The Anglo-American Manosphere routinely exaggerates women’s cognitive prowess. It sees feminism as some complex, multi-level plan designed to strip men of status and influence. In reality, the average woman could not organize a trip to the toilet. It is easy to confuse society defending women in every circumstance with female strategic intelligence – after all, the outcomes are identical. In reality, they are totally different things. Although female feminists adopt ‘revolutionary’ postures, their rhetoric is ultimately sanctioned by the Anglo-American cultural Establishment.
Of course, this is because Anglo-American countries retain a Puritanical world-view and exalt women as sexless angels while demonizing men for possessing sexual impulses. In real terms, ‘revolutionary’ Anglo-American feminism could only exist with the backing of their nominal ‘Tradcon’ opponents in politics, law and the media. Once this is understood, feminism is seen for what it truly is: unchallenged female infantilism condoned by a misandrist, gynocentric culture convinced that women are essentially perfect whatever they do or say.
Anglo feminism has advanced to its present state not because women are especially smart, but because the prevailing culture has accommodated and nurtured their whimsical delusions and ingrained tendencies to social atavism.
Consider how men dominate the various distractions post-feminist women waste their money on. For example, the sexualized ‘Bad Girl’ persona so powerful in the Anglo media – as exemplified by Sex and the City, nymphomaniac pop music and the entire fashion industry – are largely created and realized by gay men. Females are just spokespeople, clothes horses and figureheads in these lucrative enterprises because they lack the intelligence, organizational prowess and creative talent that gay men bring to the show.
In sum, frigid Anglo women dress in a sexualized manner because their ‘culture’ is a creation of highly creative and intelligent gay men; who mistakenly project their sexual desires onto Anglo women, explaining the ‘sexualised frigidity’ paradox that disfigures all females in the Anglosphere.
A key part of male enlightenment involves men hardening their views of women and seeing them for what they really are. They are not cunning cultural strategists or tacticians; they are boring, entitled clowns living on marble pedestals provided by the misandrist Anglo-American Establishment. Squandering time, thought or money on them is unworthy of the enlightened man. To drive the point home, consider the fate of this imbecile, as reported by the Daily Mail:
A model from Canada has lost the sight in her right eye after an eye tattoo procedure went horribly wrong. Catt Gallinger from Ottawa is recovering slowly but steadily over the past month following her decision to get a sclera tattoo, which colors in the whites of the eye.
Calling the decision a ‘massive mistake,’ Gallinger shared the horrifying results of the procedure on social media, according to The Sun. The images, posted to her Facebook wall, shows the 24-year-old former pet nutritionist in various stages of recovery following a visit to the hospital last month when she complained of purple discharge oozing from her eye.
Medical professionals administered antibiotics drops to the affected area and sent Gallinger home.
But shortly after receiving the treatment, her eye became swollen shut. Doctors then gave Gallinger steroid drops to alleviate her symptoms, but after three weeks the purple tattoo began to congeal around her cornea, blurring her vision and causing intense discomfort.
Gallinger told The Sun newspaper that she has had to spend hundreds of dollars on prescriptions so far and says that her modeling career is on hold for the time being.
In speaking with the publication, she cautioned others to first ‘look into not just the artist and their portfolio, but to talk to some of their clients, talk to other artists about them and get experiences beforehand’.
Asked why she wanted a sclera tattoo to begin with, Gallinger said the modification would help ‘make me feel more at home in my body’.
Physicians told Gallenger that her eye has sustained permanent damage and will either have to ‘go completely or stay a blurry mess’.
All is not lost – she will be able to model eye-patches for many years to come, while feeling ‘at home’ in her body (whatever that means). What a clown – Stephen King’s Pennywise must be looking to his laurels.
Still, Gallinger serves as a stellar example of unadulterated female idiocy. She reminds us that feminism has advanced due to patronization by Anglo-American elite males, not the strategic intelligence of its female adherents. And if we are honest, the post-feminist chaos engulfing the Anglosphere is in large part the result of female stupidity. Their idiocy has two principal components: solipsism and the herd instinct.
Solipsism is the keystone of the female mind: an inability to test theory against reality or think empathetically, especially with regard to men. This solipsism finds expression in a crushing, all-pervasive lack of self-awareness: which is why many a post-Wall woman with sagging tits and a flabby ass still acts like she’s ‘one helluva gorgeous chick’. The second root of female stupidity is the herd instinct – something that feminism has been quick to capitalise on.
Solipsism is stupid because it prevents individuals learning from others’ mistakes; even animals such as chimps, crows or parrots are capable of this. Solipsism makes women blunder through the same poor lifestyle choices over and over again: overlooking stable men for sociopathic thugs, wallowing in hyper-hypergamy during their prime years, pursuing unrealistic career choices and, above all, exaggerating their own abilities at the insistence of their beta toadies.
The follies of female solipsism are well-described in psychology and literature, not just the Manosphere. Ultimately, allowing the gender incapable of objectivity to monopolize 70% of college places will overturn the long-standing Anglo-American status in STEM, together with the Anglosphere’s military and economic standing.
Meanwhile, the herd instinct makes a virtue of sheer stupidity. Virtually all Western women have jumped on the feminist bandwagon – women of every race, class and age unthinkingly label themselves ‘feminist’, a potent example of the female herd instinct. However, social psychology has shown that ‘herd-think’ leads to individuals taking needless risks and reaching erroneous conclusions from limited premises – two traits we see over and over again among Anglo-American women.
These females are lost in a swirl of ‘you go girl!’ delusions which lead only to misery, singleness and childlessness, merely because ‘everyone else’ is pursuing them. Indeed, highly educated women are particularly prone to feminist ‘herd-think’ – a curious paradox given all the rhetoric about the ‘transformative’ power of education bandied around the Anglosphere.
In sum, women are idiots. Don’t be fooled by Manosphere writers who talk about their rapacious intelligence and strategic cunning. Anglo-American women aren’t Mongol warlords, just overgrown children with indulgent minders. Even their ‘culture’ is not their own but largely the creation of gay men.
Women wear all that make-up for a reason. Clowns wear make-up, too.
Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.