Category Archives: The Anglosphere

Feminist CEO Accused of Sexual Harassment – Crickets from the Misandrist Media

Miki

A feminist CEO quietly settled serious sexual misconduct allegations, while the story went largely unnoticed by mainstream media

While the misandrist mainstream media have been foaming at the mouth as they conduct one sexual misconduct witch trial after another from behind their benches in plexiglass studios, they’ve remained oddly mute about a feminist CEO doing some very un-feminist things at her company. One has to do some sleuthing to even find this article on CNBC:

Miki Agrawal, the founder, former CEO and now “SHE-eo” of THINX who aimed to take on the feminine hygiene industry, finds herself awash in allegations that she touched employees inappropriately and created a hostile work environment.

Oh, but her crimes are well beyond inappropriate touching. The listing of the feminist CEO’s transgressions is quite extensive. Imagine the screaming, flopping on the floor, and foaming at the mouth talking heads would descend into if a man did these things.

  • Inappropriate touching – fondling breasts of female employees
  • Workplace nudity – employees would be treated to views of Agrawal in the buff at her office, or she would “pee” while conducting video teleconferences
  • Raises were rare and reserved for men – the only two staffers who got raises were male (well, we do earn raises rather than considering ourselves entitled to them)
  • Agrawal expressed sexual interest in employees – at one point telling a lesbian how “hot” she found her
  • The company used “culture queens” rather than human resources

Of course, according to the way the geniuses in the media treat men, we have to believe all these allegations without questioning the motives of the chicks making them, because why would a woman lie?

What does this luminary in the fashion industry manufacture?

THINX makes “period underwear” and is known for its cheeky New York City subway advertising campaigns.

How innovative! Finally, women don’t have to wear tampons or maxi pads anymore! Agrawal responded to the allegations with a predictable denial in New York Magazine:

We spoke on the phone about the sexual-harassment allegations, which she called “baseless” and with “absolutely no merit.” Agrawal said her legal team has contacted third-party employment counsel. She noted that she was speaking for herself, not the company, and recorded the call.

It seems the “pussy pass” worked again, as Agrawal was spared the “raked across the hot coals” treatment high-level men in the business and media world have suffered. The allegations were “quietly settled” meaning she bought her way out of the mess.

What are we knuckle-dragging men supposed to think of the whole ordeal? “Andrew” on the Meninist web site offered his shocked commentary on the story:

This has to be a joke! How can a woman be behind sexual misconduct? The media told me that only men are monsters. What’s the deal here?!

Heh. Andrew is a shitlord if there ever was one.

So, we are left with several recurring themes in this story. Feminists think they can pursue sex at work while men cannot. Women think they own sex, and have turned it into a commodity that they offer only to men they think they can exploit for resources or social status. Media misandry is at an all-time high. Puritan sexual mores have morphed into secular feminism. And, there’s hypocrisy all around.

Anglo culture has gone insane.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Advertisements

Puritan Prudishness + Police State = Hate Crime for Whistling at a Woman

Wolf

Once a staple of Tex Avery cartoons, wolf whistling could become a hate crime

Would the Brits have been better off if they had just surrendered in World War II? One wonders if the totalitarian state back then could have kept pace with the totalitarian state emerging today. England and America – the two main sides of the Puritan cultural coin – are now repressing sex in ways tinpot dictators dare not dream of.

Here comes the next assault on heterosexuality and masculinity in support of the Androgyny Agenda and the Goddess Cult. From the Evening Standard:

Wolf whistling or making sexist remarks on London’s streets could become a hate crime. The Metropolitan Police revealed it is speaking with other UK forces to assess whether it is worth cracking down on gender-based hate crimes after a pilot scheme was launched in the East Midlands last year.

It seems Merry Old England is constructing a police state to rival the emerging regime in America. Insert some Hegelian Dialectic:

Dozens of women reported misogynistic crimes to Nottingham Police in the first few months of the pilot scheme, the force said. Sexist offences were reported at a similar rate to other hate crimes.

Voila! “The police have to do something.” Like stripping away yet more personal liberty and pedestalizing women to the point of insanity. Anglo women are truly becoming radioactive to deal with, and worse, are doing so of their own volition.

One can envision a world in the not so distant future in which men have to look away or look down like little bitches when women are around in order to not risk being burned at the stake for a “hate crime” (just as major media figures are now having their careers ruined for sexual assault charges that are decades old, baseless, and in Danny Masterson’s case – dismissed by police) for ogling breasts or behinds that women often audaciously display in an attempt to garner male attention.

Links in the chain of totalitarianism are being forged one by one by the Anglo American power structure. The analogy of a frog in a pot of boiling water certainly comes to mind. A wise man might flee now or soon while the getting is good. Things look to be only getting worse from here.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Is Marriage Legalized Prostitution? This Case Certainly Makes It Seem That Way

couple-1850073_1280

Pay now, or pay later illustrated once again

TNMM has revealed in past articles that marriage in its current form in Anglo society certainly could be considered legalized prostitution. Women in this dying culture always want to be paid for being alive and rendering infrequent sexual services, since there’s little else they contribute to a modern marriage. They “cash in” when they ring up the divorce lawyer. (Which, incidentally is why “paying up front” rather than paying after the fact should be an option for men…i.e. prostitution should be legalized.)

The transactional nature of sex in female psychology runs deep. All females are ultimately looking for resources in exchange for sex – even in the animal kingdom where female penguins exchange sex for rocks, which are the currency of penguin society.

Proving our point about women wanting resources for sex one way or the other is this case out of Australia. $15 million just wasn’t enough in frivorce court lottery winnings for an Australian wife. (P.S. Maybe this is why SE Asia is covered with Australian blokes fleeing frigid, calculating Australian women. P.P.S. I’d be happy with $1 million, which would be enough to power my minimalist lifestyle until I take the big dirt nap.)

But this chick now wants to break the bank of her ex-husband again after the IPO listing for his company netted him $93 million dollars. Odd, how even after the ink has long since dried on the divorce papers post-expiration date Anglo women have the audacity to come back and demand even more money for their crusty behinds. Here’s the woman’s shoddy logic:

The wife now alleges there has been a miscarriage of justice by reason of her former hubby failed to “disclose relevant information relating to the public listing of a company in which the first respondent held a substantial interest and which resulted in the first respondent reaping a substantial financial reward in the vicinity of $93 million.”

I’d like to be the judge in this case. I’d tell this harradin she was Strong and Independent™ now and that the decision – which she signed – was final. Tough titty, said the kitty.

In other words, her ex didn’t disclose to this money-hungry goddess (who likely had been living a decadent life before her frivorce) he had the possibility of making money after she financially pumped and dumped him in the courtroom.

The court document states that the hubby resists the claim on the basis that “any information that was not disclosed was not relevant to the case” or, if it were, no further disclosure was required.

One has to agree with the husband. Why should he have to disclose a windfall that had not yet occcurred? Even after divorce it seems men can’t be rid of The Predatory Female. The injustice for the defendant (the man) in this case is another shining example of why divorce reform is needed so badly in the nations that comprise the Anglosphere.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Netflix Fires Danny Masterson in Latest Wave of Sexual Witch Trials

Danny

Danny Masterson has just been burned at the stake in today’s sexual witch trials

Sexual witch trials of prominent actors are seemingly endless this year in Anglo America. They’re obviously witch trials for this reason: once men have been removed from their jobs, the charges disappear like farts in the wind. We never get to see the accusers because “victims” must be protected. Pretty neat how that works, right? A man’s life can be destroyed by an invisible assailant in Anglo America, who then slithers back into the darkness.

In another bow to Racial Bolshevism, yet another white man has been fired over sexual assault allegations that are more than a decade old – allegations that were dismissed by authorities when they first arose. Danny Masterson, star of “The Ranch” and “That 70s Show” told vultures in the press as they swooped in to see why he had been fired from the Netflix series:

From day one, I have denied the outrageous allegations against me. Law enforcement investigated these claims more than 15 years ago and determined them to be without merit.

As ironic as it is to watch liberal actors becoming the victims of their own hysteria, these crossroads are a dangerous place for America to be. Masterson continues:

I have never been charged with a crime, let alone convicted of one. In this country you are presumed innocent until proven guilty. However, in the current climate, it seems as if you are presumed guilty the moment you are accused.

Guilty until proven innocent has, without a doubt, been the modus operandi in this latest propaganda war directed with blunt force on the populace. The real reason these baseless claims are receiving so much attention is so it will become dangerous for heterosexual men – average Joes – to even approach women without risking fines or prison time. If powerful men aren’t immune to baseless charges, nobody is.

Netflix just announced the axe had fallen on Masterson in this tepid statement:

As a result of ongoing discussions, Netflix and the producers have written Danny Masterson out of The Ranch. Yesterday was his last day on the show, and production will resume in early 2018 without him.

The war on men and heterosexuality is reaching a crescendo. What’s so odd is that meek, weak-willed men are not fighting back against their own marginalization. We are culturally lodged firmly in Step Four of this historical process, elucidated by Turning Point USA:

Weak_Men

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Pink Promotes Androgyny Agenda by Raising “Gender Neutral” Daughter

Pink

Trashy pop star “Pink” is raising her daughter to be gender neutral

The powers that be in The Anglo-American Matrix never stop with their evil schemes to mold humanity into sexless, mechanical, consumer automatons. Social engineering, their favorite tool to brainwash and control millions (if not billions) is becoming evermore bizarre with each passing assault on the populace.

There have long been rumors that actors, actresses, as well as pop stars and starlets have to basically sell their souls to executives in order to become rich and famous. In fact, there is mounting evidence Hollyweird has long used strange rituals and sexual blackmail to keep its troupe of marionettes in line. Rumors are Will Smith has offered up his own son Jayden as a sacrifice, which is the real reason Jayden cross dresses so often.

Keep that in mind when reading the latest out of the trashy pop music industry. Also keep in mind the fact that millions of mindless single mommies blindly follow social trends set by these tools fools of the elite.

Consider this bizarre story that just emerged on Breitbart, a true list item on the Androgyny Agenda if there ever was one:

Pop star Pink says she is raising her children to be gender-neutral because her family lives in a “label-less household.” The singer, who is 38 and married to motorcycle racer Carey Hart, 42, told the U.K.’s The People she does not want her children defined by their gender. Pink said she is delighted her 6-year-old daughter Willow told her she wants to marry an African woman when she grows up.

So we get a twofer out of this story. Gender bending and gay marriage. These days, the destruction of the next generation of women is beginning at the tender age of 6 years old.

If you thought feminist propaganda was bad as the full court press begins on brainwashing young women with that doxy in their tweens and teens, wait until an entire generation doesn’t even know what sex they are. Continuing from Breitbart:

The performer of international hit “Get the Party Started,” Pink is a champion of the new gender ideology that does not acknowledge the science of two biological sexes – male and female.

What a sellout piece of crap you are, Pink.

“I was in a school and the bathroom outside the kindergarten said: ‘Gender Neutral – anybody’, and it was a drawing of many different shapes,” she said. “I took a picture of it and I wrote: ‘Progress’. I thought that was awesome. I love that kids are having this conversation.”

Notice the Marxist codeword “progress” mangled into Pink’s statement, and how cleverly crafted these subliminal cultural messages are. Cultural and psychological sickness is presented in such as way, and with such a deft, lying tongue Pink believes her own madness.

The Grammy-winner says though she enjoys motherhood, she considers herself to be a “pre-teen boy,” according to The People’s report“I do bake sales and lemonade stands,” she explains. “I take my kid to school and try to get there on time. I’m a f**king grown up now, it’s so weird. I’m still a 12-year-old boy.”

Yeah, well you can take that nonsense and cram it, Pink. This should be called what it is, child abuse. Pink should lose her kids over this idiocy. Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina. That’s where it begins and ends.

The great evil of the 20th century the world had to defend itself from came out of Nazi Germany. The great evil of the 21st century looks to be emerging out of the United States of America, with insidious Cultural Marxism, social engineering, and globalism/world domination as the three heads of the Hydra the world will have to defend itself from.

It seems dark days lie ahead.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

“Men Are Not Toxic” Strip Club Sign Causes Controversy, Proving America is Rife with Misandry

Masculinity

This sign was all it took for the mainstream media to start attacking men all over again

The Establishment hate fest directed at men continues to roar like a prairie fire across the cultural landscape of Anglo America. Fresh on the heels of sexual witch trials of major media figures, a Colorado strip club has become the latest to receive the tried and true, drive-by hit piece treatment from the mainstream media for posting a humorous billboard that says: Toxic masculinity welcome here.

Yes, a strip club welcoming so-called “toxic” men is now making national headlines. And of course, with this fake news story making the rounds on major media outlets, male behavior is once again in the crosshairs of the gaystream media. This is the low level of public discourse in the nation today. That straight men are even considered toxic to begin with illustrates the embedded misandry that runs deep in this culture.

In yet another contrived issue created out of whole cloth, the misandrist American press saw fit to further assail masculinity because of a fucking billboard. Proving this story has no logical reason to be receiving the attention it is now getting, a masturbating woman posting a reaction to the sign was all it took to stir up dander among presstitutes. Check out the justification for the story posted by The Guardian:

A photo of the sign was taken by Bonnie AD, a Denver activist for “conscious sexuality” who posted the image on her Instagram account, @eroticselflove. It duly made the rounds on social media.

Erotic self love. Hmm. Why wasn’t the sex-hating press upset about that? The masturbating feminist who posted her “outrage” said:

“I had a visceral reaction of disgust when I saw the sign, because toxic masculinity is not a joke. I wanted to share the image because I think that community accountability is vital for social change. Largely, the response on social media has been one of disgust.”

Well Bonnie, I had a visceral reaction of disgust over your Instagram account. Some of us want to make love to another human being and not ourselves.

It’s important to read between the lines. Masturbating, self-loving feminists are upset. Normal people are not. Yet, the media frame the issue as though Main Street, USA is in an uproar. (See why I grew to absolutely despise this business before abandoning it?)

Deborah Dunafon, owner of Shotgun Willie’s strip club in Glendale, CO where the sign was posted came out swinging when vultures from the press swooped down on her establishment. She told low-paid microphone holders:

“I think it’s horrible to accuse men of being toxic, because they’re not. Our business is men, and men are not toxic.”

Dunafon continued. She alludes to the truth of the matter and narratives we discuss regularly in the manosphere.

“I didn’t put that up because of marketing. I put it up because I’ve been watching what’s going on in our country as far as men are concerned and it’s infuriating. I have a son, I have four grandsons, and I feel sorry for my grandsons because they’re all teenagers and I’m afraid for them. I’m wondering if they’re gonna have to make girls sign a contract before they can even go on a date.”

Indeed, it is becoming obvious the objective of feminists and social engineers is to totally neuter men legally, socially, and culturally. (If not later, literally via the medical-pharmaceutical establishment). Dating and especially any sexual interaction with women is indeed becoming a frightening prospect. As we have seen with media witch trials, only the mere accusation of sexual impropriety is enough to destroy a man years or even decades after the supposed event took place. We are never to question female motives, you see. (Even though a high percentage of rape claims turn out to be false.)

Dunafon has obviously awakened to the ongoing wussification of America via the Androgyny Agenda:

“How many men are we gonna pick on until finally there’s no men standing? How would you like a society with men meekly running around with little bonnets on their head?”

Dunafon also knows its Beta males who are suffering the most these days.

“We believe that men in society today are totally being picked on. Shotgun has a lot of different guys come in – blue-collar guys, white-collar guys –and I’d say 98.99% of them are good guys. And they don’t want to be accused of being monsters, because really they’re not. They come in for fun.”

These are the same lonely, sexless men Police State USA regularly picks on for renting a good time with another willing adult with its endless prostitution stings. Women are now so drunk on their power and emboldened they’re marginalizing a business model that screws men out of their money, while offering nothing but lap dances and a case of blue balls in return.

How did America ever come to these crossroads? A place where it wants to extinguish the very men who provide it with its prosperity? A place in which sex itself – a normal human desire – has become the ultimate taboo? Would you fight and die for this country in a war? I know I wouldn’t.

My relations with America, Inc. have become strictly mercenary. I work for money which I save to take to places that don’t hate me and make me feel like a pariah because I have a penis and a functioning libido. Once I have dual citizenship and a foothold in another nation, I don’t even want its fucking money, anymore. I just want out.

How long before millions more come to the same conclusion? Or go MGTOW whether they’ve ever heard of that acronym or not?

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Paper Chase: Exploring the Links Between Feminism and Law

Sexuality is being warped and other assorted cultural insanity is now being unleashed by endless legalism

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

Despite the State’s unstinting legal support for false sexual abuse claims and misandrist divorce settlements, very few manosphere writers discuss the strong links between law and Anglo-American feminism. This is a startling omission, when one considers how many prominent feminists are lawyers, legal academics or politicians with legal backgrounds.

In fact, it must be said that law contains the intellectual ‘cream’ of the Anglo-feminist movement. Of course, the subaltern wing of academic feminism resides in the social ‘sciences’, with its non-patriarchal mathematics and other nonsense. The manosphere expends much (digital) ink discussing these poltroons, largely ignoring the legal wing of academic feminism. This is a pity, because the legal profession contains the best feminist minds; it is also the strongest feminist link to official institutions, the conduit through which feminism is imposed on the wider society.

Men always enquire, ‘How did this come about?’ whenever some misandrist agenda is arbitrarily applied to schools, public washrooms or sentencing procedures. More often than not, the answer is feminist legalism acting directly on ‘official’ institutions without reference to electoral processes.

Manosphere scholars seldom address feminist legalism for several reasons. First and most important, law is an obscure field full of specialist jargon. Second, manopshere scholars prefer easy conceptual victories against the (much weaker) arts-humanities wing of academic feminism. Third, the anti-Marxist fixation of the traditionalist manosphere blinds it to the intimate links between Anglo-American feminism and ‘traditional’ Anglo-Saxon culture. In this case the link is obvious, since ‘rule of law’ defines Anglo civilization. Indeed, law ‘rules’ Anglo-American society in a very literal way: think how many prominent Anglosphere politicians have a legal education or worked in the legal profession. In Continental Europe, a far higher proportion of politicians are scientists and economists (Angela Merkel is a scientist, for example).

Feminist legalism should therefore not surprise us, since the Anglosphere is defined by its legalism. The US is legalistic above all other nations; it has countless branches of law, all ever-growing like a vast tree. To pursue a biological analogy, if Anglo-American societies are the phenotype, law is their genotype; that is, they are regulated by pharisaic legalism above any other structural principle. Indeed, it might be said that the Anglosphere is law, in essence. Not only does Anglo-American feminism derive its legalistic character from this fact, it also derives much of its power from it. Curious, then, that the manosphere remains blind to feminist legalism and its power to engineer dramatic social change.

Some admiration is called for: dissident males in the Anglosphere raise a lot of rhetorical dust, while their feminist counterparts infiltrate the cultural genotype – namely, the legal system – and proceed to systematically fashion society in their own image. Equally important is their domination of legal education, since it will shape the next generation of lawyers, judges and judgements. Unlike the social ‘sciences’, law is one of the oldest and most prestigious of the university subjects: all elite universities have law departments and these attract high-status students who will become active members of the future ruling elite.

Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren and a host of other political feminists all trained at elite law schools. In sum, feminism has been wise to infiltrate Anglo-American jurisprudence, for whoever controls law has the true keys to power. Feminist sociology might be the yeast, but feminist jurisprudence is the finished loaf.

Law is the “teeth” of social engineering schemes, making entrenched feminists puppeteers

Legalism Begets Social Engineering

My research for this article unveiled a veritable hornet’s nest of feminist jurisprudence. Nearly every major law school in the Anglosphere has powerful feminist representatives, as we can see from the following website:

http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/

It is no surprise that the site unambiguously links law to social engineering. Since no one really understands law except for specialist experts, it is perfect for the underhand manipulation of society in this way. Even more disturbing is the close link between law and politics, a seamless association in the Anglosphere. RF and other American dissidents talk a lot about America’s lapse into a police state: Feminist Law Professors is where that process really begins. The following passage gives some idea of the kind of articles posted there:

The U.S. Feminist Judgments Project seeks contributors of judicial opinions rewritten to reflect a feminist perspective, and commentaries on the cases and rewritten opinions, for an edited book collection tentatively titled Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Torts Opinions.  This edited volume is part of a collaborative project among law professors and others to rewrite, from a feminist perspective, key judicial decisions in the United States.  The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. Stanchi, Linda L. Berger, and Bridget J. Crawford, was published in 2016 by Cambridge University Press.  Subsequent volumes in the series will focus on different areas of law and will be under review by Cambridge.

It is easy to see what these legal activists are doing: rewriting legal precedents in order to create a corpus of pseudo-precedent for future judgements. In so doing, the future will be theirs (for as long as this dysfunctional civilization lasts).

The Anglo-feminist domination of the legal profession is of seismic significance, when one considers the vast power of jurisprudence in the Anglosphere (not to mention its deep historical links to politics and social administration). Conversely, masculinist activism in the English-speaking world lacks any legal wing, let alone an organized one. Instead, it assumes being ‘right’ will automatically confer ‘victory’ over feminist lawyers and politicians; sublimely missing the point that law, not truth, is the key to the Anglosphere.

Perhaps the fact that most male rights activists are engineers and tradesmen explains their political impotence; after all, engineers and tradesmen do not create/interpret laws or become politicians. To be blunt, Anglo-feminists are winning all the battles because they fight on the right battlefield, namely the legal one. Unless the Anglo men’s movement adjust to this reality, they will always be marginalised and powerless.

Unless they leave the Anglo-American Matrix, of course.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

« Older Entries