Women Are Always Losing Investments for Men

Legs

Have you ever stopped to think about a long-term strategy when it comes to the high cost/high risk/very low return investment known as women?

Imagine putting huge sums of money into a briefcase. Then, giving the only keys to that briefcase to a woman, her lawyer, and a state bureaucrat while hoping for the best. They’d never screw you over, right?

Wait a second. Hold that thought. Maybe that wouldn’t be such a prudent idea. Why? Women are always losing investments for men – an obvious fact in these dark cultural days of disposable marriages and cell phone calls to scuzzy frivorce lawyers. But, even during the days of patriarchy, women were a losing investment for men.

Today’s status quo between the sexes is so bad it reads like an episode of The Twilight Zone. Imagine, if you will a world in which men can be arrested for approaching women the wrong way. In which women can use the cloak of invisibility to rain devastation onto the careers of 100+ prominent (mostly white) men with unproven, and often decades-old sexual assault charges. A world in which women provide absolutely no benefit to men whatsoever in relationshits and marriage, insult and castigate men for their biological urges, and push men to the margins of society yet demand to be treated like princesses. One can easily imagine the voice of Rod Serling narrating the play by play in this black and white dystopia.

Today’s batch of post-feminist women bring absolutely of value to a man’s life other than pink, moist anatomy. As proof, if you find you’re broke all the time, get rid of your girlfriend and watch your finances miraculously turn around. (I’ve done it. And it works.) This will illustrate just what her presence is costing you. By the way, the anatomy can be replaced by learning effective pick-up artistry or availing oneself of legal prostitution where it’s available. (Nevada, ho!)

Here are just 5 important ways women have become burdens rather than ASSets in todays’ Twilight Zone, thereby downgrading their status from bad investment grade to junk bond status. Women offer:

  • No security in relationships. “Until death do us part” has degenerated to nothing more than symbolic hot air – men are expected to invest huge sums of money into women with no guarantee the enormous investment will be worth it.
  • Huge financial risk, as one day of “I’m not happy” can snowball into financial devastation for a hapless hubby.
  • No cooking skills. The irony of entitled Anglo women pawning food preparation off on the working poor and/or immigrants is completely lost on feminists who consider food preparation to be the equivalent of torture. (Didn’t seem to kill my mother or grandmother.)
  • No virginity and declining fertility (making a white wedding gown laughable) as Anglo women now come off the cock carousel ride ready to “settle” for marriage dizzy and broken. By the time women marry, their fertility is on the decline as the average age of first marriage is now pushing 30.
  • No fidelity, as female infidelity is always blamed on men. Remember that mistake you made when you forgot her birthday 10 years ago she was supposed to have forgiven you for but didn’t?

You don’t have to read The Art of the Deal to realize that’s a shitty bargain for men. TNMM has worked out the math on what this crop of half-assed Anglobitches cost men over the course of a lifetime, with figures ranging from $200,000 to $1,000,000 or more. All for the “privilege” of some occasional sex. Or a family she can take away at anytime. Hmmm.

In the past, at least women provided 10-15 years of prime, nubile beauty and fertility to men, along with a healthy dose of homemaking skills, and culturally enforced monogamy. Most importantly, “until death do us part” actually meant what it promised. That short window of prime puss and fertility came in exchange for handing men the bill for 40-50 years or more of consumerism and materialism.

This is no longer the case. Even though women have reneged on their end of the contract, they expect to be maintained with the latest and greatest of everything – placing an enormous burden on the backs of their disposable Beta boyfriends and husbands.

Not gonna do it. Wouldn’t be prudent at this juncture, to paraphrase Dana Carvey and his classic Bush 41 impression back when SNL didn’t suck.

Imagine if men started calculating how much relationshits cost them, looked at this investment in women as a monthly payment to princess – and invested the cash instead. We’d rapidly have a bumper crop of millionaire MGTOWs and John Galts. And women would become even more destitute than many of them already are post-feminism.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern 0or make a donation for as little as $1.

Advertisements

18 comments

  • “Women Are Always Losing Investments for Men”

    Uh, no, women are NEVER an investment, they are merely an expense.

    Like

  • @JD Gen X: Exactly! Soyboys in Canada pay over C$1,800,000 (or about US$1,500,000) for a 3 bedroom bungalow at least 40 to 60 miles away from the downtown core of Toronto, actually in a suburb in the middle of nowhere, even taking into factor that Canada has a larger landmass than the USA, but only 10% of USA’s population.

    It doesn’t even make sense either, because US$1,500,000 is what we consider “Manhattan professional salary”……I doubt that in the child poverty capital of Canada, Toronto, that everyone is earning at least US$300,000 a year to purchase these multi-million dollar plywood homes in farmland communities.

    What grinds my gears is that while these couples are eligible for 0.99% mortgages, several men complained on other forums that their banks such as TD Bank, BMO, etc CHARGE $30/month fees for their checking account if they don’t maintain at least a $5,000 balance.

    That idiot Poloz will collapse the Canadian dollar all in the name of saving the Angloskank dream (plywood McMansions) housing bubble.

    There’s also idiots at the Federal Reserve who speak “deflation” when in fact, prices are rising way above their targeted 2% threshold because of higher oil prices.

    I’m not sure how long the establishment can keep interest rates artificially low while preventing civil unrest because of bubbles in various sectors.

    BTW, during this time of year, Blue Pill donut eaters from Toronto Police Services raid legitimate adult entertainment venues to harass male patrons while setting large fines to the businesses in an attempt to shut them down….Angloskanks need to lose their savings because they are influencing the legal establishment also to a certain extent.

    Like

  • I don’t see a chick in a sexually suggestive pose anymore…..I see an entitled Angloskank with a smelly pussy who think she is worth more than the hidden gold reserves in China…..Empower Angloskanks don’t shave their armpits or clean their pussy as a “protest” against patriarchy, but at the same token, these Angloskanks will not hesitate to come to class in a cleavage showing armless, oh wait, her armpits are shaved and her boobies are waxed for 12-year-old Johnny that she’s gonna fuck after class. To hell with Angloskanks!

    Like

  • No shit. We should all be working + stacking cash. Find a job outside of the “traditional go-to-university-get-hired-by-global-corp.” Me? I gig as a wildland fire fighter (see what’s happening in Cali?) and pick up shifts doing other non-traditional yet well-paying gigs. Fuck it. I choose my hours, pull in the $ and work on *myself* and the kind of life I want to live. When I’m not doing that I’m in the process of learning another language, adding (pardon the pun) to my mathematical arsenal (because if you can’t do basic math how the fuck can you properly invest or *Learn. New. High Value. Technical. Skills.*). Skills-pay-the-bills, lads. I’ll train, run and lift and generally just live my life and not give a fuck. As for women, I tell them straight up I am NOT INTERESTED in a relationship. That just drives them insane. It’s a paradox but it makes ’em want you more. And when they see you as a high-value kind of guy, it has a multiplier effect of sorts; more women see it and they want that, too. Anyway, listen and heed to what our pal RL says. He’s doing it. I’m doing it. We all should. Get off your asses, lift, train, learn something new and create value in yourself. Your bank acct will thank you for it later. Cheers and all the best.

    Like

    • JD, Herald of GenX

      This right here.

      No skills? Sawmills, mines, oil patch, fisheries, feedlot operations, etc. Camp cooks. Parts/warehouseman takes like a one-year course and pays above average. Lots of places looking for an intelligent young guy who will actually show up and isn’t putting half his paycheque up his nose. And most of them are out in the countryside; cheap living. If you’re in North America you’re living on a freaking CONTINENT, if there’s no work in West Suburbia, PA then get online and see what you can find. You’ll make new friends and you’re overdue to leave your loser BP crab-bucket friends behind anyway.

      Relampago went from media pretty boy to long-haul truck driver. Lots of burned-out and disillusioned men – corporate types … teachers … LOTS of pastors … take to the road. You’ll never see it all in a lifetime.

      Get the money. Get the power. Get your freedom. Trust me, anything you wanna do at 21 you’ll still wanna do at 40.

      Look, a century ago you might have been expected to get married, but more often than not you still had to get yourself established. That took a decade anyway, unless you were apprenticing for the family trade. The goal is different now but the formula is timeless. Get excited about every Benjamin you put in your money clip, shoebox or bank account. You are on the Highway to the 1% just by staying out of debt FFS. Seriously, the bar has never been lower.

      Nice Beta male? Be honest with yourself if you are. You think you have no power in the Sexual Marketplace? Vanish. All those “Where are all the Good Men” articles are about YOU, cowboy. Refuse to serve any agenda but your own. Some of these girls will make it tough, be warned. Mother Nature made them this way; that’s how my BPD 1st wife made me into a daddy. Your sex drive exists because of testosterone; there is no woman on Earth who will ever satisfy you all the time. Don’t beat yourself up if you’re in a dry spell; any properly functioning society would have fixed a guy like you up with a domestically-trained virgin bride by now. This is not a properly functioning society.

      TL:DR You have a future. The world isn’t nearly as fragile as you may have been led to believe. And the current shitshow will not last.

      Like

      • Correct, sir. You don’t necessarily need to have value-producing skills. However the skills you mentioned are those which most men won’t do, either because it’s too physically demanding, or because it means being isolated from large urban centres, despite them being well paying. And the ladies *certainly* won’t undertake them. Which is the point out pal Rel is trying to argue in favour of re – Ladies are a net negative investment.

        Men do most of the physically and technically demanding jobs, and put in longer days and more overtime. So we bring more and more gross to our balance sheet – so to speak.

        As we stack $ and slash debt, out net worth increases. Combine that with intangible measures such as health, better level of physical fitness, weight loss from eating healthier/cheaper, more hobbies and interests – see where this is going?

        So why would we risk our investment? And why hitch it to something that’s going to drag us down? A woman is a depreciating asset. You and the readers are intelligent and will quickly grasp this concept. How will that impact our bottom line?

        Consider also – as men get older, our time exponentially becomes more valuable. We don’t want a depreciating asset turning out to be a time sink.

        Cheers and be well.

        Like

    • Yup….This is the only way to go because salaried positions inside an office, if a man in the current feminist climate will be eligible for such jobs, will be taxed to feed the Angloskank beast.
      In the remote countryside in European countries which I shall not name (it’s definitely not the UK or Germany lol), CASH is considered valuable for business owners because it’s “financial off grid living lifestyle”.
      These restaurants in certain EU countries even offer a 10% discount if you pay cash….They don’t even care about stuffing it into an Angloskank occupied financial institution’s bank account because interest rates at the EU is technically 0.00% or even negative -0.10%.

      Like

  • Okay, all true but they have one redeeming quality. They would make great mothers! Oh boy…

    Like

  • If you think about it for a minute, we do in fact take a part of the blame…Back in the day when you marry a woman, she’ll provide you her virginity, fertility and beauty along with excellent home skills and man keeping traits. However, with porn spreading around, and men following their hormones sleeping with other women left and right and cheating on the good woman they have, the “good woman started changing their way to “compete” with the other hoes stealing their men.

    Majority of girls you fuck nowadays do it all, a complete slut package, while you’d be lucky to get a blowjob 30 years back from a good woman. So yes it’s a big fuck up ,but again since 80% of woman chase after the top 20% of men, and those men want a porn star that I outdo the others he’s been with, we’re now reaping the fruits of mass slut society we live in

    Like

    • JD, Herald of GenX

      A female slut is a woman who will offer sex indiscriminately.
      A male slut is a man who will offer commitment indiscriminately.

      Both are low value whores, and are regarded accordingly..

      If the girls won’t break the cycle – and they won’t – then it’s up to the boys.

      We made it too easy for them. We have paid dearly for that mistake. But we hold the trump card; we built it all. They NEED us.

      Like

  • As Danny Devito said in the great comedy ” Other Peoples Money”- (I paraphrase)– The fastest way to go broke is to take an increasing share of a diminishing asset.

    Even in some comedies- there is a grain of truth

    Like

    • excellent comment!

      Like

  • JD, Herald of GenX

    “Imagine if men started calculating how much relationshits cost them, looked at this investment in women as a monthly payment to princess – and invested the cash instead. We’d rapidly have a bumper crop of millionaire MGTOWs and John Galts. And women would become even more destitute than many of them already are post-feminism.”

    This right here, young guns. I never made tons of money but in 25 years marriages/divorces/child support etc. have easily cost me half a million dollars, over and above my personal upkeep. I could be retired in Central America by now, spending my evenings under a dogpile of immoral senoritas. At 52 I’ve finally cleared away the wreckage and am starting from square one instead. C’est la guerre.

    But you know what? Simple living and saving big in one year I went from 18K in debt to 20K in the bank and zero debt. When RF talks about minimalism, he’s not exaggerating. Your net worth will go vertical. Your personal power is everything; every jurisdiction in the world outside the West likes solvent men.

    Disregard females, acquire currency. You’ve got the Red Pill, so the XX chromosome isn’t a mystery to you. Start NOW. THIS is the male counterrevolution. A literal blockade of insane spendthrift women. Say No to the Dress. Let divorce lawyers, daycare operators and family court judges get real jobs. Panic will spread, believe it. Women must experience a Wall of Silence. Blatant, outright rejection.

    Get to love the word “NO”. “No, I won’t marry you. No, I won’t commit my life, labour, loyalty, paternity of children and sacred family name to someone who spent her best fifteen years grabbing her ankles for every clown who put a tingle in her taco. And I consider it a personal insult that you think I’m the kind of guy who would take that deal.”

    They need to be spending more time in the shower, drunk and crying, trying to wash away the shame of letting degenerate DNA past the gates. They need to be afraid of us leaving, and the only way that will happen is if enough of us do.

    I mean WTF boys, look what we built for them. What a ridiculous shitshow. Time to move on.

    Like

    • +100 👍

      Get to love the word “NO”. “No, I won’t marry you. No, I won’t commit my life, labour, loyalty, paternity of children and sacred family name to someone who spent her best fifteen years grabbing her ankles for every clown who put a tingle in her taco. And I consider it a personal insult that you think I’m the kind of guy who would take that deal.”

      ^^^This^^^

      They need to be spending more time in the shower, drunk and crying, trying to wash away the shame of letting degenerate DNA past the gates. They need to be afraid of us leaving, and the only way that will happen is if enough of us do.

      ^^^And much more of this for sure needs to happen.^^^

      Like

    • Great point(s) you make, sir, all the way around. Noted, all.

      Like

    • Red Pill Brotherhood

      Couldn’t have said it better. Every man should read this comment of yours and take note.

      It’s very simple: women today offer a man too much financial strain, emotional annoyance and drain and used up pussy. They can literally ruin your life whenever they want. Why give someone that power over you?

      Like

    • It sounds good, in theory, but these Central Banks of the Angloskanksphere will increase the M2 and M3 supply that Angloskanks will force their beta soyboys to borrow $500,000+ at 0.99% for a plywood house in Canada, or a condo in NYC.
      You already have a moron at the Federal Reserve insisting that inflation is “deflationary”, which punishes savers.
      In Canada, Poloz insists that a 60 cent US Canadian loonie and $8 cauliflower isn’t a sign of erosion of purchasing power.

      Like

      • JD, Herald of GenX

        “Angloskanks will force their beta soyboys to borrow $500,000+ at 0.99% for a plywood house in Canada, or a condo in NYC.”

        You’re right about that. And it will crash, and soyboy will lose it all. Cupcake will walk out the door looking for a new mark.
        He will either put a pistol under his chin, or he will wise up. Either way the Angloskanksphere loses another slave.

        On Jan 1 the Bank of Canada puts in a stress test, which you’ve probably heard about. Canada is awash in 2007 levels of borrowing and the biggest asset – home equity – is going to take a majour haircut. The Fed will use the juiced up Dow as an excuse to keep raising interest rates. It won’t take everybody down but the consumer credit Frankenstein is going to take a tire iron to the knee. And guess where women ‘contribute’ the most to the economy?

        We’ll know women have really been hit hard when some 4chan denizen at the Utah Data Centre reports a huge spike in Google searches for ‘blowjob techniques’, ‘cupcake recipes’ and ‘traditional homemaking’. Good times.

        Like

Join the Discussion | Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s