Tag Archives: Beta male

Meet Mr. Alpha and Mr. Beta President


Pick out the Alpha and Beta male in this photo

One man looks like a self-assured lion who just pulled off a stunning upset and rebuke of 8 years of Communist policy. The other man looks like he was just pantsed in the locker room.

Make no mistake about it, the surprise election of Donald Trump with a solid win (over 300 electoral votes)  is a symbolic, giant FUCK YOU to Obama and his globalist minions who thought their agenda was unstoppable.

Trump has promised to reverse everything Obama has done during this tenure in office. With Republican majorities in the House and Senate he has a chance to do so, that is if the Cucklicans don’t mutiny and obey the mandate of their corporate bosses rather than the mandate from We The People. This will be the biggest possible caveat to Trumps ascendancy to power, as the Cucklicans have proven time and time again they’re state-worshiping Democrats Lite and not Conservatives or Libertarians by any means.

As we await for the coming transfer of power, look for Obama and other globalist interests to stir the pot as much as possible as they try to fuck with the results of a democratic election by creating riots and a narrative that Trump is “divisive” or some other focus group-derived nonsense.

We must not let Trump be marginalized by these evil people.

In the Grand Scheme of things, Obama will more than likely end up being little more than a shit stain on the underwear of history. He really has been a terrible and divisive President, and living through his reign of terror has been no cakewalk. But that photo reveals he knows his presidency is about to pass into obsolescence.

The look on his face is priceless as he must now realize the jig is up and he’s been called out on his Marxism by Tuesday’s election results. As one radio commentator said earlier this week, God’s hand is all over this election. Even if you’re not religious, you have to admit the victory of the nationalist Trump over Clinton, Inc. and the globalists is the secular equivalent of the biblical victory of David over Goliath.

It doesn’t stop here. Trump has his work cut out for him. While we all heave a collective sigh of relief about this 11th hour reprieve from the total destruction of the United States of America, we must realize our fight has only just begun. Trump will be opposed by some of the most calculating and evil forces imaginable before and after he is sworn into office, and his life will be in danger at the hands of people who will stop at nothing to turn us all into serfs toeing the line painted by New World Order interests.

The Marxist media is already hard at work constructing a narrative to try and debase Trump, thereby debasing the collective decision we all just made at the ballot box in favor of what THEY want for America rather than what YOU want. Look for political betrayals from the Cucklicans and a bitter four years as the globalists fight tooth and nail to regain their stranglehold over our republic.

Meantime, let’s enjoy our well-deserved victory, as for the first time in a long time the Silenced Majority’s voice has been heard.

If nothing else, it is beyond enjoyable and satisfying to see the stunned look on Obama’s face as the bastard thought he was going to get by with everything he’s done to “Whitey” and the other groups he and his racist backers hate so much. The real racists are the ones who hide behind the cloak of racism all the time.

Trump’s election could ultimately be one of the most crucial turning points in the history of the nation. Let’s not squander what we’ve achieved. Let’s do everything we can to Make America Great Again, while realizing the gravity and reality of the situation we are in means we shouldn’t expect any miracles.

Trump is America’s Hail Mary pass. Let’s hope he makes the touchdown when he’s in office.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Real Objectification: Men Are Nothing But Utilities in Womens’ Eyes


Women are objectified for their sexuality because they bring little other value to the table for a man in Anglo culture

Women often complain about being seen as nothing but sex objects in men’s eyes. What few people realize is men are nothing but utility objects in women’s eyes.

As a man, you are not a human being in a woman’s eyes as much as you are a utility to be used for her convenience. Women prove this time and time again in their dealings with men. From the time they meet a man until he is disposed of female behavior towards the potential partner can be broken down into three major phases:

  • Meeting Phase: Male is invisible unless he has either more money, higher status, or more power than the female and surrounding male competition, or he shamelessly breaks the rules. Hypergamy is the most powerful force in the mating universe, but bad boys short circuit this wiring.
  • Relationship Phase: Male is tolerated as long as he provides material and/or social benefits to the female. Bad boys are of course, excepted in most circumstances.
  • Disposal Phase: When the male’s resources have been consumed, his social status is downgraded, or the female wishes to “monkey branch” to a higher status male, he is then disposed of. The severity of the disposal depends on how Beta he is. Hardcore Betas will be dealt with most severely by females.

So, this is why men are pushed to become walking, talking utilities by society from a very young age. Men are regularly objectified by women and society in terms of:

  • Income
  • Earning capacity
  • Potential earning capacity
  • Job
  • Popularity (younger age)
  • Social status (older age)
  • Power (48 Shades of Grey)
  • Clothing (clothes make the man!)
  • Height/Looks/Muscles/Baldness

In contrast to what we are led to believe, men are perhaps the most objectified creatures on the planet. We are most often seen as nothing but provider drones for women to take advantage of at their will.

That said, in a society that is functioning properly objectification is really a two-way street as men want women who are young, pretty, fertile, and good in the sack. But women have so manipulated the playing field (they can objectify men, but men can’t objectify them) they now regularly push subpar merchandise on men with no shame and no apology.

In short, women can now openly objectify men but it is verboten for men to objectify women. This screws everything up, and before long demographic decline sets in as we are seeing in America and Europe as the once world-dominating Caucasian peoples go out with a whimper instead of a bang – i.e. the aging/dying population we have today.

Too much power in the hands of either sex is a bad thing. Right now, women have all the power.


Want some action with her? Better have one of the following qualities to bring to the table, utility man

Male Roles in Female Lives

Female objectification of men also extends down to the roles men play in female lives. Analyze any relationship objectively and you’ll find women either use a man to fill one of the following roles in her life, or said man is completely invisible to her.

Stabilizer. Emotional creatures that they are, women often want to have a strong, asshole of a man to stabilize their mood swings and general insanity. The lack of a male stabilizing force in modern Anglo society (fuck you very much feminism) helps one see why women have generally turned into massive train wrecks in modern times. (Three kids from three different baby daddies, tattoos from head to toe, totally out of control lives, etc.)

Resource Provider. There’s the male role everyone knows well – the good old resource provider. As long as his checks clear, she hangs around. These days however, women enjoy having the resources but don’t want the pesky male hanging around, which is why the modern court system has evolved to filch men of their hard-earned money.

The Clown. Yet another male role is that of the entertainer. As The Primal Male so masterfully noted, she is the Queen and he is the jester providing her with amusement. A woman will be drawn like a moth to a flame to a man who is fun or exciting to be around, but once his entertainment value runs out, she gets bored and continues her carousel ride.

Social Status. Just as with handbags and other accessories, women want the best man to show off to their petty friends. As when purchasing a handbag, if she has money for Micheal Kors, that’s what she buys. If she has money for a Gucci or Louis Vuitton she will purchase that handbag. So, with your social status you represent the best she can “purchase” with her SMV and anatomy.

The key to understanding this behavior is whoever or whatever she associates with is only to give her the edge over other girls in her clique, as women are intensely competitive. Just realize, that with social status you are the equivalent of a new handbag in her limbic brain.

Emotional Tampon. Beta orbiters fall into one of two areas. The first is the emotional tampon, listening to her concerns about other men she’s fucking while he faps hoping for some crumbs to fall off the sexual table. This is perhaps the most pathetic of the two Beta orbiting positions, but it’s a close contest.

Friendzone. This is the other area Beta orbiters fall under. He becomes her friend hoping she’ll see what a great person he is and thereby let him visit the tunnel of love. But, this is most often a hopeless venture, and in the rare circumstances a female fucks one of her Beta orbiters it will inevitably turn into an awkward experience, and she’ll quickly dispose of him as both her friend and lover. Don’t become one of these used and abused men for a piece of ass, or as is most often the case, the vanishing mirage of a hope of a piece of ass.

These are only few of the ways women objectify men. Next time you hear a woman complaining she is being objectified because of her sexuality, remind her that men are objectified for our utility.

Some of us are sick and tired of being treated like walking, talking ATM machines and disposable meal tickets, ladies. When we can have that conversation, maybe I’ll be more willing to listen to some of your emotional hamstering about objectification of women. I feel pretty fucking objectified every time I come to the train wreck of a society known as the USA.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Stop Buying Things for Women


Putting yourself in the subservient role of gift provider weakens you in the subconscious mind of women

Women are consummate materialists, and statistics prove it (beyond the song Material Girl that made Madonna’s entire career 30 years ago). More than half of women in Anglo America would dump the man they “love” if he didn’t deliver a gift on a birthday or for Valentine’s Day. Attention Betas: A stuffed animal or a box of chocolates literally has more value than your presence in the majority of women’s lives. Let that sink in the next time you break your back and your bank account to run like a rat on The Hedonic Treadmill.

Even a female relationship coach calls women out on these warped statistics. Rachel DeAlto threw up a flag on this play, criticizing women for expecting constant gifting no matter what benefits men provide to them.

I think it’s a little irrational. I understand being emotional, and obviously there’s some expectations involved, but talk about it before you make any irrational decision.

Expectations? Sounds like lot like female entitlement mentality to me. I’m worthy of gifts because I have the vagina and you do not! Nothing says “you’re a disposable meal ticket” than irrational ultimatums on useless consumer items that will either be dead in three days (i.e. flowers) or thrown into the garbage or closet. The money must be spent or you don’t love her!

Much like the classic Simpsons episode Trash of the Titans, marketers are constantly pushing for this type of wasteful holiday spending, even for made up holidays. All they have to do it get “x” number of women to participate in or expect gifts because of the holiday, and then social forces drive everyone to conform to the new ideal. Marketers have been using this playbook, pioneered by Edward Bernays for over a century. Trash of the Titans beautifully illustrates the insanity of making people spend billions on “assorted gougeables” and other crap:

Costingtons Manager: Okay, people, we need to cook up a new holiday for the summer. Something with gifts, cards, assorted gougeables.

Costingtons Woman: How about something religious? We had great penetration last spring with Christmas Two.

Costingtons Man: Oh, I know. Spendover, like Passover, less talk, more presents.

Costingtons Manager: No, no, no! No, it’s gotta be warm and fuzzy. Something like, um, “Love Day”, but not so lame.

Marge Simpson: Happy Love Day, everyone!

Think of Valentine’s Day as the real-world equivalent of Love Day. Never mind the fact women already receive 80% of the benefits of the consumer waste machine economy in the United States since they drive 4 out of 5 purchasing decisions, that’s just not enough. Men also pay 70% of all income taxes but the vast majority of government handouts benefit women. Yet paradoxically, Anlgo women claim to be Strong and Independent™ but they would be powerless without a massive government propping them up. Real Sexism presents more shocking statistics that show women spend, on average, 90% more than they earn. Women have it made at male expense but like the consummate gatherer (or hoarder – there’s an entire A&E TV series about it) there’s always something else that makes her eye sparkle. And, there’s never enough.

You must not fall into the trap: Stop buying her things! Or best of all, never start buying her things (even drinks) so there’s no expectation set. Buying women things puts you as a man in a submissive role! She is your master and your are her slave with this type of arrangement. It’s basic economics and psychology.


You’ll never make enough to keep up with her expectations, don’t even try

Spend Less, Earn More Respect

Save yourself the expensive lesson rather than trying to buy love, save and invest your money, and learn how to manipulate women’s emotions rather than letting them into your wallet. Use the money to invest in yourself instead and you’ll attract women like moth to a flame. If you look great with nice clothes, a nice car, trips to exotic locations, and money to burn there will be women orbiting you just as they orbit other high-status men. The trick is, never let them into your wallet. Use your money for you own self-aggrandizement, not theirs.

Importantly, realize women will never return the favor of buying things to you. It’s a one way street. As radio host Tom Leykis says, women are the cheapest creatures on earth, but only when it comes to their own money. Yet, they expect exorbitance from men in their lives.

The funny thing is, the less you spend on women the more respect you will earn from them. (Remember – are you the master or the slave in the relationship?) Spending and respect from women are inversely proportional. Don’t try to make sense out of the matter. Women’s behavior when it comes to gifting makes no logical sense whatsoever because women are not logical creatures, they’re emotional ones. You would think women would be grateful to men who go out of their way to please them – but they’re not. An astute manosphere commenter who calls himself John Doe sums up the play by play:

Women are adult children, read Schopenhauer, when you give everything to a child they become spoiled and uncontrollable. The reason a women loses respect for a man who gives them everything is just like a spoiled child who always gets their way, they feel like they have outsmarted their parents, and someone she can outsmart on a regular basis is deemed as inferior, thus they lose respect for them. In fact this can be applied to relationships with females in general. Married men who give into his wife’s demands trying to keep the peace are eventually deemed as inferior, followed by the wife losing respect for him. There’s no logic in this situation, it’s all about perceived feelings.

So, to summarize, spend your money on yourself and on your real friends, not strangers who you hope to bed, and not in ways that make you subservient or “pussy-whipped” to use a old maxim. Always consider any money you spend on women a loss, because that’s exactly what it will be someday, unless you have found a NAWALT magical unicorn. Gifts and spending will only curry short term favor with women, and in the long run being a “provider” puts you in a subservient role. With women, it’s never what have you done for me it’s always what have you done for me lately? Don’t fall into the trap. Stop buying things for women, and start buying them for yourself.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Women Have No Loyalty to Men


Women’s loyalty to most men extends only to their ability to be a provider of shiny things, in other words “my vagina bought me this”

Betas and Blue Pill men everywhere never seem to grasp the fact you can’t buy a woman’s love, and women (even their wives) have absolutely no loyalty to them other than words and empty promises. (Actions speak otherwise!) Believing women “love” them when in fact women only love the resources or status their Beta herb is providing, these men are often used and taken advantage of in marriage and the thoroughly rigged divorce court system.

Johnny Depp recently fell victim to the predatory nature of women this way, illustrating the urgent need for divorce reform in Anglo America. If being a Super Alpha is no guarantee of female loyalty, why play the marriage game when these women extracted this much money from these men by nothing more than virtue of the fact they had a vagina these men once used:

  • Mel Gibson’s divorce from Robyn Moore Gibson; estimated at $425 million
  • Michael Jordan’s divorce from Juanita Jordan, $168 million
  • Steven Spielberg’s divorce from Amy Irving; estimated at $100 million
  • Ted Danson’s divorce from Casey Coats; estimated at $30 million
  • Donald Trump’s divorce from Ivana Trump; estimated at $25 million

Unlike men who will sometimes stand by a brother in need, women will exit stage right whenever it is politically and financially prudent for them to do so. They don’t care if the man they formerly “loved” is drinking puddle water and living under a bridge after the relationship is over, unlike men who will often harbor sentiments towards women even after being used. But, women are only loyal to their biological and psychological needs, and as Briffault’s Law so eloquently states, if a male is of no benefit to a female no association with the male takes place. This is the rule not just in our species but most others.

Males have to prove their “worthiness” by performing fitness demonstrations and passing tests. This ranges from a peacocks doing mating dance showing off their impressive plumes, to walruses having bloody fights with other males to see who gets the booty, to humans demonstrating the capacity to buy a McMansion and box cutter SUV that’s better than the one Becky’s Husband bought her. After the test has been passed, the male gets to mate but the woman remains loyal only insofar as the male is able to demonstrate his value to her. Slip up, and she’s out the door.

One Red Pill commenter summarizes well this lack of loyalty among women. The male is as good as muerte once his value as a meal ticket or dominant azzhole has been consumed.

As many men on this sub can attest, you can be with a woman for months or years, give her everything, and at the first sign of weakness, she will bail on you and then wipe your name from her memory banks as if you never existed. She can feel NO GUILT whatsoever about not answering your calls and texts. For all general purposes you are dead to her.

He’s absolutely right. Weakness will get you eliminated from a woman’s life faster than just about anything else. A woman’s loyalty works like this: For Betas, her loyalty extends only as far as your ability to resource provision, and for Alphas/Sigmas, her loyalty extends beyond reason because she sees you as dominant. Very important difference. Betas are weak but resourceful in the female mind, and Alphas are strong but may or may not be resourceful. Either way, weakness gets a man eliminated sooner or later. For Betas, it’s once the bigger, better deal comes along.

As pointed out in one of our Hamster Rationalization articles, women will even pursue sexual trysts with thugs and serial killers while Beta males are left to hand crank their sexual desires.

Consequently, criminals have a higher number of children than the rest of the population. Bad boys average around 3.0 offspring in their lifetimes, while in America the average for whites is 1.75 children, well below the 2.1 needed avoid demographic disappearance.

Once again we have both eyewitness and statistical evidence that women are loyal only to their biological and psychological needs. To the female, good guys don’t deserve loyalty, or even the propagation of their genes into the next generation.


Men: Always keep your options open and never give your commitment away easily no matter what a harlot she turns into

Don’t Give Your Loyalty Away

Well beyond the average Beta male (and even a Super Alpha actor) giving his life and fortune to a woman who is only using him as a meal ticket, always remember women will seek your loyalty only as a means of extracting what value she sees in you and keeping other women from realizing its promise. The man that gives his loyalty away easily is a weak man in the female mind. For the uncommitted man, women will be in a constant state of worry because he has many appealing options and she must compete with these other women in order to gain his favor. Once she has secured your commitment expect betrayal.

Importantly, once your loyalty is rewarded to a woman it will no longer be valued. Your loyalty to her means you have either lost your appeal to other women or she is the best one you can get out of the group. Either way – this is not good in her limbic brain.

The best thing you can do for a woman who expect loyalty (especially your wife) is to make sure she knows that you are fine on your own without her. I’m not saying replacing her for a better model, but just that you can live on your own without anyone’s help. As long as she knows that her actions are merely a comparative advantage in your life, she will stick around and remain loyal. This is because she knows that if she ever royally screws up, she’s out the door.

Now that we have seen women are loyal only to themselves, and once a man shows loyalty to a woman that which she seeks becomes a liability, we see there’s really no way to be the “nice guy” in a society that doesn’t have strictly enforced mores designed to keep female flightiness and predatory instincts under control.

It is heresy to say this in today’s gynocentric culture, but if women display no loyalty to men then men should display no loyalty to women. Ironically, the victory of feminism means men have no incentives to see women as anything other than sex objects and luxury expenses since women spend 90% more money than men do. Rather than go through the ruse pretending relationships and marriage are anything but legalized prostitution, let’s just get the transaction out in the open, legalize it, and save countless money in wealth transfers going from men to women in an abusive court system.

Think about it. Are we doing all these mental gymnastics in service of a myth that the sexual act between men and women is anything but a financial transaction when everywhere we turn that’s exactly what is involved? One might call that insanity. No wonder so many men are going MGTOW.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Betas Are Boring Because They Have to Be


She’s bored but Betas get the excitement sucked out of them when they’re responsible contributors to society

Women often cast aside “boring” men just as they would throw out last night’s garbage. It doesn’t matter what a Beta has done for her as much as what he’s done for her lately. So, he got his leg blown off in war protecting against invaders. But, Becky’s husband just bought her a new Lexus. If Beta boy doesn’t deliver, she’ll drop his dismembered ass like a hot potato. To be a successful Beta, a man has to not only bring home the bacon and give his money away freely and without reservation, he also has to be the equivalent of a comedy channel on cable TV. He must be entertaining, engaging, and eternally fun to be around.

Unfortunately, in order to become successful and productive member of society a Beta must do boring things, and he must do them well. It is a lot of work to become a Beta, even though society and women will never thank you, they will just demand more and more as The Hedonic Treadmill accelerates out of control. This prevents the Beta from developing the devil may care attitude and ready to go anywhere and do anything on a moment’s notice disposition of the carefree Alpha or Sigma.

This is a partial listing of the things that make Beta males so terribly boring to emotionally driven women. It’s easy to see how these list items suck the energy, life, and entertainment value out of Betas, as they must dedicate 40 to 60 hours a week of themselves to their jobs alone. (The average full time employee now puts in 47 hours a week!) To be a successful provider drone, men must dutifully do the following with their lives:

  • Get an education
  • Get a job
  • Keep a job
  • Maintain good credit
  • Develop a trustworthy reputation
  • Spend time supporting the community
  • Become kitchen bitches

Let’s delve into the life script of a Beta Bux provider and see if it’s appealing to you. To me, the life of a slave and becoming the human equivalent of a pack mule is repellant, so from the onset you’ll know why I ran away from this existence after figuring out the ruse thanks to the Red Pill Enlightenment of the early 21st century.


All work and no play makes Johnny a dull boy

Put on Your Beta Boy Pants

So, you want to become a Beta provider and gamble your entire life and fortune on a feckless and fickle female? Here’s the road to a lifetime of thankless labor and submission to females and bosses. It all begins with that most vaunted and worshipped of institutions, the magic education.

Study hard! While other young men are out plowing promiscuous girls after school, drinking and partying it up, and acting irresponsibly, it’s straight home for you to crack some books and earn those A’s (and occasional B’s). Teachers ensure you your hard work will pay off someday and you believe them. After all, even though as an adult man you will need comparatively little monetary resources to live a happy and fulfilling life, you aren’t going to be living for yourself as much as living to power a lifestyle of wasteful female consumerism. Therefore, you must dedicate yourself to earning the highest salary in the neighborhood for your future female master to exploit, otherwise you will be cast aside with the other incel Betas who live a life of porn and masturbation.

Kiss ass. Now that you have the rubber stamp from State U or some other institution of liberal indoctrination, it’s time to begin kissing ass, playing office politics, supplicating to female HR directors, and all sorts of fun at your new office space. Soon, you will be a real life Peter Gibbons from Office Space.

We don’t have a lot of time on this earth! We weren’t meant to spend it this way! Human beings were not meant to sit in little cubicles staring at computer screens all day, filling out useless forms and listening to eight different bosses drone on about mission statements.

Don’t rebel against the machine like Peter did, though. To keep those paychecks coming for your lady to spend, you have to brown nose and play the game. Don’t challenge authority. Just accept it. Remember, you’re here forever. (Or until another corporate merger or new “-ism” law of some type pushes you into the unemployment line.)

Worship the FICO. As a newly minted Beta drone, your objective in life now is to get and spend as much money as you can. Rather than living inexpensively for a decade or so to save up as much money as you can, and then invest that money for a life of future freedom, you will be catering to your wife’s whims. These whims will change each time a new fashion designer makes a splash, a new cookie-cutter SUV box on wheels comes out, she sees something on TV, or her friend Becky remodels her house. Therefore, you must maintain sterling credit, paying interest into the system rather than earning interest out of it as an investor. You must be ready to whip out the American Express or a car loan at a moment’s notice, depending on the tastes of your master/wife.

Be the nice guy. Feel like punching the shit out of that smart ass that just insulted you? No can do. As a Beta provider, you must learn to sublimate your emotions, hiding them deep within. You must learn to allow men, and especially women to walk all over you because you are the coolheaded nice guy in the community. Without this sterling reputation, such as if someone posts negative stories about you on social media, you aren’t bankable on the cubicle farm. The role model for Beta providers like yourself is Ned Flanders, minus the religion in the New America’s Christophobic culture. When you aren’t putting in 50 hours a week or more for thankless bosses, you’ll need to go to functions that “serve the community” i.e. those that allow your superiors to preen and polish their public image at your expense.

Be a kitchen bitch. Cooking may be oppression for women, but not for you, lowly male! While she texts Alpha affair guy, you must be in the kitchen whipping up gourmet meals for her, and if you’re lucky, the progeny she has now given you which may or may not be yours biologically. Put on your apron, tuck your scrotum neatly between your legs, and smile as you have completed the qualifications for becoming a completely gelded, used up husk of a man who benefits everyone else and their happiness instead of his own. After you finish cooking dinner, remember, a good kitchen bitch always cleans up and does the dishes afterwards.

Or, Go Your Own Way

If that lifestyle sounds abhorrent to you, you have the option to go your own way. It’s not politically correct to declare your freedom from being exploited like this, but the choice is either to live for yourself or live for everyone else. If there was a reasonable payoff for this sacrifice, as there was under patriarchy and over the course of 5,000 years of marriage worldwide, it would be understandable. But the current arrangement is nothing but male labor and resource provisioning exploitation.

It is worth adding if you behave like a Beta provider you will not be respected by women. She will get more demanding and you will get more desperate to jump through her hoops as time goes on. Just look at how many demands have already been placed on men, detailed in the above listing, enough to consume all the Beta’s waking hours from his youth on through his death. As long as the checks are clearing and she is receiving benefits for associating with you, she’ll hang around although she’ll probably be lusting after stronger men and assholes (i.e. the romance novel genre proves this) or acting on her desires for Alpha Fux as more and more women do these days.

This life is the height of ridiculousness, to me, to pay for a bunch of junk people really don’t need. Better to not participate than play in a game that has been shamlessly tilted. It’s a sad commentary on the misandry in our society when it takes so little to make men happy, yet women refuse to do anything that might bring some life into a worker drone’s life, unless he has some money she wishes to extract from him. So, our choice is to be the boring Beta who gets crumbs off the sexual table if he’s lucky, or the asshole Alpha who gets puss thrown at him. As has been said before here at TNMM, there is no nice way of dealing with women if you want to keep one around.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

The History of Harems: Women Orbit, Too


It’s good to be king: Italian artist Belisario Gioja painted Entertainment in the Harem depicting the lifestyle in the 19th century

Beta males usually orbit women they are sexually interested in. Just as Earth revolves around the sun because of gravitational attraction, the hapless Beta male will go into orbit around a girl he finds attractive. The girl he is orbiting will often use him for feels, to get help with homework or other tasks she doesn’t like doing, or as a plutonic companion to cull boredom. He thinks he will get a foot in the door with her, and then a penis in the vagina, but the reality is he will be going home to fap while daydreaming about her each day.

Nature, it would seem, it not without a sense of irony as women orbit, too. However, in contrast to the sexless, hopeless Beta male, the orbiting female will be attracted to a man of very high status, wealth, and/or power and she will be happy make herself sexually available to him, even though she has to orbit him along with other females who are attracted by the scent of his resources or power. The harem arises from this tendency of women to orbit high status men.

Women will often try to justify this behavior the same way a squid attempts evasion, by dropping figurative ink into the discussion. They’re just hanging around because he is such an interesting guy. Just because these girls are with him doesn’t mean there’s anything sexual going on. She just likes him as a person. You are just jealous because you don’t have girls around you like that. Whatever. Hamster rationalization, anyone? Let’s analyze this: Some leftist guy that goes around harping about global warming, with no pecs, a flabby stomach, and a beard befitting a bum does not collect a large gathering of nubile females unless he has something they want. But that’s exactly what Leonardo DiCaprio is, as depicted in the photo below, except he has status, wealth, and power. Which brings us back to Briffault’s Law, a frequent piece of scientific evidence frequently referred to here at TNMM:

Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.

The gist of Briffault’s Law is this: women are nature’s consummate users. Nothing against them personally, that’s just the way evolution designed them. Female orbiting is their way of saying: “Pick me, pick me!” to a male they have zeroed in on as someone who has vast resources they can consume. This instinctual drive, plainly seen in this paparazzi photo, carries over to this day and has a long history in our species.


Without his money, status, and power, do you think women would be orbiting the soft Beta male Leo?

History of Harems

The behavior of women orbiting men that are useful to them and the practice of women becoming part of a harem both go back thousands of years, if not much further back in unrecorded human history. The term harem is a Turkish word that refers to polygyny as historically practiced in Muslim households, although the practice of polygyny was common in Asia and other parts of the world as well. The Ottoman sultan usually kept a harem of several dozen women, including girlfriends and wives. Far from “oppression” that women claim such behavior to be, modern day evidence of this behavior, as females orbit around high status men like Leo is plain as day. Indeed, history shows countless women circling one dominant man was a highly regulated affair in the Ottoman Empire.

The harem was not just a place where women lived. Babies were born and children grew up there. Within the precincts of the harem were markets, bazaars, laundries, kitchens, playgrounds, schools and baths. The harem had a hierarchy, its chief authorities being the wives and female relatives of the emperor and below them were the concubines. There was mother, step-mothers, aunts, grandmothers, step-sisters, sisters, daughters and other female relatives that lived in the harem. There were also ladies-in-waiting, servants, maids, cooks, women official and guards.

Even though the English harem word derives from that part of the world, it was not just an Islamic practice . Here are some other parts of the world in which women were in harems of a dominant man rather than the one and only of hapless Beta males, the exact type of male they show open contempt towards today:

  • Egypt: Pharaohs demanded to be in the constant company of numerous beautiful girls.
  • Sri Lanka: King Kashyapa had a harem that numbered 500.
  • Mexico: Montezuma had 4,000 concubines when he met Cortez.
  • China: One emperor had 2,800 concubines.
  • Africa: Junior wives and concubines orbited Chieftans.
  • Mongolia: Genghis Khan fathered so many children 1 in 200 men have his DNA today.
  • In other cultures, one wife was shared by several brothers.

The University of Wisconsin showed the practice of maintaining harems is far from unusual in history. It surveyed 1,000 historical societies to find out how common polygyny has been, and the findings are astonishing: Just 18% of historical societies were monogamous. Half of rest of the 82% had occasional polygyny and the other half had it all the time. If nothing else, this historical fact helps show why women have such contempt for Beta males – they are not as valuable for providing material things as high status men. The Guardian reported these statistics:

New Scientist magazine suggested that, until 10,000 years ago [a blink of an eye in biological time] most children had been sired by comparatively few men. Variations in DNA, it said, showed that the distribution of X chromosomes suggested that a few men seem to have had greater input into the gene pool than the rest. By contrast most women seemed to get to pass on their genes.

As New Scientist proved, historically, only a fraction of males got to reproduce, and indeed the measure of man’s wealth and power was often how many women he had in his harem or how many wives and children he had. We still see echoes of this innate female behavior to “sex the winner and nix the loser” play out in society. Women will prostrate themselves before rock stars, movie stars, and other men of status while totally abandoning the honest, hardworking Beta males in society. This is commonly referred to as the Pareto Principle, or the 80/20 rule, 80% of women chase after the top 20% of men. Historically, it was always a safer bet to ration precious eggs to top men, rather than take a chance on those who would like be fodder for leaders to use in the next battle. Women still exhibit this bias towards men to this day, even though environmental conditions have changed.

The practice of polygyny and a few top men getting all the puss has been going on so long in our species new studies are showing women evolved to have sexuality that is more “fluid” than male sexuality, and will often become bisexual, having sex with other women to please the dominant man who runs the harem and jockey for position in the hierarchy of wives and concubines.

Even though feminism is constantly in the face of Beta males making demands, we see top males like Hollyweird actors are virtually immune to criticism from women for having an entourage of young women with them wherever they go because of their social status. But, could you imagine the outrage if the average Beta male worker drone went around his neighborhood everyday with an entourage of young, nubile women? Women would be incensed and instantly move to destroy such a man with verbal venom. (That is, of course, laughable both because women would not associate with such a man – they cannot extract resources from him all at the same time.) In spite of feminism, even in our modern “progressive” times, the practice of holding harems still exists. Polygyny is still legal in these countries to this day:

  • South Africa
  • Egypt
  • Eritrea
  • Morocco
  • Malaysia
  • Iran
  • Libya

Christianity stamped out the practice of maintaining harems and polygyny in much of the world, starting with missionaries converting people in Africa. However, today as Christianity and the monogamy it enforces both decline the practice is actually seeing somewhat of a revival.

Some even say by bringing it back it is a way for societies to assert their beliefs in defiance of Western “cultural imperialism.” (Ed: The liberal talent for inventing word jumbles in their quest to be eternal victims is as amazing as it is pathetic.) Even though the idea of harems and polygyny is completely and totally at odds with the gender equality feminists claim to worship, we do not hear them condemning actors for maintaining a harem. Quite to the contrary, they will defend the behavior and call men who point out their cognitive dissonance “losers.” We also do not hear them condemning Middle Eastern societies where it is still practiced. But we do often hear invented terms like stare rape, microaggression, and other such nonsense regularly used against Western Betas.

Now you know when you see women scream and throw their panties at rock stars, and orbit dominant males in society, there is a biological and historical reason for their behavior. As with many things in life, it’s winner take all, including all the sex. This is why it is infinitely better for a man’s sex life to choose to be an azzhole than it is to be a nice guy. Niceness gets you nowhere, historically or otherwise, except placed in orbit around a female who will at best take advantage of you to do things and buy stuff for her. Being dominant means women will orbit you instead.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Women Will Do Anything for an Alpha – Including Having Sex with Other Women


No fantasy is too outlandish when women are trying to please an Alpha male

A sexual jungle has been unleashed on America and Europe by feminism. A new study gives us another example of what it’s like to live in this jungle: the Alpha male gets a harem and women are willing to have sex with each other to keep him satisfied. Beta males and those lower on the totem poll don’t fare so well when this is the situation. As pointed out before here at TNMM, this causes society to de-civilize.

The new study which is dissected in this article compliments another study published last year which also found that women are either bisexual or gay but never straight. This confirms selection pressure on women in the history of the human species to get along with, and even sexually pleasure other women in the harem of Alpha males. The University of Essex found:

In tests, those [women] saying they were only interested in men were strongly sexually aroused by videos of naked men — and women.

The media responded by writing headlines slanting the story towards the gay agenda, headlines such as: Women ‘all bi or gay’. This shows us those who control the narrative in the West want the sexual market to skew even farther away from any sort of common sense. What these studies actually reveal are facts about women which have historically led to cultural enforcement of monogamy and restrictions on the wild, base natures of women, in order to build up society instead of tearing it down.

After all, what man wants to work hard if there is no cultural or sexual incentive for him to do so? Most men are minimalists by nature and can get by without the McMansion, luxury sedan, and other wasteful consumerism women cherish.


The left consistently pushes a gay agenda while relentlessly suppressing heterosexuality

Exposing the Agenda

While the left-leaning newspaper The Sun used the studies of male and female sexuality to push the LGBT bacon cheeseburger agenda, the truth of the matter is it reveals politically incorrect, harsh facts about women we in the manosphere discuss all the time. From the article:

Psychologist Dr. Satoshi Kanazawa believes that evolution has led to women becoming open to intimacy with both genders. He claims that sexual fluidity is a means of “reducing conflict and tension among co-wives in polygynous marriages.”

In short, women are hypergamous and would rather screw a Machiavellian, narcissistic, psychopathic bad boy who gets what he wants, even if that means being part of his harem and, what the hell I’ll even have threesomes or orgies with other women to make him happy. Meanwhile, Johnny 9-to-5, who may be a really, really nice guy, good provider, and potentially good father gets no action other than that provided by Rosy Palm.

Dr. Kanazawa, from the London School of Economics and Political Science, explained: “The theory suggests that women may not have sexual orientations in the same sense as men do. Rather than being straight or gay, to whom women are sexually attracted may depend largely on the particular partner, their reproductive status, and other circumstances.”

Women want to screw and attach themselves to a winner. As Anglo American culture has completely released constraints on female sexuality, crushed Beta males under its heel with an oppressive government that enslaves them with child support and alimony payments (after all, the sweet little lady couldn’t help it that she tripped and fell on another man’s Johnson) and prevents them from seeking any sexual gratification thanks to Puritanical laws on prostitution, men subjected to this cultural insanity are disenfranchised sexually. Since the sexual market is the granddaddy of all human markets, droves of men have no reason to participate when female sexuality is monopolized by a small minority of men.

Learning Game is a solution to the problem of incel these men are subjected to, however it will ultimately lead to an “arms race” among those in the know. The men who know Game, over time, will have to work harder and harder for less and less return.


Female sexual orientation has evolved to be looser than male sexual orientation

Women’s Sexual Orientation Looser than Men’s

Men show much lower tendencies to stray into homosexuality than women do. Women are, after all, much more susceptible to persuasion and control than men are. Women continue to skew more and more bisexual since the sexual revolution of the 1960s.

Experts collected data over ten years focusing on the sexual orientation of Americans, grouping them into different ‘waves’. Participants were asked to categorize themselves as: 100 per cent straight, mostly straight, bisexual, mostly gay or 100 per cent gay. Analyzing the data allowed researchers to compare how flexible men and women were when it came to sexual attraction.

Using pupil dilation tests, which reveal if a subject is sexually aroused by imagery, men and women were subjected to a series of erotic photography. The findings showed men are generally not sexually aroused by other men, however women were aroused by both men and women.

Of course, since women can never be blamed for anything in Anglo America, perfect angels that they are, the article bent over backward trying to lay the blame on men. As is typical, the fact women choose sex partners and it is men who are chosen is completely forgotten.

Dr. Kanazawa believes that women have had to evolve to deal with the experience of men having more than one partner. He claimed: “Even though humans have been mildly polygynous throughout evolutionary history, polygynous marriages are often characterized by conflict and tension among co-wives. I propose that occasional sex among co-wives may have reduced such conflict and tension, and increased their reproductive success. Female sexual fluidity may have evolved as an adaptation to facilitate it.”

SpermWarsIt would be more accurate to say: Because of female hypergamy and refusal to settle for anything less than a man who gives them bragging rights to their female friends, women’s instincts have led them to deal with, and happily accept the experience of top Alpha men they are attracted to having more than one partner.

Women will persecute a Beta male for the same infidelity. Nature is not kind to the nice guy.

Indeed, along with other wonderfully controversial facts, the book Sperm Wars by Robin Baker lends credence to the concept that women have adapted to have fluid sexual orientation.

Modern evidence suggests that, more often than not…bisexuals are born, not made.

It is not hard to see how this tendency in women led to the mythical Sodom and Gomorrah, which was later destroyed by God. Societies that do not practice restraint and allow women to orbit Alpha males while neglecting all other males do not stay civilized long.

Regardless of your religious beliefs, the story is a telling summation of the societal cost of unleashing primitive instincts on society rather than trying to constrain them. The instincts lead to temporary sexual satisfaction, but will ultimately negate the long-term fulfillment a family will bring.


Women choose and men get chosen, the only power men have is manipulating the choosing process

Adapt or Die

This study reveals one of the most in your face realities about the sexual and psychological nature of women yet.

Imagine, women evolving to be bisexual in nature only because in the feral history of the human species, before civilization tried to harness these primitive sexual forces, only so they could please the top male who subjugated and dominated all the other males in society. After all, dominance hierarchies are the norm in our species. Winner take all, including all the puss.

The choices left for the man who does not wish to become a genetic dead end are either to go to the dark side and develop Dark Triad traits of Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy, or become a master at Game, or leave for a more traditional culture in which hypergamy and an ability to resource provision will be of benefit.

Adapt to the de-civilizing society you are in or die – genetically, anyway. That, or clean house politically, purging the leaders that did this to you.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

« Older Entries