawyers had already begun writing up boilerplate legal screeds for the gynocentric, Anglo-American kangaroo courts. Gabriella served Sanders with divorce papers even before she squeezed out her annuity… er… child in the delivery room.

In case you haven’t noticed, children are nothing more than meal tickets to women in modern day Anglo-America. Fathers and fathers’ rights be damned. If women think they can’t cash in on their children, they simply go kill them at the abortion clinic. But, being married to an NFL player obviously ensures a nice, consistent stream of child support cash enforced by legal indentured servitude. (Pay up or go to jail.) We are living smack dab in the middle of one of the most insane socioeconomic systems in the history of mankind.

How much does she want? As reported by Meninist:

Gabriella is looking to score big as she is asking the courts for custody of their two children, a restraining order against Sanders, and she wants a “disproportionate” share of their assets. Ironically, Sanders is scheduled to make $13.2 million (includes $10 Million dollar signing bonus) this year from his 3 year $33 million dollar contract.

Disproportionate share, eh? Tell me again how women are not prostitutes and marriage is not legalized prostitution.

Witness, once again White Knights and fembots, The Predatory Female in action. Gabriella timed the divorce perfectly. She filed for divorce right before she pushed out her 18-year annuity that Sanders fathered. But she doesn’t just want a fat child support check. Oh, no. She wants a fat slice of the bonus he no doubt busts his ass to earn.

Sanders even reportedly said he was “blindsided” by the divorce. Ha. Yep, women will do that. They always hide their true feelings and emotions from men until they go for the jugular. This should come as absolutely no surprise to a regular reader of TNMM. Cynical as the truth may be, the truth is the truth. Women are financial predators of men, and in a society that has gone completely insane and let them frivorce rape with impunity, they’re cleaning out any men stupid enough to marry them.

Laughably, she is citing his side chicks as a reason she should be able to cash in. (I want money for the sex I gave you rule applies again!) From celebrity gossip rag TMZ:

The estranged wife of Denver Broncos WR Emmanuel Sanders has declared WAR on the NFL star — claiming he lied, cheated and spent THOUSANDS on chicks he was banging on the side.

Umm…THOUSANDS to an NFL player is like dropping a $50 to the average working slob. It seems Sanders was another fool who soon parted with his money to pay for these girls rather than a PUA. A player on the field, and another Beta with more money than common sense when it comes to women. TMZ rages on:

It’s all in ANGRY court docs filed by Gabriella Sanders — who blasts the father of her 2 children with a metaphorical bazooka right from the get go.

“When he’s not playing football on the field, he ‘plays the field’ with numerous women whom he is or has committed adultery.”

Big shocker. Knowing an NFL player will more often than not have multiple harems because women will lay down for rich and powerful men on command, nay throw themselves in front of his cock, she sets herself up as…you guessed it…the victim while she lends him enough rope to hang himself.

Gabby lays out multiple marital “atrocities” allegedly committed by her husband – and claims he spent “thousands upon thousands of dollars on girlfriends and wasting the community estate, even purchasing a vehicle for one of his illicit affairs.”

There is no doubt a personal investigator was used to follow Sanders around in order to gather information on him while she planned her frivorce rape lotto victory.

Incidents like these remind me of the Incident at the Bank I have written about numerous times, in which two Anglobitches compared notes about how much money their vaginas had rewarded them in divorce court as they cashed out at a Latin American teller. My opinion of women was already pretty low at that point. But I was forced to downgrade my opinion after witnessing that cackling display.

The long and short of it is only a fool marries an Anglobitch or a woman who has adapted to Anglo culture in today’s legal and social climate. That humble advice could have saved Sanders millions. Any other rich guys who I talk out of getting married, feel free to send me a nice contribution. I’ll take a fraction of what these hos will want out of you for my consulting fee.

The story of the Scorpion and the Frog applies: Men should not be asking why they were frivorce raped by a creature whose entire nature is built on dissimulation and acting. What they should be asking is why they were stupid enough to fall for the ruse. Taking advantage of men for material and economic gain is in women’s nature. And America was insane to let these instincts return, unchecked. It’s all just a downward spiral from here.

We’ll be on the sidelines keeping you advised of some of the more egregious frivorce rape lotto cases. These happen every day, it’s not like they’re uncommon.

Ergo, women always want money for sex. All the pleasantries around the exchange and myths of “love” and “marriage” and “commitment” are just sophistry and dissimulation. Find a divorce case in which women don’t want monetary remuneration for services performed, even in the YouGoGrrl age, and you will have found the proverbial needle in the haystack.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month. This article is the opinion of its author.

Cancer Center Founder’s Wife Demands $400k a Month in Divorce Case

Divorce-Stephenson.jpg

Is THAT woman worth $400,000 a month for the rest of your life? I bang better looking chicks than her every day of my life

As often shouted from the rooftops here at your advocate for masculinity, marriage has been reduced to a sophisticated game of prostitution in Anglo America. If you ever doubt that, the old maxim watch what women do, not what they say applies. When is the last time you saw a Strong, Independent Woman™ turn down a large divorce settlement and refuse to turn her ex-husband into an economic slave because she Don’t Need a Man™ and wants to maintain her lifestyle on her own?

Not going to happen, don’t hold your breath waiting for it.

In the latest high-profile demonstration of the oddities and evils of the American family court system and the shameless, predatory nature of Anglo women, Richard Stephenson, founder of the Cancer Treatment Centers of America and his ex-ho Alicia are duking it out in court and she is apparently salivating in anticipation of a VERY big payday.

400k

$400k a month for that? What the actual hell?! Jesus! I could be having eightsomes with hot 20 year olds at cocaine parties for a fraction of the price

In the case, Alica’s lawyer stated she lived in a celebrity lifestyle with the man of her dreams. Even better, by virtue of her having Nature’s Credit Card i.e. a vagina she is entitled to live that lifestyle for the rest of her life at Mr. Stephenson’s expense. (My wording, not the lawyer’s wording.)

She is seeking $400,000 a month to maintain her lifestyle.

Now, a few of issues arise here. First, why the fuck would any sane man want to get married in a male-hating society in which women really believe they are entitled to money because they provided sexual services in a marriage?

Second, why the fuck would any sane man get married when lawyers are swirling around like vultures ready to help women financially rape men?

Third, would you want to pay that much money for this old battle-axe? I wouldn’t give you $40 a month for her let alone $400,000. I bang better ass that that on a regular basis. Men, ALL WOMEN END UP LOOKING LIKE THIS. No matter how firm and high her tits and ass are when you seal your fate by signing your enslavement agreement/marriage certificate.

The story in the Chicago Tribune serves as a perfect demonstration of the predatory, frigid Anglo female in action. I almost feel like the narrator on National Geographic describing the play by play and explaining how she positions herself to someday financially rape this man.

First, you have your May-December romance.

He was a 51-year-old divorced father of four, an investment banker who had recently started the for-profit hospital network. She was a 26-year-old model and fashion coordinator.

Every white girl wants to be a model these days. Funny, I never heard of this plump strumpet before this court case became public knowledge.

Moving on.

Do you think Alicia was interested in Mr. Stephenson because he was a sterling man of character and she was madly in love? Or was she searching for a meal ticket and male utility value when she attached herself to him and inserted her tentacles?

The couple had one daughter together and traveled the world, flying by private jet among homes in Michigan, Colorado and the Virgin Islands, with staff at each.

Multiple homes. World travel. The modern day equivalent of kitchen slaves. Women like this don’t play around. If the check isn’t big enough and the lifestyle accoutrement not the envy of her pack of female predators, you don’t exist.

But the relationship eventually soured — what precipitated the breakup did not come up in opening statements — and Alicia filed for divorce in 2009, two years after she moved out of the estate.

Translation: She moved in for the kill.

She a Gold Digger

This is a typical performance of the Gold Digger. Find a ripe, plump target (plump from a financial standpoint) then reel him in using your feminine wiles and gifts of what Schopenhauer called dissimulation, hang out long enough to live it up on his dime while crucially sealing his fate by getting him to sign a marriage certificate, then when the novelty of being around him is over, call a lawyer and proceed to extricate the target’s money. That way, you won’t have the displeasure of having to be around him, but you get to keep his money.

At least Stephenson’s attorney David Grund tried a Strong, Independent Woman™ defense in court.

Grund contended Alicia Stephenson, who had a high school diploma and associate’s degree when the couple married, failed to live up to her part of the agreement because she didn’t continue her education so she could be “self-supporting.”

It won’t work. It’s not a question of if Mr. Stephenson will pay, but how much he will pay. The bitch won’t get $400,000 a month if Grund is worth his salt, but she nonetheless probably will never have to work again when it’s all said and done.

And women have the audacity to stay they’re oppressed. ROFLMAO.

Some men never seem to catch on to this tried and true method women use to financially rape men. Whether it’s the girl in the trailer park marrying a guy with a well-paying blue collar job then taking half of everything he owns, or an actress marrying an A-List actor then taking half, this is the female playbook at both the high and low ends of society.

It doesn’t matter if you’re dealing with a hooker or a gold-digging hussy, the transaction is always the same between women and Beta males: Pay 4 Play. Yet another example that marriage is nothing more than legalized prostitution in the modern age.

Oh, and just because somebody is rich doesn’t mean they’re not a Beta male idiot. This case reeks of Beta male stench. For $400,000 a month I could have 9s and 10s sitting on my face and wriggling in hourly rotation and multiple baby mamas and multiple homes abroad. Jesus, some men will never get it. No matter how much money they make. All that money for that pale and worn out piece of ass. Idiocy.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month. THIS ARTICLE IS THE OPINION OF ITS AUTHOR.

Heeding the Warning of The Married Beta Male Stare of Despair

beta-despair

While princess gossips on the phone, one poor bastard realizes the trap he’s gotten himself into – the marriage trap

The 2015 film The Life of an Unhappily Married Man got the look right. That’s it, that’s it right there. Have you seen it among your friends? It’s what I call the Married Beta Male Stare of Despair. Beer in hand, he looks on, completely emasculated as his gleeful wife knows she has a meal ticket in hand and thanks to our wonderful legal system, can do pretty much whatever she wants to him short of murder and get by with it. Nay, be cheered on by a male-hating society.

Once the Predatory Female has a man’s balls in a legal vice grip, no matter what happens she will walk away with cash and prizes. She can talk about being a Strong, Independent Woman™ until she’s blue in the face, yet we all know she will never, ever turn down a large divorce settlement. What a paradox.

Other examples of the Stare of Despair: As someone snaps a photo of the “happy” couple, the wife is happy in her new dress and perhaps standing in front of some new crap she bought and wants to show off in the photo, but the husband has a deeply troubled look on his face. Or, in moments of solitude the husband looks as if someone has been pissing in his Cheerios every morning of his life since he said those fateful, life-ending words, “I do.” If I’ve seen it once, I’ve seen it a thousand times. Usually among married couples who are friends of mine on Fakebook.

Just by looking at his face, one can see the weight hubby has upon him by virtue being saddled with the baggage of powering a materialistic lifestyle for wifey. He seems to be asking himself questions like: What have I gotten myself into? How the fuck am I supposed to pay for all this? Why can’t I ever satisfy her? Will she ever stop making so many demands? She doesn’t need all this crap I have to buy! What kind of creature can walk around bleeding for five to seven days and survive?

The smarter ones will be asking themselves questions like: How do I get out of this mess? If I fake my own death, can I get away from her and start a new life? If I put all my money in an offshore bank account under an assumed name, can I survive divorce?

At once, a Red Pill man feels sorry for the poor Beta bastard but at the same time realizes most of these guys are beyond redemption. Try to put an original thought in their head and a lifetime of cultural programming and brainwashing will make them lash out at you with the most incredible mental acrobatics as they voluntarily continue the life of a slave. Many won’t learn their lesson until they get put through the divorce meat grinder. Even then, once they’ve been stripped of their pride and their fortunes many men will still seek out another predatory female and let the new wife clean them out just like the old wife did. Just call it an unfortunate circumstance of nature. Many men have been programmed with the proclivity to become disposable meal tickets.

Not me.

sass

The look of submission as the husband bows his head and reads the newspaper, caving to wifey’s increasingly ridiculous demands

Hopeless, And Sexless

Beyond becoming hopeless, most men get married with the mistaken notion that it will guarantee them a lifetime supply of sex. As we will see, this is unfortunately not the case even though women definitely use marriage as little more than a front for legalized prostitution. What’s worse, the young, nubile thing you’ve married will be losing her SMV at an ever-increasing pace as she ages. After all, men age like wine and women age like milk.

A photo of a happy married couple (at least a year into their marriage, and in which the emotions aren’t being faked for the camera) is as rare as gold-pressed latinum. Once the female has the submission of the Beta male legalized on a piece of paper and knows she controls his destiny, she can proceed to live out her materialistic fantasies without a wit as to the financial, physical and emotional stress she is causing her new provider slave. What does her husband get for his participation? The bill. And utter hopelessness about his situation. As an added insult to injury, sex, and the quality of it, decreases after marriage.

A highly respected University of Chicago study found that, while the frequency of intercourse decreases by over 700%  between the ages of 20 and 70 among the general populace, among the married the decline is even more striking. Even among couples who rate their marriages as very happy and say they are still in love, frequency of intercourse declines. In another survey, 60% of couples stated that marriage had “completely ruined the excitement of having sex.”

Meantime, the vagabonds of society like me – chastised and loathed by bitter Betas and opportunistic females alike for being single and living a swinging lifestyle banging the 20 year olds Betas secretly wish they could have and that older women are jealous of – are happy swapping out sex partners almost as often as we change underwear. After all, variety in women is the spice of a heterosexual man’s life. Louann Brizendine’s book The Female Brain knows, paraphrased by a blogger:

Men are evolutionary designed for having sexual variety. They simply have a powerful HORMONAL drive to have many partners. Sexual involvement does not include in many cases emotional attachment and connection from man’s point of view.

Notice how easy some women speak negatively about male sexual drive. Particularly when a man is in a relationship. The same way someone who never had hunger can’t understand what a starving person might be feeling. Their craving for food may seem unnatural and “over-the-top”. The only advice men hear – shame on you, suppress it, it’s easy. Blaming men for their strong sexual drive will not bring any woman far. Only understanding and eventual acceptance will.

If a man does not satisfy his need for having more than one sexual partner – his interest towards his wife/girlfriend will gradually decrease. No amount of so-called “relationship advice” such as wife wearing sexy lingerie, having sex in unusual places, etc. will help to solve this issue.

In other words, men crave sexual variety, and marriage destroys sexual variety inasmuch as it destroys other things that make men happy – freedom, minimalism and not materialism, and control over their lives.

So, the Stare of Despair also reflects a longing for some “strange” that most married men will never realize once they’ve become the legal property of a female. (Incidentally, bringing up strange also brings up an opportunity for a teachable moment. When women cheat, it’s an attack on their partner. When men cheat, it’s because we are genetically programmed to seek out and plunder strange. Men with our characteristics survived nature’s and the female’s shit tests for a reason. Our ancestors spread their seed far and wide. Modern men still have those instincts. If women want men to stop having those instincts, they should stop being manipulative and cunning and give men guarantees of paternity and fidelity. That is not likely to happen, so our philandering is not likely to go away. Nice guys who attach themselves to females in a sexual jungle most certainly finish last. Only when female sexuality is tightly controlled – no pun intended – do Beta males flourish.)

al

Al Bundy is another great example of the Married Beta Male Stare of Despair

But putting that all aside, instead of falling into the trap today’s men should realize that until the current legal system is set afire and begun anew, marriage has no benefit for men. Want kids? She can take them away on a whim. Want to “do the right thing” and get married? You are literally gambling your entire financial future and freedom on an emotional and disloyal creature, not a rational one.

Have you seen the Stare of Despair among your friends and family? To me, it is one of the most convincing warnings against getting married there is. Just look at men who are married? Are the happy? Or are the miserable. Are they trying to hide their misery? That said, 1 in 10 married men may actually be clueless enough (or even more rarely, dominant enough) to have a happy marriage.

But the risks of being miserable are far higher than those of being happy. I don’t want to look like a totally defeated, married guy like Al Bundy in a few short years. (Many men also gain weight and become pudgy motherfuckers with no incentive to take care of themselves, or give a damn about their lives anymore.) Make sure to show the unhappy faces of married men you know to other potential meal tickets before they make the biggest mistake of their lives and sign on the dotted line of a marriage certificate. If even one heeds the warning, you will have performed a public service of incalculable value.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.