Tag Archives: Censorship

The Oppression of Male Sexuality Proves We Are Seen as Slaves by The Anglo-American Matrix

aqua-shooting-1736419_1280

There’s a reason The Anglo-American Matrix is duplicitous with sex: It creates lots of AFCs (average frustrated chumps) who chase sexual mirages by buying lots of material crap

It’s no wonder the power structure wants to gut free speech and censor the internet. Pure brilliance is seeping out of various corners of the information superhighway and the wisdom, flowing like fountains of truth onto a landscape parched by 50 years of media lies and propaganda is seriously challenging the saccharine platitudes once accepted as the gospel by the masses.

cover_promo

At this rate, it’s not going to be long before there’s a wage slave and sexless Beta male uprising if knowledge and truth like this continue to spread.

The coming censorship narrative will play out like a game of whack-a-mole, as the government censors one web site that commits thoughtcrimes only to have another one pop up.

In any case, I stumbled across this pearl while perusing the excellent alternative news web site The Waking Times. A user dubbed “Meter” posted a profound essay about why sexuality is dealt with is such a duplicitous manner in the West.

I actually noticed many of the same things the author writes about, i.e. the push-pull method in use when I worked in the media. We would constantly use sex to sell product, but then take a Puritanical approach to the subject during our newscasts. For example, right before the Noon news one morning, a soap opera featured scenes that were the equivalent of softcore porn complete with adultery and fornication right there on the daytime television screen. This was less than 5 minutes before we aired a judgmental story condemning local Johns who were arrested for the heinous crime of paying up front for sex (rather than paying later in the frivorce court system, or by having the State bless  and “legalize” the prostitution by calling it a marriage).

Meter’s comment explaining our Masters’ thinking behind this insanity follows:

The Matrix’s use of push-pull is best seen in its treatment of sexuality.

Always The Matrix is pushing sex through media: images, movies, porn, etc. That’s the push, getting people worked up. Yet at the same time, it creates extreme judgment and inhibition of sexuality, in the form of puritanical religions, social taboos, controlling laws, social requirements, etc. That’s the pull. By both pushing and pulling on such an energetic aspect of humanity, great frustration is created. This creates a buildup of energy. This energy is then diverted, or sublimated, into slavery or other benefits to The Matrix, or it builds up until it is released as violence, which creates fear and benefits the control matrix.

In short, heterosexuality now works like this in Anglo-America: Look, but don’t touch. Touch, but don’t taste. Taste, don’t swallow. The rules are intentionally set in opposition to create sexual frustration among the masses of Beta males, which the Great Marketing Machine that The Matrix runs on can then capitalize on by convincing millions of men (often subconciously since modern advertising appeals to base emotions in the limbic brain) the key to getting pussy is to buy this fancy car, these designer clothes, this McMansion, and the other trappings of debt slavery we are selling you.

But sexuality isn’t all the push-pull method is used for:

In censorship, push-pull is also used. Outrage is created through leaks, through open and obvious abuse and violence, through unending images of violent and unfair treatment. (You’re actually mistaken to believe they want all this hidden – they actually often shove it in your face and want you to see what they’re getting away with.) This outrage creates rage. Yet then censorship forbids speaking about this rage, forbids it being expressed – the pull. Again this creates frustration, a buildup of energy, which may then be redirected into compliance and devotion.

This works largely through fear again, by creating the illusion of powerlessness. By all but advertising the abuse conducted by wealth and power, and then denying expression of the outrage through fear and denial of grievances, the will is broken. Once that is accomplished, a surrender to power occurs; one joins what one can’t beat. That is their goal: to have you willfully join them.

Don’t let the purveyors of this insidious and nearly invisible form of mind control have their way with you.

Thus be careful anywhere you see outrage being produced, and be mindful of knee-jerk reactions to it. In some ways, the alt media contributes to The Matrix by endlessly complaining about outrageous things. Yet you’ll notice that despite all the leaks and revelations reported, very little changes. People simply become addicted to their daily headlines and videos of systemic abuse. Thus a new normal is established.

The Hegelian Dialectic and Pavlovian conditioning, at work once again.

The last passage is why this outpost for men, The New Modern Man takes a different tone than many men’s blogs. It endeavors to turn frustration into action through encouraging men to Go Galt and become minimalists who are empowered by their finances rather than controlled by them like debt slaves, as well as to forge a new sex life for themselves as slayers of poon rather than complainers who know they’re being had by women and the system but don’t do anything about it.

That’s not to say these abuses shouldn’t be acknowledged and reported. Yet merely bringing problems to light, then egoically trying to solve the endless puzzles of them, is not the same as moving forward. It can in fact be a trap, analogous to the ego always complaining about its problems and mistreatment, yet never releasing these problems and moving beyond them, sometimes actually rejecting solutions and holding the problems in place. We can hear this in the alt media in their tone of victimhood, which always reveals ego feeling sorry for itself.

The mind tends to choose the known over the unknown, and thus people are very reluctant to try new ways.

We aren’t victims around here. We are “Mad as Hell” like Howard Beale and not going to take this shit, anymore.

There you have it, folks. As someone with 15 years experience in the mainstream media as one of its “pretty faces” I can assure you Meter knows what he’s talking about. This is why I believe television and mainstream media must be avoided at all costs by the truly awakened, Red Pill man.

You know your leaders only see men as human bar codes when they fuck with one of the most important keys to male happiness – our sex lives – in this manner.

Now we know what they’re really discussing at any council of state or corporate-government complex tête-à-tête. How to further control and fuck us over. It looks like we are living in a dictatorship that uses the scientific method against us, a truly scientific dictatorship for the new millenium.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

An Internet “9/11” is Possible as Globalists Become Desperate to Regain Control of the Narrative

cuomo

Establishment media regularly try to pass off Democratic operatives as unbiased journalists – Chris Cuomo, the weakling son of Governor Mario Cuomo and brother of current New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is only one example

There are those who think we should only get our news from “official” sources. You know, like the Democratic operatives Big Media try to pass off as an unbiased source of news. Chris Cuomo, son and brother of two leftist New York governors is only one example; George Staphylococcus, a former press secretary for Bill Clinton is yet another.

If there’s anything the 2016 election showed us, it’s that the American people are increasingly distrustful of and not listening to the commands laid out by the once mainstream media. They’re increasingly reticent to commit national and demographic suicide under the guise of “diversity” and other nebulous ideals. They’re desperate not only to “drain the swamp” but to restore some sense of national pride and stability to the declining USA.

In response, the controllers of the presstitutes (the people who really run the world) are already hard at work trying to find some way to create a false narrative about “fake news” sites in order to lay the ground work for censorship and control. The Internet has all but destroyed the corporate-government narrative, and there is a shit fit happening at the highest levels of the propaganda ministry (i.e. CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, et. al.) because they have learned the American people know how full of shit they really are.

Sites like Return Of Kings are on the front lines of this war in support of free speech and it is vitally important we stay on top of our game to avoid a reversion to the managed propaganda the centralized control of mass media gave us over the last 50 years.

Make no mistake, one of the reasons leakers of misdeeds done by politicians and the elite they work for have been allowed to continue leaking dirty laundry is because it plays into the hands of those with designs on censorship and re-gaining control of the information the sheeple get to listen to. Having Julian Assange and Edward Snowden doing leaks of information and giving them extensive press coverage plays right into the hands of the censorship brigade because they can also play the protecting national security game when the time to silence dissent comes.

Fake news is only the first assault in what is sure to become a full scale war on free speech on the Internet. We can be thankful Trump won the election rather than The Bitch since his election will slow the process of censorship, but the aggressiveness of the “fake news” narrative shows us how determined some people are to shut us up and shut us down.

The New York Times is already on the front lines of this assault on free speech on the Internet. Only days after The Bitch lost the election, publisher Arthur Sulzberger published a Mea Culpa and promised to rededicate the newspaper to “honest” reporting.

We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our subscribers… [The New York Times promises to] give the news impartially, without fear or favor… We also approach the incoming Trump administration without bias.

Don’t buy into it. This is what’s known in Public Relations as a diversion tactic. While we focus on our seeming victory, they’re already moving on to their next false narrative – so-called fake news. No sooner than the ink dried on the promise to give Trump a chance, The New York Times was moving to shut up the very people who made possible his rise to power – the alt-right and alternative news web sites.

While some fake news is produced purposefully by teenagers in the Balkans or entrepreneurs in the United States seeking to make money from advertising, false information can also arise from misinformed social media posts by regular people that are seized on and spread through a hyperpartisan blogosphere.

They did a spurious case study on how a “rumor” got started about protesters being bussed in to protest at Trump rallies. Never mind the mainstream media is a business that runs lock, stock and barrel on fake news. Almost every narrative they create is a false one. One need do no more than a Google search to discredit many, if not most of the mainstream media’s stories. The hypocrisy is astounding.

censored

Who will decide what is “appropriate” speech? Why Big Daddy Government, of course

Pulling The Plug

Whether or not the “fake news” narrative gains traction, the next step will be for the elite to create a problem that affects millions of people online, then follow through with the Hegelian Dialectic with a pre-ordained “solution” to “make everyone safer online” and to “stop the spread of false information” while “protecting free speech” online by destroying it.

Look for no less than a figurative “Internet 9/11” if the elite become desperate enough. No, planes won’t be crashed into Silicon Valley by government operatives. But, “hackers” (CIA sourced, no doubt) could cause a catastrophe.

They’ll pull the plug on the backbone of the Internet, shutting down e-commerce and communication online for a few days, blame it on a “fake news” story (just like Benghazi was blamed on a YouTube video) then spring in to save us from ourselves by passing all sorts of creative laws and restrictions aimed at nothing more than eliminating competition to the corporate-government narrative and gutting yet another of our Bill of Rights protections.

Make no mistake, Freedom of Speech is the most important of Amendments to the Constitution. Once that is taken away, it’s Game Over.

Obama has already been floating the idea of official news web sites. This is nothing more than proposing the creation of the American equivalent of Pravda in the Soviet Union, in which only the state-approved newspaper was considered the truth and everything else was considered lies. Obviously, the New World Order socialist narrative would be the only truth under a system such as this, and traditional and conservative views would be relentlessly silenced

Check out what The Messiah said in Berlin recently.

In an age where there’s so much active misinformation, and it’s packaged very well, and it looks the same when you see it on a Facebook page or you turn on your television, where some overzealousness on the part of a US official is equated with constant and severe repression elsewhere, if everything seems to be the same and no distinctions are made, then we won’t know what to protect. If we can’t discriminate between serious arguments and propaganda, then we have problems.

The fact he is saying these things should frighten you. It should also make you angry. This statement is a PC way of saying the goal of the power structure is to shut us the fuck up. They want us to listen to clueless “journalists” who encourage the idea of microchipping your children and later, yourselves so every aspect of your life can be controlled by the government.

We must fight back by discrediting the “fake news” narrative at every turn and informing those who will listen of the possibility of a fake “Internet 9/11” designed to give the government a reason to curb free expression on the very Libertarian Internet of today.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month. This The New Modern Man article originally ran on Return of Kings.

The Manosphere is the Modern Samizdat

Censored-3

Self-publishers who did not conform to Communist thinking were arrested and taken to re-education camps in Soviet Russia

Today’s self-publishing men, the men a socialist revolution in America has marginalized and thrown overboard, are challenging the authority of the once mainstream, now legacy media as well as the government puppet masters who supposedly legitimize them. Online publishing by dissidents is the modern version of an old concept called Samizdat, which also happened in response to a Marxist revolution.

Samizdat is a term from the days of Communist Russia that means self-publishing. The term sounds innocuous enough but samizdat has a dark historical context, one that in modern times applies to the dissidents who are gathering around the modern-day manosphere, MGTOW, and Alt-Right movements. Many of its publishers and commenters are the same people derided and silenced by mainstream politicians and the media for their support of the Trump candidacy, though many have far more to discuss than a mere political candidate.

In Soviet times, samizdat referenced government-suppressed literature with political opinions the State did not agree with that was clandestinely printed and distributed. Just as politically incorrect opinions are suppressed by the left today, politically incorrect opinions were suppressed then by the Communist left.

Samizdat originated within the Russian Intelligentsia, a group which could include anyone from artists to teachers to scientists who were engaged in disseminating ideas that ran counter to the leftist ideology of Communism. In parallel to the self-publishing world of bloggers today, most of the texts were personal statements, protests, or opinions which differed from the mainstream. Many suggested alternative ways of handling social problems. Others included news suppressed by the “official media” of the time such as Pravda (The one and only Truth, which published government-approved propaganda).

The publishers of samizdat were subjected to censorship, harassment and surveillance of the type we are just beginning to witness in America. Facebook has been caught up in a recent scandal for suppressing conservative viewpoints while promoting liberal viewpoints. Twitter has also been caught up in censorship scandals, and Social Justice Warriors swarm and harass anyone who doesn’t conform to their hivemind groupthink. A swarming by the SJW fascists will involve at the minimum a job loss, while often an entire career can be destroyed for not conforming to the mandates of the politically correct thought police. The echoes of Orwell’s 1984 are all around us.

Looking back, we can find historical precedent to this type of behavior from leftists. In 1973, in an effort to intimidate and silence its political opponents who were publishing samizdat, the KGB concocted a show trial involving one of its most prominent publishers, Victor Krasin.

Russia

The cases of Krasin and Bukovsky illustrate the problem of state suppression of speech

Krasin Goes Up Against the State Apparatus

Victor Krasin was an economist who had long been a critic of Marxism-Leninism who was arrested for his opinions as early as 1949 and sent to Ozerlag to do hard labor as a political prisoner. Krasin spent the next five years of his life in different labor camps as a political prisoner until Stalin’s death in 1954, when he was released after being “rehabilitated” (effectively considered brainwashed) by the state. He went on to become a professor at the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute where he continued to self-publish until he was fired for it, and was arrested again years later for anti-Soviet propaganda. That arrest led to the show trial.

The stark contrast between today’s politically correct climate of censorship and suppression of Free Speech in America, and the championing of Free Speech then is astonishing. Only two weeks after Krasin’s conviction in the KGB’s show trial, the United States House and Senate adopted resolutions stating Krasin had “demonstrated enormous courage and intellectual honesty in advocating and defending the importance of fundamental civil and political liberty,” and that he had “served to illuminate the plight of hundreds of thousands of Soviet citizens.” That was then. It is not likely the publishers of today’s samizdat which challenges female privilege, bias against men in the family court system, and the marginalization of men will be lauded for their defense of fundamental civil and political liberty, since their views do not conform to those of today’s Marxist American government.

Krasin later emigrated to the United States and became a citizen in 1981. When studying the history of Krasin, one wonders how far away from such arrests and persecutions we are in America for the crime of illuminating men.

Closed_Minds

Closed minds stop thought crimes!

Bukovsky Fights the System

Vladimir Bukovsky was another samizdat publisher. A neurophysiologist and dissident of the Marxist movement, he started self-publishing shortly after entering Moscow University in 1960. One of his first pieces as portrayed the Soviet Union as an immoral society that no longer had moral and spiritual authority over its citizens. (The parallels between present-day America and Communist Russia are easily recognizable!)

For this “crime” of questioning authority and self-publishing, he was placed under investigation, and in 1961 was expelled from Moscow University. Unfazed, he continued his writing and self-publishing. By 1963, he was arrested by the KGB and convicted of anti-Soviet agitation and propaganda. Bukovsky would spend a total of 12 years in and out of Soviet prison and labor camps, and forced-treatment psychiatric hospitals. Speaking of this experience, he would later say:

I myself create it, edit it, censor it, publish it, distribute it, and get imprisoned for it.

One of the ways Soviet psychiatric hospitals treated political opponents like Bukovsky was by diagnosing them with sluggish schizophrenia. After all, why would anyone oppose the greatest sociopolitical system in the world, Communism? (Just as in America today, who would oppose multicultural enrichment, diversity, and the marginalization of the Evil White Male?) Self-publishers like Bukovsky who didn’t agree with the party line were diagnosed as being unable to grasp reality. The Soviet psychiatrists were also told to look for traits such as reform delusions or struggles for truth and justice and refusal to submit to authority so that those disorders could also be treated.

The treatments usually involved locking political opponents up in a Special Psychiatric Hospital, and drugging them with high doses of psychiatric medications.

Because of this spurious definition of schizophrenia, the Soviet Union had at least three times the number of schizophrenics as other nations. Bukovsky’s later appeals to Western psychiatrists helped expose the political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union. But, what better way for an authoritarian state to deal with political dissidents than diagnosing them as mentally unstable! These appeals led to reforms, including glasnost, which called for increased openness and transparency in government activities.

Once again, showing how political winds can shift dramatically from one generation to the next, the U.S. helped negotiate Bukovsky’s emigration from the Soviet Union. Bukovsky would end up in the U.K.

Looking at this case begs the question: How far are we from seeing conservatives and those who believe in traditional sex roles and traditional families diagnosed with a mental disorder, then rehabilitated with Obamacare in a state-run hospital in America?

Zuckerface-book

Facebook routinely suppresses Free Speech on its platform

America Heads Down Path of Politically Correct Censorship

Even though today there are no official edicts as of yet damning the authors and commenters on self-publishing web sites, we live in an environment of militant feminism and authoritarian political correctness that is becoming increasingly inhospitable to tradition and masculinity. There have even been bills introduced in the House of Representatives to curb speech the state determines is inappropriate.

Today’s internet world of Samizdat self-publishing blows a huge hole in the what the media and government previously took for granted: Control of the dialogue. The gatekeepers were able to select which topics were appropriate to discuss, decide what emphasis to place on each topic, then frame those topics in a way that’s appropriate for their interests, while limiting debate to certain prescribed limits which were also suited to their interests. It’s not easy for them to hide dissent and alternative points of view anymore. We are just beginning to see the results of a the fundamental change in the way the world communicates ideas, brought on by the internet.

One thing is for sure, self-publishing is easier, faster, and more prevalent now than it ever could have been back in the days of the Soviet Union. Men are self-publishing politically unpopular, unapproved, rational ideas that are important to their own self-interest in increasingly large numbers with an increasingly confident voice. What remains to be seen is how those in power will respond. A corporate censorship model and advertising blacklist looks to be the first volley in this assault on those who publish idea that don’t conform to those the thought police approve of.

Will we see arrests for the newly invented PC term “hate speech” soon? Will the government resort to outright censorship in the name of “national security?” Will Google and other web companies impose restrictions which content it indexes? In any case, storm clouds are gathering on the horizon, and as history shows, a Communist government will go to great lengths to suppress dissent.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month. This article originally ran on Return of Kings.