Inside the Twisted Mind of an Anglobitch: “So What You’re Saying Is…”
In a stunning interview showing how convoluted and obtuse the Anglobitch mind is, Jordan Peterson (a leading intellectual) just endured a half hour of “So, what you’re saying is…” questions from Cathy Newman of Channel 4 news as she deliberately misinterpreted what he was saying to manipulate him into making a fool of himself. As he laid out his libertarian views, Cathy tried to crucify Peterson with repeated claims he was a heretic for not adhering to feminist, leftist politico-religious doctrine.
The plan backfired, and Cathy made a fool of herself as her incessant “So what you’re saying is…” act has become a viral internet meme. While they argue their way through a number of issues, including the “evil” patriarchy, fallacious gender pay gap and the insane leftist claim that men and women think and act exactly alike, the climax of the interview comes when Peterson sticks to his guns under Cathy’s criticism of him for refusing to use invented, gobbledygook transgender pronouns the insane left created out of whole cloth. As reported by Life Site News:
“Why should your right to freedom of speech trump a trans person’s right not to be offended?” Cathy demanded.
As we all know, the totalitarian left is obsessed with not offending others even though they can be some of the most offensive people on the planet. Peterson traps her in her own self-righteousness.
“Because in order to think, you have to risk being offensive,” said Peterson. “Look at the conversation we’re having right now. You’re certainly willing to risk offending me in the pursuit of truth. Why should you have the right to do that? It’s been rather uncomfortable.”
Even Cathy couldn’t come up with an emotional, hamster wheel argument against that logic, demonstrating time and again throughout the fiasco how women can’t debate men logically – as the emotional realm is their domain. (Not that there’s anything inherently wrong with that.)
“Well, I’m very glad I put you on the spot,” Newman stammered, visibly taken aback, as Peterson laughed.
Watching this interview actually reminds me of arguments I’ve had with women in which they distort everything I’m saying. In debates or arguments, women will hamster wheel the most stunning non-sequiturs, stumble through the most inane logical fallacies, fog the mind with emotional nonsense rather than adhering to rationality, and perform the most amazing mental acrobatics to either completely avoid the truth in one’s statements or try to confuse their opponent by jumping around from one point to another – much as a squid squirting ink into the water to confuse its prey.
This is not only a good demonstration of how closed-minded the corrupt media are in the Anglosphere, but it doubles as a good display of how wily (and frankly, maddening) women are when engaging in arguments with men. It’s as if they want to avoid facts altogether, and create their own version of truth.
If you can get through the entire interview without shoving your fist through the screen due to Cathy’s typical Anglobitch combativeness and argumentativeness, the interview is a good demonstration of how to maintain frame and destroy feminists and leftists with logic and reason as they bounce around from one half-formed argument to another. Enjoy.
Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.