Category Archives: Sexuality and The Sexes

The Curse of the Cat Lady: SMV Tables Turn as Women Age

cat-1423844_1280

The number of cat ladies will increase sharply in the coming years

Women are dealt all the best cards in the poker game when they’re young. They have an enormous amount of power over the lives of men, and since feminism appeared on the landscape like a plague our supposed social betters have used it use it to walk all over us. But, take note ladies. Nothing lasts forever. The shins you kick on your way up may be attached to the ass you have to kiss on your way back down.

The tables turn. SMV (Sexual Market Value) flips as people age: Men’s increases and women’s decreases. As women age and their power over men evaporates because nobody wants old, decrepit ass with cobwebs and HPV inside, men have the chance to even the score.

The coming spinster bubble has been highlighted before, as the average age of white women nationwide is now 43 and rising. (White women abandoning family to become job slaves means they literally are killing the entire race – white population decline is only accelerating.) They shafted men when we were young by refusing to reproduce in numbers sufficient to sustain the population, tormented us with their newfound right to be hyper-hypergamous, and decimated the nation by voting for far left wingers.

But, they’re getting old. They’re childless like never before. There won’t be anyone to care for them in their old age. While they love to chant the Don’t Need a Man™ mantra when they’re young, Anglobitches will be needing a utility object (i.e. a man) to come save the day as a bankrupt U.S. government is forced to reduce retirement bennies. Especially after their spendthrift lives have led them to insolvency in their old age. (Women spend $100,000 more than they earn over the course of their lives. In the past, men have made up the deficit.)

Will you be ready to sacrifice your quality of life so that an Anglobitch might have it easier during her golden years? Or, will you relegate her to the same lonely existence she sentenced you to when she had power over you?

To me, it’s time to exact vengeance as the women who rejected good, decent men when we were young are will soon be rejected in their own time of need. Personally, there’s nothing I’ll enjoy more than watching the YouGoGrrl, career girl lifestyle go down in flames as huge swaths of women end up poor and lonely in their old age while I’m banging women half my age abroad.

What will you do when aging women start crying out for men to help them in the near future? Or, cry out for government overlords to forcibly take money from men to pay for the short sightedness of women?

Third wave feminism now ushers in the age of the cat ladies. Coming soon to a dystopia near you.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Advertisements

Boxy Pale Tails vs. Bountiful Booties on the World Stage

woman-3065625_1280

The butt don’t lie. Anglo chicks have the boxiest behinds and most boyish features but affection from them comes at an astronomical premium

It should come as no shock Anglo chicks have an overly inflated sexual market value (SMV). Even though they have some of the boxiest, most boyish physical features on the planet Anglo chicks use their presumed value to tease, taunt, and wreck the lives of men in America. Men who apparently are clueless that they’re now paying through the nose for an inferior product. Even if these guys aren’t getting any, they’re still paying through the nose thanks to the massive welfare state.

Men are allowing themselves to be treated like chumps as board-like women exploit them emotionally and financially. Perhaps because they think this is all they’ve got. No, my friends. Women with sexier features do exist. Boxy behinds do give way to bountiful booties. About all you have to do to find them is leave the matrix.

Anglo chicks aren’t just lacking anatomically, but behaviorally as they have become some of the most boorish, classless, inaccessible souls on the planet who consider men utility objects who exist only to be trodden upon. But, for the moment let’s focus on anatomy. Especially, comparing Anglo anatomical features to women on the world stage. TNMM reader John James sums up the situation:

Put her in Rio in a thong and watch her bone-protruding, overly flaccid, boxy Anglo hips get blown away by the legions of 18-25 year olds down there who come at 1/50 the expense/risk and have far more sexuality. The thong doesn’t lie. So many pedestalized, oneitis bait Anglo artsy/pretty girls really come down to earth in a thong. NAKED TRUTH.

It’s true. I see the occasional pack of white girls when I’m traveling abroad and I must say, there’s just no comparison. With the slimmest waists and fullest behinds, better bust to booty ratios, better hip to waist ratios, and features that aren’t marred by bleached, burned up hair, foreign women have got it going on. And, they come without the staggering price tag a self-anointed princess here will run you.

Imagine, some men mortgage their lives for a boyish-figured woman with a bad attitude and a heavy dose of penis envy. Typically, when I come back I am astonished at how unkempt women in this country are. It takes a week or so for me to mentally adjust to being back in this mess. A world in which every woman is “better” than ever man even if she doesn’t deserve her lofty social laurels.

bikini-2194704_1280

Is a flat behind and ill attitude really worth mortgaging your financial future when sexier women are available?

Culture Matters

My personal feeling is spoiling women spoils them. In a world in which men’s roles have been displaced by Uncle Sugar, women feel they don’t “need” men anymore. A true testament to the fact women only see men as objects to be used.

Women in Anglo America have had it too good for too long, their success coming at a high price. Their materialistic lifestyles place enormous weight on the backs of the men they berate at every opportunity. Women abroad haven’t been spoiled with legions of Beta males scrambling to do their bidding, and this shows with their more down to earth attitudes. (Lesson: Never get on The Hedonic Treadmill.)

This is why women with boxy behinds, flat chests, or mounds of fat think they deserve to have a man furnish them with one of the unattainable lifestyles they see on fake reality TV. But, one good turn deserves another which is why men should exercise their right to use their own SMV to land a sexier women.

All it takes is fleeing the Anglobitch plantation. John James talks as if he’s a man who knows how much finer foreign women are from personal experience.

Untouchable, oneitis bait girls in the USA are mediocre when naked, on the international stage. If I ever have a son (unlikely), our summers will be spent with me touring him around the world so he knows what’s out there. Tits and ass are just what international women simply have on the regular, like purses and shoes. T and A is nothing to commit suicide over, like it is in fatass USA.

Yes, time abroad makes a man never want to come back to fatass (or boxy ass) USA. This once-great nation has become the textbook definition of dystopia.

Not only do women at home have inferior anatomy, but they have afforded themselves astronomical SMV value by torturing men with a lack of sex and affection for decades. It’s a bubble which is now in the process of bursting as feminist brainwashing is exposed for the travesty it is. Much as in finance, a “correction” is in the process of occurring because Anglo pussy futures are far overvalued.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

What I See Each Time a Couple Passes

men-2425121_1280

How much is that chick costing him a month? Does he even realize it?

“I wonder how much that piece of tail is costing him.”

That’s what I think each time a couple passes by. Especially if it’s a high SMV chick. This might seem crude or unusual to those uninitiated in the crimson arts, but that’s the reality of relationshits for those of us blessed and cursed with the ability to see unvarnished reality.

Every woman has her price. Hypergamy. Briffault’s Law. Penguin prostitutes. The list of proof backing up that claim goes on and on. Hell, just open your eyes if you’ve never used them before and pay attention to the way chicks behave.

My next thought after seeing the couple is: “I wonder what mistake he’ll make (or she’ll claim he makes) that will end that relationshit.” How much it will cost him. If he’ll be turned into a slave by the family court system.

I used to envy men with attractive girlfriends but now I almost feel sorry for them. I know what circus act the poor bastard probably had to put on to get that girl’s attention, or how much of his life and freedom he had to mortgage to entice her hypergamous instincts with consumer purchases. That is, if he’s the typical well-meaning Beta male.

I also know he’s now subject to her whims legally, culturally, and spiritually. He’s one false rape claim or “It’s not you, it’s me” away from having his life destroyed and his motivation taken away.

In short, the bloom is off the rose. Once you’ve stared into the gaping maw that is female sexuality and psychology, you’ll never see women – or the men who are with them – the same way again.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Chicks Dig Criminals: Nikolas Cruz Gets Inundated With Fan Mail (and $$$) from Girls

US School 192276

“Your eyes are beautiful and the freckles on your face make you so handsome. I’m really skinny and have 34C sized breasts,” writes one Cruz groupie

Nothing turns women on more than a murderous psychopath. (At least, a purported murderous psychopath if matrix agenda setters are to be believed.) No sooner than Nikolas Cruz was locked up did legions of women come out of the woodwork to start seducing him with love letters, snapping sexy photos of themselves and even sending him cash. Fox News reports:

Lovestruck groupies from around the country are showering the Parkland, Fla., gunman Nikolas Cruz with fan mail, including sexually provocative photos and donations.

This case is an important lesson on the twisted nature of female sexuality. Women wouldn’t let Cruz figuratively smell where they peed when he was a bullied loser. But now that he’s a criminal superstar with his face plastered everywhere, the panties can’t come off fast enough. TNMM has reported on the hamster wheel propensity that compels chicks to spread eagle for bad boys in the past, an unflattering reality about female sexuality. Women get wet at the thought of screwing bad boys but vaginal moistness dries up at the thought of banging a nice guy.

Cruz being showered with love letters from hot ladies is far from unusual. Mass murderers often run virtual harems, and even have women begging these thugs to breed them. Criminals now wind up with 3.0 children on average per lifetime, while Beta males are on the road to genetic extinction in a post-feminist world.

There’s a term for women who get off on fucking violent criminals and thugs: Hybristophiliacs. This term would include a large segment of the female population if the truth be told. What are hybristophiliac girls writing to Cruz? Seductive lines like these:

“When I saw your picture on the television, something attracted me to you. Your eyes are beautiful and the freckles on your face make you so handsome. I’m really skinny and have 34C sized breasts.”

Yep, the kind of women most Betas only dream of are now chasing after Cruz. They even send him nudie pics. Fox writes:

A Chicago woman reportedly sent Cruz numerous suggestive photos, including one in which she slurps a Popsicle while wearing a bikini, and another in which she shows off her backside for the camera.

Yes, female psychology is that dark. When’s the last time a woman actively sought you out to send a picture of her behind? Probably never if you’re the typical mangina working in an Office Space setting. But, after women heard Cruz killed 17 students they turned him into a virtual celebrity while becoming hot and bothered in the process. From Fox News:

Cruz’s attorney, Howard Finkelstein told one newspaper he’s “never seen this many letters to a defendant” in 40 years as a public defender.

Knowing this, it doesn’t take a genius to realize letting female instincts run wild will totally wreck a civilization. We’ve discussed the consequences of letting female sexuality loose many times in the past. From our article on Convict Game:

Cultures that don’t rigidly control female sexuality are doomed to devolve over time into an uncivilized state for many reasons, not least among them the fact that criminals reproduce more than good guys do in the absence of proper female guidance. Ergo, chicks dig jerks. And they breed like wanton whores with criminals.

Obviously, nobody listened. There’s a kicker to this sordid story. In true gynocentric fashion fitting for Anglo media, Fox News tries to explain away the estrogen-driven interest in Cruz by defending and pedestalizing women, insinuating only defective women thow themselves at thugs:

The unseemly interest in Cruz may stem from women with poor parental relationships, or a strong desire to save an apparently lonely and vulnerable figure, mental health experts told the paper.

No, Fox News. This episode of love letters to mass shooters is yet another illustration of the depravity of female psychology. Criminals get love letters from and bang the hottest ass on a regular basis. When stories like this surface, it’s one of the few times we get to see women for what they really are – and the reality doesn’t fit your candy floss propaganda imagery extolling them as goddesses imbued with superior virtue.

This gynocentric propaganda brainwashes millions of well-meaning men. The truth is, once again nice guys finish last. And women will beat a path to the jail cell of a criminal to lay down for him.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

The Gender Tax Gap: Men Pay 200% of the Taxes Women Do

Money_Chick

It’s time for women to stop leeching off male productivity

Revised March 12, 2018.

The much-balleyhooed gender pay gap receives an inordinate amount of attention in the gynocentric mainstream media. However, the gender tax gap is completely ignored. Why? Because it paints a very unflattering picture of women and directly contradicts the Don’t Need a Man™ narrative.

It’s time once again to bring up the sordid subject of female privilege. We found numbers to back up the claim that women live priviliged lives suckling Beta male tax dollars from the government tit. The blog Judgy Bitch dug up some devilishly delicious statistics which prove Strong, Independent Women™ are actually a monstrous drain on government revenue.

It turns out Don’t Need a Man™ is quite the inaccurate feminist narrative. The truth is, without the government stealing tax dollars from men and redistributing them to women, feminists and other females would be destitute. The tab women run up using government resources over the course of their lives is quite shocking. Rampant female privilege in the Anglosphere costs society an average of $150,000 per female over her lifetime according to a New Zealand study. Of course, men pick up the tab for both themselves and women. Here’s how Judgy Bitch accurately phrased it:

Economically, women cost more to the state than they benefit. The government is literally paying women to be alive.

That statement isn’t just hyperbole. The following charts from a New Zealand study on the gender tax gap show what a drag women are on society, and on Beta male wallets.

  • Figure 5 illustrates how large the gender tax gap is, as the male share of the tax burden is immensely larger than the female tax burden.
  • Figure 16 illustrates how women receive more government benefits than they pay into the system during the course of their lives in all but a short window from roughly age 40 to age 60. Even then, women receive far more government benefits than men.
  • Figure 17 is the most damning, as it shows the cumulative fiscal impact per capita per sex. Women are a net drain on government resources (and therefore male taxpayers) from birth to death. Women end up with an average $150,000 lifetime deficit between what they pay into the system vs. what they take out of it! Importantly, men would wind up a net surplus at the end of our lives if Socialist governments didn’t force us to support women with our tax dollars! So, it can be said Western governments are broke because of women, and Western governments are wealth redistribution agents that rob overproductive men to pay underproductive women. It can also be said that if men didn’t have the burden of women and weren’t forced to carry both their weight and our own, we could work a lot less and enjoy life a lot more.

Without the monstrous, gynocentric governments now plaguing the West robbing men of our productivity, women would be in dire financial straits because the simple fact is women don’t produce much of anything (statistically speaking) except drama. That’s not an empty claim, it’s an economic fact. And self-evident if you’ve ever worked in an office full of YouGoGrrls.

Even in these post-feminist days, now that the red carpet has been rolled out with female hiring preferences in just about any field, women still can’t keep up with the juggernaut of male productivity. Female materialism also results in consumer spending that is 4 times higher than male spending, according to a well-known Harvard University study. These two facts combined – the tax gap and the juggernaut that is female consumerism – help illustrate the bottomless financial pit women represent, a pit men are expected to continuously and thanklessly throw money into.

selfie with many money

Women create an average drain of $150,000 on society’s purse over the course of their lives, according to a New Zealand study

Feminism and Finances

The tax gap proves how pointless it is to try and reinvent the wheel when it comes to the sexes. Rather than advising women to assume traditional female roles (roles that are more financially and socially prudent for the culture at large) feminism and its clandestine use of Penis Envy pushes chicks into jobs and men out of jobs. The result? A poorer, less productive society overall.

The fact that women consume more than they earn remains unchanged, despite tireless efforts by the left to turn women into wannabe men. The Anglo-American Androgyny Agenda is destroying society, not advancing it.

What’s even more insane is the fact feminists and America’s ultra-corrupt political establishment have the audacity to continue to tout the Big Lie about “poor, downtrodden women” suffering from a wage gap, when the fact is women are not paid less because of their gender. The wage gap results as a matter of personal choices each sex makes about which careers to pursue, women working fewer hours and fewer years of their lives than men, and men choosing jobs that are more demanding and therefore pay more…rather than jobs that let them wear nice clothes.

Donald Trump’s liberal daughter Ivanka pushed these tired, Marxist pay gap narratives we’ve heard for 50 years at The Don’s RNC coronation last year. But when the numbers are crunched, men end up paying twice the taxes women do while receiving a fraction of government benefits. Then, men get lambasted for supposedly making more money. When all calculations are complete, here’s the truth of the matter as phrased in Judgy Bitch’s writeup:

While the 77¢ for a dollar wage gap has been under the spotlight for the past years, the 200¢ for a dollar tax gap has, to my knowledge never been mentioned.

Indeed, where else have you heard about the 200¢ for a dollar tax gap, a tax gap that costs the male-funded government $150,000 for each arrogant Anglobitch walking around? It’s certainly not being covered in the corrupt media!

Even in these days of women at work pushing men out of a limited number of jobs, women only briefly contribute a small surplus to the tax system they avail themselves of. This, as they’re provided with everything from free abortions to WIC to food stamps to government mandated hiring quotas – designed to knock yet more males out of their jobs.

Women are a financial drag on society from cradle to grave, with the exception of a short period in their lives when they pay in slightly more than they take out. But, even then male contributions to the system eclipse female contributions. From Judgy Bitch:

In the brief period in which women generate more or as much tax money than they consume, men outscore them by at least 3 times.

Of course, statistically sterile Anglobitches can’t hide behind the fact they are a third as productive as men because they take care of children. Women are not having families anymore and that is killing the West, as birth rates among whites (and other ethnic groups assimilated into Anglo culture) remain well below replacement fertility.

There’s more. Women only work slightly less at GloboWorldCorp jobs than men do these days. Judgy Bitch writes:

The workforce participation rate gap between men and women doesn’t exceed 10% in either age group.

This certainly doesn’t explain away the massive tax gap, much to the chagrin of feminists. Women are enormous drains on public resources.

Once again, we find the lies of feminism have put women and society in quite a conundrum. Men have no incentive to support a system run by and for women who hate them, and women can’t carry the load when it comes to running society.

Motorcycle

It’s time to let women take care of their own financial problems

Go Galt, Become a MGTOW, or Become a Layabout PUA

In conclusion, we find female frivolousness, covetousness, solipsism, and irrationality will ultimately bankrupt any government that disenfranchises men and “empowers” women. Women spend and cost so much they can’t collectively pull their own financial weight.

After perusing these statistics, men should realize both the corporate-government complex and women are leeching off our productivity whilst giving us shit sandwiches in return. Anglo women are insufferable harridans who spit fury at men for even existing.

Men are treated like pariahs in this culture. Yet, we’re expected to work ourselves into early graves trying to feed a monster that does nothing but exploit our productivity for female benefit.

At the very least, in the interest of “equality” women’s tax rates should be much higher than men’s to make up for the drain they create on society’s purse. When the stats are examined, a Red Pill truth leaps out of the numbers: Women will suffer much more than men if each sex is forced to support their own Strong, Independent™ lifestyles, and women are not allowed to leech off male productivity any longer.

Don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone, ladies.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month. Revised March 12, 2018.

Carousel Riders Don’t Make Good Wives

model-2614569_1280

Marital success declines when women ride the cock carousel until just before their biological clock strikes midnight

It shouldn’t come as a surprise that Anglobitches who have been around the block more times than the Good Humor man don’t make good bets for marriage. Numerous studies confirm this, but one particular study from The Heritage Foundation is interesting in that it focuses on women over 30, i.e. women whose impact with The Wall is imminent.

Non-MaritalSexualPartners

The more cock carouseling a woman does, the worse a bet she is for marriage

One would think that as women’s sexual options wane with their breasts sagging and behinds drooping with each passing year, along with the prospect of becoming a genetic dead end as eggs die in their womb they’d settle down and be grateful that any man was investing himself in such a depreciating ASSet. But, that just isn’t the case.

The more sausage they’ve had, the less likely the hapless Beta male who marries one of them is to have a successful marriage. This is true even for women about to hit The Wall or who have already impacted with it. Similar trends are seen among younger women who marry, and although there is a little more statistical noise the trend lines reveal the same sad fact: More cocks before the vows, less marital fidelity after the vows. Marrying an Empowered™ slut comes at an extreme risk to your finances, personal property, and dignity. (At least, in Anglosphere nations. Other nations don’t let women frivorce rape men this way, including those in continental Europe, Latin America, and much of Asia.)

A telling Heritage Foundation study found the most successful marriages involve women who are virgins at the time of marriage. If her husband pops her cherry, the marriage has good odds of surviving – a 4 out of 5 success rate. By the time a woman has 5 cocks before marriage, the chance of marital success plummets – these couples have a 2 out of 3 chance of getting divorced! And by the time women have 16-20 cocks, a full 4 out of 5 will end in divorce.

This is why religious institutions have pushed for sexual chastity until the time of marriage for 5,000 years. Because anything less is not a stable foundation for a society. It isn’t just religious leaders who have tried to impart this wisdom. Anthropologist J.D. Unwin independently confirmed sluttery destroys nations and cultures three-quarters of a century ago after a secular study of 80 tribes and the 6 civilizations thought to have existed. Unwin wrote:

These societies lived in different geographical environments; they belonged to different racial stocks; but the history of their marriage customs is the same. In the beginning each society had the same ideas in regard to sexual regulations. Then the same struggles took place; the same sentiments were expressed; the same changes were made; the same results ensued. Each society reduced its sexual opportunity to a minimum and displaying great social energy, flourished greatly. Then it extended its sexual opportunity; its energy decreased, and faded away. The one outstanding feature of the whole story is its unrelieved monotony.

The takeaway message is when women became “liberated” whores of the type we now suffer in the West, civilization inevitably failed. A full 100% of the time. But, things are even worse than most men imagine. Women are so far gone in the West they’re now accumulating more sexual partners than men. (The 80/20 rule resurfaces.) From the Daily Mail:

By the age of 21 they have had sex with an average of nine lovers  –  two more than their male partner. And a quarter have slept with more than ten partners in the five years since losing their virginity  –  compared with a fifth of young men.

For fun, let’s sprinkle in a dose of feminist hypocrisy.

Young women are also twice as likely to be unfaithful, with 50% admitting they have cheated on a partner  –  half at least twice. Yet if their man was caught being unfaithful, 99% of the 2,000 women surveyed said they would show him the door.

Proving once again the Western world is upside down and how quickly things get out of control once men start acting weak and letting women rule over them (referencing the wisdom in Isaiah 3:12) women have now adopted a male sexual strategy while men have been turned into cucks and incels. Let’s apply some evolutionary psychology to these stats. Nature actually intended things to be the opposite. Men have the biological imperative to cheat, not women. Why?

Sperm is everywhere and eggs are scarce. If a man cheats and shoots a hot load of sperm into a willing slut’s womb, he can produce another load shortly thereafter. However, if a woman gets knocked up, one of her limited lifetime supply of eggs is taken and she’s out of commission for 9 months. This is why female cheating is worse than male cheating. It creates bastard children for Beta Bucks guy to waste his resources on. (What’s more, men have the psychological capacity to separate sex from love. A topic for another time.)

We can glean from these uncomfortable facts the set and frame of Western society has been so irrevocably changed there’s little hope left of salvaging it. Trying to reason with masses of sheeple is as hopeless as standing in front of a fast-moving train and expecting to stop it.

The best a man can do at this point, with the Western world so far gone is protect himself and his assets. Don’t get involved with hos beyond pump and dumps. Avoid marital and legal entanglements with the Anglobitch like the plague. And if the virus of feminism infects the entire world, we can expect a cratering of civilization worldwide.

Here’s an interesting hypothesis that we’ll be testing in the coming decades. Human population growth has been growing at an exponential rate, what’s known in statistics as a J-curve the last century or so. What typically follows such a tangential rise in mathematics is a comparable crash. Feminism and its wicked stepsister Socialism may be the philosophies that bring on the crash. Strap in for a bumpy ride until this insanity resolves itself of its own volition.

History has shown us 86 times that it never ends well.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Without Sex, What Value Do Women Bring to the Table?

club-2765134_1280

Even women admit sex is their only bargaining chip with men

“Ladies, how would you keep your man if you lost your vagina?” the late comedian Patrice O’Neal used to ask audiences. When women in the audience would invariably respond with oral and anal sex, O’Neal would respond, “See, I gave you the chance to talk and you qualified yourself as a series of holes. I’m supposed to treat you special but you’re just a bunch of holes to yourself.”

This happened every time O’Neal popped the question on an audience. Hilarious as O’Neal was, the awakened man knows how right he is. Women innately know how right he is, too, even if they vehemently deny it.

Given the chance to bring something else to the table other than sex, women automatically turn themselves into sex objects. Women admit they have nothing to offer men beyond sex. And now, they don’t even offer sex in a Neo-Puritan #MeToo world in which hypergamy has also been taken to the nth degree – meaning the average guy doesn’t have a chance with women who are actually inferior to him.

We men are just supposed to cave in to infinite material and comfort demands and expect nothing in return. We are expected to be willing chumps in Anglo culture.

Knowing sex is woman’s only commodity is the reason a feminist culture relentlessly limits the supply of sex. It’s classic economics. If men can get their sexual needs fulfilled with a prostitute or in a libertine culture, what purpose do women serve in men’s live? Nagging? Bitching? Making demands? Spending more money than men earn? Women abandoned being decent wives and mothers at the first opportunity they were given, so they certainly don’t serve that purpose anymore.

Men don’t give a fuck about women’s careers, social status, or finances – which is hard for modern women to comprehend since they try so hard to attract men by emulating Alpha males. But men do care about sex, youth, and beauty. Over 4.5 billion years of evolution has encoded these traits in our genes.

However, women don’t offer these traits to men, either. Now that sex, youth, and beauty is off the table in an English-speaking world that relentlessly represses sensuality, tells women to waste their youth chasing rubber stamps and bad boys, and where 2/3 of potential mates are overweight or obese, women have become toxic burdens in the average man’s life.  At least in the past women brought childrearing and culinary skills to the table, along with a dose of (feigned) sweetness of character, caring and compassion. Not anymore. And they stripped these things from men’s lives with a cavalier, “Fuck you and the horse you rode in on!” attitude. (Further revealing women only see men as objects and not human beings.)

This is how far the modern woman has fallen in a post-feminist world – especially true for the Anglobitch, who thinks her golden-fuzz adorned vagina is so valuable it commands a kingdom of diamond rings, granite countertops, and exotic sheet metal by virtue of its existence. It also demands cushy jobs while “the help” or the men who built the world women covet get squeezed out of the only thing that gives males utility value in women’s eyes – decent, well-paying jobs.

As feminism has returned women to their pre-civilized, feral nature, men are beginning to see them for what they are: unrepentant prostitutes. Whether prostitutes who extract resources from men in a sophisticated way through marriage, or scantily clad mistresses turning tricks on the corner, the equation is always the same. Sex for resources. We see it from the social heights of Hollyweird with multi-million dollar frivorce settlements and high marriage turnover to the banality of lower class life as a neighbor is turned into a slave of the divorce-industrial complex by decree of the family court. Sex for resources is the rule even in the animal kingdom.

This is why in the second half of my life I limit encounters with women to the realm of fun and pleasure. They are consummate destroyers of male lives as they bring nothing else to the table other than holes. Patrice O’Neal was right.

If I like her company we can get it on once in a while, and that’s as far as it needs to go. When relationshits come into play, I’m on the way out the door because I don’t need the manipulation or the emotional and financial baggage that comes with them.

So, what to make of a world in which women are actively working to destroy the only remaining value they bring to the table – sex – after they already destroyed their femininity?

Ultimately, men created the civilized world for women (who don’t appreciate it or the men who created it) and men can destroy it in true John Galt fashion. One might darkly envision a dystopian future in which the artificial womb is created, sexbots have replaced needy, demanding, and thankless women and men decide to do away with females altogether. Eliminating them from the gene pool – totally flipping feminist Sally Miller Gearhart’s statement about reducing men to 10% of the human race on its ear. For it is men who have the creative genius to bring about that kind of world, not women.

Or at least, we can envision a future world in which men bring about a return of the patriarchy and start demanding that the hole people bring something else other than their anatomy to civilization.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

« Older Entries