Category Archives: Divorce-Industrial Complex

John Cena Made Girlfriend Sign 75-Page Contract Before Moving In

Cena

Take note: John Cena protected his assets by making his live-in girlfriend sign a 75-page contract

In this day and age, a man can never take too many precautions when it comes to dealing with predatory females who are considered divine creatures and eternal victims by the court system. Especially, a woman who has been assimilated to the prevailing Anglobitch culture in a nation reeling from third-wave feminism.

WWE star John Cena is reported to have made his girlfriend Nikki Bella sign a 75-page contract before moving in. Of course, the mainstream press is chiding Cena’s decision to financially and legally protect himself from the well-known flightiness of women now that the two have split and she can’t frivorce rape him or receive other compensation. (If you read TNMM or other manosphere writers you know well women always want to be paid for sex, whether turning tricks on the corner or manipulating their way into marriage.)

Nikki complained about Cena’s decision to a sympathetic mainstream press before she moved in. All that’s missing from Nikki’s interview is a handkerchief and “My Heart Bleeds for Thee” playing on the violin. Fox News reports:

“I just don’t understand it. I just don’t know what to feel. I’m so confused,” Nikki said, according to People. “It kind of makes me second-guess where John and I stand in our relationship. I love John but maybe he knows that he doesn’t want to be with me forever?”

“Is that all I’m ever going to be in [John’s] heart, is a guest? Am I ever going to have that permanent spot in the rest of [his] life?” she said after seeing the contract.

It seems our boy John knows what users women are, and how feckless they can be when it comes to their relationships with men. And, how money hungry they become once a breakup happens. John’s mistrust of Nikki was prudent.

The contract stated Nikki Bella — who announced her split with Cena this week — would have to vacate the home immediately if the WWE stars broke up.

Knowing how unreliable American chicks are, Cena moved to protect his finances and personal property from the wrath of women who think they’re entitled to steal both once they get “tired” or “bored” in a relationshit.

Fox News doesn’t say who broke up with who, but women initiate the vast majority of breakups after they’ve extracted the money, status or resources they want from their male prey or, like a kitten, another shiny object (a higher status male) catches their eyes. Cena defended his decision to protect himself from a vicious legal system and a misandrist culture:

Cena [explained] the agreement was done to protect his finances so he can support his family members.

“You met my family. You think my mom paid for that house herself? She didn’t. My brother lives in that house, they’re expecting a child. My younger brother, he’s got medical problems. I make sure he’s okay. I always tell them, I’m a horrible brother, but I try to be the best provider that I can,” Cena said in 2016. “I just don’t want to ever be in a position where that’s in jeopardy.”

Cena apparently caught on to the predatory female game after a previous divorce.

Cena was previously married to Elizabeth Huberdeau but got divorced in 2012 after three years.

“Having been through that process, here is how I view it. It is like buying a handgun for home defense. It gives you a sense of security, and it gives you a failsafe in case something happens,” Cena said. “And those who buy a handgun for self-defense pray, pray they never have to use it. Without it, it’s a dog fight.”

It’s worse than a dog fight, it’s a suicide mission in Anglo culture. Women can mow a man down like a scythe through fresh spring grass in court.

Take note, men. Letting a woman move in these days is a really bad move, but if you really must have a steady supply of sex and empty female companionship have her sign a contract stating she’s just a house guest before she moves in.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Backpage Shutdown Further Represses Sexually Unfulfilled U.S.

lips-327493_1280

The American police state is cracking down on online prostitution in a neo-Puritan culture

Following President Trump’s signage of the FOSTA act, the American police state made a power grab that immediately put a lot of sex workers out of business. It also worsened the incel lives of desperate Johns who use their services in an erotophobic culture. FIB and assorted alphabet agencies claimed they were saving women from horrible, profitable lives as sex workers by using the agency’s iron first to close down Arizona-based Backpage.

Surprisingly, one lamestream media outlet is playing devil’s advocate and finally asking questions that never got asked before thugs in blue barged in to arrest Backpage’s purveyors. From AZ Central, an Arizona-based news outlet:

The site had served as a microcosm of a larger debate on prostitution in recent years, and the seizure of what the DOJ called the “Internet’s leading forum for prostitution ads” ignited swift reactions on both sides.

Well, not quite AZ Central. The general public never got to have a “debate” over prostitution. Government officials had that debate for us and didn’t bother to ask our opinion about what they were doing. Local news channels and the totality of corporate controlled media have consistently adhered to an anti-sex, anti-freedom, anti-male, anti-sex worker doxy.

The narrative in the Puritan press following the shutdown was universally as follows: Prostitution evil, Backpage shut down, female victims protected by Big Daddy Government.

Of course, establishment YouGoGrrls who run the Anglobitch plantation cheered the move, no doubt as a way of tightly controlling men’s sexual options in a culture that regularly profits from the financial exploitation of men who are so desperate for love women can make them do just about anything for it. A top Republicrat was front and center in her support for the move.

Anti-sex-trafficking advocates, including Cindy McCain, cheered Backpage’s demise as a blow to an abusive industry.

As usual, Police State USA didn’t bother listening to the women who provide sexual services and the men who purchase them. Even seasoned sex workers say men are desperate for female affection, and are a far cry from the sexual deviants a sexually repressive culture makes them out to be. Sometimes they don’t even pay for sex – but to have someone to talk or to cuddle with. However, working girls had to take to social media to have their opinions heard.

Meanwhile, sex workers across the U.S. and Canada swarmed social media to air concerns rarely heard in political discourse: To them, Backpage’s demise meant the end of safeguards and a reliable revenue stream in a profession that’s not going anywhere.

“They’re devastated,” said Laura Dilley, executive director of PACE, a Vancouver-based nonprofit that advocates for decriminalizing prostitution.

That’s a narrative you never hear on the news. Sex workers having their lives devastated by tyrannical government moves. Much less a narrative that talks about men having another sexual outlet taken from them in a culture in which 80% of men are now “not good enough” for female affection, even from land whales.

The American government never learns. Prohibitions only push banned activities underground. Alcohol prohibition did it. The drug prohibition has done it. And banning prostitution has done it. Worse, the obtuse nature of do-gooders in the police state means they don’t see the problems their actions create.

If sex workers can’t advertise online, they can’t screen their clients beforehand and are forced back out to bars and into the street, Dilley said.

Never is this angle presented in the Puritan press. That sex work isn’t going anywhere, there will always be a demand for it (even more so in the Law of the Jungle Anglo culture of today) and now women who need the money will be forced to ply their trade in riskier ways.

“There’s a lot of uncertainty; a lot of grief and fear,” said Jelena Vermilion, a sex worker based outside of Toronto. “A lot of people are essentially planning to be homeless, planning how to fall gracefully as much as possible…From Friday, a lot of these people haven’t had any calls.”

A Michigan woman who goes by the name Sarah Fenix on Twitter posted a viral thread about how the ability to screen on Backpage saved her from riskier sex work.

Even though women who sell sex say Backpage made them safer, their arguments fell on predictably deaf ears inside the thuggish law enforcement agencies Americans now suffer.

In a press statement, FBI Director Christopher Wray said Backpage’s closing strips traffickers of a key tool. “This website will no longer serve as a platform for human traffickers to thrive,” he said. “Whether on the street or on the Internet, sex trafficking will not be tolerated.”

The product of neo-Puritan feminism and a gynocentric culture, a few fantastic and unrepresentative cases of child sex trafficking were used as a pretext to stop all adults from advertising and seeking sexual services on the web. FIB touted a passel of cases as the “norm” on Backpage, cases which it used to arrest Backpage’s CEO and other members of his team.

Of the 17 victim narratives in the indictment, only three do not mention a pimp or trafficker. Of the three women who apparently posted their own ads, two were killed by customers.

That was the pretext. Never mind the hundreds of thousands or millions of men and women who used Backpage’s service responsibly. Police State USA excels at finding rare abuses of liberty then “cracking down” with oppressive (and in this case, repressive) legal action stripping those liberties from everyone.

It’s the old “trade a lot of liberty for the illusion of security” game that’s been going on since time immemorial. The Founding Fathers of the U.S. warned against falling prey to this tactic of tyrants, but barrel-bellied Americans don’t seem to notice the tightening leash around their necks.

Meantime, Anglobitches and their social engineer controllers have once again been successful in tightening their grip on the supply of sex in an attempt to make male demand of it benefit them more and more financially. It won’t work. Men are already calling the bluff, and would rather go MGTOW, end up alone, or flee to less erotophobic cultures rather than betting the farm on some pasty tail.

Why sex workers and incel men allow themselves to be abused and controlled like this by an oppressive government remains beyond my comprehension.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

No More Frivorce Rape: British Judge Says Paying Women After a Divorce is Ludicrous

family-3090056_1280

The most senior British family court judge is calling for fairer treatment of men – and women aren’t happy

It seems Anglo men finally have an advocate in the form of Britain’s most senior family court judge. Sir James Munby has called for the abolition of male slavery and forced wealth transfer payments to women brought on by the divorce-industrial complex. In a speech to lawyers given just before his forthcoming retirement this summer, Munby said it’s ludicrous that men still have to pay women after a divorce in this age of the Empowered™ YouGoGrrl. The Daily Mail writes:

Britain’s most senior family judge called for an overhaul of marriage law yesterday, saying people would one day laugh at the idea that a man had to support his ex-wife for life. Sir James Munby called for equality for divorcees when maintenance payments are settled by the courts, highlighting ‘absurd’ divorce settlements that are unfairly biased against men.

Isn’t it funny how women eschew equality when it comes to treating men equally or assuming equal responsibility for their spendthrift lives?

Munby is right the forced wealth transfers are often destructive to male lives, as the Anglobitch blog recently highlighted with the case of a surgeon whose life was financially and then legally destroyed after a divorce. The surgeon’s plight was highlighted by a prison guard who grew tired of seeing good men thrown into modern day debtor’s prisons because they couldn’t pay their exes. The prison guard wrote:

The very worst case I saw as a prison guard was a surgeon, yes an American surgeon who was one of the most respectable guys I ever met, hard working, worked until 2 a.m. 6 days a week to save people’s lives. With all the work hours, his wife got “lonely” and started sleeping around, eventually having 2 kids that weren’t even his as he found out later.

And then she filed for divorce so she could take the surgeon’s money, blow it on cocaine and stupid luxuries for herself without doing any work herself (that’s the real destination where the “child support” money goes) and sleep around with her favorite Chad of the week, all on her hard working surgeon ex-husband’s money. She won an insanely high judgment in a US family court, millions of dollars in child support and “alimony” that the poor surgeon would have to pay.

Since by the court’s judgment, “she should be entitled to maintain the same standard of living after the divorce”, even though this greedy gold-digging Anglobitch is the one who filed for the divorce to steal from her hard-working husband who was actually saving people’s lives.

Of course, the surgeon couldn’t keep up with the insanely high cost of the forced wealth transfers, was promptly stripped of his medical license and for failing to make court-ordered payments, and eventually thrown into prison.

This is the very type of injustice Munby seeks to eradicate from the court system. The judge went on to assail the presumption that men are in charge in modern marriage, which is of course a total farce because women initiate the vast majority of divorces and hold all the cards in the legal system.

He said it had taken too long to rid the law of the Victorian notion that men were in charge in a marriage, and the law was marked by “hypocrisy and lack of intellectual honesty”.

Munby also said future generations will judge the current situation harshly – a legal system featuring unchecked female supremacy in family courts.

“Past judicial utterances we now find almost absurd should serve as a terrible warning of how history will, in due course, come to judge the present generation.”

Meantime, the Anglo world continues to practice overt misandry in the court system, and the culture at large. Nowhere else in the world are men trodden upon by the legal system as in the Anglosphere. While Munby’s call for justice for men is refreshing, don’t expect reform anytime soon. Lawyer Jill Kirby offered vociferous opposition to the judge’s call to end the female gravy train. Kirby called for Munby’s resignation:

“He wants to remove fault from marriage break-up, which is unfair to a faithful partner. This is a highly political speech. He should step down.”

It’s obvious from Kirby’s comments there’s a long road ahead until female responsibilities (like assuming financial responsibility for their own lives) catch up with the pace of their privileges.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Anglo Misandry: Deadliest Mass Shooters Grew Up in Homes Without Fathers

gun-1678989_1280

The deadliest mass shootings are perpetrated by young boys without fathers

The Anglosphere is destroying itself with cultural and institutional misandry, brought on by the madness of modern feminism. Turning fathers into little more than disposable accessories that women change as often as designer handbags, Anglo common law and the insidious divorce-industrial complex have had a bigger part in destroying the fabric of society than guns by eliminating the roles of men and fathers.

Supporting this claim, this thought crime fact just dropped: 26 of the 27 deadliest mass shooters grew up in homes without a father. That’s 96% of them. This astonishing truth was the first casualty in the orgy of gun control madness following the events at Parkland and every other mass shooting tragedy of recent memory. (If government narratives are even to be believed. But, lets take them at face value while we analyze the biographies of the purported mass shooters.)

Surprisingly, Fox News and other mainstream outlets are now picking up on narratives formed in the crucible of manosphere Realtalk. After being out to lunch on men’s issues for generations, our collective voices are finally being heard by the spinmeisters. They now acknowledge the Anglosphere’s regular mistreatment of men and the destruction of the institution of marriage, on which all of civilization is based are having detrimental effects:

The root of fatherlessness rests in two things: our culture’s dismissal of men as valuable human beings who have something unique to offer, and its dismissal of marriage as an institution that’s crucial to the health and well-being of children.

What the U.S. needs is single mom control, not gun control. Astonishingly, Fox also outed manipulative behavior from mothers in their expose on mass shootings and single mommery.

The unfortunate result is that some divorced mothers use any opportunity to undermine their children’s relationship with their father or, if not that, dismiss the significance of a father’s role. In 2016, when Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt were getting divorced, Jolie actually said it never crossed her that mind her son “Mad” would need a father. That may be an extreme example; but it’s not something anyone, Hollywood star or regular person, would have thought—let alone said—twenty years ago.

Indeed, dads and men in general are considered nothing more than “the help” in modern Anglo society, bumbling idiots and disposable meal tickets as Jolie’s remarks attest to. Male roles are supposed to be limited to writing checks and handing out money unconditionally while “wise” women spend it on reckless consumerism.

The child support check clearing is all that matters. And if “dads” don’t pay up, it’s debtor’s prison for them. What makes the child support fiasco even worse is the fact that by virtue of paying such high amounts, fathers are less able to spend quality time with their children by virtue of the fact they have to work themselves to the bone to stay out of debtor’s prison.

The masses of men are catching on to their mistreatment. Derek posted this comment in response to the report exposing the correlation between fatherless homes and mass shootings:

Most women don’t seem to think it’s important to have the father around who is an equal stakeholder – they’d rather have the control and collect money every month, who cares what’s best for the kid. The courts seem to agree, as they tend to only let the dads have every other weekend in most cases.

We know well the certitude of Derek’s statement. Realizing that I was to be nothing but a slave – never on equal footing with women with regards to my own children in the eyes of Anglo law – is a big part of the reason why I developed a visceral hatred for Anglo culture, and have been clawing my way out to live a better life abroad.

Not to mention compounding factors like the way men are shamed for having normal sex drives, the way heterosexuality is marginalized, family is marginalized, and 80% of men have become incel at least part of the time by the sexual jungle unleashed by feminism. These men forced to watch as quality women ruin their lives and the nation cock carouseling with bad boys, and “good guys” getting nothing but wage slavery and loneliness in return.

Don’t expect change even though word of the modern man’s plight is now oozing out into the mainstream dialogue. The best option for most men is still to abandon this failed society by expatriating or to drop out and enjoy the decline poolside.

Any solutions that are applied (if these Realtalk reports aren’t quickly shuffled under the rug) will be at best bandages, since the destruction of men and the family is a major agenda item of the New World Order. Not to mention, a goal of appropriately named deconstructionism and post-modernism – previously discussed here at TNMM – which is becoming the dominant philosophy in America’s universities.

A world of total chaos – brought on by matriarchy – is what the elite crave. The more broken down a society is, the more profitable it becomes.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Slavery Never Ended in America: It Still Exists in Family Courts

Couple

After the sex act, men have absolutely no reproductive rights and few legal rights

American politicians love to self-righteously pat themselves on the back, play the race card, and genuflect before audiences about the horrors of slavery. Oh, what backwards times those were. Surely, lessons have been learned after slavery died as the de facto labor system worldwide, and we will never again subject another human being to work under threat of imprisonment or other indignities.

Well…not so fast. Husbands and fathers that are dumped by Anglobitches in that misandrist nation are once again subject to enslavement.

As is the case with almost anything politicians say, the harsh truth shows just the opposite. Indeed, slavery was legally abolished in 1865, but it has been resurrected in the family court system. Men are being forced, by the vicious teeth of the Anglo legal system to make wealth transfer payments to women despite the fact that in the 21st century every female claims to be a Strong, Independent Woman™ who Don’t Need a Man™.

Evidence shows quite the opposite of these bold feminist claims. Women do need a man. At least, a man slave. And they especially need his child support and/or alimony check to clear every month. Meantime, the male prey item (referencing the apt term found in the classic book The Predatory Female) is reduced from father to sperm donor by the legal system if a relationshit or marriage doesn’t work out.

This predatory system has become big business in the world’s preeminent sellout culture. A National Fatherhood Initiative report exposes the big business child support has become in the U.S.:

From 2001-2012, the federal Office of Child Support Enforcement reports a whopping increase of 50 percent in child support collections from $21 billion to $31.6 billion.

That’s 50% growth over the course of a decade of the child support gravy train – outstripping the growth of most businesses. As we will see, men are being literally turned into financial slaves of ex-wives or ex-girlfriends. Worse, women initiate or cause 4 out of 5 divorces, so they hold the cards when it comes to male liberty and slavery.

Feminists and the misandrist Anglo legal system have succeeded in usurping male rights by implanting this toxic mentality into the minds of several generations of women in the Anglosphere: What woman needs the inconvenience a man represents (with his needs for food, love, and sex) when the fruits of his labor can be forcibly extracted and delivered by Big Daddy Government?

CS_Court

The family court system frequently turns men into servants

What is Slavery?

Let’s look at some definitions of slavery to see if forced child support and alimony payments fit the definition.

How much are men forced to pay into the system? Child support alone averages $500 a month per child, and alimony for a man who makes $5,000 a month would be an additional $1,600 a month payment in most states. These are payments that must be made whether or not the newly minted slave of the government gynocracy can afford them, whether or not he has a job, and with no regards to his personal health or well-being.

American men are being forced to make a wealth transfers to women under threat of imprisonment and/or having both professional and driver’s licenses revoked, with no accountability on the part of the mother to show that the funds are being spent exclusively for the benefit of the child, or if she even needs the alimony in this age of career girls. It would appear this scheme fits the textbook definition of slavery well:

  1. The state or condition of being a slave; a civil relationship whereby one person has absolute power over another and controls his life, liberty, and fortune
  2. the subjection of a person to another person, esp. in being forced into work
  3. work done in harsh conditions for low pay

The current child support and alimony system in the U.S. fits textbook slavery definitions #1 and #2 very well. When men lose driver’s and professional licenses after falling behind on court mandated wealth transfers to women, slavery definition #3 comes into play.

In fact, a recent expose by a prison guard turned expat on Rookh Kshatriya’s excellent blog illustrates how men who contribute to society are being betrayed by both women and their government. He tells the story of a surgeon whose life was destroyed by a predatory Anglobitch, a man who went from saving lives to doing work in harsh conditions for low pay:

The very worst case I saw as a prison guard was a surgeon, yes an American surgeon who was one of the most respectable guys I ever met, hard working, worked until 2 a.m. 6 days a week to save people’s lives. With all the work hours, his wife got “lonely” and started sleeping around, eventually having 2 kids that weren’t even his as he found out later. And then she filed for divorce so she could take the surgeon’s money, blow it on cocaine and stupid luxuries for herself without doing any work herself (that’s the real destination where the “child support” money goes) and sleep around with her favorite Chad of the week, all on her hard working surgeon ex-husband’s money. She won an insanely high judgment in a US family court, millions of dollars in child support and “alimony” that the poor surgeon would have to pay. Since by the court’s judgment, “she should be entitled to maintain the same standard of living after the divorce”, even though this greedy gold-digging Anglobitch is the one who filed for the divorce to steal from her hard-working husband who was actually saving people’s lives.

After a few years of doing this, and losing his house and his nice car, the poor surgeon threw out his back while helping a patient onto an operating table. He had to cut down his hours as a surgeon, and went to the divorce court asking for a reduction in the support demands, and ask that his lazy, spoiled brat bitch ex-wife get a damn job herself. But the court refused using the same delusion filled imputation bullshit they pull on other ex-husbands, claiming he could somehow make millions of extra dollars using his surgical wizard skills somehow. Which he couldn’t do in reality with his injured back, something the family court judge couldn’t or wouldn’t even try to understand. So then now the alimony and child support were demanding 120% of his income. You see, the family court system will never let you off the treadmill once they target you, especially if you earn a lot of money. Eventually he drained his savings and retirement, couldn’t make the payments at all—and he wound up in the prison where I was a corrections officer.

The corrupt American family court-media-feminist-academia cultural Marxist-big business-prison industrial complex had worked perfectly to ruin this poor man, and what a prize they had. A dedicated, hard working US surgeon, saving lives every day, drained of his money and reduced to poverty by a gold-digging, spoiled greedy bimbo who divorced him due to his very dedication, had kids with other men to force him to pay bullshit “child support” in addition to never-stopping alimony, his assets taken by his gold-digging ex wife and the state to grease their own corruption, the “child support” in actuality supporting the ex wife’s corrupt, hedonistic lifestyle after divorce. And then the poor surgeon himself made a literal slave in a US prison, stripped of his license and made a perpetual debtor, worked to the bone but never allowed to profit from his own efforts or hard work. That really is how it works in the US family court and prison system. That poor surgeon was the worst case we ever saw, made us so mad we were talking about how we were going to “free the Bastille” and start a revolution ourselves to stop all the corruption, Robespierre style. And free all the innocent men, and even some women, who were imprisoned this way, to feed more slaves to the machine.

As this case shows, women have absolute power over men in the court system. A man’s life, liberty and finances are subject to forfeiture by an oppressive, legalistic system simply because he had a failed relationship with an Anglobitch.

Let’s look at another definition of slavery.

Slavery is a legal or economic system in which principles of property law are applied to humans allowing them to be classified as property, to be owned, bought and sold accordingly, and they cannot withdraw unilaterally from the arrangement. While a person is enslaved, the owner is entitled to the productivity of the slave’s labor, without any remuneration.

Being forced to pay a woman in order to stay out of jail means men have become property owned by the state, as men are bought by the court system and sold by women into their bondage – and of course men cannot withdraw from the arrangement. A man’s owner, the state, entitles itself as well as his ex to the productivity of the newly minted slave’s labor for 18 years or even for a lifetime in the case of alimony, forcing payments to be made to a totally unaccountable “mother” or ex.

Legs

Women have the right to choose, therefore men must be given the right to choose in the interest of equality

Legal Abortion: Men’s Right to “Choose”

How do we remedy this situation in the interest of men’s rights? A start would be giving men the right to a legal abortion.

One of the conditions of slavery is the fact a party to the “agreement” cannot withdraw unilaterally from the arrangement. It’s is an interesting condition to elaborate on. Men in the United States have no legal rights to withdraw from being fathers after conception, even though women can physically abort their child anytime they choose. This means women have all the power over men and their children’s lives, and men have none. In effect, all a woman has to do is find an idiot who makes a good salary to impregnate her, then she gets a guaranteed income for 18 years. (If he marries her, potentially an income for life!)

At the very least, to give men the rights granted to slaves in 1865 – to unilaterally withdraw from the arrangement – American lawmakers need to follow the model recently proposed by the Swedish, reported by the Daily Mail. Interestingly,  the idea of “legal abortions” came from European liberals:

Expectant fathers in Sweden should have the right to ‘legally abort’ their unborn child up until the 18th week of pregnancy, the youth wing of the country’s Liberal Party has proposed. Swedish Liberal Youth argues that men should be given an equal say in whether or not they wish to become a parent, and be granted the option to cut any lawful responsibilities. The suggested ‘legal abortion’ would be irreversible and would see the man renounce all parental duties and rights to see the child once it has been born.

Men are currently given no say in whether or not they wish to become a parent after the sex act. Once again we see bias against men in society, while women play the victim card to their benefit.

Fathers

Statistically, women are more likely to become deadbeats than men

Deadbeat Moms

To illustrate one of the many hypocrisies of Anglo culture, let’s examine a term of scorn heaped upon men who can’t make the expected wealth transfers. The phrase Deadbeat Dads is a popular one on the left and in the media. But we never hear the term Deadbeat Moms, even though women have a higher percentage of child support defaults (i.e. falling behind or not paying) than men. Deadbeat moms occur at 1.2 times the rate of deadbeat dads in Anglo America:

  • 32% of custodial fathers did not receive child support payments from “mom”
  • 25% of custodial mothers did not receive child support payments from “dad”

Delving into the numbers, child support statistics get even more interesting. Mothers default more often even though they are not forced to pay as much as fathers by the court system.

  • The average due to custodial mothers is $4,800 annually
  • The average due to custodial fathers is $4,100 annually

So, even though women do not have to pay as much child support as men do, they become deadbeats more often. The media never discuss this, nor do lawmakers. Also, thanks to a gynocentric court system that displays the opposite of “equality” leftists and feminists claim to hold so dear:

  • 84% of the time women get custody
  • 16% of the time men get custody

If equality was truly a desired outcome, rather than women continuing to enjoy all legal rights and privileges men would get custody 50% of the time, or both parties would co-parent (as is done in Iceland) and neither would be forced by the legal system to make payments to the other.

sperium-2505952_1280

Men need to be more than sperm donors in the eyes of the law

A Rising Tide of Men Speaking Out

There is good news. Men are now throwing off the culturally-imposed prohibitions on speaking out against a system that abuses them.

Male utility is often cited as the only use women have for men in the modern age. In the long darkness before humanity became civilized, men were not given roles in society. After giving men roles in society, civilization flourished. By banishing fathers from the matriarchal kingdom, we have regressed, not progressed as a society.

As alluded to earlier, there has been some kickback to this model of female privilege and superiority, however. Daniela Carrigo posted this comment on the National Fatherhood Initiave’s page:

As a woman it infuriates me that dads’ sites always start with ‘respect the child’s mom’ and mom’s sites never mention dad. Dad sites say ‘pay child support’ or ‘be fiscally responsible for your child’ and mom sites, not so much – like – never.

You want to protect marriage? Make giving dads custody and making moms pay child support the NORM. All studies show moms start divorce proceedings or, in the majority of births today, never marry dad – why, alimony is on its way out but child support is tax free and GUARANTEED.

Cut off the free cow and women (as one I know) will stop raising kids dad free with free money. Get a damn job and stop expecting money from the man you keep the child from! You should be able to earn enough to not need child support OR you don’t DESERVE THE CHILD!!!!

Indeed, there is rarely if ever any question of accountability on the part of the mother. Men are blamed from the moment the sex act occurs, while women are not blamed for spreading their legs. Women receive government benefits for children they can’t afford, while men are sent to prison for children they can’t afford.

Men at Yahoo! Answers also give us a taste of the dirty underbelly of the Anglo American family court system:

Think about it, the man has his monthly income taken away from him. Not to mention he can go to jail for not paying this fine. This utterly DESTROYS any motivation the man may have to work harder/improve his performance or start a business for example, what’s the point if his hard-earned money is just stolen from him?

Meanwhile, the woman is free to mess around w/ other guys w/ the money she receives for free from her former victim. The financial needs of the child are almost always a small fraction of what she receives, and so she is free to spend the extra money on purses/shoes/jewelry, etc.

The saddest part is, the man is denied of seeing his child either by the woman or the Gov’t, despite any attempts he may try to make contact. Even worse is when the woman trains the kid to hate his dad by calling him a “deadbeat” or a “loser”, when in fact this is usually further from the truth (MOST fathers will not abandon their kid).

Child support is nothing but slavery. The fact that a few careless/manipulative women can exploit the system to deny honest men contact with their children WHILE stealing 50-60% of their hard-earned income is just wrong.

The Yahoo! discussion continues with this response:

I totally agree with you. That’s why more men are foregoing the marriage and staying single. I can tell you that if my wife and I divorced I would never get remarried. Divorces are slanted against men. Women are so vindictive when it comes to revenge that they can’t see how their actions are hurting men and their own kids. If the courts were a lot more fair and the lawyers a lot less greedy then men would not be so afraid of the marriage contract or the results of some woman with dollar bills in her eyes.

It’s true. Men are waking up to the fact that any dealing with an Anglo American women puts their entire lives in jeopardy. (A fact made even truer by the recent spate of #MeToo sexual witch trials in this Neo-Puritan, anti-male, anti-sex, anti-procreation, feminist culture.)

Rather than this unfortunate circumstance happening by accident, the outcome of enslaving men with their own children has long been the aim of the social engineers who have this nefarious goal: make sex and reproduction so risky for men they will not reproduce, which will lead to population control.

At least, that’s the idea in theory. In reality, it means that good, hardworking, law-abiding men are not reproducing because of the hell the legal system has created, but thugs and bad boys are reproducing because they are often in trouble with the law anyway and don’t give a damn. Statistics bear this out: Criminals have an average of 3.0 children per lifetime, while the average for the rest of the population is 1.75 children per lifetime.

The penalty for slaves who don’t pay once they are indentured by a state that meddles in family matters is discussed below, from the same Yahoo! Answers board.

If you come up short on child support you immediately get a warrant issued. The best solution I’ve seen for a more equitable solution for child support would be for the custodial parent to provide receipts to CSA and checks issued as valid reimbursements (just like a FSA account), any money not used out of that month gets returned. This will separate the good responsible parents from the not so responsible parents, unaccountable money leads to fraud and theft.

The stories of this waste of child support money are numerous among men I know. In one case, a friend of mine is forced to make $1,500 in child support payments each month. However, his kids go around in raggedy clothing while mommy dearest drives a Cadillac Escalade and always looks like she just walked out of the mall. And he’s powerless to do anything about it.

Finally, the breakup of family and subjugation of men also means the corporate-government complex will have more control over the minds of the next generation of children than ever before.

BallChain

The figurative ball and chain still exists in Anglo America’s family court system

Slavery Still Exists

As these facts show, slavery literally still exists for men of all colors in the United States of America. If women are truly seize the mantle of the empowerment they purport to desire so badly, they must not be given a legal crutch with which they can support their past bad choices, including choosing fathers they could not reasonably have expected to stay with until the children they create are raised.

We have discussed definitions of slavery. Here is a term women need to learn, as it comes with the territory of an empowered individual:

Accountability is an obligation or willingness to accept responsibility or to account for one’s actions.

To be Empowered™, women must also become accountable. Big Daddy Government and his welfare state, i.e. Uncle Sugar is an enabler of bad choices for women, and his enabling of reckless and predatory female behavior must be stopped. Men are already being held legally accountable for their actions, however men do not get the same privileges women do. There are four ways to rectify this injustice:

  • Men need to have reproductive rights which are on par with those of women. My body, my choice needs to have the legal equivalent of Me Being Enslaved, My choice. Men must be given the right to a legal abortion if women are given the rights to a physical abortion. This will force women to be prudent about reproductive decisions.
  • Gynocentrism in the courts must be eliminated. Men must be legally recognized as more than sperm donors and check-writers, and fathers must be given custody o children half the time; or, Anglo law should adopt a model in which custody is shared and no forced payments are created by the court system.
  • The no fault divorce system must be abandoned and Anglo law must return to a model in which fault must be proven to get a divorce.
  • Even better, the government needs to stay out of familial matters between two adults as much as possible and let them sort out the matters for themselves.

But we all know women don’t really want to be empowered. They want their cake and ice cream, rights AND privileges, and to eat them both. However, this system will utterly destroy the social fabric in the Anglosphere.

The current legal system makes men totally disposable rather than stakeholders in the family and society. Many of us feel this is by design of social engineers and Marxists rather than a result of any real concern about women’s rights. The true goal of such a system is to reduce mothers and fathers to squabbling factions who wage war on each other in the court system, allowing lawyers, judges, and those allied with this unjust system to make a living off the backs of the common man.

Leaving the family in the hands of a corrupt government is destroying it. As George Orwell put it: The real division is not between conservatives and revolutionaries but between authoritarians and libertarians. Authoritarians have created Big Daddy Government, an authoritarian monstrosity that has removed real fathers from society and enslaved them. Libertarians are trying, unfruitfully, to get the government out of our families.

Until then, the best options for men who know they’ve been betrayed by both their women and their government are to go MGTOW, Go Galt, or become an expat and leave the hateful Anglosphere altogether.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

MSM Lists Reasons Women Get Divorced, But We Tell You The Real Reason

woman-1979272_1280

Everything is just fine and dandy in a relationshit or marriage – as long as you’re literally paying your dues to the female

The MSM loves to come up with clever, psuedo-explanations for just about everything. It’s an industry that runs on pretty lies.

Low-paid, gynocentric propagandists recently compiled a nice and tidy, hamster-wheel inspired listing of why women divorce men, and published the results in Business Insider. TNMM decided to peruse the claims and come up with our own, Red Pill conclusions rather than trusting those who have turned deception into an art form to tell us why divorces happen.

Right away, we can glean bias in the article by merely scratching the surface. The first mistake the story makes is assuming “couples” get divorced, when the plain truth is women initiate or are directly responsible for three-quarters or more of divorces. The report about why “couples” get divorced (as if men have any say in the matter) was driven by research conducted by Psychology Today:

When it comes to studying divorce, social scientists have two options. They can observe different couples and try to figure out on their own what predicts the end of a marriage, or they can simply ask people why their marriage ended.

Enter Hamster Rationalizations to taint the results. Asking women why they got divorced isn’t scientific, as females can effortlessly come up with a pocket full of excuses to hide their ulterior motives. Further, henpecked, Blue Pill men often go along with what women say was the cause of divorce without sticking up for their own interests. In any case, here’s the study’s methodology:

Researchers either ask participants to choose from a list of potential reasons for divorce, or they ask participants to answer an open-ended question about why they divorced.

Here are the reasons listed by this non-scientific study of divorce, based on research from psychologist Scott M. Stanley:

  • Infidelity: Predictably, this is blamed on men. The study highlighted this response: “He cheated on me … Then I met somebody else and did the same thing. And when he found out about it we both essentially agreed that it wasn’t worth trying to make it work anymore because it just hurt too bad.” Maybe he started cheating because she sucked in bed. (I just wrote an article discussing good sex vs. bad sex.) Maybe she could have used some pointers on how to be better in bed. (Women always enjoy giving men pointers on how we can do… everything… better. Why not return the favor?) Maybe she, like most women, turned into an ice cube when she didn’t get something she wanted (like $$$) out of him.
  • Substance Abuse: Also, blamed on men. From the study: “I said ‘absolutely no more bars’ and as soon as I found out he was back in them, I asked for [a divorce].” Never is the idea that maybe a bitch who is hell on wheels drives a man to drink. In my Beta days, I had several Anglobitches that made me want to drown my problems with tequila.
  • Lack of commitment: You guessed it. The man’s fault. Do you see a trend emerging from the gynocentric media? “It became insurmountable. It got to a point where it seemed like he was no longer really willing to work [on the relationship]. All of the stresses together and then what seemed to be to be an unwillingness to work through it any longer was the last straw for me.”
  • Too much conflict and arguing: I’m sure the belligerant tone we’ve already seen from women who chimed in on this study has nothing to do with conflict. Hell, I can barely stand to be in the same room as two loud-mouthed, entitled Anglobitches clucking around like hens laying an egg. Moreover, lock me in a room with a woman who treats me like I’m her man slave, and there will be arguments.
  • Growing apart: A female favorite. We’ll translate this hamster rationalization for you – Beta bucks guy isn’t thrilling her with the emotional ups and downs she grew accustomed to while riding Alphas on the cock carousel. So, cupcake feels herself growing apartNever to women seem to grasp the fact Betas are boring because they have to be.
  • Getting married too young: Actually, getting married young is how our grandparents managed to stay together 50+ years. What man wants to marry scratch and dent merchandise at age 35? But, here comes another neat rationalization spun off the hamster wheel: “The main reason [we divorced] was because of our age. I think that being 19 at the time we got married, it just didn’t take. I think that we didn’t take anything as seriously as we should have.”
  • Financial problems: This excuse means wifey has pushed her Beta Bucks husband to the very edge of a financial cliff with her wasteful, spendthrift lifestyle. Now that she can no longer extract any value from him, Briffault’s Law kicks in and she doesn’t want anything to do with the used-up bastard. She pushes him into the chasm.

Of course, all of the above are divorce excuses that sound good on the surface, but any man who has been through the frivorce meat grinder knows any and all of these rationalizations really come down to money. Financial problems are the real cause of divorce. But how many? It’s hard to put a figure on the number that are caused by money because the conflating factors provide convenient cover storys. In any case, from CNBC:

Finances are the leading cause of stress in a relationship, according to a survey of people in a relationship or partnership released by SunTrust Bank. Some 35% of all respondents experiencing relationship stress said money was the primary cause of friction. Among respondents with relationship stress aged 44 to 54, 44% said money was the primary cause.

The numbers are likely much higher than one-third and one-half, since money is clandestinely connected to the other listed problems as we will later explain.

womens-power-2245102_1280

If you haven’t figured it out, marriage is legalized prostitution

Saving Face

The New York Times confirms money fights and money problems accurately predict divorce rates. An important study helps us go beyond the divorce factors listed above:

A new study, by Jeffrey Dew at Utah State University, attempts to quantify that risk. His finding: Couples who reported disagreeing about finance once a week were over 30 percent more likely to get divorced than couples who reported disagreeing about finances a few times a month.

Professor Dew looked at responses from about 2,800 couples surveyed by the National Survey of Families and Households. In this survey, both husbands and wives were asked, separately, about how often they disagreed with their spouse over chores, in-laws, spending time together, sex and money.  These same respondents were then contacted again several years later, and asked if they were still married.

Of all these common things couples fight about, money disputes were the best harbingers of divorce. For wives, disagreements over finances and sex were good predictors of divorce, but finance disputes were much stronger predictors. For husbands, financial disagreements were the only type of common disagreement that predicted whether they would get a divorce.

Here’s the takeaway from that study. No matter how many neat excuses women and their enablers in the media make up, the simple fact is women only see men as walking wallets. Women make up other excuses for divorce so they don’t come out “looking bad” when all is said and done. Face is very important to a predatory female – she doesn’t want to look like the savage solipsist she is.

Once a woman has extracted the valuable marrow from one man’s bones, just as any predator move she moves on to the next kill. In our species, that means a call to the frivorce lawyer. Indeed, family courts have ballooned into a $50 billion a year industry in Anglo America as lawyers have turned innate female behavior into big business.

Here’s how divorces ultimately come down to money. A woman who feels she can no longer get money out of her boyfriend or husband, or feels she can monkey branch to a more profitable man, will often cut off sex and become quarrelsome and emotionally detach herself from the relationship – leading to the aforementioned infidelity, substance abuse, lack of commitment, conflict and arguing, and growing apart problems. An otherwise loyal, well-behaved hubby is going to screw around, get drunk, not be committed, argue with, and grow apart from a mean ass woman. How neat for this woman that by turning into a frigid cunt, thereby estranging her husband she now has ready-made excuses to ditch him in a court of law. She’s saved face, and she’s conveniently attached the blame for the divorce to her ex – even though she spurred his bad behavior with her own. How’s that for female manipulation?

It all comes back to Briffault’s Law: The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place. Benefit = money and resources.

It hurts to know women don’t see you as a human being worthy of love and respect unless they feel you can bring some benefit to them in the form of financial or other types of resources. But, it’s far better to know the truth about women than to persist living inside the candy-coated cultural delusions that create the suffering of so many millions of well-intentioned men.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

5 Reasons Why Men Are Still Opting Out of Marriage and Relationshits

engagement-1718244_1280

Marriage rates are down once again, and men are wisely avoiding romantic entanglements with Anglobitches

Both marriage and long term relationshits continue a steep decline in a moribund Anglo culture. New statistics from the Census Bureau and Pew Research Center illustrate marriage hasn’t just died, it is a rotting corpse. This unfortunate reality reflects the ultimate success feminism was at achieving the Marxist goals of breaking up the family:

  • Last year, only 9% of 18-to-24 year olds in the U.S. were married, compared to 45% in 1960.
  • Only 45% of all households include a married couple.
  • 57% of adults got married ten years ago, but only 51% are getting married now.

But men aren’t just shunning marriage, they’re starting to shun relationshits altogether. It seems even the lure of the moist, pink anatomy is starting to lose its appeal. It could be because men know the average relationship isn’t going to last, anyway. From the Daily Mail:

A study looking into the impact of modern society on romantic lives has revealed that couples today are unlikely to last the distance that love birds in previous generations enjoyed.

New research reveals that couples are now most likely to end their relationships after just two years and nine months.

That’s the average. A man wouldn’t be wise to be in a relationshit that is statistically proven to be a passing fancy of overtly predatory women in today’s culture.

But why, on a deeper level, are both marriage and LTRs in decline as cock carouseling becomes the new, de-civilizing norm? We posit it is the unfathomably low quality of modern Western women. Men are getting wise to the game and the risks of the Divorce Industrial Complex. And they’re getting tired of taking shit from r-selected women. (Women in an r-selected environment become less feminine and less civilized with each passing generation.)

There are some very good reasons to avoid entanglements with fat, entitled, flighty, worthless American women. Here are 5 reasons men are wisely avoiding Anglobitches.

1. Anglobitches are total sluts. Women in modern culture aren’t just sluts, they’re proud sluts. This is, of course, a reversion to a primitive state of affairs in human mating rituals. Women are sluts and males are expendable ONLY in uncivilized societies. When women sleep around and a permanent pairbond isn’t the norm, men have no incentive to invest in either women or society. Ultimately, this will bankrupt the society as women are statistically proven to spend more than they can ever produce. It will also lead to problems with delinquency since single moms are proven to raise more criminals and deadbeats, as well as slutty daughters. (Carousel riders, just like mama.)

2. Anglobitch entitlement mentality and Princess Syndrome. Women who bring nothing but a laundry list of demands and a condescending attitude to the table expect to land Prince Charming who owns a McMansion and a Ferrari, giving her access to a large disposable income for her to waste on her flights of fancy and materialism. Tatted up, short-haired, damaged goods women don’t want to build a life with a “good” man, they want life in the lap of luxury to be handed to them by Richie Rich with no obligations. Until such time they get tired of him and want to monkey branch to one of his rich friends. Ergo, men are seen by women as nothing but expendable provider modules. She “deserves” it. Well, in her own mind she does.

3. Women have total power over men in today’s Anglo culture. The legal system in America is a complete joke. With nothing more than a passing whim, a woman can destroy a man legally and/or financially. Take your pick of risks: She can destroy him with fake rape claims. She can destroy him with a frivorce and endless all-the-money payments. She can enslave him with child support. Best not to become legally entangled with a proven predator of male utility value.

4. Men are pariahs in Anglo culture. The vitriol Anglo culture spits at men is astonishing to witness to those who have spent time in other cultures. Men are viewed as everything from rapists to sex fiends to simple-minded beasts by the altering eye that alters all in Anglo culture. It has even been said men are like dogs. To which the best response is, yes, we (like dogs) are loyal as fuck when someone treats us good. Unfortunately, the arrogant demeanor of Anglo women today makes them unapproachable to many men. Those men considered “unworthy” of a sniff of the golden vagina.

Here’s a personal anecdote about this oddity of Anglo culture: I was recently traveling through the South and found myself in the middle of a social gathering on a Saturday in Nashville, TN. As a pack of 20-ish females walked by, I got the sense of utter arrogance and contempt from these girls. They looked down at me and other men as pawns in their game of acquisition. No, I didn’t want to break through their bitch shields or pass any of their inevitable shit tests for a pale, flat piece of tail. I just wanted to get the fuck away from them.

5. Women aren’t worth it. As a man ages and acquires wisdom and experience with chicks, he begins to realize they simply aren’t worth it. Sex ends up costing him more than its worth. It took me going through 150+ women to realize they’re all pretty much the same, only with different packaging of the same lies they tell me. There is no magic unicorn. Women are always a losing investment. At some point, the risk will begin to outweigh the reward. What’s more, trying to appease women with materialism and consumerism is a surefire ticket to slavery. A minimalistic man can live an awesome life on $18,000 to $25,000 a year. This modest income affords plenty of travel, booze, and rendezvous with fast women if he manages his finances well and learns the trade of PUA. Why work double to play a losing game of “Keep the Anglobitch Up” when a man can work half and invest in himself and his own interests rather than some ungrateful hag?

Fuck ’em.

Women are drunk on their power for the time being. But, the day will come when the pied piper must be paid. Society will collapse because the current state of affairs is not culturally, socially, or financially sustainable.

J.D. Unwin showed us all past societies that loosened restraints on female sexuality eventually fell and crumbled to dust. Bedlam ensued afterwards, as civilization ended. What’s more, each Anglobitch currently runs a $100,000+ deficit on society over the course of her vain, narcissistic life. This deficit has traditionally been balanced by taxing Beta males. Once these men stop working themselves like dogs to pay abusively high taxes to support a system that robs them to make up for the deficit Anglobitches create, the entire house of cards will collapse. Bring it on.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

« Older Entries