Category Archives: The Sexes

Machiavellian Intelligence: Why Everything in the Blue Pill World is A Lie

Sofia Vergara, Bruce Rosenblum

Symbolic of Hollywierd and Anglo culture, Sofia Vergara was put on a pedestal at the Emmy Awards

Telling the masses of men to put women on a pedestal is obviously a blue pill myth, designed to create a nation of supplicating, subservient Beta males. Why would self-described benevolent leadership tell men to do such a thing?

Taking the red pill often leads us to realizations we’d rather not have to face as awakened men continuing our journey down the rabbit hole of reality. Rather than running away from those unpleasant truths about women and the world, we face them. This is the essence of science and masculinity—openness to new ideas and ruthless scrutiny of old ideas, leaving emotional considerations aside.

The older I get and more truth-seeking I do, and I suspect many ROK readers will agree, the more I find everything we are told to believe and told to be believe in by society and the power structure is a lie. Especially if it comes from the government, the edumacation system, or Establishment media. After all, we have government selling people slavery to protect them, the edumacation system teaching people how to be obedient and follow orders rather than how to think critically, and the Establishment media deceiving the masses with corporate-government propaganda for over 50 years.

Generally, the lies we hear on a day in and day out basis are designed to maintain control over the populace (the necessary illusions detailed by Reinhold Niebuhr) and to keep money moving around at a sufficient enough rate to keep the economy moving.

But, why is everything necessarily a lie? Enter the concept of Machiavellian intelligence. This concept goes to the very heart of the organization of human society.

In cognitive science and evolutionary psychology, Machiavellian intelligence (also known as political intelligence or social intelligence) is the capacity of an entity to be in a successful political engagement with social groups.

The concept sounds benign enough on the surface. But far from it, Machiavellian intelligence explains why the masses have been conditioned to love their own slavery, to defend the shepherds who enslave them, and now in the 21st century to hate Marxism while embracing Cultural Marxism—i.e. the gradual process of destroying all traditions, languages, religions, individuality, government, family, law and order in order to re-assemble society in the future as a Communist Utopia.

This benefits the Establishment and elite, of course, to the detriment of the well-being and happiness of the masses. The elite don’t come out and tell the masses what their plans are for them or elucidate how much of their humanity has already been stripped of them. They provide illusions and myths to keep the “commoners” on course.

Also known as Machiavellianism, it is the art of manipulation in which others are socially manipulated in a way that benefits the user.

Or, put in a more RealTalk sort of way:

Machiavellian intelligence is a component of human intelligence thought to be rooted in the Darwinian selection value of using cunning, cooperation, and deceit to manipulate others.

At every level of society, one will find cunning, coerced cooperation, and deceit manipulating those who have not awakened to the horrors of the system being used to exploit them. We see cunning and deceit all around us, whether it be Hollyweird actresses playing the victim card to regain lost notoriety or politicians using these concepts to maintain their power and authority.

lying_down

Innate human instincts to deceive for personal gain are amplified in women

The Deceiver Or The Deceived

What the concept of Machiavellian Intelligence boils down to is the fact humans have evolved to fall into one of two classes: the deceiver or the person being deceived. As explained in the excellent essay Machiavellian Intelligence: The Macro-Evolutionary Influence:

Humans did not learn to be manipulative of one another at a particular point in history; instead, they have always been that way, even before the transition from apes to a society of hunting and gathering.

The bottom line is it was easier to lie to competing tribes and convince them there were no food or other resources on a particular tract of land than it was to spill blood defending those resources. Call it an adaptation that decreased violence but led to the creation of a blue pill class in human societies.

If humans were not innately manipulative, they would have evolved to be completely reliant on physical strength; yet, that is not the micro-evolutionary path humans took. Physical dominance was not the only indication of leadership and power.

This adaptation also explains why weakling liars (i.e. Obama) often end up in positions of power rather than dominant Alpha males.

Leadership also depended on coalitions and acquiescence by those who are being dominated. In the case of the chimps, it was not always the most physically fit chimp who was the Alpha male; rather, it was the best deceiver of the group. In hunter-gatherer societies, this political rule of nature allowed non-dominant individuals to operate against the dominant by forming groups to oust the leader.

The translation goes like this. The best liar and deceiver often ends up at the highest level of business or government, not the strongest and definitely not the most honest man. Even two thousand years ago Aristotle knew all politics were based on the ability to deceive. This is true whether in petty office politics or politics on the national stage.

Machiavellian intelligence is evolutionary baggage hardwired into our species. It allows a small cabal of ruthless liars to maintain control over billions by selling them on fantasies most of them will never truly realize – like the “misplaced” American Dream.

This is why the Red Pill, truth-seeking men of the manosphere will always be marginalized and demonized by the Establishment. We are cutting into their game by telling the truth.

Equally important, but perhaps a topic for a separate article, human females are natural masters at Machiavellian intelligence. In other words, bitches gonna lie and deceive. It’s what they do – even more so than the males of our species. Arthur Schopenhauer wrote:

For as lions are furnished with claws and teeth, elephants with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid, so Nature has provided woman for her protection and defense with the faculty of dissimulation, and all the power which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this form. Hence, dissimulation is innate in woman and almost as characteristic of the very stupid as of the clever. Accordingly, it is as natural for women to dissemble at every opportunity as it is for those animals to turn to their weapons when they are attacked; and they feel in doing so that in a certain measure they are only making use of their rights. Therefore a woman who is perfectly truthful and does not dissemble is perhaps an impossibility. This is why they see through dissimulation in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with them. From the fundamental defect that has been stated, and all that it involves, spring falseness, faithlessness, treachery, ungratefulness, and so on. In a court of justice women are more often found guilty of perjury than men. It is indeed to be generally questioned whether they should be allowed to take an oath at all. From time to time there are repeated cases everywhere of ladies, who want for nothing, secretly pocketing and taking away things from shop counters.

The Winona Ryder shoplifting incident certainly comes to mind with that closing sentence.

Incidentally, this is what makes the truth-telling mission of the manosphere such a noble venture. We are straying from the way humans have done business since the beginning by embarking on a mission to awaken men rather than to deceive them.

Only time will tell if we are able to bring a higher standard to the world by encouraging them to see the nature of the cages and the series of human farms (religious, political, economic) they were born into.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month. This The New Modern Man article originally ran on Return of Kings.

Robotic Blowjob Cafes: The Anglosphere Just Gets Weirder and Weirder When It Comes to Sex

sex_robot

Will sex robots break the female monopoly on being sexual gatekeepers?

You can go to jail for fucking a willing adult female and leaving a $100 bill on the nightstand in Anglo America. But in Anglo Europe, it will soon be just fine to drop your load into a sex robot and pay the owner of a blowjob cafe $80 for the pleasure of doing so.

For many men, women have become so unpleasant to deal with robots are becoming more appealing than the real thing. There’s already talk that sex robots may replace prostitutes in both nations. Business Insider dug up a law professor named John Danaher who told them:

The displacement hypothesis says sex robots will eventually push human sex workers out of a job. It’s served by two other ideas called “the transference thesis” and “the advantages thesis.”

The transference thesis argues that people will successfully be able to project their sexual desires onto robots, or as Danaher puts it, “the fact that there is demand for the former suggests that there will also be demand for the latter.”

The second leg of the displacement hypothesis — the advantages thesis — simply suggests that robots designed for sex work will have advantages over human sex workers. For example, sex robot manufacture is legal in many countries where prostitution is illegal. There are also ethics and health advantages, as sex trafficking and objectification need not be a concern for robots. And as long as sanitation is maintained, STDs would largely not be a concern.

Don’t know about you, but to me there will never be a substitute for the real thing, baby. And by personal experience I know the threat of getting an STD is vastly overblown by those in the Establishment who try to scandalize sex at every turn. I’ve slept with well over 100 women, many of them unprotected, and never had an STD. (Just had a complete medical scan, and I’m clean as a pin. But then I don’t sleep with trash. Most of the time.)

Thankfully I now reside in libertine Latin America, where there’s no shortage of the real thing with feminine women. So, sex robots here are laughable. But in the Anglosphere, the cumulative effects of sexual repression are adding up as both sides of the same Anglo culture coin struggle to find some way to deal with human sexuality. Specifically, male sexuality which is shamed and shunned on both sides of the pond.

Anyway, getting back to the original premise of the story – a blowjob cafe opening in England. The online magazine Minds reports:

Businessman Bradley Charvet, plans to open the ‘blow job cafe’ in Paddington, claiming that robot sex will soon be completely normal.

Charvet goes on to say:

Sex robots will always be pleasing and could even become better at technique because they would be programmable to a person’s need. It’s totally normal to see a new way of using robots and others sex toys to have pleasure.

Sounds great, doesn’t it? Especially for the huge glut of Beta, Gamma and Omega males who have a hard time getting laid in today’s sexual jungle. As usual feminists have to find something, anything wrong with satisfying normal male sexual desires. Even if men are screwing inanimate objects that have nothing to do with real females other than anatomy.

red_woman

While nothing will ever replace real women for me, it is nice to see feminists already having a meltdown over an inanimate object

The Female Monopoly on Sex Upset

Kathleen Richardson of De Montfort University in the Down Under portion of the Anglosphere in Australia obviously worries the robots will cut into the female monopoly on sex, although she tries to couch her concern with typical feminist flack.

I want people to stop thinking about the word ‘robot’ and think about the word ‘property’, and what we’re being encouraged to do is have relationships with property.

Insert typical feminist boilerplate language. Kathleen goes on:

While we live in a world which still considers women as property, then it’s not too much of a stretch of the imagination to start creating property that looks like women and then encouraging people to have the same sort of relationships.

She’s leading a crusade against sex robots, probably because she knows once men can get their jollies from a sex robot that doesn’t bitch and doesn’t turn them into child support slaves, subpar women in the Anglosphere won’t be able to extract a high price for such a lousy product. The divorce rape racket will be put into serious jeopardy.

Might there finally be a check and balance on unlimited female power when it comes to sex, strange as robots may be?

Incidentally, prostitution is legal in Great Britain and Australia but still verboten in Puritanical, feminazi-dominated America. A dizzying array of sex laws still plague the uptight nations, moreso in America than England and Australia. Even sex toys are illegal in Alabama (shocking, I know considering the how advanced the state is) and the current governor of Texas tried to ban them in 2007.

However, fudge packing and enshrining fudge packing with marriage is perfectly legal in both states as the elevation of homosexuality and marginalization of heterosexuality continues in America. (FYI, I’m a sexual libertarian. Don’t care what people do to pleasure themselves as long as they leave children out of it.)

No doubt, future historians will have a field day dissecting our current malaise as something as simple and natural as sex has been – pardon the pun – fucked up by our culture. But, let’s look on the bright side. At least women will soon have some competition.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Paging Dr. Freud, Your Penis Envy Theory Is Once Again Verified

yougogrrl

Yet more evidence American women want to be just like men instead of just like women – new plastic penis equivalents allow YouGoGrrls to pee standing up

If ever there was any doubt about the validity of Freud’s Penis Envy theory – beyond the fact it has been one of the driving forces behind a consumer economy for a century and Western women routinely try to act like, compete with, and displace men from their roles in society – here’s unmistakable confirmation.

penisenvy

K-selected white women struggle the most with their femininity – no surprise they’re featured in advertising for the product

In an androgynous twist on the YouGoGrrl™ mantra, there’s a company now making it possible for women to pee as if they had their own penis. The Go Girl promises to free women from taking life sitting down. Now, instead of popping a squat they can stand up and pee. Take that, evil men!

Unsurprisingly, it’s a white girl trying on her new appendage in the promotional photo. Anglo women were the genesis of today’s rabid feminism, after all, and are the most vocal haters of men out there among the world’s major cultures. They’re also the most ashamed of anything traditionally associated with being female, so a plastic pee pee is a natural fit for them.

Think it’s just a fringe device? Wrong. Walmart, the nation’s biggest retailer sells them for under $10 and it’s rated 4 out of 5 stars by women who have bought them on the company’s web site.

For those unacquainted with Freud’s theory, here’s a little background:

In a 1933 lecture simply titled “Femininity,” Freud said that women become envious of penises at a young age, when they realize boys derive more sexual pleasure from their penises than girls do from their own sexual organs. Freud said this penis envy grows over time and manifests in a daughter’s love for her father and the desire to give birth to a son, because those are as close as a woman can get to having a penis of her own.

Since Anglo women no longer give birth in numbers sufficient to sustain the population, the last sentence of the above paragraph can be revised. Now a Go Girl is the closest a YouGoGrrl can get to having a penis of her own, rather than a pesky son who would only take away from her ability to spend lavishly. That is, without having a dick physically sewn on at a genital mutilator/sex change doctor.

It’s a topsy-turvy world with all this social engineering.

An already androgynous America just got a little more confusing as women are not only embarrassed to be maternal, feminine, and kind in the 21st century, they’re now making strides towards having their very own penis. And men are encouraged to sit down instead of  standing up when they go potty.

Plastic penises like the Go Girl help promote the androgyny agenda as forces are already at work to completely eliminate primary and secondary sexual characteristics in the West, turning us all into sexless pods.

Arguments about hygiene – i.e. not having to sit down on a toilet seat are immediately dismissable as women who use this product are carrying around plastic soaked in urine in their pocketbooks, man bags, or whatever else they’re using as a tote for the device. Either that or they’re dropping ten bucks every time they take a piss and creating an inordinate amount of environmental waste, proving our “women are consummate materialists and environmental destroyers” hypothesis correct.

What a fucked up society. See why I left? And don’t want to come back.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Real Objectification: Men Are Nothing But Utilities in Womens’ Eyes

colombian_chick

Women are objectified for their sexuality because they bring little other value to the table for a man in Anglo culture

Women often complain about being seen as nothing but sex objects in men’s eyes. What few people realize is men are nothing but utility objects in women’s eyes.

As a man, you are not a human being in a woman’s eyes as much as you are a utility to be used for her convenience. Women prove this time and time again in their dealings with men. From the time they meet a man until he is disposed of female behavior towards the potential partner can be broken down into three major phases:

  • Meeting Phase: Male is invisible unless he has either more money, higher status, or more power than the female and surrounding male competition, or he shamelessly breaks the rules. Hypergamy is the most powerful force in the mating universe, but bad boys short circuit this wiring.
  • Relationship Phase: Male is tolerated as long as he provides material and/or social benefits to the female. Bad boys are of course, excepted in most circumstances.
  • Disposal Phase: When the male’s resources have been consumed, his social status is downgraded, or the female wishes to “monkey branch” to a higher status male, he is then disposed of. The severity of the disposal depends on how Beta he is. Hardcore Betas will be dealt with most severely by females.

So, this is why men are pushed to become walking, talking utilities by society from a very young age. Men are regularly objectified by women and society in terms of:

  • Income
  • Earning capacity
  • Potential earning capacity
  • Job
  • Popularity (younger age)
  • Social status (older age)
  • Power (48 Shades of Grey)
  • Clothing (clothes make the man!)
  • Height/Looks/Muscles/Baldness

In contrast to what we are led to believe, men are perhaps the most objectified creatures on the planet. We are most often seen as nothing but provider drones for women to take advantage of at their will.

That said, in a society that is functioning properly objectification is really a two-way street as men want women who are young, pretty, fertile, and good in the sack. But women have so manipulated the playing field (they can objectify men, but men can’t objectify them) they now regularly push subpar merchandise on men with no shame and no apology.

In short, women can now openly objectify men but it is verboten for men to objectify women. This screws everything up, and before long demographic decline sets in as we are seeing in America and Europe as the once world-dominating Caucasian peoples go out with a whimper instead of a bang – i.e. the aging/dying population we have today.

Too much power in the hands of either sex is a bad thing. Right now, women have all the power.

white_chick

Want some action with her? Better have one of the following qualities to bring to the table, utility man

Male Roles in Female Lives

Female objectification of men also extends down to the roles men play in female lives. Analyze any relationship objectively and you’ll find women either use a man to fill one of the following roles in her life, or said man is completely invisible to her.

Stabilizer. Emotional creatures that they are, women often want to have a strong, asshole of a man to stabilize their mood swings and general insanity. The lack of a male stabilizing force in modern Anglo society (fuck you very much feminism) helps one see why women have generally turned into massive train wrecks in modern times. (Three kids from three different baby daddies, tattoos from head to toe, totally out of control lives, etc.)

Resource Provider. There’s the male role everyone knows well – the good old resource provider. As long as his checks clear, she hangs around. These days however, women enjoy having the resources but don’t want the pesky male hanging around, which is why the modern court system has evolved to filch men of their hard-earned money.

The Clown. Yet another male role is that of the entertainer. As The Primal Male so masterfully noted, she is the Queen and he is the jester providing her with amusement. A woman will be drawn like a moth to a flame to a man who is fun or exciting to be around, but once his entertainment value runs out, she gets bored and continues her carousel ride.

Social Status. Just as with handbags and other accessories, women want the best man to show off to their petty friends. As when purchasing a handbag, if she has money for Micheal Kors, that’s what she buys. If she has money for a Gucci or Louis Vuitton she will purchase that handbag. So, with your social status you represent the best she can “purchase” with her SMV and anatomy.

The key to understanding this behavior is whoever or whatever she associates with is only to give her the edge over other girls in her clique, as women are intensely competitive. Just realize, that with social status you are the equivalent of a new handbag in her limbic brain.

Emotional Tampon. Beta orbiters fall into one of two areas. The first is the emotional tampon, listening to her concerns about other men she’s fucking while he faps hoping for some crumbs to fall off the sexual table. This is perhaps the most pathetic of the two Beta orbiting positions, but it’s a close contest.

Friendzone. This is the other area Beta orbiters fall under. He becomes her friend hoping she’ll see what a great person he is and thereby let him visit the tunnel of love. But, this is most often a hopeless venture, and in the rare circumstances a female fucks one of her Beta orbiters it will inevitably turn into an awkward experience, and she’ll quickly dispose of him as both her friend and lover. Don’t become one of these used and abused men for a piece of ass, or as is most often the case, the vanishing mirage of a hope of a piece of ass.

These are only few of the ways women objectify men. Next time you hear a woman complaining she is being objectified because of her sexuality, remind her that men are objectified for our utility.

Some of us are sick and tired of being treated like walking, talking ATM machines and disposable meal tickets, ladies. When we can have that conversation, maybe I’ll be more willing to listen to some of your emotional hamstering about objectification of women. I feel pretty fucking objectified every time I come to the train wreck of a society known as the USA.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Cancer Center Founder’s Wife Demands $400k a Month in Divorce Case

Divorce-Stephenson.jpg

Is THAT woman worth $400,000 a month for the rest of your life? I bang better looking chicks than her every day of my life

As often shouted from the rooftops here at your advocate for masculinity, marriage has been reduced to a sophisticated game of prostitution in Anglo America. If you ever doubt that, the old maxim watch what women do, not what they say applies. When is the last time you saw a Strong, Independent Woman™ turn down a large divorce settlement and refuse to turn her ex-husband into an economic slave because she Don’t Need a Man™ and wants to maintain her lifestyle on her own?

Not going to happen, don’t hold your breath waiting for it.

In the latest high-profile demonstration of the oddities and evils of the American family court system and the shameless, predatory nature of Anglo women, Richard Stephenson, founder of the Cancer Treatment Centers of America and his ex-ho Alicia are duking it out in court and she is apparently salivating in anticipation of a VERY big payday.

400k

$400k a month for that? What the actual hell?! Jesus! I could be having eightsomes with hot 20 year olds at cocaine parties for a fraction of the price

In the case, Alica’s lawyer stated she lived in a celebrity lifestyle with the man of her dreams. Even better, by virtue of her having Nature’s Credit Card i.e. a vagina she is entitled to live that lifestyle for the rest of her life at Mr. Stephenson’s expense. (My wording, not the lawyer’s wording.)

She is seeking $400,000 a month to maintain her lifestyle.

Now, a few of issues arise here. First, why the fuck would any sane man want to get married in a male-hating society in which women really believe they are entitled to money because they provided sexual services in a marriage?

Second, why the fuck would any sane man get married when lawyers are swirling around like vultures ready to help women financially rape men?

Third, would you want to pay that much money for this old battle-axe? I wouldn’t give you $40 a month for her let alone $400,000. I bang better ass that that on a regular basis. Men, ALL WOMEN END UP LOOKING LIKE THIS. No matter how firm and high her tits and ass are when you seal your fate by signing your enslavement agreement/marriage certificate.

The story in the Chicago Tribune serves as a perfect demonstration of the predatory, frigid Anglo female in action. I almost feel like the narrator on National Geographic describing the play by play and explaining how she positions herself to someday financially rape this man.

First, you have your May-December romance.

He was a 51-year-old divorced father of four, an investment banker who had recently started the for-profit hospital network. She was a 26-year-old model and fashion coordinator.

Every white girl wants to be a model these days. Funny, I never heard of this plump strumpet before this court case became public knowledge.

Moving on.

Do you think Alicia was interested in Mr. Stephenson because he was a sterling man of character and she was madly in love? Or was she searching for a meal ticket and male utility value when she attached herself to him and inserted her tentacles?

The couple had one daughter together and traveled the world, flying by private jet among homes in Michigan, Colorado and the Virgin Islands, with staff at each.

Multiple homes. World travel. The modern day equivalent of kitchen slaves. Women like this don’t play around. If the check isn’t big enough and the lifestyle accoutrement not the envy of her pack of female predators, you don’t exist.

But the relationship eventually soured — what precipitated the breakup did not come up in opening statements — and Alicia filed for divorce in 2009, two years after she moved out of the estate.

Translation: She moved in for the kill.

She a Gold Digger

This is a typical performance of the Gold Digger. Find a ripe, plump target (plump from a financial standpoint) then reel him in using your feminine wiles and gifts of what Schopenhauer called dissimulation, hang out long enough to live it up on his dime while crucially sealing his fate by getting him to sign a marriage certificate, then when the novelty of being around him is over, call a lawyer and proceed to extricate the target’s money. That way, you won’t have the displeasure of having to be around him, but you get to keep his money.

At least Stephenson’s attorney David Grund tried a Strong, Independent Woman™ defense in court.

Grund contended Alicia Stephenson, who had a high school diploma and associate’s degree when the couple married, failed to live up to her part of the agreement because she didn’t continue her education so she could be “self-supporting.”

It won’t work. It’s not a question of if Mr. Stephenson will pay, but how much he will pay. The bitch won’t get $400,000 a month if Grund is worth his salt, but she nonetheless probably will never have to work again when it’s all said and done.

And women have the audacity to stay they’re oppressed. ROFLMAO.

Some men never seem to catch on to this tried and true method women use to financially rape men. Whether it’s the girl in the trailer park marrying a guy with a well-paying blue collar job then taking half of everything he owns, or an actress marrying an A-List actor then taking half, this is the female playbook at both the high and low ends of society.

It doesn’t matter if you’re dealing with a hooker or a gold-digging hussy, the transaction is always the same between women and Beta males: Pay 4 Play. Yet another example that marriage is nothing more than legalized prostitution in the modern age.

Oh, and just because somebody is rich doesn’t mean they’re not a Beta male idiot. This case reeks of Beta male stench. For $400,000 a month I could have 9s and 10s sitting on my face and wriggling in hourly rotation and multiple baby mamas and multiple homes abroad. Jesus, some men will never get it. No matter how much money they make. All that money for that pale and worn out piece of ass. Idiocy.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month. THIS ARTICLE IS THE OPINION OF ITS AUTHOR.

« Older Entries Recent Entries »