Two Ways the Welfare State Screws the Dating and Mating Market
The advent of the welfare state has assaulted the sex lives and personal lives of Beta male laborers like few forces in the history of humanity. It has skewed the dating and mating markets so severely that millions of men have been rendered lonely and involuntarily celibate due to its existence. MGTOW is at least in part, a revolt against the exploitation of men brought on by the welfare state.
Comparing societies that do and don’t have behemoth welfare states, two inescapable conclusions arise to the keen social observer.
1. The welfare state renders most males worthless to women because of Briffault’s Law. Briffault’s Law is actually a very nice way of saying all women are hoes, and additionally, every woman has her price. But, it’s worded more tactfully in the official definition: The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.
Here’s what that means. Women don’t associate (i.e. date and mate) with men who can’t provide material and/or resource benefits at a higher level than they’re already accustomed to. (Reading between the lines, one can glean hypergamy is the most powerful sexual force in the universe.) In a society where men do not have higher status than women socially and economically, legs close and figurative chastity belts cockblock Betas, Gammas, and Omegas from sexual access.
When women are taken care of by the state with money stolen from Beta males, and there’s a government “safety net” that keeps chicks from facing the realities of making bad decisions and consequences of mistreating of men who come into their lives, you end up with a society full of fat, sassy, land whales who think their wet spot is worth more than Gold Pressed Latinum. This is the clusterfuck we currently witness every day in Anglo America.
What will make this already dire situation even worse are Socialist “equal pay” schemes now appearing in Anglo societies, which actually seek to give women pay advantages over men in every industry. (Always remember: Equality is code language for female superiority.) This will render men even more worthless in the eyes of women. Call it a Draconian method of birth control and of atomizing the social environment so men and women become enemies and competitors for corporate crumbs rather than cooperating friends. (A society of socially isolated competitors is also more susceptible to outside control and manipulation.)
Take away the welfare state, and suddenly millions of men will become visible in the eyes of women again. Not because women see them as human beings, but because they will see men as a resource to exploit in the absence of Big Daddy Government and his magic Treasury pen.
2. The welfare state drains the market of low women. When women don’t get free access to the fruits of Beta male labor stolen for them by a welfare state, economic and social reality sets in. Women have to find a way to earn money rather than waiting for a welfare check to direct deposit on the 3rd of the month and the food stamp card to be reloaded a week later. They have two basic choices: Take the high road and become loyal wives and loving mothers, or to take the low road and rent sexual favors by the hour.
Since many women have nothing to offer men other than sex, this is naturally what they revert to using to make money in the absence of a Beta-cuckolding welfare state. However, this class of women is actually important in a functioning society.
TNMM posits “low women” or prostitutes, sluts, etc. actually act as a social safety valve in human societies. Good men who aren’t “good enough” for whatever reason to most women (too nice, too hardworking, too smart, too boring, etc.) are still able to find basic human companionship and importantly – a Maslow’s Hierarchy mandated sexual release with low women. Men are happy because they get laid and get a dopamine high via some basic female affection, and women are happy because they get paid a decent sum of money for an easy line of work. Contrary to Anglo media bias and cultural brainwashing, prostitutes often enjoy their work and often make better wages than they would have slaving away at mindless GloboWorldCorp jobs.
The welfare state destroys this social safety valve. Women who would have been making money by keeping Beta males emotionally and sexually gratified are now inaccessible to needy guys.
Important conclusions can be drawn from this duality. Two roads lie before us. The welfare state can either become even more exploitative of men or it can be destroyed. We advocate for it to be destroyed. It is an unnatural creation imposed on our species and it creates permanent classes of makers and takers, with Beta males being the makers and fat, idle women being the takers. (In addition to other making and taking classes.)
In societies that don’t have welfare states, people are forced to earn a living rather than waiting on free checks funded with money stolen from contributing members of society. Women are forced from their pedestals, and into participating in society with men rather than “snatching” a free and/or subsidized living because of the benefits of possessing certain anatomy while spitting vitriol at the very men who enable their privileged existence.
Importantly, MGTOWs and minimalists can “starve the beast” of its lifeblood by downsizing their lives and refusing to participate in career and tax schemes that exploit male labor. As the amount of money going into the mouth of the beast decreases, the amount it gives to idle women will also have to decrease.
The welfare state must die. Siphoning its lifeblood is a start.
Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.