Tag Archives: Law of the Jungle

Americans Having Less Sex, But Not This American


Being a reliable Beta male no longer pays sexual dividends in the insane West

Most Americans aren’t getting laid as much as they used to.

A skewed sexual market (i.e. the return of the Law of the Jungle brought on by feminism) means fewer men are monopolizing more women. Harems, that have dominated much of human history are forming anew. And a large rump of Beta males aren’t getting any nookie as a result.

In today’s world, Betas are in the midst of a terrible sex drought while Alphas and Sigmas are enjoying a bumper crop. It pays to be the bad boy or to have vastly more resources than your competition, and not old Mr. Reliable these days.

Speaking in generalities, around 80% of female sexuality is now monopolized by 20% of men since civilization-destroying feminism was unleashed on the West. In business and many other areas of life, this phenomenon is called the Pareto Principle. Anthropologist J.D. Unwin would not be surprised by what has happened, as he warned in vain about easing restrictions on female sexuality based on his epic survey of human societies cross-culturally and throughout history. Every time a society eased restrictions on female sexuality it degenerated and fell apart.

A large population of sexless men will have destructive consequences for the West. The men doing the grunt work aren’t getting sexually rewarded anymore. This scenario has never boded well for a society across recorded human history. Access to porno and pushing everyone to go gay is not going to cut it forever, and social engineers should familiarize themselves with this fact.

When factoring in the large numbers of sexless Betas with the small numbers of Alphas and Sigmas who are getting laid on the regular, statistically, Americans are having less sex than ever overall. The mainstream rag Washington Post details the numbers:

Using 1989-2014 data from the General Social Survey, the study found that American adults have sex seven to nine fewer times per year than in the 1990s. Back then, Americans on average had sex 60 to 62 times a year, but in the early 2000s the frequency began to slip, and by 2014 it had declined to less than 53 times a year.

Dang. I probably had over 53 different women last year, not including all the times I slept with each one. But I spent almost the entire year of 2016 outside America in a much more libertine Latin culture.

Incidentally, marital beds are also growing colder, so marriage isn’t going to save Beta Johnny from the ongoing sex drought.

When looking only at married people, the drop was even sharper — from around 73 times a year in 1990 to around 55 in 2014 — bringing their frequency of sexual activity below that of never-married people. People in that group have sex an average of 59 times a year.

That’s an average of about one lay a week.

Of course, as Groucho Marx knew politics (and journalism for that matter) is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies. The Post goes on to do just that in its nebulous article:

The report did not list causes for the decline. But it cited possible factors including increased access to entertainment and social media, a decline in happiness among people age 30 and over, higher incidence of depression, and use of antidepressants associated with sexual dysfunction.

While those are without a doubt contributing factors, once again mainstream “journalists” keep missing the target as they lob out politically correct but dead wrong diagnoses as to what’s wrong with a sexual market in which women have way too much power, Beta males have had their resource provisioning cucked by a welfare state, and there’s an epidemic of obesity, entitlement and overall bitchiness nationwide.

Read: Feminism is the root cause of almost every sexual and demographic problem facing America and Europe today.

Yet, the slave masters expect male worker bees to go along and get along as jobs get shittier and shittier by the year with longer hours, less pay, and vanishing retirement plans. This is why I gave up on being a Beta male, quit my corporate slave job and started living the life of a ZFG asshole. What good was being responsible doing for me sexually?

Since going rogue, I go through women like I go through underwear. Life as a vagabond is much more rewarding to me as a male than as a corporate drone in monotone. How long until the masses of men figure this out and throw their sabots into the machine?

Here’s the bottom line. The sexual market is the granddaddy of all other human economic markets. Everything else is just sophistry. Leaving millions of men with a case of blue balls does not bode well for the West.

Now at least we have some numbers backing up what we have been discussing in the manosphere for a number of years.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Women Will Do Anything for an Alpha – Including Having Sex with Other Women


No fantasy is too outlandish when women are trying to please an Alpha male

A sexual jungle has been unleashed on America and Europe by feminism. A new study gives us another example of what it’s like to live in this jungle: the Alpha male gets a harem and women are willing to have sex with each other to keep him satisfied. Beta males and those lower on the totem poll don’t fare so well when this is the situation. As pointed out before here at TNMM, this causes society to de-civilize.

The new study which is dissected in this article compliments another study published last year which also found that women are either bisexual or gay but never straight. This confirms selection pressure on women in the history of the human species to get along with, and even sexually pleasure other women in the harem of Alpha males. The University of Essex found:

In tests, those [women] saying they were only interested in men were strongly sexually aroused by videos of naked men — and women.

The media responded by writing headlines slanting the story towards the gay agenda, headlines such as: Women ‘all bi or gay’. This shows us those who control the narrative in the West want the sexual market to skew even farther away from any sort of common sense. What these studies actually reveal are facts about women which have historically led to cultural enforcement of monogamy and restrictions on the wild, base natures of women, in order to build up society instead of tearing it down.

After all, what man wants to work hard if there is no cultural or sexual incentive for him to do so? Most men are minimalists by nature and can get by without the McMansion, luxury sedan, and other wasteful consumerism women cherish.


The left consistently pushes a gay agenda while relentlessly suppressing heterosexuality

Exposing the Agenda

While the left-leaning newspaper The Sun used the studies of male and female sexuality to push the LGBT bacon cheeseburger agenda, the truth of the matter is it reveals politically incorrect, harsh facts about women we in the manosphere discuss all the time. From the article:

Psychologist Dr. Satoshi Kanazawa believes that evolution has led to women becoming open to intimacy with both genders. He claims that sexual fluidity is a means of “reducing conflict and tension among co-wives in polygynous marriages.”

In short, women are hypergamous and would rather screw a Machiavellian, narcissistic, psychopathic bad boy who gets what he wants, even if that means being part of his harem and, what the hell I’ll even have threesomes or orgies with other women to make him happy. Meanwhile, Johnny 9-to-5, who may be a really, really nice guy, good provider, and potentially good father gets no action other than that provided by Rosy Palm.

Dr. Kanazawa, from the London School of Economics and Political Science, explained: “The theory suggests that women may not have sexual orientations in the same sense as men do. Rather than being straight or gay, to whom women are sexually attracted may depend largely on the particular partner, their reproductive status, and other circumstances.”

Women want to screw and attach themselves to a winner. As Anglo American culture has completely released constraints on female sexuality, crushed Beta males under its heel with an oppressive government that enslaves them with child support and alimony payments (after all, the sweet little lady couldn’t help it that she tripped and fell on another man’s Johnson) and prevents them from seeking any sexual gratification thanks to Puritanical laws on prostitution, men subjected to this cultural insanity are disenfranchised sexually. Since the sexual market is the granddaddy of all human markets, droves of men have no reason to participate when female sexuality is monopolized by a small minority of men.

Learning Game is a solution to the problem of incel these men are subjected to, however it will ultimately lead to an “arms race” among those in the know. The men who know Game, over time, will have to work harder and harder for less and less return.


Female sexual orientation has evolved to be looser than male sexual orientation

Women’s Sexual Orientation Looser than Men’s

Men show much lower tendencies to stray into homosexuality than women do. Women are, after all, much more susceptible to persuasion and control than men are. Women continue to skew more and more bisexual since the sexual revolution of the 1960s.

Experts collected data over ten years focusing on the sexual orientation of Americans, grouping them into different ‘waves’. Participants were asked to categorize themselves as: 100 per cent straight, mostly straight, bisexual, mostly gay or 100 per cent gay. Analyzing the data allowed researchers to compare how flexible men and women were when it came to sexual attraction.

Using pupil dilation tests, which reveal if a subject is sexually aroused by imagery, men and women were subjected to a series of erotic photography. The findings showed men are generally not sexually aroused by other men, however women were aroused by both men and women.

Of course, since women can never be blamed for anything in Anglo America, perfect angels that they are, the article bent over backward trying to lay the blame on men. As is typical, the fact women choose sex partners and it is men who are chosen is completely forgotten.

Dr. Kanazawa believes that women have had to evolve to deal with the experience of men having more than one partner. He claimed: “Even though humans have been mildly polygynous throughout evolutionary history, polygynous marriages are often characterized by conflict and tension among co-wives. I propose that occasional sex among co-wives may have reduced such conflict and tension, and increased their reproductive success. Female sexual fluidity may have evolved as an adaptation to facilitate it.”

SpermWarsIt would be more accurate to say: Because of female hypergamy and refusal to settle for anything less than a man who gives them bragging rights to their female friends, women’s instincts have led them to deal with, and happily accept the experience of top Alpha men they are attracted to having more than one partner.

Women will persecute a Beta male for the same infidelity. Nature is not kind to the nice guy.

Indeed, along with other wonderfully controversial facts, the book Sperm Wars by Robin Baker lends credence to the concept that women have adapted to have fluid sexual orientation.

Modern evidence suggests that, more often than not…bisexuals are born, not made.

It is not hard to see how this tendency in women led to the mythical Sodom and Gomorrah, which was later destroyed by God. Societies that do not practice restraint and allow women to orbit Alpha males while neglecting all other males do not stay civilized long.

Regardless of your religious beliefs, the story is a telling summation of the societal cost of unleashing primitive instincts on society rather than trying to constrain them. The instincts lead to temporary sexual satisfaction, but will ultimately negate the long-term fulfillment a family will bring.


Women choose and men get chosen, the only power men have is manipulating the choosing process

Adapt or Die

This study reveals one of the most in your face realities about the sexual and psychological nature of women yet.

Imagine, women evolving to be bisexual in nature only because in the feral history of the human species, before civilization tried to harness these primitive sexual forces, only so they could please the top male who subjugated and dominated all the other males in society. After all, dominance hierarchies are the norm in our species. Winner take all, including all the puss.

The choices left for the man who does not wish to become a genetic dead end are either to go to the dark side and develop Dark Triad traits of Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy, or become a master at Game, or leave for a more traditional culture in which hypergamy and an ability to resource provision will be of benefit.

Adapt to the de-civilizing society you are in or die – genetically, anyway. That, or clean house politically, purging the leaders that did this to you.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

The Law of the Jungle Rules Today’s Sexual Market


The Law of the Jungle describes today’s degenerate sexual market in the West

Since feminism, the sexual market in the West has been shifting to operate on an r-selected Law of the Jungle. If you are looking for a mate or just trying to get laid in this market, this is why the whole balance seems thrown off. In the jungle, a woman would rather be part of the harem of a leader rather than tied to a subservient follower. Dominance is what it takes to survive the jungle, and the pecking order is everything to female psychology. A Guns N’ Roses classic rock hit illustrates the concept:

Welcome to the jungle, it gets worse here everyday, learn to live like an animal in the jungle world we play…

If you are doing things for women looking for their approval, or trying to be Mr. Nice Guy you are going to be disposed of or flat out used. It’s all tied into the dual mating strategy of women: Alpha fux, Beta bux. Do not find yourself in the position of being the reserve. And do not believe women when they tell you they are different than other women. Philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer elegantly explains this concept:

For as lions are furnished with claws and teeth, elephants with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid, so Nature has provided woman for her protection and defence with the faculty of dissimulation, and all the power which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this form.

Hence, dissimulation is innate in woman and almost as characteristic of the very stupid as of the clever. Accordingly, it is as natural for women to dissemble at every opportunity as it is for those animals to turn to their weapons when they are attacked; and they feel in doing so that in a certain measure they are only making use of their rights. Therefore a woman who is perfectly truthful and does not dissemble is perhaps an impossibility.

This is why they see through dissimulation in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with them. From the fundamental defect that has been stated, and all that it involves, spring falseness, faithlessness, treachery, ungratefulness, and so on.

Know this, and always remember it: Women will screw dominant men while keeping a boyfriend in reserve and will never, ever admit it. Sex is a woman’s way of trying to lock a dominant man into a commitment before dumping the cuckolded boyfriend, and dissimulation (lying) is her way of maintaining an advantage on the sexual playing field. What she really wants is a bad boy: subconsciously this is for the protection he offers and increased chances of survival for any offspring he might sire with her in a dog eat dog world.

It all boils down to the economics of sex. Sperm is cheap, and eggs are expensive. Women want the best of the best sperm since they have a short window (as compared to men) in which they can reproduce. And, for most of human history placing a wager on a bad boy has been the best bet. Civilization has changed this, but the human genome is still coded with the old instincts.

Even though Western culture has suppressed many of our animal instincts, we still instinctually behave the way we did before collectively finding ourselves on today’s government tax farm. Like it or not, man is a predatory animal. Our predatory nature goes down to our very physiology and anatomy: Our eyes are placed at the front of our heads instead of on the side as in prey animals. We prey not only on other animals, but on each other. We (usually) do not kill each other, but our winner take all instincts reach down into the very core of who we are. A nice guy is going to be prey and an asshole is going to be the predator. The asshole gets the egg, while the nice guy gets used and abused.


When in the jungle, it’s every man for himself so don’t be taken advantage of by women

Don’t Be Her Walking, Talking Wallet

A nice guy who acquiesces to women is a man who women instinctually know has few options. They will keep him around if he is a provider of resources for them, but they will subconsciously look for the sperm of a dominant man to impregnate them. Even a woman’s biology is set up to exploit Alpha Fux, Beta Bux, as pointed out in the wonderfully controversial Sperm Wars by Robin Baker. As an aside, the truth is never politically correct, nor is it popular. As Plato told us 2,000 years ago:

None is more hated than he who speaks the truth.

Getting back to Sperm Wars, its findings reveal deception and trickery in women goes past their innate deceptiveness and all the way down to their biology:

  • Ten percent of children are not fathered by their “fathers”
  • Less than one percent of a man’s sperm is capable of fertilizing anything (the rest is there to fight off all other men’s sperm)
  • Vaginal mucus encourages some sperm but blocks others
  • A woman is far more likely to conceive through a casual fling than through sex with her regular partner because her body allows the sperm from the fling to pass through faster than that of her regular partner

After conception, if the dominant man has pumped her and dumped her she will need someone to stay and help raise the child. This is where you come in as her resource provider! So…how do women test to see who is dominant and who is  the resource provider?


Do you have what it takes answer the call of the wild, and do you want to continue to live this way?

Shit Testing

Since sperm (and men who provide it) are so abundant, women begin weeding out process right away. Shit testing is how they weed out weak men. The Disposable Male explains how this process works:

Initially, she can simply watch him in competition with other males. … But finally, the only real test a woman can set is whether a man can negotiate and overcome her own defenses. To test this, she has to resist first verbally, then physically. The stronger and more realistic her resistance, the better the test.

In other words, women want a man who not only win out and control other men but a man who will stand up to her, and put her in the subservient role nature designed women for. How else can one explain the 50 Shades of Grey phenomenon?

Do you have what it takes? Or will you sulk away or cave in to her? Unfortunately, her shit tests only begin with the initial test to see if you are good enough for her to take a chance on. They will continue throughout any relationship with her, and in the Western world this poses dangerous risks because of a predatory legal and family court system. Fail too many shit tests and you could find yourself getting divorce raped or turned into a slave of the court.

Fail shit tests and you may also find yourself being the Beta bucks provider. As pointed out earlier, the cruel world of the sexual market extends down from the macroscopic world we live in to the microscopic world of the biology of women and men. Michael Gilbert’s book The Disposable Male explains:

Bang! They’re off! Like a rocket!

Surging forward in a frantic fight for the lead, racers jostle one another on the crowded track. Skirmishes flare up. Some are roughly bumped aside. Others fall and are nearly trampled by the herd of charging marathoners behind them. The strongest an most clever bolt to the front. Pacing themselves, the focused leaders dash along the obstacle course toward their goal.

By the final lap, the contenders are reduced to a handful – just the hardiest, best-prepared specimens with the most robust builds and the sleekest lines.

As they dash for home, the racers in the lead pack dig for every last drop of strength, pushing themselves beyond all measure, pulsating with exertion. Second place wont cut it. Its winner take all.

Suddenly, a scintillating ball of light a million miles high illuminates the horizon. The finish line is just a tantalizing sprint a way. Diving like Superguppy, the exhausted winner hangs on for dear life.

The egg is joined! Outperforming a few hundred million competitors, one triumphant microscopic sperm has won the seminal race of life.

Male competition extends all the way down to sperm fighting their way towards the jackpot of all jackpots, an egg waiting to be fertilized. By dissimulating (lying) and having biology that is primed for you to be cuckolded and your resources taken advantage of by another man’s offspring, failing any of her litany of lifelong shit tests is the equivalent of getting eaten in the jungle.


Traditions like marriage survive the test of time for a reason; discarding them is playing with fire

Escaping the Jungle

Living in a sexual jungle certainly does pose risks. The only way for Western civilization to escape the Law of the Jungle is to return to a sexual market that does not cater to women’s destructive (for civilized society) instincts.

In the past, behaving the way women in the West now do would have been so disastrous the situation would have corrected itself. However, the tax farm we now live on subsidizes this type of behavior with – you guessed it – Beta bucks of hardworking taxpayers. The r-selection paradigm creates an unstable environment (i.e. uncivilized one) and leads to the following:

  • Single parenting
  • Women with children with many different fathers
  • Early sexual maturity in children
  • Short generation time (children having children)
  • Lack of male participation in society

The natural balance that would have put an end to this, women finding themselves outcast from society or destitute for making childish, irresponsible or fickle choices won’t return unless the system subsidizing it fails. Failure of the system is certainly a long-term likelihood as men either go MGTOW and check out of the system completely or revolt and demand change.

Marriage has been instituted worldwide across all different cultures for a reason. These are the reasons it is important to a civilized society, laid down in a 1955 article by social anthropologist Edmund Leach:

  1. To establish a legal father of a woman’s children.
  2. To establish a legal mother of a man’s children.
  3. To give the husband a monopoly in the wife’s sexuality.
  4. To give the wife a monopoly in the husband’s sexuality.
  5. To give the husband partial or monopolistic rights to the wife’s domestic and other labor services.
  6. To give the wife partial or monopolistic rights to the husband’s domestic and other labor services.
  7. To give the husband partial or total control over property belonging or potentially accruing to the wife.
  8. To give the wife partial or total control over property belonging or potentially accruing to the husband.
  9. To establish a joint fund of property – a partnership – for the benefit of the children of the marriage.
  10. To establish a socially significant ‘relationship of affinity’ between the husband and his wife’s brothers

A man’s monopoly over a woman’s sexuality and the promise of paternity is the linchpin of the entire deal. Without it, there is really not much benefit to marriage for a man. For the monopoly over her sexuality, a man basically pledges everything he produces in life to her and his children. The importance of marriage as the bedrock of civilization cannot be understated. Once lost, an inevitable turn towards the sexual market we have today begins. The situation only gets wilder with time.

Accepting the Law of the Jungle or doing the unthinkable, growing a set and going back to a model of enforcing monogamy is perhaps the ultimate societal shit test for men. Are Western men still man enough to put animal instincts back under the restraints of patriarchy and enforce monogamy? If not, expect society to continue to degenerate under r-selected sexual forces.

Welcome to the Jungle.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.