Category Archives: The Sexes

The Androgyny Agenda Reaches Star Trek


Meet “Michael Bernham” – the protagonist on a new Star Trek series

If the transgender narrative wasn’t already ground into your eyes and ears like so much visual and verbal glass by the mainstream media, here comes a new Star Trek series to serve as a vehicle to mainstream the androgyny agenda. It further confirms the long-running franchise will continue to boldly go off the rails, a process started by J.J. Abrams when he turned the esoteric enterprise into a big budget farce directed at low-IQ moviegoers.

A new CBS series entitled Star Trek: Discovery will be the first new television series in the franchise since the failed Enterprise left the airwaves a decade ago. Predictably, Hollyweird execs want to piss down the backs of longtime fans and into the face of the people who inhabit “flyover country” they hate so much.

The series will be led by the delicious Sonequa Martin-Green, but she will be playing a character named Michael Bernham. Rumors vary widely on why the execs chose the odd name for a female character. Some say Berhham will be – you guessed it – a transgender lead for the series. Another unofficial web site says the series is only trying to make names androgynous, and not the character himself…er…herself…er…itself.

The TrekMovie staff would like to point out that Michael is a female first name, and we have confirmed with CBS that Michael Burnham is, and always has been, the name of Martin-Green’s character.

Another web site called Fansided seemed excited at the prospect of gender ambiguity.

If the writers are indeed creating our first transgender Trek character, they need to do so with caution. Put too much light on her sexuality and it becomes a SJW issue; alienating your baby-boomer crowd. Not enough light will seem like they perhaps missed a chance for social commentary.

Either way, why can’t Martin-Green have a female’s name and the audience allowed to enjoy her in all her sexy, womanly glory without muddying the waters, you fucks?

But we all know the media and Hollyweird run on mainstreaming fringe elements of society, and what better way to further insult the 99.7% of the population that isn’t transgender than shoving such a character in their face.

PR flacks and marketing morons think they’re being “edgy” when they make decisions like this. But the further they push the boundaries, the more they lose normal people. There’s no limit to the depths of hell once the race to the bottom begins. But can the people who love this lifestyle just crater all by themselves and leave the rest of us out of their lust to desexualize human beings?

Of course, all it takes for this perversion to stop is for audiences to stop paying attention. This isn’t “progress” anymore unless one considers it progress towards the edge of a cliff. It’s just more sickly, Anglo American sexual ambiguity and Cultural Marxism packaged as something cutting edge. Don’t watch it. We just discussed getting messages from the media out of your home and out of your life earlier this week. Perhaps now, more than ever is the time to take action. If we all collectively stop paying attention, pushing perversion will cease to work as a business model for the industry of illusion.

One might previously have though the demise of Anglo America on the world stage was a bad omen. But with the nation now trying to cut penises off men and sew them onto women, some of us are beginning to think the end of this society in decline can’t come soon enough.

After all, the end game of Cultural Marxism is to eliminate all sex differences. Are you ready to embrace the Rachel Maddow future? Well, here’s one motherfucker who won’t go down without a fight.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.


Women Hunt Men, Men Hunt Resources


Here’s a new way of looking at a woman who’s interested in you – proceed with caution

To maintain frame and rationality in the mating game, visualize a woman who is interested in you just as you would visualize a large cat staring down a prey item. Be careful you don’t wind up her lunch, your finances and freedom shredded to ribbons by her claws.

Any man who has succumbed to a predatory female will know well the discussion we are about to have. A discussion about how women hunt men like prey items since the Law of the Jungle has returned to the West post-sexual devolution. Worse, they now do so with total cultural and legal impunity. Like jaguars in the jungle, women are in search of the tastiest prey item to whet their appetite. A gynocentric culture and misandrist legal system only sharpens their resolve, and weakens men’s hand as they scurry about.

Women, unless constrained by patriarchal culture, behave as financial and resource predators of men. This unfortunate reality of human relationships is alluded to in the classic men’s book The Predatory Female.

When you begin to fraternize with a woman, you are taking the first steps in a ritual mating dance that, if allowed to progress, will result in your moving about the floor in a semi-comatose state until you are fleeced of your money, property, and peace of mind.

The simplest way to put it is: Women hunt men, and men hunt resources for women to consume. The totality of human sexual relationships revolves around this fact.

The hunt begins.

A predatory female will study you. She learns to know what you are thinking. She begins the strongest primeval death grip known to man.

Of course, sex is one of the most powerful instincts human beings have. Being the gatekeeper of sex is her trump card, one she will play ruthlessly at the poker table as she places you into the “death grip” alluded to above. If you are a willing prey item, she will soon have total control over your sexual, financial, and legal life as well as your freedom.

How does she select her prey?

If a woman in interested in you, know that you have been identified as a prey item. You are something she thinks she can consume. In her eyes, you are either a tasty meal ticket or a success object to show off to her friends, or both. Your humanity matters very little to her. As a man, you will never be nothing more to a woman other than an object she can exploit using nature’s credit card to “pay” you, even though she is so adept at manipulation most Betas never realize the nature of the beast they’re in bed with literally, financially, and emotionally.

Know that once your resources have been consumed, or you are not able to keep up with her pace on The Hedonic Treadmill, or she finds a more appealing prey item (i.e. a new man) to monkey branch to, you will cease to exist and be left like roadkill smeared on the pavement along the highway of life.

If you’re invisible to her, it’s because you are not seen as a potential meal ticket she can use to raise her status or better her quality of life.

These are the facts Red Pill men must face if they want to have an advantage on the sexual playing field. Manipulate the predator using this wisdom. Become a more difficult prey item to mesmerize her, but never let her get close enough to take a bite out of you.

As jaded as this knowledge might seem to the uninitiated, there is really no other way to explain the behavior of women and female adherence to the Law of Hypergamy, which is right up there with the Law of Gravity when it comes to female nature. Hypergamy, is of course, the female predilection to only date and marry men who are above them in socioeconomic status.

Women, the predators, are upwardly mobile when it comes to the mating game. Men, the prey, are almost always downwardly mobile when dealing with women. The cost of her sexuality is his lifeblood, a lifetime of labor and sacrifice. This is doubly true when dealing with an Anglobitch, more cunning and difficult to appease than other women. (With less reward, too.)

Of course, bad boys are an exception to the Law of Hypergamy, but in the vast majority of relationships you’ll find a woman with a man who provides material benefit to her. (Even if she enjoys seeks out and enjoys bad boy seed on the side – somebody has to pay for her lifestyle. But Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks is a topic for another time.)

The predatory nature of women is something of a secret in modern society, but the cold reality of this revelation was well-known when men were stronger and better educated than the gelded simpletons skulking about the landscape today. Rudyard Kipling wraps up our cautionary tale about women hunting men with his classic poem The Female of the Species:

WHEN the Himalayan peasant meets the he-bear in his pride,
    He shouts to scare the monster, who will often turn aside.
    But the she-bear thus accosted rends the peasant tooth and nail.
    For the female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    When Nag the basking cobra hears the careless foot of man,
    He will sometimes wriggle sideways and avoid it if he can.
    But his mate makes no such motion where she camps beside the trail.
    For the female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    When the early Jesuit fathers preached to Hurons and Choctaws,
    They prayed to be delivered from the vengeance of the squaws.
    ‘Twas the women, not the warriors, turned those stark enthusiasts pale.
    For the female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    Man’s timid heart is bursting with the things he must not say,
    For the Woman that God gave him isn’t his to give away;
    But when hunter meets with husbands, each confirms the other’s tale—
    The female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    Man, a bear in most relations—worm and savage otherwise,—
    Man propounds negotiations, Man accepts the compromise.
    Very rarely will he squarely push the logic of a fact
    To its ultimate conclusion in unmitigated act.

    Fear, or foolishness, impels him, ere he lay the wicked low,
    To concede some form of trial even to his fiercest foe.
    Mirth obscene diverts his anger—Doubt and Pity oft perplex
    Him in dealing with an issue—to the scandal of The Sex!

    But the Woman that God gave him, every fibre of her frame
    Proves her launched for one sole issue, armed and engined for the same;
    And to serve that single issue, lest the generations fail,
    The female of the species must be deadlier than the male.

    She who faces Death by torture for each life beneath her breast
    May not deal in doubt or pity—must not swerve for fact or jest.
    These be purely male diversions—not in these her honour dwells—
    She the Other Law we live by, is that Law and nothing else.

    She can bring no more to living than the powers that make her great
    As the Mother of the Infant and the Mistress of the Mate.
    And when Babe and Man are lacking and she strides unclaimed to claim
    Her right as femme (and baron), her equipment is the same.

    She is wedded to convictions—in default of grosser ties;
    Her contentions are her children, Heaven help him who denies!—
    He will meet no suave discussion, but the instant, white-hot, wild,
    Wakened female of the species warring as for spouse and child.

    Unprovoked and awful charges—even so the she-bear fights,
    Speech that drips, corrodes, and poisons—even so the cobra bites,
    Scientific vivisection of one nerve till it is raw
    And the victim writhes in anguish—like the Jesuit with the squaw!

    So it comes that Man, the coward, when he gathers to confer
    With his fellow-braves in council, dare not leave a place for her
    Where, at war with Life and Conscience, he uplifts his erring hands
    To some God of Abstract Justice—which no woman understands.

    And Man knows it! Knows, moreover, that the Woman that God gave him
    Must command but may not govern—shall enthral but not enslave him.
    And She knows, because She warns him, and Her instincts never fail,
    That the Female of Her Species is more deadly than the Male.

Indeed, let the wisdom of that poem and this short lesson on the predatory nature of women flow through you. It is one of the most important lessons a playa or a MGTOW can have when it comes to dealing with the opposite sex.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

The Androgyny Agenda: U.S. Army Issues Guidelines for Pregnant Men


The Marxist gender confusion and elimination agenda is proceeding – now men can be pregnant too

The Anglo world has long had issues with sexuality, from unhealthy Puritan repression morphing into modern, secular feminism to an ethnic group of women who have the most acute case of Freudian Penis Envy in the world. After all, feminism and women trying to be just like men rather than just like their grandmothers originated here, it didn’t originate anywhere else. On top of all these issues, the corporate-government complex sees eliminating sexual differences as the wave of the future. As these problems spiral out of control, sexuality becomes stranger and stranger in this society.

For example, the U.S. military is now issuing mandatory transgender sensitivity training and guidelines for pregnant men. You read that right. Now “men” (i.e. gender confused women) can be pregnant, too, in this gender-bending society. Mind you, this is happening under President Trump. Obama got the ball rolling, and turncoat Trump isn’t stopping it.

Lt. Colonel Jennifer Johnson of the U.S. Army told the press YouGoGrrls like her will be distributing the new propaganda and enforcing the new, Marxist dictates.

This training is mandatory for all uniformed members, as well as Department of the Army civilians.

The gender-bending insanity is further detailed by Fox News:

Female soldiers must also come to terms with taking a shower alongside men who identify as women – even if the transgender soldier did not undergo sex-reassignment surgery.

This means a man can now claim to be a woman and then go take a hot shower with naked women in the Army, or vice versa. The U.S. Army training further details just how embedded gender confusion has become in the military.

Accommodations cannot isolate or stigmatize the TG soldier. As these training materials proclaim, there will be ‘mixed genitalia’ in military showers and sleeping quarters. Moms and dads in America need to know this before they send their sons and daughters to military service.

“Mixed genitalia” is another phrase to add to the insane liberal lexicon. What about when “men” become pregnant?

Transgender Soldiers with a medical condition, including pregnancy, will be treated the same as any other Soldier with that condition.

Of course, the ultimate aim of agenda items like this one in the playbook of global Communism is to eliminate ALL differences in humanity, right down to genitalia. This is the biggest reason, beyond its innate issues with sexuality since the days of Puritanism, that modern American society is merging male and female into one androgynous glob – one baby step at a time.

Ron Crews, director of Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty took the typical, conservative approach to “fighting back” against the new guidelines. Conservatives typically offer up symbolic resistance to new, insane government policy before kowtowing to new legal and social paradigms created by leftists.

That pregnancy scenario is beyond words. This is an example of how this social policy can be used simply to promote personal agendas at the expense of taxpayers with no regard for being what the military is all about. Millions of dollars and training hours have been consumed with lectures on how to deploy transgender personnel in a war zone that has laws against that behavior. Military commanders should be focused on fighting wars, not on how to deal with transgender personnel.

Words, and nothing more from the right once again.

It surely is a strange, Brave New World in America. Perhaps what is even more amazing is how passive the sheeple are about these social engineering schemes wrecking the military and eventually, humanity. Bread and circuses have worked for thousands of years. It seems they’re still doing quite an effective job at subduing resistance to the destruction of both masculinity and sexuality in Anglo America.

Say, let’s head down to the mall and have a big plate at the all you can eat buffet and forget all about this while watching a foosball game. Maybe willful ignorance really is bliss.

One wonders if the populace will lie down and take chemical castration of boys as silently as they’ve taken all the bathroom confusion and gender bending. You know, make them more docile and open to suggestion, like girls.

That is the next logical step (already being discussed in some circles) for the self-appointed shepherds of humanity to take, beyond drugging “defective” boys with Ritalin and confusing the next generation about their sexuality in the media and edumacation system.

They’ll have to kill me first.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Reader Mailbag: Secular, Modern Feminism Has Puritan, Religious Roots


Modern, secular feminism is a new twist on an old religious doxy

There’s a common misconception when we discuss latent Puritanism in a spiritually dead, modern Anglo-America. Jonathan Castle writes The New Modern Man with an astute question:

Love the site and your writing. But there seems to be a central contradiction:

1 – America is spiritually dead
2 – America has ‘puritan’ sexual repression

I probably don’t understand what you’re saying, or what you mean by spiritual, but if you want America to not be spiritually dead, shouldn’t you embrace some form of traditional faith – which necessarily puts boundaries on sexual expression?

Have you set up a catch-22, a no-win situation?

Rookh Kshatriya, creator of the Anglobitch blog and the Anglobitch Thesis, provides Jonathan with a succinct reply, describing how feminism and Puritanism are intimately linked to one another.

Jonathan, there is no contradiction. The puritanical repression persists as a residual legacy of Anglo-American religion, albeit shorn of its religious roots. Its modern strongholds can be found in secular mass culture, for example Disney movies about perfect princesses or horror films in which all men are villains and women are all saints. Now, these cultural artefacts are not religious in any way, but the old religious puritanism persists in them, albeit in secular form. Similarly, feminism is not an explicitly religious movement, but Anglo feminism has exactly the same anti-sex, anti-pleasure stance as the temperance movements of the 19th century which it claims to despise. The Anglobitch Thesis teaches that Anglo feminism (and much Anglo culture in general) is essentially Victorian puritanism in secular guise. This explains the intellectually vapid and contradictory nature of Anglo feminism; it embodies what it claims to oppose.

Spending a good amount of time outside this culture makes one appreciate the utter brilliance of that analysis. Modern, secular feminism has directly resulted in an echo of the religious days of Puritan America, and is an embodiment of an anti-sex, anti-pleasure world view.

When I’m in Latin America, sex is everywhere, it is not viewed with shame and scorn as it is in Anglo America, and the culture is one of living one’s life to the fullest, interspersed with periods of work – not the other way around – work at the expense of everything else that makes life worth living.

As TNMM detailed in The Puritan Roots of American Feminism, feminism has foisted upon Americans the same doxy the Puritans once held sacred: Sex is evil, hard work for the benefit of women is sacred, and indulgence in sex or refusing to work hard is a sin punishable by fire and brimstone.

Only in modern times, the fire and brimstone of the legal system and judgments from talking heads in the media rain down on those men who indulge in sex with willing whores or who pursue women for sex or who are “deadbeats” because they don’t adhere to the “work until you drop over dead” mantra.

It’s helpful to think of the nightly newscasters on your local station as self-appointed “priests” up on high dishing out condemnations and judgments on the populace as actual priests once did on their flocks. Also, think of how culturally taboo it is becoming for men to approach women and the legal noose a man can have wrapped around his neck via sexual harassment code and public shaming for something as innocent as an off-color remark.

This is, of course, the case because Anglo-America has embedded within it the core belief that sex is evil, and that sexuality is a “blessing” bestowed upon women (who are “better” than men) only they can choose to share with men who are “blessed” to receive it.

The legal system also forces males into financial servitude via frivorce lotteries/alimony and child support annuities, a new spin on the Puritanical, sacred value of hard work for the explicit benefit of women.

Lifelong hard work being forced on men for the material benefit of women is a claim supported by statistics of who benefits the most under the current paradigm. The current government spends far more revenue on women than it does on men, around 66% by some estimates, and the economy is 80% driven by female purchasing decisions according to Harvard University.

Feminism was supposed to be about liberation, but it has turned into a goddess cult, as one would expect in a sexually repressed, gynocentric, female-worshipping culture. Only the religious aspect of the belief system has been dropped.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Reader Mailbag: The Female Kiss of Death


A TNMM reader provides insight into the Female Kiss of Death

As women move to discard unwanted men from their lives, how many times have we seen this scene play out in front of our eyes, whether we are on the receiving end or it is a brother of ours?

It is a behavioral pattern that could be referred to as The Female Kiss of Death, a process broken down into three simple steps by TNMM reader Doc J. He writes:

If a woman decides to get rid of a man that she no longer wants to have around, there is a process for that:

  1. Manufacture an “offense” – it doesn’t matter if the “offense” is real, only she has to think it is real. (All her girlfriends will agree with her reasons anyway.)
  2. Accuse him of that “offense”.
  3. Punish him for that offense and viola – she has easily eliminated a man that has done her no harm and made herself a victim in the process…an added plus!

I have seen it work over and over.

Indeed, Doc J provides a keen insight into the female psyche with this succinct writeup. This three step process is yet another illustration of female dissimulation Schopenhauer so eloquently detailed a century ago.

The Female Kiss of Death is related to the usual female record-keeping of “What I had to put up with” of actual and perceived slights, but in this case a bitch just makes something up and tags the hapless Beta male with a fake offense. The aim is to make it socially acceptable for her to dispose of him, and to make him the scapegoat so she can hide her ulterior motives. Like monkey branching or whatever the flavor of the day might be.

It is also another example of the sage wisdom to never listen to what women say, to watch what they do.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

« Older Entries