New Sexual Consent App Emerges as the Anglo-American War on Sex Continues

a-3049571_1280

Before you stick it in, a new Orwellian sex app wants you to document her consent

In a strange combination of The Truman Show and Orwell’s novel 1984, an app called LegalFling has been developed that is supposedly designed to protect men from false rape charges in a #MeToo world. (Hegelian Dialectic at work yet again, brothers. Create a problem that largely doesn’t exist, like #MeToo which even actress Brigitte Bardot is denouncing as overblown. Then introduce tyrannical “solutions” like this app.) There’s just one catch: By using it you are letting both GlobalWorldCorp and Big Brother know notch by notch, fling by fling, detailed information about your sex life. Including whether or not you used a condom or are into BDSM.

Accept

A new app wants to know who you fuck and how you fucked her – and for you to upload photos of you and your fling!

The scary part is, once Pandora’s Box is opened and apps like this are mandated by government policy (no doubt this is the ultimate goal of social engineers working for elite tyrants behind the curtains of democracy) one can envision a future in which the entirety of every sex act will be recorded to make sure princess doesn’t “withdraw consent” during the sexual escapade. You know, we have to “protect” those perfect Anglo goddesses from “evil” men out to do them wrong.

On a related note, when political hacks like Hillary say “The future is female” what they really mean is women will have almost complete legal control over male lives in the dystopian world Western machine culture is at work designing. The emerging electronic world will put government bureaucrats enforcing the dictates of feminism in our bedrooms like never before.

The sinister nature of apps like this are not stopping companies from trying to make a buck and Big Daddy Government from intruding into people’s sex lives in a truly nauseating collaboration. (Anglo America has already been stopping heterosexual P4P encounters for nearly a century with Puritanical anti-prostitution legislation. This is the next level of that intrusion.)

Now, you can (and someday, will likely be legally required to) whip out your phone before intercourse, snap a photo of you and your partner, then click which types of sex she is consenting to. Marketing flacks pushing the app put it this way:

During a fun night you meet your fling. Now it’s time to get consent. Does your fling really want to take it further? Simply open the LegalFling app, scroll to your contacts and send a request.

Of course, the app claims it offers services beyond creating a legally binding contract.

Your sexual preferences, including your dos and don’ts are automatically communicated. Are you into BDSM but your fling isn’t? LegalFling matches sexual preferences automatically, so you’re immediately aware what your fling doesn’t appreciate and will not consent to.

What a bargain! Instead of asking her if she likes it raw, now an app can tell you and a host of other people about her sexual preferences! How long before a government alert window tells people they can’t do this or that kind of sexual activity? Or better yet, a government lackey supervises the entire encounter remotely?

Interestingly, mainstream mierda news outlets say lawyers are reported to hate the app. Probably because they weren’t on the take when designing it.

Shine Lawyers solicitor Peter Coggins told news.com.au the app is “possibly one of the most offensive things [he has] come across”.

Coggins goes on to add:

“Consent can be withdrawn at any time, which would render any prior consent given, however documented, meaningless. This is a very bad attempt to regulate potential criminal matters with mechanisms of civil law.”

Note the femcentric nature of his commentary. Coggins’ statement points to the fact lawyers would really like to have cameras watching the entire tryst and getting kickbacks before signing off on the app.

Truly, we are entering that Brave New World set in 1984 that Huxley, Orwell, Bradbury and others tried to warn us was coming. With micromanagement of human behavior made possible by an overly litigious, paranoid society, unscrupulous social engineers and marketing flacks, combined with electronic surveillance popping up all around us one wonders how long it will be before a real catastrophe is created.

The American government has been shown to destroy everything it touches time and time again. Give a government totalitarian control of the human species, and how long before it wrecks us, sending us into extinction by meddling with primal forces of nature like sex?

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

6 comments

  • The controllers will do absolutely anything to own and control the planet completely. They continue to exert a huge multi-pronged effort to reduce the human population, as there are currently too many of us for them to have the absolute control they desire. I have read accounts on sites that I trust, that the population reduction for the USA is a total allowed population of no more than 65 million. We are over 340 million currently.
    This latest effort to control procreation is abhorrent to everyone with an intact IQ, unfortunately there are not many of us left. No one should use this app ever, you would have to be a complete fool to notify any business, person and/or agency of your private sex life. Has the human IQ actually fallen even lower than I think?

    Like

  • Thankfully, I’m at an age where sex isn’t such an obsession anymore; at my age, I can take it or leave it. Stuff like this only reinforces those sentiments…

    Like

  • I’ve read that there is a campaign against ‘human trafficking’ in South America/Caribbean countries where American oil workers will have to work/or are working sooner. Literally armed police men storming into bars to round up Colombian and Venezuelan bar girls to deport them out of the countries. This is done under agreements with the US International laws like transparency and other bullshit.

    I think these anti-prostitution and anti-sex campaigns are Angloskank hatred of American men. BUT WE HEAR STORIES HOW ANGLO or at least Western women don’t complain when they are violently raped by a refugee with questionable citizenship and morality.
    Rather than show pity for these feminists, laugh at them when they ‘complain’ that refugees violently attacked them and raped them at Cologne, rather than to fall in the trap of acting Superhero on a feminist who enforces anti-sex laws using American, Canadian and Euro Union soft and hard power to impose it onto other countries and cultures under the veil of human rights and women.

    Like

    • >Western women don’t complain when they are violently raped by a refugee with questionable citizenship and morality

      It’s not rape if she likes it, but it’s rape if she’s found out and can gain sympathy from society.

      Like

  • Well, maybe that is a great thing to have it documented, but, I would rather an app to collect the woman’s commitment that she has not had sex with another man for over a month, so her period would cleanse her of his semen/DNA, and, that she has no known STD of which there are around 125.
    Otherwise, you are just playing Russian Roulette with your dick instead of a gun.
    Get the point?? Pun intended.
    Watching the flesh fall off your dick is no laughing matter. To die as a result of antibiotic consumption isn’t either. Antibiotics are indiscriminate in that they kill all microbes of which there are several million types you need in your body.
    Show me an app that will save your life!!! There isn’t any and won’t be this millenium.

    Like

  • Interesting fact- the United Kingdom has 1 percent of the worlds population, but 20 percent of its CCTV. Big Brother is watching all the time. Has it made Britain a safer country? Heck no!
    The Rotherham sex ring scandal went under the radar for years.
    I see a pattern, the surveillance state cannot function without support of an ideology. In the case of Britain, the police knew what was happening but didn’t want to be called ‘racist.’
    We will see a similar thing in America. I think we already do. At least, I do. The state cannot move without the acquiescence of a passive people.

    Liked by 1 person

Join the Discussion | Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s