Category Archives: The Anglosphere

Prostate Cancer Kills More Than Breast Cancer, But Receives Half the Funding


Prostate cancer is overtaking breast cancer in annual deaths – will another men’s issue go ignored?

The flood of pink we see each October reminds us of the tragedy that is breast cancer. Pink ribbons, wear it pink, pink everything. Breast cancer awareness is a worthy cause. However, another deadly disease – prostate cancer  – curiously doesn’t receive near the same amount of attention. This, even though prostate cancer is now killing more people each year. Some new medical data suggest we might need to instruct women to be a little more “inclusive” about men’s issues.

Illustrating Anglo culture’s gynocentrism and innate misandry, we don’t see nearly as many blue ribbons fluttering each Blue September. (Did you even know that’s what Prostate Cancer Awareness Month is called?) This needs to change in order to adhere to the much ballyhooed doctrine of “equality” in Anglo culture.

The script has flipped as prostate cancer is now deadlier than breast cancer, so we need to see Blue September elevated in a such a way it becomes more prominent than pink October. New statistics published in The Guardian show the doleful details:

New figures reveal that 11,819 men died in the UK from prostate cancer in 2015, overtaking breast cancer, which resulted in the deaths of 11,442 women.

These are long-term trends, and the number of prostate cancer deaths is likely to rise not only in the UK, but in other Western nations.

However, breast cancer receives more than twice as much research funding despite declining death rates.  The Daily Caller reported the lack of funding for men’s cancers a few years back:

In fiscal year 2009, breast cancer research received $872 million worth of federal funding, while prostate cancer received $390 million. It is estimated that fiscal year 2010 will end similarly, with breast cancer research getting $891 million and prostate cancer research receiving $399 million.

Prostate cancer researchers only wish they received the attention and financing breast cancer researchers do. From The Guardian:

Angela Culhane, chief executive of the charity Prostate Cancer UK which collated the figures, said the number of prostate cancer deaths had risen as a result of an ageing population, while improvements in research and screening meant the same effect was not seen for breast cancer.

“We want to learn from what they have been able to achieve [for breast cancer] and we can see the correlation between that investment in research and the progress that then follows in terms of reducing the number of deaths,” said Culhane.


Judging by the illustrations, breast cancer groups seem to think all nipples are pink

Surely, we wouldn’t be in a culture that actively discriminates against men, would we? A culture that is frequently the opposite of the patriarchal “hell” for women we’re told by the media it is? A culture that offers little sympathy or even acknowledgement for men who lead women in combat deaths, industrial deaths and accidents, homicide deaths, homelessness, length of jail terms, and now sex-specific cancer issues, among other unflattering statistics.

Further, holding modern women and feminists to their own standards, we might offer the criticism that pink ribbons for breast cancer are “inappropriate” in this day and age, the age of über political correctness. Pink has been traditionally associated with femininity, but that color association might be out of date in today’s “gender neutral” culture. Worse, it gives the impression that all nipples are pink, when only the pastiest Anglobitches have pink nipples.

It’s time for men to take a page out of the feminist playbook, put on some penis hats and go march in the streets demanding more funding for prostate cancer research. All exaggeration and righteous indignation aside, Anglo culture can never truly claim “equality” until serious men’s issues like prostate cancer are acknowledged and funded on par with women’s issues.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.


Puritanism on Parade: Kansas Legislature Calls Porn and Masturbation “Health Hazard”


Kansas just condemned porn in a sideways attack on masturbation

Sexuality absolutely terrifies Anglo America. Nothing shakes this prudish society to its core more than its primal fear of sex, fueling a regular rotation of ridiculous media sex scandals and gossip about who’s fucking who. Whereas other societies have taken a “live and let live” approach to sexuality, Anglo America’s collective asshole puckers at the mere mention of cocks, cunts, and intercourse. Anglobitches especially love lording their bleach blonde, pasty-behind sexuality over men’s heads like a figurative Sword of Damocles, and a gynocentric government helps them tighten their grasp on this society’s testes in any way it can.

As an erotophobic society since its inception at the Massachusetts Bay Colony hundreds of years ago, Anglo culture has never really come up with a cogent way of dealing with sexuality in a lucid manner. Bans, shaming, and forced celibacy are the cultural norms.

We see latent Puritanism echoing throughout feminist doctrine, prostitution (a “crime” in this repressed culture) now being conflated with a mostly fake human trafficking scare in a lame attempt to drive away customers and close the legs of spread eagle service providers, and worst of all, men are open to slavery and/or imprisonment either way they go when it comes to pursuing sex.

If marriage doesn’t render a man bankrupt and literally enslaved by the state, hiring a whore will destroy him as a voyeuristic police state keeps tabs on his sex life.

And now, there’s another move in the War on Sex coming out of Kansas. Not only can men not approach women or have casual sex in a #MeToo world or hire a professional to ease sexual tension, Police State USA now wants to eliminate fapping. Kansas just took a serious move towards banning porn and masturbation. From mainstream mierda affiliate KSNT:

The Kansas Senate passed a resolution denouncing pornography as a public health hazard Tuesday. The resolution said porn leads to health impacts and societal  harms. It states porn can lead to body image disorders, sexual performance issues and a normalization of violence and abuse. The resolution passed 35 to 4.

This is the first step towards passing a ban on pornography – and therefore, an indirect effort at banning masturbation. (Anglo America rarely pursues the targets of social engineers directly. It always attacks in a sideways manner in order to maintain plausible deniability.)

It’s simply astonishing that this Puritan culture can’t come to terms with the fact adults need a sexual release now and then. While there’s no doubt fapping does lead to performance issues and other problems, government meddling with sexuality through passing endless regulations, laws, and codifying sex acts as “crimes” is part of why sex is so “fucked up” (pun intended) in America. (TNMM has linked this lack of sexual gratification with the obesity epidemic in one hypothesis that claims sexually unfulfilled Americans figuratively “fuck” their food.)

Let’s take score of what this latest government incursion into private lives means for heterosexual men. Men can’t approach women. Men can’t fuck women without massive legal and social risks (or have to ask for consent every few minutes as in the case of California’s insane affirmative consent law). And now, the cornfield state of Kansas is moving to curb porn so men can’t rub one out.

It seems nobody in Puritanland remembers how powerful a drive sex is, especially for men. There will soon literally be no way to legally satisfy sexual cravings in America if this insanity continues apace.

Only four lawmakers voted against the resolution, including state senator David Haley. Haley told the press:

“It’s almost laughable, but it’s kind of sad that any particular state government would waste its time and its energy on having this kind of legislation brought forward, but we’re in Kansas so nothing is beyond the pale.”

Proving the metastasizing totalitarian government in America is ultimately not about left vs. right but the state vs. you, Republicans came up with the no-fap initiative. KSNT reports:

Republican Senator Molly Baumgardner co-sponsored the resolution. She said the resolution codified lawmaker’s concerns about the effects of wide-spread porn usage.

“To ignore addressing that pornography, and all of the excessive exposure to it, impacts our society, impacts our children, impacts our families is folly,” Baumgardner said.

No word on what the next chess move is by these geniuses. But, you can bet if state legislatures are passing resolutions like this one, there are forces at work behind the curtain driving the War on Sex as erotica is attacked from all sides.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Girl Tries to Scam $150 Dinner from Tinder Date – But He Outfoxes Her


An Anglobitch’s plan to use her date and score a free $150 dinner epically backfired

An awakened man knows women often compartmentalize relationshits with men. They friendzone guys who Beta orbit them, throw themselves under thugs and bad boys, and consciously choose to flat out use “good guys” who treat women they way feminists say women want to be treated. (Word to the wise: They don’t really want to be treated good by guys they bang.)

Anglobitches in particular have no qualms about using one guy for dinner while running off with another for a sexual escapade the same night. We call this the Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks theory here in the manosphere.

It’s heartening to see that men are wising up to the cruel, calculating games of women. Case in point, check out this hilarious dine and dash story making the rounds. After an underdressed Anglobitch with a frigid persona ran up a $150 tab she expected Dinner Guy to pay for, he walked out and left her ass with the bill. This tale of a date set up by a woman under false pretenses even made the Daily Mail:

A man who plucked up the courage to go on his first ever Tinder date after being ‘superliked’ by a seemingly-eager woman has told how the evening ended in total misery after the unnamed lady behaved so rudely that he ran away without telling her. After talking for a few days, the Imgur user, known only as Minilogo37, shared that despite their chemistry prior, the date took a turn when the girl arrived to the fancy restaurant in sweatpants, did not look at him once, and ordered the most expensive items on the menu.

Heh. Excellent. Women choose their targets wisely, in true Predatory Female fashion. She probably saw him on Twitter and thought he’d be so thrilled to have been “picked” she could get a night of free fine dining out of him. And he would scurry off after the date, rub one out, and she would lie and say she was “going home” while no doubt hopping on the cock carousel that night with a full belly. But Dinner Guy caught on to her game quickly, especially when she came to their “date” dressed for the gym. Dinner Guy writes:

We met up tonight at a restaurant I’d picked out. She didn’t look at me, wore sweatpants, and immediately ordered a $13 appetizer. Okay, not a deal-breaker. I tried starting a conversation a few times, but she only gave one word answers. Then, she orders a $25 steak and $22 crab legs. She drank four $9 glasses of wine.

I actually suffered this quite often in my Nice Guy days back in college. Women would feign interest in me, use me for food and entertainment for the night, then turn cold as the night prematurely drew to a close. The next day, phone calls would go unanswered. Dinner Guy recounts a similar scenario:

“She talked more to the waiter.”

It’s at this point a man should know he’s being played. It seems Dinner Guy knew well, and played the chess game appropriately:

I got the steak, and a few drinks myself. Right about the time our main courses arrived, I’d pretty much given up. As we were finishing, I excused myself and went to the restroom. While I was in there, a light bulb went off. I left the bathroom, headed out the door, got in my car, and drove home. Now, here I am. She messaged me a few times, called me a “fucker” about twelve times. Heh.

I’d seriously like to buy this guy a drink. Excellent execution. The fact she messaged him and called him a fucker scores him bonus points. Bring this guy another round. The irony is, she’s probably more likely to fuck him now that he’s shown her he’s not the Beta target she thought he was. Chicks dig jerks.

It seems she spent a good amount of time buttering him up beforehand for the $150 dinner. The innate female talent for what Schopenhauer called dissimulation means women effortlessly play mind games with men up until the time they go in for the kill.

Dinner Guy’s method of dealing with a predatory Anglobitch won him some praise from those who read the article. Well, praise from men who know what it’s like to be used by entitled women, and scorn from women who like using men. As the Daily Mail writes:

One user wrote, ‘You played the player at her own game and won,’ while others said things like, ‘I would’ve looked her in the eyes as I ask for separate checks,’ ‘I agree, this guy knows how to play,’ and ‘You handled that like a champ. Enough said.’

Another man wrote:

A lot of women have admitted to using Tinder for that very reason, good on you for turning it around on her.

Gentleman, if a woman is helping herself to the most expensive items on the menu while acting like a total bitch, she’s not interested. Part of being a good PUA and practicing good Game is knowing when to walk out on a bitch. Don’t be a typical Dinner Guy. Be this guy, and leave her ass sitting.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Slavery Never Ended in America: It Still Exists in Family Courts


After the sex act, men have absolutely no reproductive rights and few legal rights

American politicians love to self-righteously pat themselves on the back, play the race card, and genuflect before audiences about the horrors of slavery. Oh, what backwards times those were. Surely, lessons have been learned after slavery died as the de facto labor system worldwide, and we will never again subject another human being to work under threat of imprisonment or other indignities.

Well…not so fast. Husbands and fathers that are dumped by Anglobitches in that misandrist nation are once again subject to enslavement.

As is the case with almost anything politicians say, the harsh truth shows just the opposite. Indeed, slavery was legally abolished in 1865, but it has been resurrected in the family court system. Men are being forced, by the vicious teeth of the Anglo legal system to make wealth transfer payments to women despite the fact that in the 21st century every female claims to be a Strong, Independent Woman™ who Don’t Need a Man™.

Evidence shows quite the opposite of these bold feminist claims. Women do need a man. At least, a man slave. And they especially need his child support and/or alimony check to clear every month. Meantime, the male prey item (referencing the apt term found in the classic book The Predatory Female) is reduced from father to sperm donor by the legal system if a relationshit or marriage doesn’t work out.

This predatory system has become big business in the world’s preeminent sellout culture. A National Fatherhood Initiative report exposes the big business child support has become in the U.S.:

From 2001-2012, the federal Office of Child Support Enforcement reports a whopping increase of 50 percent in child support collections from $21 billion to $31.6 billion.

That’s 50% growth over the course of a decade of the child support gravy train – outstripping the growth of most businesses. As we will see, men are being literally turned into financial slaves of ex-wives or ex-girlfriends. Worse, women initiate or cause 4 out of 5 divorces, so they hold the cards when it comes to male liberty and slavery.

Feminists and the misandrist Anglo legal system have succeeded in usurping male rights by implanting this toxic mentality into the minds of several generations of women in the Anglosphere: What woman needs the inconvenience a man represents (with his needs for food, love, and sex) when the fruits of his labor can be forcibly extracted and delivered by Big Daddy Government?


The family court system frequently turns men into servants

What is Slavery?

Let’s look at some definitions of slavery to see if forced child support and alimony payments fit the definition.

How much are men forced to pay into the system? Child support alone averages $500 a month per child, and alimony for a man who makes $5,000 a month would be an additional $1,600 a month payment in most states. These are payments that must be made whether or not the newly minted slave of the government gynocracy can afford them, whether or not he has a job, and with no regards to his personal health or well-being.

American men are being forced to make a wealth transfers to women under threat of imprisonment and/or having both professional and driver’s licenses revoked, with no accountability on the part of the mother to show that the funds are being spent exclusively for the benefit of the child, or if she even needs the alimony in this age of career girls. It would appear this scheme fits the textbook definition of slavery well:

  1. The state or condition of being a slave; a civil relationship whereby one person has absolute power over another and controls his life, liberty, and fortune
  2. the subjection of a person to another person, esp. in being forced into work
  3. work done in harsh conditions for low pay

The current child support and alimony system in the U.S. fits textbook slavery definitions #1 and #2 very well. When men lose driver’s and professional licenses after falling behind on court mandated wealth transfers to women, slavery definition #3 comes into play.

In fact, a recent expose by a prison guard turned expat on Rookh Kshatriya’s excellent blog illustrates how men who contribute to society are being betrayed by both women and their government. He tells the story of a surgeon whose life was destroyed by a predatory Anglobitch, a man who went from saving lives to doing work in harsh conditions for low pay:

The very worst case I saw as a prison guard was a surgeon, yes an American surgeon who was one of the most respectable guys I ever met, hard working, worked until 2 a.m. 6 days a week to save people’s lives. With all the work hours, his wife got “lonely” and started sleeping around, eventually having 2 kids that weren’t even his as he found out later. And then she filed for divorce so she could take the surgeon’s money, blow it on cocaine and stupid luxuries for herself without doing any work herself (that’s the real destination where the “child support” money goes) and sleep around with her favorite Chad of the week, all on her hard working surgeon ex-husband’s money. She won an insanely high judgment in a US family court, millions of dollars in child support and “alimony” that the poor surgeon would have to pay. Since by the court’s judgment, “she should be entitled to maintain the same standard of living after the divorce”, even though this greedy gold-digging Anglobitch is the one who filed for the divorce to steal from her hard-working husband who was actually saving people’s lives.

After a few years of doing this, and losing his house and his nice car, the poor surgeon threw out his back while helping a patient onto an operating table. He had to cut down his hours as a surgeon, and went to the divorce court asking for a reduction in the support demands, and ask that his lazy, spoiled brat bitch ex-wife get a damn job herself. But the court refused using the same delusion filled imputation bullshit they pull on other ex-husbands, claiming he could somehow make millions of extra dollars using his surgical wizard skills somehow. Which he couldn’t do in reality with his injured back, something the family court judge couldn’t or wouldn’t even try to understand. So then now the alimony and child support were demanding 120% of his income. You see, the family court system will never let you off the treadmill once they target you, especially if you earn a lot of money. Eventually he drained his savings and retirement, couldn’t make the payments at all—and he wound up in the prison where I was a corrections officer.

The corrupt American family court-media-feminist-academia cultural Marxist-big business-prison industrial complex had worked perfectly to ruin this poor man, and what a prize they had. A dedicated, hard working US surgeon, saving lives every day, drained of his money and reduced to poverty by a gold-digging, spoiled greedy bimbo who divorced him due to his very dedication, had kids with other men to force him to pay bullshit “child support” in addition to never-stopping alimony, his assets taken by his gold-digging ex wife and the state to grease their own corruption, the “child support” in actuality supporting the ex wife’s corrupt, hedonistic lifestyle after divorce. And then the poor surgeon himself made a literal slave in a US prison, stripped of his license and made a perpetual debtor, worked to the bone but never allowed to profit from his own efforts or hard work. That really is how it works in the US family court and prison system. That poor surgeon was the worst case we ever saw, made us so mad we were talking about how we were going to “free the Bastille” and start a revolution ourselves to stop all the corruption, Robespierre style. And free all the innocent men, and even some women, who were imprisoned this way, to feed more slaves to the machine.

As this case shows, women have absolute power over men in the court system. A man’s life, liberty and finances are subject to forfeiture by an oppressive, legalistic system simply because he had a failed relationship with an Anglobitch.

Let’s look at another definition of slavery.

Slavery is a legal or economic system in which principles of property law are applied to humans allowing them to be classified as property, to be owned, bought and sold accordingly, and they cannot withdraw unilaterally from the arrangement. While a person is enslaved, the owner is entitled to the productivity of the slave’s labor, without any remuneration.

Being forced to pay a woman in order to stay out of jail means men have become property owned by the state, as men are bought by the court system and sold by women into their bondage – and of course men cannot withdraw from the arrangement. A man’s owner, the state, entitles itself as well as his ex to the productivity of the newly minted slave’s labor for 18 years or even for a lifetime in the case of alimony, forcing payments to be made to a totally unaccountable “mother” or ex.


Women have the right to choose, therefore men must be given the right to choose in the interest of equality

Legal Abortion: Men’s Right to “Choose”

How do we remedy this situation in the interest of men’s rights? A start would be giving men the right to a legal abortion.

One of the conditions of slavery is the fact a party to the “agreement” cannot withdraw unilaterally from the arrangement. It’s is an interesting condition to elaborate on. Men in the United States have no legal rights to withdraw from being fathers after conception, even though women can physically abort their child anytime they choose. This means women have all the power over men and their children’s lives, and men have none. In effect, all a woman has to do is find an idiot who makes a good salary to impregnate her, then she gets a guaranteed income for 18 years. (If he marries her, potentially an income for life!)

At the very least, to give men the rights granted to slaves in 1865 – to unilaterally withdraw from the arrangement – American lawmakers need to follow the model recently proposed by the Swedish, reported by the Daily Mail. Interestingly,  the idea of “legal abortions” came from European liberals:

Expectant fathers in Sweden should have the right to ‘legally abort’ their unborn child up until the 18th week of pregnancy, the youth wing of the country’s Liberal Party has proposed. Swedish Liberal Youth argues that men should be given an equal say in whether or not they wish to become a parent, and be granted the option to cut any lawful responsibilities. The suggested ‘legal abortion’ would be irreversible and would see the man renounce all parental duties and rights to see the child once it has been born.

Men are currently given no say in whether or not they wish to become a parent after the sex act. Once again we see bias against men in society, while women play the victim card to their benefit.


Statistically, women are more likely to become deadbeats than men

Deadbeat Moms

To illustrate one of the many hypocrisies of Anglo culture, let’s examine a term of scorn heaped upon men who can’t make the expected wealth transfers. The phrase Deadbeat Dads is a popular one on the left and in the media. But we never hear the term Deadbeat Moms, even though women have a higher percentage of child support defaults (i.e. falling behind or not paying) than men. Deadbeat moms occur at 1.2 times the rate of deadbeat dads in Anglo America:

  • 32% of custodial fathers did not receive child support payments from “mom”
  • 25% of custodial mothers did not receive child support payments from “dad”

Delving into the numbers, child support statistics get even more interesting. Mothers default more often even though they are not forced to pay as much as fathers by the court system.

  • The average due to custodial mothers is $4,800 annually
  • The average due to custodial fathers is $4,100 annually

So, even though women do not have to pay as much child support as men do, they become deadbeats more often. The media never discuss this, nor do lawmakers. Also, thanks to a gynocentric court system that displays the opposite of “equality” leftists and feminists claim to hold so dear:

  • 84% of the time women get custody
  • 16% of the time men get custody

If equality was truly a desired outcome, rather than women continuing to enjoy all legal rights and privileges men would get custody 50% of the time, or both parties would co-parent (as is done in Iceland) and neither would be forced by the legal system to make payments to the other.


Men need to be more than sperm donors in the eyes of the law

A Rising Tide of Men Speaking Out

There is good news. Men are now throwing off the culturally-imposed prohibitions on speaking out against a system that abuses them.

Male utility is often cited as the only use women have for men in the modern age. In the long darkness before humanity became civilized, men were not given roles in society. After giving men roles in society, civilization flourished. By banishing fathers from the matriarchal kingdom, we have regressed, not progressed as a society.

As alluded to earlier, there has been some kickback to this model of female privilege and superiority, however. Daniela Carrigo posted this comment on the National Fatherhood Initiave’s page:

As a woman it infuriates me that dads’ sites always start with ‘respect the child’s mom’ and mom’s sites never mention dad. Dad sites say ‘pay child support’ or ‘be fiscally responsible for your child’ and mom sites, not so much – like – never.

You want to protect marriage? Make giving dads custody and making moms pay child support the NORM. All studies show moms start divorce proceedings or, in the majority of births today, never marry dad – why, alimony is on its way out but child support is tax free and GUARANTEED.

Cut off the free cow and women (as one I know) will stop raising kids dad free with free money. Get a damn job and stop expecting money from the man you keep the child from! You should be able to earn enough to not need child support OR you don’t DESERVE THE CHILD!!!!

Indeed, there is rarely if ever any question of accountability on the part of the mother. Men are blamed from the moment the sex act occurs, while women are not blamed for spreading their legs. Women receive government benefits for children they can’t afford, while men are sent to prison for children they can’t afford.

Men at Yahoo! Answers also give us a taste of the dirty underbelly of the Anglo American family court system:

Think about it, the man has his monthly income taken away from him. Not to mention he can go to jail for not paying this fine. This utterly DESTROYS any motivation the man may have to work harder/improve his performance or start a business for example, what’s the point if his hard-earned money is just stolen from him?

Meanwhile, the woman is free to mess around w/ other guys w/ the money she receives for free from her former victim. The financial needs of the child are almost always a small fraction of what she receives, and so she is free to spend the extra money on purses/shoes/jewelry, etc.

The saddest part is, the man is denied of seeing his child either by the woman or the Gov’t, despite any attempts he may try to make contact. Even worse is when the woman trains the kid to hate his dad by calling him a “deadbeat” or a “loser”, when in fact this is usually further from the truth (MOST fathers will not abandon their kid).

Child support is nothing but slavery. The fact that a few careless/manipulative women can exploit the system to deny honest men contact with their children WHILE stealing 50-60% of their hard-earned income is just wrong.

The Yahoo! discussion continues with this response:

I totally agree with you. That’s why more men are foregoing the marriage and staying single. I can tell you that if my wife and I divorced I would never get remarried. Divorces are slanted against men. Women are so vindictive when it comes to revenge that they can’t see how their actions are hurting men and their own kids. If the courts were a lot more fair and the lawyers a lot less greedy then men would not be so afraid of the marriage contract or the results of some woman with dollar bills in her eyes.

It’s true. Men are waking up to the fact that any dealing with an Anglo American women puts their entire lives in jeopardy. (A fact made even truer by the recent spate of #MeToo sexual witch trials in this Neo-Puritan, anti-male, anti-sex, anti-procreation, feminist culture.)

Rather than this unfortunate circumstance happening by accident, the outcome of enslaving men with their own children has long been the aim of the social engineers who have this nefarious goal: make sex and reproduction so risky for men they will not reproduce, which will lead to population control.

At least, that’s the idea in theory. In reality, it means that good, hardworking, law-abiding men are not reproducing because of the hell the legal system has created, but thugs and bad boys are reproducing because they are often in trouble with the law anyway and don’t give a damn. Statistics bear this out: Criminals have an average of 3.0 children per lifetime, while the average for the rest of the population is 1.75 children per lifetime.

The penalty for slaves who don’t pay once they are indentured by a state that meddles in family matters is discussed below, from the same Yahoo! Answers board.

If you come up short on child support you immediately get a warrant issued. The best solution I’ve seen for a more equitable solution for child support would be for the custodial parent to provide receipts to CSA and checks issued as valid reimbursements (just like a FSA account), any money not used out of that month gets returned. This will separate the good responsible parents from the not so responsible parents, unaccountable money leads to fraud and theft.

The stories of this waste of child support money are numerous among men I know. In one case, a friend of mine is forced to make $1,500 in child support payments each month. However, his kids go around in raggedy clothing while mommy dearest drives a Cadillac Escalade and always looks like she just walked out of the mall. And he’s powerless to do anything about it.

Finally, the breakup of family and subjugation of men also means the corporate-government complex will have more control over the minds of the next generation of children than ever before.


The figurative ball and chain still exists in Anglo America’s family court system

Slavery Still Exists

As these facts show, slavery literally still exists for men of all colors in the United States of America. If women are truly seize the mantle of the empowerment they purport to desire so badly, they must not be given a legal crutch with which they can support their past bad choices, including choosing fathers they could not reasonably have expected to stay with until the children they create are raised.

We have discussed definitions of slavery. Here is a term women need to learn, as it comes with the territory of an empowered individual:

Accountability is an obligation or willingness to accept responsibility or to account for one’s actions.

To be Empowered™, women must also become accountable. Big Daddy Government and his welfare state, i.e. Uncle Sugar is an enabler of bad choices for women, and his enabling of reckless and predatory female behavior must be stopped. Men are already being held legally accountable for their actions, however men do not get the same privileges women do. There are four ways to rectify this injustice:

  • Men need to have reproductive rights which are on par with those of women. My body, my choice needs to have the legal equivalent of Me Being Enslaved, My choice. Men must be given the right to a legal abortion if women are given the rights to a physical abortion. This will force women to be prudent about reproductive decisions.
  • Gynocentrism in the courts must be eliminated. Men must be legally recognized as more than sperm donors and check-writers, and fathers must be given custody o children half the time; or, Anglo law should adopt a model in which custody is shared and no forced payments are created by the court system.
  • The no fault divorce system must be abandoned and Anglo law must return to a model in which fault must be proven to get a divorce.
  • Even better, the government needs to stay out of familial matters between two adults as much as possible and let them sort out the matters for themselves.

But we all know women don’t really want to be empowered. They want their cake and ice cream, rights AND privileges, and to eat them both. However, this system will utterly destroy the social fabric in the Anglosphere.

The current legal system makes men totally disposable rather than stakeholders in the family and society. Many of us feel this is by design of social engineers and Marxists rather than a result of any real concern about women’s rights. The true goal of such a system is to reduce mothers and fathers to squabbling factions who wage war on each other in the court system, allowing lawyers, judges, and those allied with this unjust system to make a living off the backs of the common man.

Leaving the family in the hands of a corrupt government is destroying it. As George Orwell put it: The real division is not between conservatives and revolutionaries but between authoritarians and libertarians. Authoritarians have created Big Daddy Government, an authoritarian monstrosity that has removed real fathers from society and enslaved them. Libertarians are trying, unfruitfully, to get the government out of our families.

Until then, the best options for men who know they’ve been betrayed by both their women and their government are to go MGTOW, Go Galt, or become an expat and leave the hateful Anglosphere altogether.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Keanu Reeves Discusses The Anglo-American Matrix


Keanu Reeves draws parallels between The Matrix and the NWO with recent statements

Keanu Reeves, star of The Matrix (1999) recently said he believes the plot of the blockbusting film is “real.” Indeed, the film’s socioeconomic commentary is a foundational part of TNMM as well as a frequent meme in the manosphere. Of course, Reeves doesn’t believe we are literally living inside a computer program controlled by aliens. But he does touch on what the plot of the film represents. As he filmed an advertisement for Squarespace in the Mojave Desert, Reeves said:

The human race has been enslaved for thousands of years. We have been kept in a mental prison by shadowy elites and secret societies that have done all they can to suppress us and stop us reaching our potential.

Any thorough study of history is likely to yield this fact. That we are all human “sheep” living on a series of human farms. Religious, political, economic, and cultural.

Unfortunately, a nation of sheep often begets a government of wolves as is happening in the United States. As this dark reality was slowly exposed by Realtalk on the Internet, and the mainstream mierda propaganda model that controlled the minds of the world began to lose sway, the elite began to lose control of the very sheeple they hoped to lead to slaughter with the culmination of the New World Order. Reeves continues:

I think people were really scared the world was ending until, you know, very recently. It just felt like things had gotten out of control. We’d lost any hope of being able to save ourselves from the dark forces in the world.

Reeves even praises President Trump for exposing the Deep State and other secret societies working to undermine freedom around the world:

But just open your eyes for a minute and look around at what’s happening. It’s astonishing. People like Trump are lifting the veil on an astonishing web of interconnected manipulation.

Reeves even used a term previously relegated to the realm of “conspiracy theory” but one that is proving to be more apt with each passing year – the New World Order:

Love him or loathe him, he is allowing humanity to wake from its slumber and see that the same few people, the same secret societies, the f*cking New World Order, are actively controlling our lives and suppressing our true ability.

A “prison planet” is the ultimate aim of this cabal of totalitarians as electronic tyranny is foisted upon the world in ways never before possible. Reeves believe there’s hope, however.

But people are slowly waking up. It’s time to take back our infinite power and fling open the doors of the mental prison we have been encouraged to build for ourselves. It’s not an easy thing to do, but it’s time to walk into the light of freedom.

As always, TNMM works daily at freeing the minds of men. At waking up the flock. It’s nice to see that even in a town as twisted and corrupt as Hollyweird, there are a few like-minded souls who work towards the destruction of the matrix.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Police State USA Takes “Human Trafficking” Farce to the Super Bowl


Police State USA is out in force at the Super Bowl to stop as many heterosexual hookups as possible

After a recent New Orleans “human trafficking” sting went door to door at Bourbon Street strip clubs right before Mardi Gras season trying to snare horny patrons in Police State USA’s anti-sexual gratification net – yet failed to net a single human trafficking case – American police forces are taking their circus on the road. In fact, they’re taking it to the Super Bowl. Reason magazine reports on the sexual prohibitionists and myth makers’ activities:

Dan Conboy, a police lieutenant in the Minneapolis suburb of Edina, said cops from all over the area would be focused on sex trafficking this weekend, with help from federal authorities. Their focus “won’t just be hotels, but also the airport, clubs and bars–any area where large groups will congregate,” reported the Minneapolis Sun Current.

First off, it’s amazing that this many resources are being deployed to try and stop heterosexual women from selling sexual services to lonely men. This is where we’re at in America, folks. The immoral government is on another classically neo-Puritan moral crusade, turning itself into the biggest cockblock possible. Continuing from Reason:

“This year’s Super Bowl will have the greatest deployment of federal resources yet, due to the city’s relatively small police department,” reported KTSA Minneapolis. Around 1,700 federal agents are expected in town, along with state and local police, the Minnesota National Guard, and officers from more than 60 police departments around Minnesota. In addition, “a 10,000-strong volunteer force has been trained to spot suspicious activity” around town.

You read that right. The latest angle from those planning a totalitarian, socialist state is getting citizens to spy on and tattle tale on each other.

“Hello, I saw some guy with what looked like a slut!”

“We’re on it. We’ll throw his ass to the ground, humiliate him, and give him a criminal record for having those disgusting urges!”

All these public resources and public relations bravado have been directed at a human trafficking problem that largely doesn’t exist, as the matrix lunges at the victimless crime of prostitution. (This is also the case with many other invented “problems” created out of whole cloth by The Anglo-American Matrix and its love affair with the Hegelian Dialectic, i.e. creating problems that don’t exist to create social hysteria and profit. Ultimately, the goal is to make the populace enslave themselves with constant, invented security threats like these.)

Even Reuters accidentally admitted the “human trafficking” campaign is largely a farce in one of their reports on the Super Bowl sex stings:

Although the attorney general of Texas dubbed the Super Bowl the “single largest human trafficking incident” in the United States in 2011, this is largely a myth, academics and anti-trafficking campaigners said.

The commercial sex market grows modestly during Super Bowls, but also during other large events, from the Las Vegas consumer electronics show to Memorial Day weekend, said Lauren Martin, a trafficking expert at the University of Minnesota.

Meaning, willing whores come to the Super Bowl and other big events to sell their “product” to willing men. It’s plain to see P4P (pay for play) is what the matrix wants to wipe out, not human trafficking.

Troublingly, operations like this illustrate the fact the American police state now likes to insert itself into every area of its citizens’ lives as possible. Including their private lives. And there’s nothing as private as sex. Our overlords are quite serious about the War on Sex. From Reason:

In other words, “sex trafficking” gives federal and local authorities an excuse for posting police anywhere and everywhere people are gathering—and for enlisting citizens as spies, too.

Just as TNMM has been reporting, the matrix is making a push to conflate “human trafficking” with regular old prostitution, in an effort to completely take sex away from heterosexual men who don’t agree to subjugate themselves under the gynocentric terms of marriage in feminist-dominated Anglo culture:

Even police willing to admit there’s no evidence for a surge in sex trafficking around the Super Bowl are still planning on using the game as an excuse to conduct prostitution stings. Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) Sgt. Grant Snyder explained the theory: More men than usual may be looking to pay for sex this weekend, and even though most of the people they’ll approach will be consenting adult sex workers, someone getting paid for sex could be a trafficking victim.

Note the typical logic pretzel Clancy Wiggins and Co. twists with the above statement. How long before the remnants of the Fourth Amendment (protections against illegal search and seizure) go out the window? After all, someone in your house might be a terrorist concealing a sizzling bomb. Probably not. But “you never know” in these days of government-fostered paranoia.

Reason magazine injects some reality into what the police will really be doing. Contrast this with the heroic language at officials’ self-congratulatory press conferences:

Therefore—rather than rescuing victims, or finding the people exploiting them—the police are going to arrest a tiny fraction of potential prostitution customers and publicly shame them. (It’s the thought that counts, right?)

In a misandrist culture, shaming men for having sexual desires is what the “human trafficking” campaign is all about. In fact, American police are daring people to sexually satisfy themselves:

For the 10 days leading up to the Super Bowl, MPD has been working with other agencies to conduct “Operation Guardian Angel,” in which police post online ads posing as adult sex workers and arrest those they lure to meet them.

It’s classic entrapment by the minions of Big Daddy Government.

“People who are coming to Minneapolis and are thinking about illegally buying sex know there’s a really good chance they’re talking to law enforcement, that we’ve infiltrated and embedded ourselves in the networks that are trying to sell sex,” Minneapolis City Council Member Steve Fletcher said.

Michelle Guelbart, of ECPAT, an organization that claims to have a mission to end the sexual exploitation of children (why this is being conflated with regular prostitution, nobody knows) gives us a hint at the truth behind all this bullshit in another mainstream media propaganda puff piece from mainstream mierda affiliate WTOP:

“The conversation is moving in the direction that we want it to,” she said.

The conversation is indeed going in the direction social engineers and tyrannical feminists want it to. Assailing the sex lives of Beta males in America.

Where does that leave us? French economist Frédéric Bastiat tried to warn us of the dangers of giving police too much power over the lives of citizens well over a century ago. The human trafficking farce is stark evidence we have descended into the type of society he wrote about:

To create crime, create laws. When there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.

When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.

Indeed, Police State USA glorifies itself in human trafficking narratives, while plundering and recklessly destroying the lives of men who dare leave a Benjamin on the nightstand after having sex with a willing woman.

The greatest tyranny ever known to mankind continues to take root, while a largely oblivious and passive American populace sit on their fat asses munching Cheetos and watching men throw a ball around. Bread and circuses, it seems, work every time.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Planned Parenthood Pushes Sex Change Drugs to Transgender Children


Planned Parenthood moves to drug children with powerful sex hormones

TNMM regularly documents the twisted (and often, downright strange) nature of sexuality in Anglo America. Now, an organization that made its name killing the unborn is moving to offer drugs to children confused by so-called gender dysphoria. Which is, of course, a product of the brainwashing of children in schools and the media by social engineers bent on eliminating sex differences from humanity. From Life Site News:

As the U.S. abortion rate continues to decline and regulations tighten, Planned Parenthood is looking toward a new source of revenue – hormone ‘sex-change’ treatment for minors at Medicaid expense.

That’s right. They want the Beta male dupes who pay the majority of taxes in the United States to fund a new attack upon civilization via the welfare state. (Often referred to around here as Big Daddy Government.) To its credit, Planned Parenthood has already got one sex change revenue stream going.

The abortion giant has been dispensing ‘hormone therapy’ drugs to gender-confused adults since 2016 – giving out transgender hormones to 250 gender dysphorics in the Sarasota area alone last year. The Guardian reports that “Planned Parenthood is one of the largest sources in the U.S. of transgender healthcare.”

Treating adults is one thing. But bringing children into the fold is quite another. How this push to drug minors – in ways that can damage their undeveloped bodies – isn’t considered child abuse is a testament to the manipulative power of such leftist organizations like Planned Parenthood, and a compliant, corporate media that focuses on headlines that really don’t matter while other issues like giving powerful, sex and life-altering drugs to children are swept under the rug.

But, hey. There’s profit to be had in the world’s preeminent sellout culture.

The nation’s largest and most lucrative abortion conglomerate has now “decided it was time for us to expand the care that we were providing to minors,” Vice President of Medical Affairs Suzie Prabhakaran told the Sun Coast.

Insert some typical, liberal hamster rationalizing.

Reasoning that gender confused youth may have difficulty getting sex “change” hormones because “a lot of doctors can be judgmental,” Prabhakaran says it’s important to give children “medications that affect the changes they’re looking for.”

You’ll need boots to wade the rest of this statement.

Planned Parenthood’s website explains that some youth feel their gender “doesn’t match…the gender that they feel they are inside.” Contrary to many mental health professionals, the abortion-and-sex hormone business teaches that “the mismatch between a person’s body and gender identity isn’t in itself a mental illness.”

The devil is always in the details. Giving sex-altering hormones to children is part and parcel of the ongoing Androgyny Agenda, which ultimately seeks to eliminate sexual dimorphism in America and the world. Meaning, social engineers want to eliminate male and female and turn humanity into unisexual pods. (Perhaps this is the real reason the related, and mostly bogus “Human Trafficking” narrative has been spawned as a way of tormenting lonely heterosexual men?) Those who run the world truly hate the human species, it would seem.

This is why men are being feminized and women are being masculinized. But now, why wait until adulthood to confuse people about gender?

Mission creep (which happens every time government funding is dumped into an organization like Planned Parenthood) will eventually mean “gender confused” or “dysphoric” minors will be able to elect to be sterilized at a young age. This is no doubt one of the desired outcomes.

Meantime, Planned Parenthood continues the rest of its bloody mission:

The report shows Planned Parenthoods committed 321,384 abortions last year alone, and received $543.7 million in tax dollars.

A total of 58,220 mostly men died in the Vietnam War. Planned Parenthood is responsible for 5 Vietnams in its killing centers each year. And now, they want to eliminate male and female in their latest science experiment.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

« Older Entries