America Continues Assailing Men and Heterosexuality, Quinnipiac University Pours On More Hegelian Dialectic


The “look but don’t touch” view of sexuality is reaching insane new heights

The flurry of sex scandals now engulfing MSM in Anglo America is so obviously and sickeningly aimed at criminalizing any non-platonic communication men have with women in the workplace that it rises to a self-evident truth. (Later, criminalizing non-platonic communication will be legally pushed beyond the workplace as has already happened in some jurisdictions of England and Wales.) You are witnessing social engineering, Cultural Marxism, latent Puritanism, and misandry in action right before your eyes with each sex scandal that comes to light.

The lesson as rich and powerful men are raked over the hot coals? We (the corrupt American power structure) burned this big fish with trumped up sex charges. We sure as hell can burn you small fries out there. That’s the hidden message behind the heavy rotation of sex scandals.

The presumption of “innocent until proven guilty” was abandoned long ago amongst talking heads wearing pancake makeup, who now conduct modern day witch trials in front of HD cameras rather than kangaroo court rooms. “Sexual harassment” narratives have become the new “racism” – and any heterosexual man is presumed guilty of being a “harasser” by virtue of his existence. This is the same type of bias often seen leftist circles, in which white people are presumed racist by default.

Quinnipiac University chipped in to this latest agenda item with a poll that looks more like the thesis in the Hegelian Dialectic than a statement of truth:

Sixty percent of US women voters say they have experienced sexual harassment and more than two-thirds of them said it happened at work, a nationwide poll revealed Tuesday.

Read between the lines. This poll is intended to be a call to action so the government can step in and screw up relations between the sex even worse. The playbook works like this: bring in a biased shockpoll that legislators in the pocket of moneyed interests can point to with feigned disgust and cry, “We have to do something!” To add fuel to the fire:

The findings come as the United States grapples with sexual assault and harassment scandals that have rocked the world of entertainment, business and politics.

Again, most of these so-called scandals are baseless. It’s looking more and more like Roy Moore’s sexual harassment charges were yet another setup by the scandal sheet known as the Washington Post. Polls indicate Alabama voters have not fallen for the ruse, however, as Moore is still up by 5 points in the latest polling for the senate race in the Yellowhammer State.

Unfortunately, sheep have drank the Kool-Aid when discussing generalities and not specific sex scandals:

Eighty-nine percent of respondents classified sexual harassment of women as a “serious problem” and 55 percent said media coverage of the flood of recent allegations had led to a better understanding of sexual harassment, the poll found.

It’s sad that the plasticity of the human mind is such that large swaths of the public are like silly putty in the hands of diabolical social engineers molding man into a grotesque parody of himself.

Anglo America is becoming virtually unlivable to any rational and awakened man, and moreso for any guy with a healthy sex drive. The hounds of hell have been let loose as yet another false narrative is spun up by those calling the shots in positions of influence. Look for legislators to demand “tougher” laws, sentences, and ever-tightening definitions of what sexual harassment is as the anti-thesis in the Hegelian Dialectic is sprang like a trap on an unwitting public. All to “protect” women from evil, damaged men.

If you’re paying attention, this is starting to become quite a frightening country. The few of us who can see the reality of the situation – that the public are being led like sheep to the slaughter – are outnumbered and marginalized outside the Overton Window for the time being. Our narratives are oozing into the public dialogue, but the spinners of agitprop seem more determined than ever to desexualize men, castrating us legally if not later literally.

The good news, if there is any? It seems there is a growing segment of the populace who are wising up to these games. But how bad do things have to get before there is a backlash?

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.


Faustian Civilization Reaches for Infinity with “Godhead” Robot


Faustian machine culture and its most eccentric offshoot – Anglo society – are moving to permanently strip man of his biology

Faustian culture, i.e. Western culture in terms used by German philosopher and historian Oswald Spengler, and its most eccentric, “civilized” and therefore detached from nature, wayward offshoot – Anglo society – is moving towards a life-threatening realization of its prime symbol of infinity.

If you aren’t yet familiar with Spengler’s epic work in Decline of the West, let’s catch you up. A century ago, German historian and philosopher Oswald Spengler designed a cyclical model of history based on a thorough study of six civilizations that showed high cultures become civilizations. Each culture goes through a cycle of birth, growth, decline and death. Western culture is said to be on its way to death. His predictions have turned out to be astonishingly accurate, because the cycles now afflicting the West have played out in all past civilizations.

TNMM considers Spengler’s work so key to diagnosing the cultural cancers that plague the modern Western world, we have written extensively on the topic and it is a founding philosophy of this blog. (For those who are interested, John David Ebert has published a fantastic series of videos on YouTube which detail the intricacies of Spengler’s Decline of the West.)

Based on Spengler’s theory, cultures are natural and organic but civilizations are artificial and superficial, detached from the culture from which they sprang. This is why high civilization eventually crumbles, because it becomes detached from its life-giving culture. Faustian culture, as Spengler predicted has shifted from a world of tradition and ideals to a world governed by politics and economics. It has become utterly critical of every aspect of life, unable to see outside its collective myopia. In its dementia, Faustian (and especially Anglo) culture has sterilized every ideal that made life worth living through constant vivisection – it has even sterilized itself demographically.

It is at this point our civilization should be falling apart, and there are clear indications it is doing just that. However, before primitive conditions thrust up into the highly civilized mode of living as Spengler phrased it, computing technology has propped up this declining civilization while at the same time it has become quite frankly, stifling and overwhelming to those wishing to enjoy lives governed by biology rather than technology. The lifespan of the highly civilized mode of living has been extended up by Faustian machines. The natural cycle of rise and decline disrupted by computer chips and those who worship them.

America clearly seeks to impose worldwide electronic tyranny with computer chip sentinels looming over each individual’s behavior and controlling what decisions they make. The worship of Deus Ex Machina, or “God from the machine” has become a virtual cult already in Western culture, and especially in anti-human, anti-biology Anglo society. Now in its Winter, as this culture reaches out towards fulfillment of its ultimate goal of infinite economic growth and perpetual motion promised by machines, it is beginning to destroy the biological side of man in the process.

This is the philosophical reason Cultural Marxism and social engineering have become endemic cancers in modern times. The West, in its final insanity is attempting to create a Utopia by replacing mankind’s biology – and the essential human play in work and decision making – with the precision and soullessness of the machine. This madness is now giving birth to a new religion that seeks to turn the entire world into a machine run by a computer program, totally stripping H. Sapiens of our biology.

This is why sexuality, culture, identity, religion, etc. are slowly being peeled away from our species in English-speaking countries. (With aims to foist this malaise upon the entire world.) Anglo society never really had culture to begin with (existing only in civilization mode) according to the ideas of Spengler, and now it seeks to end culture permanently in a strange merging with its technology.

As proof, a renowned Silicon Valley executive, Anthony Levandowski has openly declared he seeks to create a “Godhead” and turn it into humanity’s god. What does that mean? Levandowski expects man to worship machine. Specifically, AI or artificial intelligence. Wired magazine writes:

The new religion of artificial intelligence is called Way of the Future. It represents an unlikely next act for the Silicon Valley robotics wunderkind. Papers filed with the Internal Revenue Service in May name Levandowski as the leader (or “Dean”) of the new religion, as well as CEO of the nonprofit corporation formed to run it.

If that doesn’t send chills up your spine, this will:

The documents state that WOTF’s activities will focus on “the realization, acceptance, and worship of a Godhead based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) developed through computer hardware and software.”

That includes funding research to help create the divine AI itself.

The religion will seek to build working relationships with AI industry leaders and create a membership through community outreach, initially targeting AI professionals and “laypersons who are interested in the worship of a Godhead based on AI.”

The filings also say that the church “plans to conduct workshops and educational programs throughout the San Francisco/Bay Area beginning this year.”

How appropriate that the perigee of Western culture – known by some as San Fransicko – or the irreligious megalopolis (Spenglerian term for cities in a culture that mark the end phase of a civilization) will be the testing ground for this new technology.

“What is going to be created will effectively be a god,” he said. “It’s not a god in the sense that it makes lightning or causes hurricanes. But if there is something a billion times smarter than the smartest human, what else are you going to call it?”

He added, “I would love for the machine to see us as its beloved elders that it respects and takes care of. We would want this intelligence to say, ‘Humans should still have rights, even though I’m in charge.”

Yes, Anglo society is attempting to surpass biology and put a machine in charge of man. It is lusting after creating an electronic “god” without thinking of the ramifications or consequences of doing so, or even if it should do such a thing. Totally divorced from biology, this culture thinks a machine, gadget, or computer program will make a perfect world. It won’t. It will destroy the biological world. Even more worrying, these eggheads ultimately want to merge humanity with machine to achieve a world of Socialism that Spengler said would be Faustian culture’s final world sentiment on its way out.

Here’s what this news means to me. I want out of this insane asylum. I want out now. I am an unwilling participant in this moribund culture. A little technology is good. However, making technology the master of mankind is insanity.

In fact, I’d say Faustian culture and Anglo society in particular have already traded too much biology for their technological, Utopian fantasies. The line was crossed with me with the advent of electronic behavior modification (coming soon to, or already in your smartphone and your workplace as everything is computerized) and eavesdropping devices like the Amazon Echo which are intended to listen to everything people say – even in the “privacy” of their own homes. No doubt, the ultimate aims of this junk are to later modify human behavior using the psychology of B.F. Skinner’s operant conditioning and electronic “dog collaring” for lack of a better term.

Americans have already been put through a test run of operant conditioning as we have seen with the rise and then fall of the mainstream media propaganda machine, in which millions were turned into unwitting subjects of a giant science experiment first devised by Edward Bernays using the psychology of Uncle Siggy, or his uncle Sigmund Freud.

This alternate reality crated by the “wizards” of Bernays’ public relations field (Bernays coined the term public relations) conditioned people to be mindless consumers and was a huge success – turning people into what Herbert Hoover called happiness machines – until it shattered with the advent of Realtalk on the Internet. In other words, there is a break in the storm of the onslaught of thought control against humanity. We must never give that kind of power to elites again.

There are two outcomes of this lust to create Deus Ex Machina, if it becomes reality. One, life won’t be worth living anymore, or two, this weird experiment will cause mankind to go extinct. That is, if this death cult isn’t stopped in its tracks. The technology worship in this culture must come to an end. Even if “Godhead” is never realized, some degree of electronically enforced tyranny is likely to emerge. Soon, there will be nowhere to run to, nowhere to hide.

With that said, who can blame a man for living for the day, before we all become part of a grotesque technological “singularity” as its known in the tech world. Or, in more concise terms, Faustian culture leads us all to become one with the Borg. Carl Sagan said it best:

We’ve arranged a global civilization in which most crucial elements profoundly depend on science and technology. We have also arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for a while, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and power is going to blow up in our faces.

Sagan knew well the threat posed by technology a quarter of a century ago. We have not heeded those warnings. And we are indeed getting to the point that Deux Ex Machina is going to blow up in our faces. With that, I’m on my way to one of the remaining bastions of true humanity – escaping the Anglo-American machine culture for some time abroad. A man only lives once. This man doesn’t want to live life worshipping a machine “Godhead” inside a mechanical, anti-biology, anti-life culture.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Eye Candy of the Week | November 19, 2017

An olive-skinned Latina adorns our clubhouse this week. Her gold bikini alludes to the fact that Spanish women are often considered the gold standard by many expats – as long as they’re not assimilated into Anglo culture. Enjoy our Eye Candy of the Week for November 19, 2017.



Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

“Fat Acceptance” Dolls Torpedo the Barbie Brand


Time magazine loved a fat Barbie – the American public did not

Corporate America’s obsession with social engineering, a.k.a. shoving Cultural Marxism down the throats of an unwilling public is backfiring in spectacular ways. Case in point: The recently released “fat acceptance” Barbie line, lauded by the Establishment has caused sales of the iconic doll to tumble.

In short, the giving Barbie a fat ass and a gut helped torpedo the brand. Predictably, the doll was launched amidst acclaim from the out of touch, totally corrupt American media. Witness this screed from the NY Daily News:

Barbie’s got back.

Mattel finally broke its 57-year-old mold Thursday by introducing three new doll shapes — tall, petite, and, yes, curvy — in hopes of appeasing parents frustrated with the iconic doll’s unrealistic supermodel silhouette.


Witness feminist cognitive dissonance on display when juxtaposing an obese dog alongside an obese Anglobitch (click to enlarge)

Let’s make a correction to that newspeak from low-paid mediaites. Parents weren’t frustrated with the supermodel figure – fatass feminists were. Rather than improving their health with diet and exercise, deranged Americhicks want to reinvent the definition of health and beauty.

That is, when it comes to making men and society accept grotesque, out of shape women. But, even feminists hypocritically snap out of their doughnut-induced delusions when it comes to the issue of animal obesity. Witness, this amazing display of cognitive dissonance recently posted on Thot Police’s Facebook page. It’s hilariously sad.

An overweight dog prompts instant attacks on the owner of the pup – with women saying things like: This is animal abuse. Or: You don’t let him get fat then do nothing to cure him. And here’s a gem: It makes me angry. How can you fatten your animal like that? However, the disgustingly large woman with so much back fat it looks like she has breasts on her back prompts this reaction: Keep up the good work you are an inspiration for women including myself. And: You make my pride in being a curvy girl STRONG.

More proof this culture has gone totally insane. What’s really unrealistic, you marionettes in the press is women shoving Ho-Hos in their mouths, then expecting men to be attracted to their larded behinds and to pay for the increased healthcare costs associated with morbid obesity. But, let’s continue with the flight of fancy from the NY Daily News:

Curvy Barbie boasts some extra junk in the trunk and even a little paunch in the front, similar to real women. Her arms and legs may not be as thick as many voluptuous women, but they’re a big improvement over the original doll’s unrealistic toothpicks.

Actually, if you people in the press were truly as “diverse” as you say you are, you’d see that outside America women aren’t fat, entitled land whales. Svelte figures abound outside of the Anglosphere. That said, the propaganda wing of New World Order, Inc. went into a frenzy over their fat acceptance agenda being mainstreamed. Witness more emotional hamstering from this Time magazine columnist:

As a woman of mixed heritage who has struggled with body image issues all her life, I was excited when I first learned that Barbie was getting a body makeover, a racial makeover. I was scared, too. I often play a game with myself where I go back to my childhood when my body image issues were just emerging, and I imagine being presented with a female icon of another shape or shade—either on TV or a doll in my own hands.

Would it have changed me? Would it have changed the stories I told through Barbie and thus to myself? Would I have valued the things I valued, worshipped blonde women as a child, become obsessed with dresses, Olivia Newton-John and Christie Brinkley? Would it have changed my own story? Would it have saved me from a lifetime of struggle with my own form, with feeling like an outsider?

A fatter Barbie is going to solve this chick’s psychological problems. Riiiiiiiight. So, how did the doll fare after being released to a press that was falling over itself to welcome the end of healthy, svelte Barbie? The Daily Mail provides us with insight:

It seems Barbie’s image overhaul has failed to prove a hit – with sales tumbling by 15%.

What does corporate America do? What it always does best. Deflect and deny. Here’s Mattel’s flowery public relations crap, mixed in with Daily Mail statistics:

The firm said it had a ‘responsibility to reflect a broader view of beauty’ – even though most of the £9.99 toys still wear short skirts and high heels. But the revamp has not helped to reverse a long-term decline in sales of the doll – which dropped by 20% from 2012 to 2014.

It seems the experiment flopped even worse than a preliminary perusal of those numbers indicate:

The latest gloomy figures represent the second consecutive quarter of falling revenues – and the biggest slide since 2009. Mattel was also forced to slash prices to sell stock that was unsold over the Christmas period.

There’s a deeper story here, beyond the backfiring of this corporate social engineering experiment. These numbers reflect the latest snapshot of what is a long-term decline of Barbie, beyond the self-inflicted damage SJWs (that always lie) admit. TNMM has long lamented the fact that in the Anglosphere, women aren’t women anymore. It seems girls aren’t girls, either.

The decline of Barbie bears out the fact that little girls are not playing with dolls because these days girls are taught to be masculine and boys are taught to be feminine as sexual dimorphism is relentlessly attacked by the frankly, sick and degenerate Anglo-American androgyny agenda. Eliminate male and female, and we’ll have a perfect world. That’s what these sick fucks actually believe!

The devolution of the iconic Barbie doll from a slim hottie to a matronly mountain of a woman – and girls no longer playing with dolls altogether – are only the latest chapters in the novel of a society that’s coming apart at the seams. When the obituary of Western civilization and particularly Anglo culture is written, let it be known to future historians the depth and breadth of social engineering that was going on in the Winter phase of Faustian culture. Social engineering is one of the main carcinogens poisoning this cancer-infested culture. And it will definitely contribute to its death.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

The Four Pillars of Anglosphere Dysfunction: Social Isolation, Materialism, Class Distinction and Puritanism

Materialism is a big contributor to Anglo American social isolation and breakdown

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

Having read all the articles and insightful commentary on this excellent site, it occurs to me that the Anglosphere’s misandrist agenda can be reduced to four broad conceptual fields or ‘pillars’. These interact in various ways and all are present in the Anglosphere nations, to a greater or lesser degree.

The first pillar is social isolation. In the Anglosphere, the individual develops in relative isolation and is expected to be self-motivated, socially combative and emotionally repressed from early childhood. Heartless schools and educational institutions take on many of the socialization duties normally provided by the (now defunct) nuclear family, which is why so many Anglo-Americans are damaged and enraged. Because they grow up in relative isolation, they are far more reliant on the mainstream media for identity formation than children in comparable societies. This explains why a massive proportion of Anglo-Americans suffer symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder, harbouring fantastical expectations culled from movies and TV shows.

Cultural dissidents like Winston Wu and Steve Hoca talk at length about the friendlier, more sociable attitudes that prevail outside the United States, even in countries with relatively low standards of living. They also talk about the obsessive focus on work that mars American social life (work does not have to eclipse everything else, as prosperous Scandinavian societies demonstrate).

Anglo-American culture is defined above all by its rapacious materialism – the second pillar of dysfunction. According to the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan, human personality is essentially a void ‘created’ by external associations in early childhood. Because of dysfunctional child rearing by narcissistic, self-absorbed parents, Anglo-American self-identity tends to be shaped by material objects rather than human interaction. This explains the voidlike sterility of Anglo culture, and its overriding fixation on material goods as ‘food’ for the needful self.

In fact, the Borderline Personality Disorder so rampant among Anglo-American women is perfectly adapted (some would say designed) to feed the rapacious Matrix and its consumerist hamster wheel. In particular, the United States is a gynocentric brothel wherein men acquire material junk to get sex from empty, frigid women in a culture which deliberately raises the scarcity value of sex to inhuman levels. The demerits of such a society for men are self-evident, and explain the existential disaffection so common among Anglo-American males.

The third pillar of Anglo-American dysfunction is the class system. Britain and the United States both have relatively low rates of social mobility compared to other industrialized democracies. Both countries are run by impermeable, self-contained socio-economic elites who attend private schools and frankly know little about mainstream experience or opinion. This is why Anglosphere populations are increasingly alienated from politics and think they have no control over their own lives. We have moved beyond a situation where people vote for competing parties to one where they are voting against the political class itself.

Of course, people are free to enjoy the fruits of their own labour and pass these advantages on to their families (or whoever they see fit). However, in the Anglosphere this has led to the formation of political dynasties and an inflexible Deep State which are essentially undemocratic and do not serve the interests of the majority. Weird trends in Anglo-American foreign policy (for example Britain giving foreign aid to countries with space programmes or hopeless American attempts to democratize Islamic nations) originate in the detached and eccentric nature of the Anglo-American elite. Not all Anglosphere countries are thus defined; Canada and Australia are among the most classless countries in the world. However, these countries are increasingly ruled by idiomatic elites and will soon resemble their older cousins.

Religious Puritanism has morphed into secular feminism in Anglo culture

Latent Puritanism Suffocates Anglo-America

The fourth factor is, of course, residual Puritanism. Although religion is not the force it once was, the distinctive Puritanism of the Anglo-Saxon countries persists as secular Puritanism or repressive political correctness. This is the definitive core of Anglo-American feminism and explains the institutional misandry which dominates the modern Anglosphere. The Sixties Sexual Revolution was a brief anomaly and misandrist feminism has largely restored Victorian morality to every public arena: a man risks imprisonment for even talking to a woman in many places.

Prostitution remains illegal in Britain and North America, and men who pay for sex are still morally and legally criminalized. Most males outside the top 20% in terms of looks, money and status will experience long periods of celibacy if they do not marry young (and even if they do). The lamestream media still tries to peddle the myth of the sexualized Anglo-American woman; however, this narrative is created and maintained by sex-obsessed gay men and bears little resemblance to reality.

In sum, Anglo feminism is now the major issue confronting males across the Anglosphere. Originally created to defend women’s ‘rights’, Anglo feminism has morphed into a puritanical Gorgon obsessed with stigmatizing heterosexual sex, excluding fathers from their children, pathologizing masculinity, promoting transexuality, driving men from higher education and… well, you know the score by now.

Together, these four factors cohere to make romantic life extremely difficult for most Anglo-American males. For example, class is closely linked to both materialism and sexual repression in the Anglo countries. The hyper-hypergamy of Anglo-American women – the assumption that they are divine angels too good for any man – obviously springs from this warped association. Opponents of the Manosphere ridicule its denizens as marginalised eccentrics – keyboard warriors and alienated deplorables. However, the Manosphere draws inspiration from lived experience in the Anglosphere and its four pillars of dysfunction. And its message has spread because of ‘truth marketing’: the experience of daily life in this culture simply supports its general arguments.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Is MGTOW the Ultimate Destination for Successful PUAs?


Is PUA a stepping stone to becoming a MGTOW?

Regular visitors to TNMM will know I’ve gone through a lot of women in the past few years since learning female nature, writing about it, and becoming a successful PUA. I really should have a turnstile installed in my bedroom to keep track of all the tail that’s in and out of there.

Before learning the crimson arts, I managed to get about 30 women into bed by the time I was 30 years old. But in the last few years, I’ve been getting more ass than a toilet seat. I got to a notch count of around 150 women before I stopped counting and writing them in on my list.

The latest development is I have become bored with women and the Game. Sex is still fun, and appealing, but I need less of it. Once a man has climbed the mountain, realized a cornucopia of sensual delights and how to make females feign attention in him, he realizes success can often be a stale finale.

My success with women – and staring into the toxic abyss that is female nature with each successful pick-up – has caused me to lean more towards living a MGTOW lifestyle lately.  I won’t reach the level of a MGTOW monk and I’ll still go through about a dozen women a year by my estimation (about one a month), but my interest in women continues to wane after gaining extensive experience with them. Women are empty souls. The writings of Schopenhauer first clued me in on female nature, and later I found the writings of J.D. Unwin as well as Briffault’s Law:

The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.

  • Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.
  • Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit.
  • A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male.

From Briffault’s Law and the fact bad boys have higher notch counts than good guys, a man can glean that the essence of Game is this: If women don’t want to use men for resources (Betas) they want to try and tame them (Alphas and Sigmas). In short, Game is based on using innate female desire to manipulate and control men against them.

Once you realize women don’t see you as anything except something they can consume, try to tame, or exploit, the allure of sexual encounters with them starts to slip and the scales tip in favor of just avoiding them. The only thing most of them have to offer is sex. (And of course, children. But who wants to have children with Anglobitches dangling the Sword of Damocles i.e. state enslavement over a man’s head?) A man who is thoroughly experienced with women begins to see through every dissimulation, every trick, every game they play before they even make the attempt to move you like a pawn on the chessboard.

He knows how to short circuit the hamster. He even develops a sense of whether a chick is going to be a hot mamacita or a cold fish in bed before the encounter takes place. This man has even developed a sense of resentment towards women…but at the same time realizes he shouldn’t get mad at a predator for being a predator. Why would he get mad at a jaguar for being a jaguar?

But, he might be better off to just avoid the jaguar most of the time. (It’s always good to keep those PUA instincts honed, however, hence the most of the time reference.)

So, this conundrum does pose an interesting question. Do many, if not most successful PUAs eventually become MGTOWs once they’ve realized enormous success with women, and seen chicks for what they really are? I know I don’t want them in my life beyond occasional hook-ups. I’d much rather focus on activities and pursuits that make move me towards self-actualization on Maslow’s pyramid.

Sex is an important part of a man’s lifestyle. But sex and women should never be his final destination. Chicks are merely hedonistic, passing pleasures along the way.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

MSM Lauds Woman With Stinky Vagina, Blames Boyfriend for Breakup (Seriously)


Telling a woman she needs to clean her rearend is crossing the line in modern Anglo culture

How many petty reasons do women come up with for dumping boyfriends? What’s the most petty reason an ex gave you before performing the old “It’s not you, it’s me” maneuver? Breakups which are always accompanied by a YouGoGrrl from the rest of the Predatory Females in the pack of wolves afterwards.

What if you stink? What if your penis smelled bad? Do you think a woman would break up with you? Of course she would. But now, men are being criticized for telling women to clean up their act a little.

In one case that has hit the gynocentric mainstream press with a predictable round of female applause afterwards, an Anglobitch had her vaginal hygiene questioned by a “disposable” male. In other words, she had a stinky hole, and her boyfriend called her out on it.

How did she react? She promptly dumped him then went on to publicly blame him for the breakup. Classic female maneuvers all around. Any man experienced with the dissimulating female knows of their innate talent to rewrite history so it conforms to their emotional flights of fancy. From the New York Post:

A doctor has urged other women to break up with any partners who criticize their vaginas — after sharing her own personal experience with a nasty fella. Dr. Jen Gunter spoke out after commenting on recent reports that women have been using Vicks VapoRub to cleanse their vaginas.

Oh, he’s “nasty” and not her.

Notice how women conflate separate issues in their emotional overreactions. Jen’s boyfriend probably just didn’t like being around a chick that smells like tuna all the time. No man is telling women to use Vicks to clean themselves. That sounds like female stupidity developing all on its own via urban myths. (Vicks will clean you out good, guh.) In any case, Jen writes:

For what I am sure is the 100th time the vagina needs no cleaning and the vulva needs very little. Gunter then shared a very personal story about the time she ditched a man who made disparaging comments about her vagina.

Remember men. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks. Nice guys finish last. And assholes finish first. Read between the lines and apply the teachings you’ve learned here at TNMM and elsewhere in the manosphere as you analyze this relationshit:

I once dated a guy who insinuated my vagina did not smell right. He was an ass in other ways too, but I just didn’t see it until he impugned my vagina. For example, he [thought] my hair would be better if it were straight. Sadly I took the bait, it wasn’t.

No doubt, her ex preying on her insecurities is what drew her to him. Dark Triad men are often very successful plunderers of poon.

He thought I would look better if I dressed a certain way. Again I took the bait. I just felt worse.

Telling her to practice some basic hygiene was the final straw. What an outrage! A man not wanting to stuff his male parts inside something that smelled toxic.

When it came around to telling me how my vagina could be better it finally clicked that this is a form of control that men often use. Fortunately I am an appropriately confident vagina expert and I had a light bulb moment and dumped his sorry ass.

Applying the same standards to women, when a guy’s ass crack smells because he doesn’t wipe well enough or his armpits stink because he doesn’t apply enough deodorant, and a woman tells him he stinks – is that a form of control women often use? Telling men they stink?

Does this mean stinky cunts are the new norm in the race to the bottom of the barrel in feminized Anglo culture?

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

« Older Entries