Tag Archives: Cultural Marxism

Feminist Stays Being a Stay at Home Mom Should Be Illegal


One radical feminist now wants this to be illegal

Attention, feminists. You’ve been had.

Isn’t it funny how “empowering” women has now morphed into the desire to force them to become common laborers rather than mothers? Some might say that was the plan all along.

Sarrah Le Marquand, a prominent feminist, has revealed the next “progressive” (i.e. regressive) chess move social engineers want to make. She wants to make being a stay at home mom illegal in Australia, the “Down Under” part of the increasingly insane Anglo world. This move would, of course, metastasize like the other cultural cancers to the rest of the English-speaking world. Marquand just penned up an authoritarian-themed column entitled: “It should be illegal to be a stay-at-home mum.” Here’s an excerpt from her screed.

Rather than wail about the supposed liberation in a woman’s right to choose to shun paid employment, we should make it a legal requirement that all parents of children of school-age or older are gainfully employed.

This is of course, about much more than lawmakers gone wild and pivoting to separate women even further from the lifelong rewards of motherhood, it’s about putting children in the hands of the State birth in order to foster the organizing, electronically enforced world Communist state. The State needs to brainwash your kids from infancy to go along with its collectivist schemes.

Marquand, no doubt a mouthpiece for power brokers behind the curtain who are pushing for savage reductions in the quality of life and personal autonomy for the average person, wants to make a female life as a corporate drone mandatory and legally enforced.

Only when the tiresome and completely unfounded claim that ‘feminism is about choice’ is dead and buried (it’s not about choice, it’s about equality) will we consign restrictive gender stereotypes to history.

That’s some dangerous language – it’s not about choice, anymore.

This latest diabolical plan dovetails with the separate but equally important androgyny agenda TNMM has reported on. Put succinctly, the elite want the equivalent of human machines rather than human beings in the dystopian world of the future they’re designing.

This is the fatal flaw of the West. It lost its humanity long ago. It no longer considers its humanity to be of any importance, only its machines and economic devices. (This is detailed in the Decline of the West section of this blog.)

If there’s one thing that’s funny about this story, it’s the fact women are now resisting being turned into men legally, as they’re realizing their all privileges and no responsibilities lifestyle might be in jeopardy. From Katherine Timpf at National Review:

Marquand insists that the people who believe “feminism is about choice” are wrong, but she believes that feminism is about forcing women to do things that they do not want to do — and it should be obvious to anyone with a brain that that backwards interpretation is about as blatantly wrong as it gets.

Men are constantly forced to do things we don’t want to do. And women are whining about that becoming the norm for them. That’s why there is one spot of irony and humor in what is otherwise a dreadful scenario.

Feminism was never about empowering women. It was about reducing them to live the lives of men, as worker bees rather than mothers and wives. A least the social engineers have now revealed another card in their hand at the poker table.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Women’s Suffrage and How It Relates to Today’s Decline


Women already had enormous biological advantages over men, but they had to take over the traditionally male world of politics, too

We live in a modern day dystopia. There’s plenty of shopping to do, plenty to eat, and everything looks nice and functional from the outside. But, scratch the paper-thin veneer of this postcard image or make a turn into the wrong neighborhood and the illusion is quickly destroyed. Demographically, America and Europe increasingly do not look like America and Europe. Americans are highly leveraged just to keep their fading dream alive, and slowly the sand the civilization was built on is being eroded by unending tides of liberalism and feminism. These two institutions, more than any other, are washing the foundation of the West right out from under it. A foundation built by men, like it or lump it. The West needs its men, but in modern terms it treats them like they’re nothing but disposable meal tickets, even despite evidence this is leading to demise. Women voted for the world we see today, at both the ballot box and using the power of the purse strings which they also control.

Today’s dystopia is the manifestation of the Anglo female’s psychology: materialism, solipsism, gossip, and covetousness permeate the land. It seems to many like there’s something that’s just not quite right, but the masses can’t figure it out so they look to political demagogues to fix their problems. The political class only betrays them and serves their real master – the female voter – while pilfering from the tax dollar trough.

One can trace many of the problems now sinking the ship of state in America and Western Europe back to women’s suffrage. Let’s conduct a thoughtcrime experiment as we examine what has been wrought by giving women the right to vote and more importantly, feminism encouraging them to wage war against men at the ballot box. The United States granted women’s suffrage in 1920, but before the battle was won and the inexorable lurch towards Socialism and today’s culture of misandry was cemented, an organization called the National Association Opposed to Women’s Suffrage put out this pamphlet. Ironically, many of it’s talking points have been proven true. The NAOWS made these claims in opposition to women voting:

  • BECAUSE it means competition of women with men instead of co-operation.
  • BECAUSE 80% of the women eligible to vote are married and can only double or annul their husband’s votes.
  • BECAUSE it can be of no benefit commensurate with the additional expense involved.

Several of the talking points from this pamphlet have been proven true

Even though The Atlantic published an article deriding this piece of literature with snark as is typical of the left, its main talking point has been unequivocally proven true. In the 21st century, men are being forced out of jobs by YouGoGrrl careerist shrikes by unfair competition, i.e. policies that provide disincentives the hiring of men. Women do not cooperate with men in Anglo-America as much as they railroad men to get what they want through everything from an anti-male culture to a gynocentric family court system that robs men of all classes from paupers to Alpha male actors. Interestingly, slavery still exists in America in the family court system, but because men are being enslaved, nobody cares.

Forcing men out of work and reducing their earning capacity has created huge issues with the delicate relations between the sexes, because female psychology shows us time and again women only see value in a man if he has money, status, or power. Money is deeply connected to a man’s status and power, so one can suffice it to say at the root of it all, women are only interested in male earning capacity. Women also hypergamous, wishing to date and marry up rather than dating or marrying across or down in economic status. So, we have the very problem this pamphlet predicted 100 years ago playing out before our very eyes. Women compete with men rather than co-operating with them. Beyond this competition destroying the nuclear family and creating today’s epidemic of fatherless children, women working for The Man rather than her man means corporations can cut labor costs in half and government can double the number of people paying revenue. Women’s suffrage, in real world effects, means a war on male status and power over society and family – two entities males have successfully guided since day one of the human species.

The second talking point is also proven true. Women annul or “cancel out” men’s votes, as they vote in larger numbers than men in America. This gap grows election to election as men realize their voices don’t count. The Washington Post went on another of its leftist, feminist male-bashing tirades in an article bragging about this.

But the truth is that women vote in higher numbers than men do. We have in every presidential election since 1980, and the gap has widened over time. In 2012, the difference in turnout was nearly 4 percentage points (63.7 percent of ladies voted vs. 59.8 percent of gents). The disparity was more than twice as large if you look just at those who have never been married. Girls, it seems, really do run this world.

Run the world they have, and after the 2012 election women can say they’re running it off the fucking rails as the United States and Europe wilt and die under the weight of unchecked immigration, gargantuan Socialist governments, the death of freedom and free will, daily terrorist attacks, and men checking themselves out of a system that targets them while at the same time labeling them evil oppressors.


Women want the government to make the hated Beta provider obsolete, and they’re succeeding

But Wait, There’s More

The third talking point is also substantiated by the fact women push for government policies that attempt to turn an inept entity made up of corrupt, squabbling bureaucrats into their own personal servant. The United States government has assumed the role of the Beta provider male, rendering a large proportion of the male population obsolete. Here are the results of the ignorance of Briffault’s Law this represents:

  • Increased role of government: Women support Socialism rather than individual competition, and the role of government as the “provider” for her and society. As a result, 70% of the U.S. government’s revenues go towards wealth redistribution and gibsmedat handouts, overwhelmingly aimed at giving women taxpayer money.
  • U.S. military intervention: Women do not support military intervention, even when national interests are at stake. They also support open-door immigration because women invite, men invade – it’s a way of shit testing to see who are the dominant males, the invaders or the natives.
  • Healthcare and welfare: Women overwhelmingly support socialized healthcare and welfare policies, funded in large part by men who pay 70% of all income taxes.
  • Firearms restrictions: Doves that most women are, they do not support the right to self-defense, and worse, their opinions on firearms are informed by a Marxist media since television news audiences are majority female.
  • Affirmative action to achieve equality: Evil White Males™ are being pushed out of jobs to accommodate everyone else. However, women never target dirty, difficult and dangerous jobs for affirmative action quotas, only forcing men out of cushy office jobs. And, women can’t “find a good man” because they took his job and now earn more than he does. (Again, hypergamy means a man is invisible to a women unless he has higher earnings or social status – and social status is largely dependent on earning capacity.)

In other words, the current government cucks the average man at the request of female voters. Since women have made up the majority of voters for so long, as proudly proclaimed in the Washington Post article, shouldn’t they also receive the majority of blame for the cluster our society has turned into? In addition to women creating crushing Big Daddy Government, materialism has become the national religion, a religion driven by the spending habits of women whose decadence funds 80% of the consumerism machine. Women then complain about environmental problems, clueless that their materialistic lifestyles cause the problem.

Real Sexism, a blog dedicated to exposing sexism towards men in Anglo culture, discusses how women are consummate takers who see government and men as nothing but provider modules to finance their wants.

Men earn 61.5% of all income but only account for 25% of domestic spending. Men only spend 40% of what they earn after tax. In contrast women make up 38.5% of all income but control 75% of domestic spending, women on average spend 90% MORE MONEY THAN THEY EARN. Men are exploited as cash machines and even with spending on children accounted for women still spend more money on themselves than the combined spending for men and children. This can even be observed in the floor space allocated to women’s products in most shopping centers.

So, it’s been established that women vote in politicians who promise more Beta male tax dollars so the girls can strike off the lower-earners of society from their list of suitors, they vote to live in consequence-free bubbles when they have children (often with layabout bad boys) out of wedlock as the majority now do, and they’ve proven several of the talking points of the anti-suffrage movement correct. Finally, with the power over the pocketbook, the voting women do with their dollars has yielded an empty, demographically sterile, sickeningly materialistic culture.

How does one “fix” all these problems? That’s not an easy proposition as the West has been inculcated with the belief in that women need to be involved in politics for a century. The problems brought on by women voting and canceling out the voices of men in the modern age are baked into the cake. The right of women to vote won’t be taken away, our culture is much to far gone to even consider that. Really all that’s left for men to do is throw up their hands and refuse to feed the beast women have created. All we can do now is live with the consequences of the men who failed one shit test too many back in 1920. Unless, there’s a heretic out there willing to take up the mantle of denying women the vote.

Unpopular truth like this goes through three stages, first it is ridiculed, then it is violently opposed, then it as accepted as self-evident. We are at the ridicule stage. And sadly, for all the good he’s doing, Trump’s daughter Ivanka has been pushing feminist narratives in his campaign. Men’s role a second class worker bees in Anglo society isn’t likely to change anytime soon, and women at the ballot box will only continue to reinforce that fact.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

The End Game Of Feminism And Cultural Marxism Is To Eliminate Sex Differences


Much as the infamous ladyboys of SE Asia, Marxism seeks to blur the lines between men and women

Leftists tell us that feminism started in the 1960s as a way of achieving the liberal code word “equality.” What initially sounded like a noble venture has led to disastrous results. Even so, Marxists are nowhere near achieving their ultimate goal of either figuratively or literally neutering the entire population. The Transgenders and Toilets or Great Bathroom Debate, which effectively means people have been confused as to which bathroom to use in America by 0.3% of the population that identifies as transgender and a compliant, Marxist media are only pieces of a larger puzzle these lunatics are trying to put together. It helps to reference what the definition of Cultural Marxism is:

The gradual process of destroying all traditions, languages, religions, individuality, government, family, law and order in order to re-assemble society in the future as a communist utopia. This Utopia will have no notion of gender, traditions, morality, god or even family or the state.

For the purposes of this piece, we will focus on the liberal Utopian dream of no gender. Feminism is the first volley in this assault on the biological, psychological, and anatomical realities of gender. Feminism has been trying to masculinize women and feminize men for 50 years. It has yielded results that encourage the Marxists to push even harder towards their ultimate goal of an androgynous, sexless society. Men are becoming softer spoken, meeker, and we have even seen the rise of cuckoldry as a mainstream sexual fetish when in the past men would have killed another man who was banging their wife. The leftist rag The Daily Beast even ran an article praising it as the fetish of intellectuals:

Cuckoldry is defined as a wife’s infidelity. Chaucer and Shakespeare characterized it as the ultimate shame. So perhaps it’s no surprise that today it’s developed into a fairly popular fetish. The Internet is rife with husbands enthusiastically soliciting other men—often larger, hotter, sexier men than themselves—to have sex with their wives while they watch.

Once a month, Drs. Paul and Sally Pines, a pair of New York City-area Ph.D.s who have been married 25 years, check into a hotel suite with another man. As Paul looks on, Sally and the man snuggle up together on the couch like lovebirds. Soon their clothes are off, and before long, she’s wailing in ecstasy as the man has aggressive, passionate sex with her. Paul, helpless, can only watch and suffer. Afterward, Paul serves lunch to his wife and the man in the suite’s dining area; they eat in the nude before launching into another long, loud, sweaty session.

Beyond weird fetishes that turn men into eunuchs, on the other side women have become man-jawier, less fertile, career-obsessed, and manlier in the Anglo world. The fact this is happening is not an accident. Blogger Christina Laila wrote about these trends fulfilling part of a plan:

Gender inequality became the focus to breakdown Western culture. The strong family unit became a target. At the time, families consisted of a father who worked and provided for the family, while the mother stayed at home and reared children (often times elderly grandparents also lived in the home). In order to get the people to acquiesce and become part of the fodder, the leaders knew that they had to remove the father from the home and get women in the workforce. The ‘think tank’, Critical Theory was formed and so began the introduction to feminism and the idea that the two sexes are merely a ‘social construct’.

Marxists literally believe they can put an end to sex. As we are about to see, this idea will lead to a nightmare if brought to its conclusion.


Beautiful women like this may be a thing of the past as feminism attempts to masculinize the female


Realizing the goal of eliminating the “concept” of man and woman would mean no more traditional sex roles, and it would mean that males and females would become androgynous corporate and government-serving pods. After all, to use Huxley’s term, viviparous reproduction will become a primitive relic once the New World Communist Order enlightens us all.

For you must remember that in those days of gross viviparous reproduction, children were always brought up by their parents and not in State Conditioning Centres.

“Human beings used to be …” he hesitated; the blood rushed to his cheeks. “Well, they used to be viviparous.”

“Quite right.” The Director nodded approvingly.

“And when the babies were decanted …”

“‘Born,'” came the correction.

“Well, then they were the parents—I mean, not the babies, of course; the other ones.”

The poor boy was overwhelmed with confusion.

“In brief,” the Director summed up, “the parents were the father and the mother.” The smut that was really science fell with a crash into the boys’ eye-avoiding silence. “Mother,” he repeated loudly rubbing in the science; and, leaning back in his chair, “These,” he said gravely, “are unpleasant facts; I know it. But then most historical facts are unpleasant.”

This concept of a sexless society was also dealt with a quarter of a century ago in a Star Trek: The Next Generation episode called The Outcast. The parallels between this episode and the path feminism and Marxism are taking us down is chilling:

According to their official doctrine, the J’naii had evolved beyond gender and thus view the idea of male/female sexuality as primitive. Those among the J’naii who view themselves as possessing gender are ridiculed, outcast, and forced to undergo “psychotectic therapy” – a form of therapy meant to remediate gender-specificity [essentially neutering people] and allow acceptance back into J’naii society. Soren [who feels like a woman] is essentially put on trial where she passionately defends herself and expresses her outrage at what their society does to those who are different. J’naii diplomats force Soren to undergo this therapy, citing reformed citizens’ newfound happiness and desire to be normal.

Traditional gender roles are already seen as “primitive” by Marxists, even though studies consistently show both men and women are happier when they conform to roles that have evolved in diverse societies all over the world and been a part of history for thousands of generations.

It does not require a huge leap of the imagination to think men and women who want to live their lives with traditional sex roles, have sex with each other, and reproduce through pregnancy will be taken to a State re-education camp, much in the same say Soren was.


Turning man into a profit making machine seems to be the obsession of 21st century social engineers

Machine Culture

Drilling down to a more philosophical level, this strange sex and gender problem the West finds itself in the middle of is an offshoot of what Spengler called the spread of the Final World Sentiment of Western culture. He predicted the Final World Sentiment for Western culture would be Socialism and Communism from the year 1900, which is the culture’s innate desire to fulfill the promise of its Prime Symbol Infinity. To achieve an infinity of prosperity, heaven on earth in other words, Spengler said Western culture fundamentally believes man must not only design machines in search of this goal but one day become a machine.

From The New Modern Man article The Last Act: The Rise and End of the Machine Culture:

As the Final World Sentiment of Western man spreads (which Spengler said was the quest for a Socialist Utopia from the year 1900 onward) the Socialist longing develops into a desire to become God. This is a profound commentary on anti-religious Marxists of today and what they really want to accomplish by removing all biology from man. Cultural Marxism’s goal of stripping man of all traditions, individuality, religion, family, and even his gender – making both sexes androgynous as the sickness of feminism is attempting to do with disastrous results – represents Western man’s longing to achieve infinity: He must become a machine himself in order to become God.

This ultimately leads to catastrophe, which Spengler explained in Man and Technics is the engine that either causes a species to go extinct or for a mutation to spread throughout it. Scientifically, this fact is defined as punctuated equilibrium. Indeed the cycles of history show no deviation from a civilization ultimately sterilizing itself demographically, and often the last chapter of a civilization ends in catastrophe. The West might end up sterilizing itself not only demographically, but literally.

It is reasonable to think the West’s long arc through history could end in a catastrophe as it tries to figuratively or literally neuter the entire world to get rid of the “primitive” notion of men, women and sex. Beyond proving Freud’s penis envy theory correct, feminism and Marxism could be catastrophes that put the very survival of the human species into question.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month. This The New Modern Man article originally ran on Return of Kings.

Feminism Proves Freud’s Penis Envy Theory Correct


Feminism proves Freud’s Penis Envy theory correct

Sigmund Freud’s ideas on psychoanalysis, the id, ego, and superego as well as his ideas on primitive emotional and sexual forces dominating human psychology have largely been proven true by his nephew Edward Bernays. Bernays put Freud’s ideas to work for corporations and government, and the result has been an all-consuming culture of materialism and today, an elite-managed democracy. Both corporations and the government manipulate emotions rather than speaking to man’s intellect to maintain their power.

In addition, feminism has been proving Freud’s Penis Envy theory correct for half a century. Women have abandoned their feminine strengths and now pursue male avenues of personal fulfillment. In Anglo America, a society that has had a long history of difficult relations between the sexes, this has progressed to the point women are attempting to displace men from all avenues of the society. What is Penis Envy? According to Freud:

It is a stage during female psychosexual development, in which female adolescents experience anxiety upon realization that they do not have a penis. Freud considered this realization a defining moment in a series of transitions toward a mature female sexuality and gender identity…it is sometimes used in contemporary culture to refer to women who are presumed to wish they were men.

What else is feminism than an attempt to turn women into men? John Smith of Quora puts it less tactfully but more honestly.

Since men often have more adult qualities, like being the bread winner in a family and essentially being a protector and provider (biological basis of attraction and male/female relationships) a woman feels like a child and inferior.

One of the most hilarious criticisms of the theory comes from feminists:

A significant number of feminists have been highly critical of penis envy theory as a concept and psychoanalysis as a discipline, arguing that the assumptions and approaches of the psychoanalytic project are profoundly patriarchal, anti-feminist, and misogynistic and represent women as broken or deficient men.

The hamster is really spinning the wheel to come up with that rationalization. What else is feminism but trying to turn women into broken or deficient men? Pretending there are not innate psychological, anatomical, and behavioral differences between the sexes is the height of insanity.


Feminism pushes the sexes to deny their innate sexual, behavioral, and anatomical differences ultimately resulting in an androgynous, sexless society

What Feminism Does to Society

Turning women into men (sans penis) as feminism wants to do is proving to have disastrous results for society. Women are increasingly being pushed into male spaces, and men are being told they cannot have male spaces any longer but dare not go into female “safe spaces.” Birth rates are tumbling such that societies that practice feminism are dying off, the family is being destroyed, and the sexes are becoming more feral in a sexual market that resembles the jungle. Feminism seeks rights and privileges but no responsibilities for women other than to become corporate drones that displace men from their jobs and roles in society, and importantly, reduce wages while increasing tax revenue.

It also teaches them the very important and respectable professions of mother and housewife are outdated and a product of evil men oppressing them. All these factors combine in an attack on traditional gender roles that have been an important part of the human species since it evolved, which boil down to the following:

Masculine roles are usually associated with strength, aggression, and dominance, while feminine roles are usually associated with childrearing, nurturing, and subordination.

Research proves both women and men are happier when they conform to this model, rather than the Western idea of trying to surpass human biology in a quest to realize Utopia. Interestingly, Spengler (who predicted the current malaise of Western culture in 1918) said Western man’s ultimate, unattainable goal – based on his Prime Symbol of Infinity – was turning himself into one of his machines, forgoing his biology. President Herbert Hoover quipped social engineers like Bernays were indeed turning men and women into happiness machines! And that was three-quarters of a century ago.

Marxists claim feminism is about achieving equality, but in reality it has these effects:

  • Turning women into taxpayers to add to the largesse of the system
  • Women dedicating their lives to an unloving corporation rather than a loving husband and family
  • Programming both men and women against their innate biological tendencies
  • Moving society towards androgyny; a sexless society
  • Ignoring and suppressing valid male issues
  • Seeking higher status for women via special rights and privileges
  • The rise of casual sex (and the Thousand-Cock Stare)
  • The decline of marriage
  • The decline of family
  • The rise of single parenting
  • Children being indoctrinated by the state rather than educated by their families
  • Rising numbers of fatherless children, leading to delinquency

Paul Gottfried, cultural critic has boiled all these bullet points down to this statement:

Feminism has been a social disaster that continues to take its toll on the family and has contributed to a descent by increasingly disconnected individuals into social chaos.

It’s the classic political tactic of divide and conquer. After social chaos is created, isolated, disconnected individuals are much easier for a state to manage than people who are members of strong, cohesive families.


Feminism encourages women to forego their natural strengths

Foregoing Femininity for Feminism

Feminism encourages women to forgo “oppressive” roles that actually play to their strengths in society: roles like wife, mother, and nurturer. There is perhaps no better illustration of Penis Envy than women labeling as outdated and oppressive the strengths their biology – and notably their vaginas – give them. Feminists want to be just like men instead of just like women.

The most famous case of women emulating men started in the 1960s with feminists burning their bras. Rather than prove Penis Envy wrong, behavior like this actually screams I want to go around with out a bra just like men, saggy breasts be damned!

Next up came I want to have a career and a job, just like men! However, in a cruel, corporate managed world that demands more and more from its employees for less and less reward, some women are beginning to realize that becoming a corporate bootlicker wasn’t such a good deal after all. After all, tending to their children (rather than having them raised by a nanny), baking cakes, watching soap operas, and vacuuming will not lead to the vortex of hell as feminism warns. (As an aside, in Latin America women laugh at the idea of household chores and activities like these for women being oppressive.)

Feminism, which paints women as eternal victims and men as eternal oppressors suggests women do indeed have an inferiority complex, which Freud showed stems from the realization women are anatomically “deficient” during what he called the Phallic Stage. And now, with the advance of modern technology, women can have a penis sewn on. Anglo-America’s weird concept of trying to reinvent biology and sexuality has led to such crises as the Great Transgenders and Toilets Debate.


Is sex a primitive, outdated concept and do men need to be neutered so they can be more like women?


Ultimately, feminism is a Trojan Horse used by Cultural Marxists to effectively neuter society. The goal of Marxism is a sexless society in which men are feminized and women are masculinized. Achieving equality really means achieving no sex at all: no penis, no vagina, no intercourse. Just sexless, corporate, taxpaying pods with no biology. In the minds of the damaged, evil individuals pushing this agenda, no sex and no gender will lead to a Utopia on earth.

A Star Trek: The Next Generation episode called The Outcast dealt with this concept. The episode focuses around the J’naii, and the echoes of the sexless society feminism seeks are chilling.

According to their official doctrine, the J’naii had evolved beyond gender and thus view the idea of male/female sexuality as primitive. Those among the J’naii who view themselves as possessing gender are ridiculed, outcast, and forced to undergo “psychotectic therapy” – a form of therapy meant to remediate gender-specificity [essentially neutering people] and allow acceptance back into J’naii society. Soren [who feels like a woman] is essentially put on trial where she passionately defends herself and expresses her outrage at what their society does to those who are different. J’naii diplomats force Soren to undergo this therapy, citing reformed citizens’ newfound happiness and desire to be normal.

It is reasonable to think, given the path society is now taking that people who have normal sexual urges and who believe in traditional gender roles will someday be sent to re-education camps in a similar way to the plot laid out in The Outcast.

Just look at how society already condemns traditional gender roles and excommunicates people who believe women should be subservient to men and that men should lead society. How dare you say a thing like that! When, for the vast majority of human history those sentiments would have been considered completely normal. This is the danger with slow, steady social engineering that uses feminism and the useful idiots that subscribe to it as one of many tools in a toolbox of social engineering. People are slowly indoctrinated into a completely new belief system without realizing how manipulated they have become.

Will the day come that men are forcibly neutered? Men have already been figuratively neutered in the West by cultural engineering schemes that force them to behave more like nice girls instead of rowdy boys, so they can be “normal” like females who quietly and calmly follow orders and do not question authority. Taking the next logical step towards an androgynous society sounds like the path to hell, not heaven.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

If God Does Not Exist, Anything is Permitted


Religion means much more to a society than just belief

Dostoevsky said it best: If God does not exist, anything is permitted. His novel The Brothers Karamazov had it right, without a religious moral code as its backbone society degenerates and becomes amoral. People begin to stand on shallow principles, as has happened in the West. Nihilism, the belief that life is without any intrinsic value becomes rampant. And, as one churchgoer told me at a Catholic church here in Latin America:

When people don’t believe in God, they begin to believe they are God.

G.K. Chesterson also knew the dangers of ditching religion.

When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything.

As we are about to see, even atheists often have religious beliefs. But, their beliefs are focused on other dogma instead of a god.

What the Left Worships

The left assumes a posture of superiority in America, because to them they are “smarter” than the “primitives” who still “cling to their religion and guns” as Obama put it.

However, religion seems to be deeply embedded in the mind of man and the irreligious left is just as susceptible to religious belief. As author Michael Crichton observed, the left adopts global warming and other environmental issues as religion without realizing it. The entire global warming farrago is based on shaky scientific evidence and political machinations, but leftists defend it with religious fervor.

Those who do not believe in this pseudo-elite dogma are excommunicated from the leftist community and condemned as non-believers or deniers. The Global Warming Religion also reflects belief in sin and redemption: people sin when they drive automobiles and use air conditioning but they can redeem themselves by paying a carbon tax.

Crichton explains in his excellent essay Environmentalism as Religion:

Environmentalism seems to be the religion of choice for urban atheists. Why do I say it’s a religion? Well, just look at the beliefs. If you look carefully, you see that environmentalism is in fact a perfect 21st century remapping of traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs and myths. There’s an initial Eden, a paradise, a state of grace and unity with nature, there’s a fall from grace into a state of pollution as a result of eating from the tree of knowledge, and as a result of our actions there is a judgment day coming for us all. We are all energy sinners, doomed to die, unless we seek salvation, which is now called sustainability. Sustainability is salvation in the church of the environment. Just as organic food is its communion, that pesticide-free wafer that the right people with the right beliefs, imbibe.

Unfortunately, people often mean well when they believe in such a religion but their goodwill is subverted by those who turn a cause into a racket. They also become fanatical in their beliefs and want to persecute those who do not believe, as we have seen with the American government discussing criminalization of climate denial.


Buddhism’s principle of nonviolence has served Asian societies well

Religion’s Role

As most of Europe is now atheist and an increasing number of people are not of the book in America, we have seen the breakup of the family and the rise of degeneracy. Without religion to guide it, or the wrong religion, society can go off the rails quickly. These excerpts from an essay on religion detail three of the most important functions it serves.

Religion promotes the major social virtues like truth, honesty, non-violence, service, love, discipline etc. A follower of the religions internalizes these virtues and becomes disciplined citizen of the society.

There is perhaps nothing that requires more discipline than raising a family and children who become responsible members of society. Much to the chagrin of secularists, religious families do the best job of achieving this according to demographic research of social scientists in Demographic Winter.

The family is perhaps the hardest feature of civilization to hold together, because man still has animalistic instincts as Freud told us in Civilization and Its Discontents. Religion, when done right attempts to harness these animal forces and direct them towards the common good.

Religion inculcates the spirit of self-service. It demands that people should be charitable and benevolent. Through various religious experiences he forgets the worldly life and problems. This experience suppresses the animal desires and converts the animal qualities of man to human qualities.

And as Marxists know, when traditional religion can be subverted and turned into religions of the environment and the state it imbues bureaucrats with enormous influence and power. Their religion has become government worship. Marxists see the state as the savior of mankind.

Religion is one of the most important agents of socialization and social control. It has significant role in organizing and directing social life. It helps in preserving social norms and strengthening social control.

No religion in perfect. But before relegating Christianity to the ash heap of history as many on the Left want to do, a cost-benefit analysis should be done. But what are its pros and cons when attempting to replace it with a religion that worships government and the state as the savior of mankind?

Governments have failed man time and time again and attract the very worst people (generally, sociopaths) in our species. As Ronald Reagan said:

Government is not the solution to our problems, government is the problem.

Government is force. Essentially, it is a mob with a monopoly on violence. Therefore, it can only bring about change by coercion. It is not a savior of mankind, but rather a cancer upon it.


The cost-benefit analysis works out in favor of Christianity or other traditional religions vs. worshipping government

 Cultural Marxism

Destroying traditional religion and replacing it with a religion of the state is one of the effects of Cultural Marxism. This is Cultural Marxism on paper:

[Cultural Marxism is] gradual process of destroying all traditions, languages, religions, individuality, government, family, law and order in order to re-assemble society in the future as a communist utopia. This Utopia will have no notion of gender, traditions, morality, god or even family or the state.

In practice, it leads to worshipping the government as a religion. Also, it is an irony the diversity Leftists sanctify in their religion of Marxism will ultimately destroy true diversity, as all nations, peoples, and beliefs are blended into one ethnically mixed collective that bends its knee to the almighty state.

The main vehicles currently used to promote the Socialist worldview are the legacy media and Hollywood.



Militant secularists in Hollywood regularly denigrate the beliefs of Christians and Jews, but they do not poke fun at Buddhists and Muslims. In 1976 Carrie portrayed a lunatic Christian mother locking her daughter up in a closet after she had her first period. More recently, Larry David peed on a painting of Jesus Christ for comedic effect on his HBO series. One blogger pointed out Hollywood’s bias:

Christians [are often portrayed] as weak nut cases, serial killers, stupid, schizophrenic, bad parents, demonic or intolerant.

Seldom do we hear a point of view which differs, such as the following: Minister Eddie Hyatt’s essay How Secular Media is Destroying Minds and Destroying America sums up what the sewer pipe coming out of Hollywood does to society as it spews its Christophobic bile into theaters and our homes.

I have come to realize that “don’t believe everything you see on TV” is a message that America and the Church needs to hear. This is because our nation has adopted a belief system based on a make-believe world produced by Hollywood script-writers and actors. In this fictional world of Hollywood, sin does not exist and there are no consequences for our behavior. In this unreal world, which is the product of someone’s imagination, sexual deviancy and immorality are the norm and “fun” with no negative outcomes or aftereffects. Drunkenness, crudeness and vulgarity are presented as acceptable and even “funny.” Good is depicted as evil and evil as good.

It becomes much more than entertainment when people begin to subconsciously believe the fantasies filmmakers are spinning, and adopting the moral codes represented on the screen.

Christianity is attacked more than any other religion in America. This is due in part to Marxism, but the reasons go deeper than that. As Spengler knew, once a society reaches the civilization stage a battle of New vs. Old ideas proceeds. The society attempts to replace tradition and religion with economics and theory. It begins to focus on earthly ideals instead of spiritual ones. This ultimately leads to a society’s downfall.


Looking Up Instead of Down

Religion should inspire people to figuratively look up instead of down. Society benefits by its giving man higher aspirations and goals in life than hedonism, materialism, and nihilism.

The failure to inspire man has widespread implications. One of the most important of our time is the fact the more secularized society becomes, the fewer children people have. A birth dearth has become so advanced in the West it threatens to destroy economies, so immigrants have to be brought in to keep the machinery of the economy running. This of course, say nothing of Western culture which is imperiled by its self-imposed sterilization and demographic replacement.

Secular households consistently do not produce enough children to sustain the population. Ph.D. Mom Dropout explains how children are viewed in religious households vs. secular households.

Religion essentially extends one’s time-horizon to include multiple generations–children, grandchildren, etc. However, from a secular viewpoint, children are a burden that detracts from “living life to the fullest”–after all, your short time on Earth is all you have. Therefore, children are more likely to be valued in a religious household and less valued in a secular household.

Statistically, a strong family and religion go hand in hand.

There is a strong connection between the birth rate and weekly church attendance.

Demographers know it, religious families with both parents present not only have more kids but their kids statistically turn out better than those from secular families. That said, these facts are not meant to recommend people go listen to hellfire preaching every weekend. But, without any religious principles at all man returns to a feral lifestyle. First the family goes, then the culture, and then the civilization. Bronze Age myths may seem trite to some, but they have survived for thousands of years for a reason. Changing the set and frame of a society carries with it enormous risks.

Secularism does not carry the weight of a civilization. Like it or not, religion does.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

The 5 F’s of a Happy Man


Men are pretty simple creatures, it is not hard to make us happy

In the increasingly isolated, demographically moribund existence individuals face in the Western world, men are regularly scapegoated for all the problems women and the world face. This “Women are Wonderful” effect is rampant in modern times, and it a symbolic of a culture that pedestalizes women. The Women are Wonderful effect is detailed here:

Research suggests that people associate more positive attributes with women compared to men. This bias reflects an emotional bias toward women as a general case.

Contrary to what the cultural mythmakers tell us, the conclusion can be made that society is actually sexist against men as the narrative turns women into eternal victims and men into the antagonists. This bias favoring women marginalizes men and feminism then pours gasoline on the fire. As Martin Daubney of Loaded magazine has observed The Grand Narrative of the Western world (and Anglo society in particular) disparages men, illustrated in this infographic:


Anglo society’s biases represent men as evil oppressors and pedestalize women

According to this distorted world view, men have no problems, men are the problems, we have all positive opportunities, and we control politics, the economy, and society while actively oppressing women. This caricature of men could not be farther from the truth in the present day, since men and especially white men are excommunicated from society.

Following The Grand Narrative, if society instead went back to a traditional model in which men manage politics, the economy, and society both sexes would be happier. However, one major clarification needs to be made: Men do not have all positive opportunities nor outcomes, and do not wish to actively oppress women. In fact, most men want to serve women in the traditional manner and for women to in turn serve us in a traditional manner. This delicate balance between the sexes has been upset by feminism and Cultural Marxism, which seeks rights and privileges for women without giving them responsibilities.

This bias against men is represented by the fact that never is the issue of female privilege discussed by feminists nor is handing women the blue-collar and grunt work responsibilities of society a topic of interest. Men overwhelmingly die in greater numbers in combat, in the workplace, at industrial jobs, they make up the majority of the homeless, and women win custody of children 4 out of 5 times. They are also subject to being turned into economic slaves of the child support and alimony system but get no say in the vaunted “women’s right to choose” as to whether or not their offspring will be killed by an abortionist after conception.

While returning to traditional sex roles sounds complicated, one must realize in reality what most men want is pretty simple. Our desires can be broken down to a simple list. And for that, we offer our lives, our bodies, our protection, guidance, and the fruits of our labor. Here is a list of 5 F’s which keep men happy.


Men are genetically and biologically wired to desire sex; all interaction and transactions are directed at bedding a hot babe; for the female the directive is getting an Alpha male to commit

(F)uck Us

Biologically, the meaning of life is to have sex and reproduce. It has been the Prime Directive on planet earth for over 4 billion years. All animals have sex, and humans are no exception. The sexual market is the granddaddy of all other markets. Like it or not, all other transactions humans make are in service or either raising their status or power for men, or women making themselves more alluring to Alpha males.

Sex is a biological and psychological need for both men and women, but especially men. Without it, all sorts of problems arise. The mass shooting craze in Anglo America only illustrates one of the psychological dangers of leaving a class of men completely sexless. (Of course, drugging them with brain-altering SSRIs does not help.)

The numbers of men who don’t get any are quite large, yet very few females (not surprisingly) ever have to go without. Here’s what one study found about how many involuntarily celibate (incel) men there are in Anglo society :

A whopping 40% of young men under 35 reported to be INCEL for the past 6 months (involuntary celibate), but only 3% of women. This was from a survey of 5,000 people. So 40% of men under 35 can’t get sex or have not had sex in the past 6 months, where as only 3% of women under 35 reported not having sex in the past 6 months. What does this tell you? To me it means 40% of men are rejects, not good enough for women, be it from being too ugly or socially undesirable or whatever. And it means that women are whores who get sex easily.

Going back to monogamy and marriage would end this glut of males at the lower end of the spectrum, since females instinctually only chase the top 20% of men and neglect the rest. The result is not only violent outbursts from sexless males, but a mass checking out of society such as the MGTOWs (Men Going Their Own Way) are righteously doing. As one MGTOW put it:

  • Chasing women is stressful, requiring much deliberation, effort, and strategy.
  • Once you have a woman, she will invariably bring great stress into your life; power struggles, constant nattering and complaints, constant neediness and being demanding, drama, arguments, restrictions of your freedom to do what you want when you want, even what foods you put into your body.
  • When the woman leaves you, or you leave her, more stress and drama ensues.

The MGTOWs have a valid point. However, without the family society does not continue and those that remove themselves from the sexual market become genetic dead ends. This is a philosophy that is great for a certain segment of men, but someone has to carry the weight of society if we wish for the human species to continue.


Family is the foundation of a civilized society

Give Us a (F)amily

By turning the idea of family into an antiquated concept relegated to lowly “breeders” Western society is committing suicide. Here are a few reasons family is so important to men and society and general.

  • Family organizes society around the fact children are the future
  • Family makes for a more civilized society
  • Family gives men a reason to strive and work hard
  • People with supportive families are happier and more fulfilled as individuals

The documentary Happy, which features findings from the scientific study of happiness found:

Society tells us in order to be happy, we need to be successful, make a lot of money, and have a good job. Although having enough money to take care of basic needs (food, shelter, clothes) does increase happiness, an excess of money doesn’t necessarily make us any happier. Someone who makes $5 million a year isn’t necessarily any happier than someone who brings home $50,000 a year. In fact, people who are very focused on making more money and higher social status tend to be more depressed, anxious, and generally less energized. The happiest people are those who focus their time and energy on close, supportive friends and family, and community.

Family turns the focus of society from pursuit of extrinsic goals (money, image, possessions, shallow things) to intrinsic goals (personal development, activity, and community) that naturally make people happier.


Cooking is becoming a lost art since feminism

(F)eed Us

Cooking is becoming a lost art since feminism. According to feminism, the kitchen might as well be a dungeon and is the vortex of hell in the ongoing oppression of women. In reality, when women do traditional things like cooking and cleaning, they wind up happier than careerist shrikes who sell commit themselves to corporations who do not care about them instead of a husband that would.

The American Sociological Review found if men did all of what the researchers characterized as feminine chores like folding laundry, cooking or vacuuming — the kinds of things many women say they want their husbands to do — then couples had sex 1.5 fewer times per month than those with husbands who did what were considered masculine chores, like taking out the trash or fixing the car… the greater the husband’s share of masculine chores compared with feminine ones, the greater his wife’s reported sexual satisfaction.

This flies in the face of everything feminism tells women and men, and it is only one study among many that reinforce inconvenient facts that the sexes are fundamentally different. Another study in New Zealand also found this, even though its findings are cloaked in politically correct language.

Psychologists surveyed a representative sample of (6,000) New Zealanders and found that a man’s score on a test of ‘benevolent sexism’ – a view of women as ‘deserving of men’s adoration and protection’ – was directly correlated with his overall life satisfaction. Their results also indicated that women are happier in relationships with sexist men.

Benevolent sexism is an invented phrase for traditional sex roles that have existed for thousands of generations in our species for a reason. Traditional roles exist not because women are oppressed by men, but because traditional sex roles make both sexes happier. Women want to submit to a powerful man (i.e.as the 50 Shades of Grey insanity proved). So, guys stop being a limp-wristed metrosexual and start being a demanding asshole.

Sending women back to the kitchen may be the best thing we ever did for their happiness.


Ball busting women are a huge turnoff

Don’t (F)ight With Us

There is nothing more unattractive than a ball-busting woman. Unfortunately it is becoming more common as Cultural Marxism continues pushing an agenda of androgenizing the population, masculinizing women and feminizing men. As the excellent men’s blog Chateau Heartise puts it:

‘Manning up’ by secularized post-industrial women is prominent in both their physical features (fatter, manjaw-ier, bigger framed) and their personalities (bitchier, more entitled, less fecund, more prone to binge drinking).

Assuming a feminine posture is more desirable than continuing to prove Freud’s penis envy theories right on a daily basis.

Men also need to realize women operate on the hedonic treadmill principle, and stop putting up with constant complaining. Find a way to end it by being an asshole (chicks dig jerks) and tell her to shut the fuck up. The hedonic treadmill is an important concept:

The hedonic treadmill, also known as hedonic adaptation, is the observed tendency of [women] to quickly return to a relatively stable level of happiness despite major positive or negative events or life changes.

This means that no matter what men do for women, what men buy for them or the sacrifices they make, once a new car, wardrobe or home is purchased women will return to the same overall level of happiness. Meaning, her feels from that huge purchase won’t last long. Consumerism and materialism is driven by women and it is not making people happier. Rammstein actually highlighted this tendency in their excellent song Rosenrot (translated to English).

The boy climbs the mountain in torment
He doesn’t really care about the view
Only the little rose is on his mind
He brings it to his sweetheart

She wants it and that’s fine
So it was and so it will always be
She wants it and that’s the custom
Whatever she wants she gets

At his boots, a stone breaks
[He] Doesn’t want to be on the cliff anymore
And a scream lets everyone know
Both are falling to the ground

Don’t be the boy who climbs the mountain of her materialistic desires in torment just because she is bitching only to end up falling off the edge. And women, stop being so demanding and be thankful for what you already have as world religions tell you to do.


Fucking around is perhaps the worst thing you can do to a man

Don’t (F)uck Around

There is nothing more devastating to a man than female infidelity. In addition to the supreme slap in the face cuckolding him is, unknowingly raising a child that is not biologically his offers no greater disrespect. Estimates vary but anywhere from 3% to 10% of men are raising a child that is not biologically theirs and are ignorant of the fact.

In the Western world, female infidelity is encouraged if not rewarded with cash and prizes by a family court system that actively practices misandry (male hatred).

Paternity guarantees are why marriage evolved in all societies on earth. Ditching this disincentivizes men from participating in society and turns them into nothing more than sperm donors. Offering men a seat at the table of the human family with guarantees of female fidelity was one of the best features of patriarchy. As Female Misogynist put it (yes, a woman who criticizes other women!):

Patriarchy, to begin with, gives males purpose. A man who is hoping to achieve great things, to build something, to discover something, has to restrain his violent impulses.

This ownership gives the man a motivation to protect his wife and daughters (and sons) from threats, chiefly other men.

In unpatriarchal societies, which are invariably either primitive tribes or else rapidly collapsing civilizations, women are raped or robbed frequently. Men have no reason not to do these things; their sole purpose is to act as sperm donor and gratify their own whims. Such tribes have no real concept of paternity, so mothers are free to raise their sons as they wish, without interference from those pesky fathers. According to feminist propaganda, these women will raise their sons to be peaceful and nonviolent and respectful to women. In reality, these fatherless boys grow up violent, rootless, and with no reason not to do whatever they feel like.

All civilized societies on earth have practiced monogamy. This is why not fucking around is so important.


Like it or not, patriarchy, marriage, and family are the building blocks of a civilized society

Not So Hard to Do

We often hear what women want but society fails to ask what men want. The 5 tenets of  making men happy are very little ask. Following this outline will make society more civilized and benefit it in the long run. The alternative is to continue along the primrose path the West is now taking towards genetic, cultural, and demographic extinction.

The West is continuing to trade what works for what sounds good. Having women in the workplace benefits the government by providing 50% more taxpayers and  benefits corporations by cutting labor costs in half, but does not benefit civilized society nor the family.

The failure to conform to this simple model is the product of a society that has lost touch with the traditions it was founded on. As Spengler put it, in the Winter of a society people analyze everything to death and life is no longer a thing to be lived but a problem to be solved. Intellectuals arrogantly criticize the life-giving traditions of the society and moneyed interests profit from tearing these traditions apart. Fertility declines, families break up, and society falls apart.

Meantime, nobody ever asks how can we serve both sexes better, only how can we serve women better.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

America’s Bathroom Insanity Another Sign The Marxists Are Winning


The fact people are in an uproar over which bathroom to use only confirms Marxists set the agenda of what is discussed in America

The obsession over transgenders and toilets continues in Anglo America, affirming the continuing tyranny of the leftist minority and its hatred for middle America. It also affirms the left’s marionettes in the legacy media still control the narrative. To solve the problem posed by The Great Bathroom Debate there have been proposals to do one of the following:

  • Add third gender bathrooms which will crush small businesses with unnecessary costs
  • Make all bathrooms unisex bathrooms (further blurring the lines between the sexes as desired by diabolical Cultural Marxists).

One question that has never been asked that should be asked: Why is it so hard for someone to use a bathroom the same as the sex listed on their birth certificate, and have that sex legally changed if they decide to surgically mutilate their sex organs?

The only reason this issue has been taken up by leftists is because marginalizing the non-transgender population and muddying the waters of the concept of gender pushes their agenda. It helps to know one of the chief goals of today’s left is pushing Cultural Marxism with the goal of destroying the concept of gender. This is the real purpose behind this debate, since only 0.3% of the population is transgender.

The Marxist’s true aim is eliminating the antiquated (to them) concept of gender, and turning us all into sexless, androgynous pods. To their twisted mind, this will help bring about a Utopia.

Also, having spent a decade working in the “mainstream” or legacy media before I left in disgust, I can assure you the entire industry runs on creating controversy and inventing issues like this out of whole cloth. So, the entire bathroom farrago is profitable for them while it serves an elite who set the agendas in the media.


Cultural Marxists are attacking the concept of gender in the U.S.

The Minority is “Better Than” the Majority

Putting 99.7% of the population on notice and allowing people who are biologically one sex or the other to use the wrong bathroom is insanity. It is surreal that this issue is even being discussed as often as it is by the media and politicians. As explained by blogger Cristinia Laila:

Cultural Marxism always has a group of people considered ‘special’ or ‘protected’. These groups rights always supersede the rights of others no matter the consequences. One by one, Counties and States are fighting over gender neutral public bathrooms. This will give grown men the right to walk into a bathroom or locker room where women and little girls are nude or partially nude. What kind of society do we have where this is appropriate? What kind of society do we have where the most vulnerable, the women and children are put in danger of predators and perverts just to cater to an infinitesimal group of people?

Laila also explains the real agenda behind The Great Bathroom Debate:

Race and gender inequality became the focus to breakdown Western culture. The strong family unit became a target. At the time, families consisted of a father who worked and provided for the family, while the mother stayed at home and reared children (often times elderly grandparents also lived in the home). In order to get the people to acquiesce and become part of the fodder, the leaders knew that they had to remove the father from the home and get women in the workforce. The ‘think tank’, Critical Theory was formed and so began the introduction to feminism and the idea that the two sexes are merely a ‘social construct’.

The differences between the sexes are far more than a social construct. The differences are biological, anatomical, and psychological reality. More importantly, the Great Bathroom Debate makes people forget other evils their government is doing by making them focus on window dressing issues like this one.


Obsessing over window dressing issues takes people’s minds off other things their government is doing

Dangers to Children

At least Presidential candidate Ted Cruz got this much right when discussing the North Carolina bathroom laws.

Grown adult men — strangers— should not be alone in a bathroom with little girls. And that’s not conservative. That’s not Republican or Democrat. That’s basic common sense.

Of course, leftists in rags like the NY Daily News have been getting up on their soapboxes and letting everyone know, once again, how morally superior they are by preaching one of their code words: tolerance.

But [allowing men into women’s bathrooms] is not false tolerance — it’s real tolerance.

Predictably, they take the side of those they claim are being oppressed by not being allowed into the wrong bathroom.


Gender is not a confusing concept except in Anglo America where liberals use 0.3% of the population to attack the other 99.7%

Fallacy of the Superior Virtue of the Oppressed

Putting this into a philosophical perspective, Bertrand Russell knew the so-called oppressed did not have superior virtue to the majority simply by virtue of being oppressed.

There’s no rational reason to believe that one segment of mankind is morally superior to another. But many moralists like to think better of groups to which they do not belong, and especially oppressed groups such as “subject nations, the poor, women and children” – or noble savages…The logic can then be used by the oppressed: because we are more virtuous, we should rule.

We see this time and again with leftists. The majority, particularly if they’re heterosexual, white, and Christian are demonized while those with tendencies that differ from the norm are lifted up as sterling, superior human beings.

The reality is, once the Cultural Marxists realize this agenda item, this is what will happen next.

Eventually, once the oppression ends, everyone can see that the superior virtue was fictional… Socialists want it both ways: to proclaim the virtues of the [working class] while working to change the conditions that [causes] those supposed virtues.

Marxists will then go on to look for another victim group. Once The Great Bathroom Debate is won, they will pursue another fringe group to take up the cause of. Indications are the next cause they take up will be lowering the age of consent and legalizing pedophilia. As pointed out by Conservapedia this issue has already been broached by at least one Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg:

Ginsburg called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to persons who are less than 12 years old. She asserted that laws against bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist are unconstitutional.

Clearly, there are still more institutions of Western Civilization for the left to knock down, unleashing the worst instincts of man on the society. The left is doing it piece by piece, step by step.

Ultimately, once America and Europe are eliminated as threats to an immoral, Communist New World Order the thinking of the elite is the rest of the world will fall into line with their evil chess game.


In order to effectively fight back against Marxism we need to change tactics, stop dancing to their tune and stop playing defense

Change Tactics

If traditionalists and conservatives want to win and save society from a degenerate future, instead of dancing to the Marxists’ tune and playing defense the majority needs to take a different tactic and go on the offensive.

For the past 50 years the majority has been losing the culture war because it always assumes a defensive crouch each time a far left agenda item is unleashed on them, and  they then fall back instead of going on the offense and making the far left out to be the hounds of hell they are. The left needs to be made to defend its degenerate policies, not the other way around in which conservatives try to prove they are not some sort of collective boogerman.

As long as the left and its Cultural Marxist media set the agenda, look for ever-increasing ridiculousness to enter the Overton Window of acceptable political debate in a dying America. One would have never thought we would arrive at the point that bathrooms become such a hot topic of debate, but alas, the power hungry know no bounds in their sociopathic quest to destroy those they disdain.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

« Older Entries