Imagine a future with a female aristocracy and in which men are reduced to 10% of the population – feminists are openly calling for it
When our elite overlords tell us “The Future is Female” they’re giving us a hint at the hell they have planned for the common man on this planet.
A 5,000 year old social contract giving men dominion over women, placing men at the center of the human family and of human society at large isn’t just being rescinded, it’s being ripped to shreds and the tatters burned.
The largely automated, electronically enforced tyranny of the New World Order will put elites at the top issuing orders, women in the middle following orders and a tiny minority men on the bottom being subjected to orders.
(As this monumental tranformation of human society occurs before our eyes, notice how Judge Kavanaugh is being villainized for daring to even question the baseless claims of his female accuser at his Senate witch trial. This cultural precedent isn’t happening by accident. Men can no longer question the words of their new masters.)
We are getting but a mere a taste of this new, emotionally-driven type of society with the Kavanaugh witch trial and the embedding of #MeToo hysteria in the culture. The West has so long been based on male characteristics – namely the search for rationality in jurisprudence and balance in running the institutions of society – most men can’t imagine what a world increasingly run by women (doing the bidding of elites) will look like.
Just think of Rudyard Kipling’s famous poem The Female of the Species. Indeed, the female of the species is deadlier than the male and the elite know this. It’s why they want to put women into positions of power from corporate boards to seats in the legislature to heading up the executive and judicial branches.
Women are much more prone to emotional hysteria, emotional manipulation and submission to authority than men. And, they are much more ruthless. Anyone who has learned well the crimson arts of seduction and pick-up artistry knows that once the benefits are extracted from the male and he is of no further benefit to the female, he is dead in her eyes. This is the premise of Briffault’s Law, after all.
Men have already been rendered largely worthless in the eyes of women. How many generations before the nightmare vision of some feminists is implemented? A world in which men aren’t just child support and alimony slaves, but slaves altogether. As we are already seeing with the skewing of the sexual marketplace, a society in which 80% of men are invisible in women’s eyes, men are worthless (and as good as dead) to women unless they provide some benefit. The benefit men have traditionally provided to women and the family has been stripped from them by their own governments.
Once women have been given total power in the West by the elite puppet masters currently managing our Western pseudo-democracies, The Hegelian Dialectic schema of manipulating the decision makers in society becomes much more effective. The elite only need introduce emotionally-driven issues into the national narrative to get what they want. Women behave and respond emotionally, so hysteria will be the norm in the future whenever the elite want to create change. The template for a society that’s run this way is already being laid down with today’s mainstream media.
Here’s how the model works: Introduce an emotionally driven (if totally illogical) narrative into the female hivemind, who will then hamster rationalize any new, Draconian policies introduced by the elite.
This model is much more effective in a world where men have no voice. Once today’s soy boys are tomorrow’s capons, chemically if not literally castrated for the sin of toxic masculinity the new gynarcho tyranny will move to cement male subordination.
Women are also much more susceptible to following unjust rules simply because they come from dictates issued on high. Used to bowing to authority throughout the history of humanity, they will unquestioningly follow dictates issued by their superiors. Since the State and the Corporation have supplanted traditional male roles in society, men are increasingly becoming utility objects without utility in women’s eyes. Women don’t answer to husbands or even their fathers, anymore. They answer to their new husbands and fathers, the State and the Corporation.
One might envision a world in which the dream of some prominent feminists – to reduce the male population to 10% of the human species – is realized. They’re even openly calling for ideas like International Castration Day and aren’t being censored by the far left tech overlords. This well-publicized desire of women like The Femitheist to commit genocide against men and enslave the remaining 10% of the male population echoes the thinking of feminists like Sally Miller Gearheart:
In her early career, Gearhart took part in a series of seminars at San Francisco State University, where feminist scholars were critically discussed issues of rape, slavery, and the possibility of nuclear annihilation. Gearhart outlines and justifies a three-step proposal for female-led social change:
- I) Every culture must begin to affirm a female future.
- II) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture.
- III) The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.
Gearhart does not base this radical proposal on the idea that men are innately violent or oppressive, but rather on the “real danger is in the phenomenon of male-bonding, that commitment of groups of men to each other whether in an army, a gang, a service club, a lodge, a monastic order, a corporation, or a competitive sport.” Gearhart identifies the self-perpetuating, male-exclusive reinforcement of power within these groups as corrosive to female-led social change.
Thus, if “men were reduced in number, the threat would not be so great and the placement of species responsibility with the female would be assured.” Gearhart, a dedicated pacifist, recognized that this kind of change could not be achieved through mass violence. On the critical question of how women could achieve this, Gearhart argues that it is by women’s own capacity for reproduction that the ratio of men to women can be changed though the technologies of cloning or ovular merging, both of which would only produce female births. She argues that as women take advantage of these reproductive technologies, the sex ratio would change over generations.
It doesn’t take a genius to see Gearhart’s plan is being implemented piece by piece in America and Europe.
Of course, this is all music to a totalitarian elite’s ears. What better way to run a tyrannical society where they give orders and the rest of society takes them than to put women in charge of the levers of control and reduce men to nothing more than a new slave class? Now you know why male spaces are being destroyed, men are being marginalized, and men are being pushed out of the institutions they created with the keys to the castle being forcibly handed over to women.
It’s the mother of all shit tests. And Western men are failing miserably. Something so grotesque could only come from the hearts and minds of of women in male and sex-hating Anglo culture. Truly, this once great culture has become a blight on humanity.
Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.