Category Archives: Culture

The Modern Day Anglobitch, Defined

CH recently posted a provactive writeup on the manliness of modern women. It caught my attention because the blonde haired, blue eyed, predatory female he featured is the poster child for the modern Anglobitch. Most interesting, the critique comes from the WN corner of the manosphere who are understandably concerned about their self-interest in a nation that has been turned against them.

This particular specimen is representative of many if not most Anglobitches in leadership roles in modern, dystopian ‘Murica. Its name is Elizabeth Holmes, and in typical female fashion she just financially raped a large tech company with massive accounting fraud. (I suppose when women aren’t financially raping men, they’re financially raping large corporations. YouGoGrrls!) Maybe women displacing men from the workforce will accelerate the collapse. We can only hope.

CH perfectly sums up why Yours Truly and so many other men avoid modern white women like the plague. (Incidentally, with their newfound Empowerment™ to become men sans penis, Anglo women have become practically invisible automatons to me. Annoying, chattering drones that take up space and spend inordinate amounts of money.) The following paragraphs might as well be a textbook definition of the Anglobitch. The description applies not only corporate career girls, but the majority of paleface women in a society with terminal cultural illness:

Wew. The Strange.

Under the skin of every female CEO you’ll find high T, manjawdibles, phallic clits, an excitable infidelity-cuckoldry neural feedback loop, a deep ocean vocal register, and quite often a leftover kippah from her bitch mitzvah.

In other words, a man. Parenthetically speaking.

PS Gaze into the technicolor funhouse abyss of her eyes. Crazy is as crazy glares. We live in the era of autistic psychocunts. #LOSING

But, it’s not just female CEOs that are transforming into this bleak manifestation of humanity. It’s white women in the culture at large. They might as well be men, as TNMM has lamented in the past.

Not only do Anglobitches start out with less sexual dimorphism than any other type of woman (a higher proportion possess flat behinds, flat chests, boyish figures, and chronic Penis Envy than women from other backgrounds) but the combined, dark forces of social engineering and the Anglo-American Androgyny Agenda are transforming them from from wannabe men into half-men.

Of course, the eventual goal is making women indistinguishable from men. Net result: Work force doubled. Humanity reduced to compliant service animals of the elite who don’t breed with each other anymore.

This claim – that women are being turned into men – is so obvious to anyone with their finger on the pulse of America it rises to self-evident truth. Eliminating sexual dimorphism is an agenda item of the New World Order, and has long been a goal of Marxists in their quest to eliminate all that makes us human: destroying tradition, morality, family, religion, race, sex, class, and identity.

Holmes is only the beginning of the transition. As scary as Holmes is, women WILL get even manlier thanks to evolutionary pressure similar to that which led to the domestication of animals now being applied to humans by the powers that be. What we have with its (Holmes’) frightful example is a portent of things to come if Western culture doesn’t implode before it assimilates the rest of the world into its matrix.

Here are the Cliffs Notes on the philosophy behind this insanity. We’ve mentioned it before that Faustian culture, in its death throes now seeks to turn the entire world into a machine according to a prescient book published by Oswald Spengler a century ago. What could be more mechanical than a sexless human with no identity? What we are witnessing is why Orwell tried to warn us: If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever. Those warnings were unheeded, and now here we are smack in the middle of dystopia.

This is why I live for the day, and enjoy exotic women on foreign shores. True delicacies compared to the manjawed, mean-faced, clipped hair cunts back home. But only while supplies last.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Advertisements

Hateful Anglo-American Feminist Messages Are Invading Latin America

Proving the tentacles of The Anglo-American Matrix stretch around the world and in many ways the entirety of Latin America is a vassal state of this evil empire, feminist messages are now inflitrating Latino music and media. It appears social engineering of the same type that has destroyed culture, family, and free expression in the U.S. is now being taken global.

Case in point: A smash hit this year with over a billion YouTube views is now playing into the eyes, ears and minds of young Latinas. “Mayores” centers around a young girl enticing older men with her sexuality then flat out using them as utility objects and walking ATM machines – while bragging about it every step of the way. The plot for “Mayores” (meaning older men) has “Becky G” stealing expensive jewelry from one of her marks after luring him into her lair then handcuffing him to a bed – a larcenous move typical of the Anglobitch in divorce court. The artista promulgating these anti-male messages isn’t alone in her assault on men.

As someone who has long enjoyed the masculine sound of Reggaeton, Dembow, Bachata, Salsa and other forms of Latin music, I was mortified to start hearing whiny chick music all around me in Latin America in late 2017 and early 2018. Even many of the male artists have toned down their lyrics in a move towards being “nice guys” rather than badasses.

Worse, these new songs – which started coming all at once – have the same messages of careerism, YouGoGrrlism and I Don’t Need a Man™ embedded in their lyrics that have marginalized Anglo men while sending women off to chase career girl carrots on sticks. A new wave of Spanish artistas now sound exactly like their Anglobitch counterparts with the same screeching voices, misandry, and vagina entitlement complexes, only in a different language. No doubt, funded by the same money men that destroyed America with cultural degeneracy promulgated by one of the most effective mediums – music.

Additionally, I’ve started noticing Latin news media pushing many of the same fake news narratives as Anglo media. In particular, the “equal pay gap” myth is now being perpetuated, as is a “violence against women” campaign designed to turn men into cucks of the police state in the same way Anglo America has done. (Did you know in many states you can’t buy a firearm if a chick falsely accuses you of domestic violence? How’s that for your precious Second Amendment rights? They hang on an Anglobitch’s whim, like so many other aspects of male lives these days.)

It’s obvious a full court press has begun to destroy the longtime, patriarchal Latin culture with the same cultural hemlock that destroyed the Anglo world. But will it work?

The good news is, people in Latin America generally don’t gather around the television and let it tell them what to think the same way Anglos did for 50 years. However, feminist messages – particularly those embedded in hit music – are having a detrimental effect on the culture at large as I’ve definitely noticed an uptick in the number of Latinas who now want to chase the Have It All™ college/career girl fantasy that has turned millions of Anglo women into worn out, used up, spinster, corporate-dependent, cumbucket cat ladies by age 40.

Feminism has left broken lives in its wake in Anglo America for both men and women, and now globalists want to take this degenerate philosophy global. The globalists are now making bold moves, that’s for sure, springing this trap on masculine Latin America. One can only hope it’s a move of desperation as globalism is exposed by alternative media for the monster that it is. The worst nightmare I can think of is the entire world becoming a carbon copy of the Anglosphere.

Oh, and a quick reminder: The men who founded the free societies we once enjoyed rebelled over much less than this.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

What Used to Happen to Bad Leaders

Jan_De_Baen1920

The Corpses of the De Witt Brothers by Jan de Baen

This is what used to happen to traitorous or incompetent leaders in the West. Or, when the populace just happened to get pissed off at their rulers. Now, people just bend over the barrel and hope the latest loss of liberty or tyrannical power grab foisted upon them by the elite and those who do their bidding in the political class doesn’t rip their anus as it’s inserted.

In this case, after repeated invasions of the Dutch Republic, the people decided to make their voices heard to the ruling class and let it be known that they’d had it. Jan de Baen was there to capture the carnage on canvas.

Other than Rembrandt’s The Night Watch showcasing the Dutch Golden AgeThe Corpses of the De Witt Brothers by Jan de Baen was my favorite piece during my visit to the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam. The museum describes Jan de Baen’s work like this:

The ultimate humiliation: the nude, flayed corpses of Johan and Cornelis de Witt on public display in the Groene Zoodje, the execution ground on the Vijverberg in the middle of The Hague. On 20 August 1672 they were assassinated by their political opponents. Johan had been the most powerful man in the Republic for close to twenty years, steadfastly supported by his brother Cornelis. But they were held responsible for everything that went wrong in the year 1672, known as the ‘Year of Disaster’.

A little more digging reveals:

De Witt held a key position in Dutch politics, being a kind of Prime Minister avant la lettre. In that role, he was repeatedly in conflict with the Orange faction, led by Prince William III of Orange (later King of England during the so-called Glorious Revolution), who felt menaced in his authority. When De Witt came to power, a collective aversion to monarchical power dominated among the Dutch people. But things changed in 1672, the ‘Disaster Year’, when the Dutch Republic was attacked by a large alliance of hostile countries. Popular feeling suddenly turned in favor of William III, and mistrust grew against Johann de Witt and his brother Cornelis.

The latter, who was also an influential political figure, got imprisoned in The Hague on false accusations of treason. On 20 August 1672, when Johan was visiting his brother in prison, the brothers were dragged out of the building and lynched outside by an angry mob. The rage seemed to be spontaneous, but was in fact well-organized and planned by Orangist militiamen. The frenzy was so immense that the De Witts were not just killed, but literally ripped apart by the inflamed mass. Body parts like heart and fingers were removed to be exposed as souvenirs, while other parts were roasted and eaten by the hysterical crowd, in a bizarre outburst of cannibalism. Their corpses were eventually hung upside down on a scaffold nearby. The disgusting sight was captured in this dark painting, whose artist (attributed to Jan de Baen) seems to have witnessed the lynching and presents us his gruesome experience in this early form of visual journalism.”

Of course, this scene and story offend politically correct, soy boy sensibilities today as the populace has become accustomed to revering leaders who repeatedly betray them and heap scorn upon them. One might imagine traitors wouldn’t be so bold if we lived in a nation in which irrational things like this still happened.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Studies Show YouGoGrrl Careerism Harms Kids

business-2762810_1280

The pink-haired career girl – a photo representative of the strange times we live in

Why do women insist on having careers, often at huge personal and familial costs? There are three probable answers.

First, women are very susceptible to suggestion, and believe having a career is the “right” thing to do thanks to cultural indoctrination from grade school to college. They’re also bombarded with messages promoting careerism 24/7 from the corrupt corporate media. Women think they’ll enjoy a world much like the fantasy world “career girls” on TV enjoy – a lot of sitting around talking, gossiping, and spending money without actually doing much work. The truth is, most women end up wage slaves after entering the GloboWorldCorp matrix.

Second, women believe covering their basic needs on their own (Don’t Need a Man™ syndrome) will raise the asking price for pussy when it comes time to select a mate. Unfortunately, the men they took jobs away from can’t improve women’s lives if both sexes are sharing crumbs from the corporate table. Women end up alone due to their hypergamous instincts (instincts to date and marry up in social status, not across or down) and the fact they waste the decade or so they can actually provide value to men with their youth and fertility instead riding the cock carousel.

Third, women think they can bypass men and go directly to the source of male resources by taking men’s jobs. After all, women have been programmed to think men are mainly useless beasts of burden by feminism, who have the “baggage” of all their emotional and “dirty” sexual needs (as Puritanism would put it). Women think they can have more material things, fuck Alpha male leaders in business, and crap on the Beta males they loathe if they do the work themselves. However, women have actually bankrupted themselves by attempting this end-run around Beta males as the ongoing retail collapse shows.

Worse, seldom do women think about the effects their choices are having on children. In addition to the grave error post-feminist societies commit by banishing fathers from the gynocentric kingdom thereby damaging traditional family structure, mommies who dump their kids on nannies or in daycare to chase corporate paychecks are raising compromised members of society.

There is a large body of research confirming that moms are desperately needed in the home, not shuffling paperwork in endless corporate hierarchies for subsistence wages and/or the materialistic shopping and eating out binges women crave. Check out this writeup from Daily Mail:

Twenty years ago, distinguished teacher and psychotherapist Doreen Goodman started What About The Children? in response to the horrific murder of Jamie Bulger. She expressed the view that the little boy’s young killers were victims, too, because children who have their emotional needs met early in life are unlikely to become murderers.

She argued strongly that children should be cared for primarily by a consistent mother figure for the first three years.

Indeed, consistent research shows that children raised by absentee moms are more likely to become delinquents and do poorly in school. Then, there’s this research. Of course, shunned by gynocentric, myopic, Anglo society.

The great psychologist and psychiatrist John Bowlby was saying the same thing in the Fifties.

His vast experience and fieldwork led him to develop attachment theory: the idea that infants need to experience a warm and continuous relationship with their mother (or permanent mother substitute) in order to thrive.

He was attacked by feminists and ostracised by psychoanalysts for saying what now seems obvious: that the formation of an ongoing relationship with a child is a vital part of parenting. His work is underpinned by a vast amount of research.

Need even more research stating moms need to care for their children rather than climbing the corporate ladder? How about this.

I learned much about babies’ separation anxiety and stress at the What About The Children? conference – and wish Elizabeth Truss had been there, too.

She’d have heard Professor Sir Denis Pereira Grey (former president of the Royal College of Practitioners), early years expert Dr Carole Ulanowsky, consultant child psychotherapist Robin Balbernie and professor of social work and psychology David Howe talk about how growing problems in society, such as depression, can be due to poor child/career relationships and stress in the first three years.

Anglo society does specialize in creating broken individuals, who look to materialism and consumerism to satisfy their emotional needs rather than other human beings. Such is the dubious outcome of a century of social engineering aimed at pushing women out of the home and into the workforce – dubbed The Century of the Self by BBC filmmaker Adam Curtis.

The studies highlighted above only focus on the first three years. But the need for consistent, loving mothers in kids’ lives goes well beyond three years of age. Not to mention, the need for consistent, loving fathers and not Child Support Check Dads.

Some might call into question the need to have children at all, but to those souls one might remind them of the fact demographics is destiny. Those cultures which shun children and the responsibility that comes with them are moribund societies, much like the demographically declining Anglo world of today – a world in which whites are dying off at record pace.

In sum, women need to abandon the corporate world and embrace the hearth of the home if Anglo society is ever to function properly again – or even survive. The dereliction of feminine duty to society is having disastrous consequences to both the next generation and the fabric of English-speaking nations, while these gynocentric societies refuse (as if under a gag order not to challenge the “goddesses” of Anglo culture) to take women to task even as they face their own destruction.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Isolating the Male Prey: Jealous Woman Nearly Kills Her Boyfriend’s Best Friend

Anglobitch

An Anglobitch nearly killed a man by slicing his neck with a knife because he wanted to party with his best friend; Anglo courts say it was an “accident”

Predatory females are well-known to quardon off men from male friends once they “take control” of any male prey item, i.e. once they lock a boyfriend in a relationshit. By isolating a man from potential female competition, his friends, and even his family, women can then practice their most innate talent: their talent for manipulation. A man is much easier to control and extract resources from without pesky voices of reason telling him not to spend his last dime or mortgage his future for a bitch.

Sometimes, this instinct to isolate male prey items gets taken too far. Such was the case in England, when a predatory female went so far as to try to kill her boyfriend’s best friend. From Yahoo News:

A mum has been jailed after she slashed her boyfriend’s best mate’s neck with a knife – because she was jealous of their bromance.

Notice, even though a man almost died the Anglo press feels it necessary to insult her boyfriend, calling it a “bromance” rather than his “best friend.” Misandry runs deep in this culture. It should come as no surprise it was an Anglobitch who launched the attack.

Jodie Goodwin, 20, narrowly missed vital blood vessels and arteries in Anthony Milburn’s neck when she lunged at his throat with a knife, it was claimed. The UK mum-of-one was furious with then-partner Andrew, who said he and his friend were going to a house party after a night in the pub. She armed herself with a 14 cm-long kitchen knife and lunged at Anthony, 27, inflicting a 4 cm-deep wound circling his neck, which needed 16 stitches, he said.

Notice the corrupt media using language in the report to humanize the vicious woman as much as possible, i.e. calling her “the mum-of-one”. (Women are always treated with kid gloves in a gynocentric society.) Interestingly, but not surprisingly the judge who heard the case went light on Jodie even though she nearly killed someone. The pussy pass strikes again.

Goodwin admitted to wounding without intent and was told she was lucky to avoid facing a murder charge by a judge who jailed her for 27 months.

How lunging at someone’s neck with a knife is “wounding without intent” one may never understand. Her predatory attack left her boyfriend’s best friend with a massive scar.

Anthony, a roofer and father-of-two, who has revealed the scar, said: “My best mate’s girlfriend could have killed me – all because she was jealous.”

Predatory females won’t let male prey go easily until they’ve finished extracting the marrow from his bones, i.e. all the money in his accounts, all the value he’s likely to produce in his life, etc. Anthony told reporters:

Me and Andrew were having a good laugh so when I found out a friend was having a house party nearby I said ‘Let’s go’. Jodie had a face like thunder and hissed ‘You’re not going with him!'”

Again, how this was construed as an “accident” in court is baffling.

Scar

This massive scar happened as a result of an “accident” according to Anglo courts

Then, it happened. The attempted murder which Anglo courts reduced to an almost laughable charge:

“She stormed into the kitchen and returned seconds later with the knife. After waving the blade towards Andrew she waved it towards me. Then she pounced – it all happened so fast. Her face went pale – my blood was gushing everywhere.”

It seems she didn’t want her walking ATM machine to party without her. After all, he might pick up another bitch and let her into his wallet first.

Newcastle Crown Court heard all three had been out drinking in February 2016 before they returned to Goodwin’s house in Cambois, Northumberland. The court heard she was “jealous of the close friendship he had with her boyfriend” and had openly voiced her dislike for him in the past. Speaking after the case, Anthony said she had been jealous of his friendship with her then-partner, and became angry when he suggested they go to a party.

Once again, anyone familiar with females (especially Anglobitches) knows well their propensity to cut men off from the outside world. From the get go, Jodie Goodwin had her maniacal gaze focused on her boyfriend’s best friend:

“While me and Andrew played pool, she’d complain that he was ignoring her. He said ‘I think she’s jealous of our friendship – she’ll soon chill out.'”

Of course, she didn’t chill out. She became increasingly enraged that her boyfriend’s attention wasn’t solely focused on her and her manipulations. However, it’s interesting to hear her lawyer rationalize Jodie’s vicious behavior. Once again, we must suffer the pussy pass:

Ian Hudson, mitigating, said it was a “drunken, spontaneous act” and Goodwin, had matured since having a baby.

Oh, it’s alright she nearly killed a man and left him with a life-altering scar because she had a baby since the incident. What kind of fucked up logic is that? It’s simply stunning this passes muster in Anglo society. No doubt, with her child support annuity now in hand Jodie will be less possessive of her male prey item.

It seems Rudyard Kipling’s sage wisdom “The female of the species is deadlier than the male” rings true in this case. And throughout the world. The problem is, there’s no counterbalance to stop female temper tantrums and resultant murderous behavior in the gynocentric Anglo world. Women are free to pillage and destroy male lives at will, and suffer few consequences.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

New Oppression, Old Values: The True Origins of Modern North American Misandry, Repression and Usury

Witch Trial

Puritan sexual and cultural repression has 400 year old roots in Anglo America

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

The dysfunctional state of modern North America seemingly embodies all the worst qualities of sterile Anglo-Saxon culture: usury, legalism, hypocrisy, misandry, socialism, repression and rampant gynocentricism. While Canadian and American men consider their downtrodden situation unique and unprecedented, their benighted region is extremely reminiscent of the English Commonwealth (1649-60), which was in many respects a template for the future United States. This period in English history saw puritans under Oliver Cromwell take full charge of government and impose savage repression on the British people for over a decade.

All objects of beauty were systematically smashed, free speech punished, taverns and innocent pastimes outlawed while dour cruelty came to dominate law and punishment.  In sum, the Commonwealth embodied all the cold, frigid inhumanity of the Anglo-Saxon soul. As I have written elsewhere, this period left a permanent mark on the English national character – and by extension, the whole Anglo-American world.

Although the terrible state of modern North America is unendurable for men, it does serve a positive instructional purpose. Because it is so close to the English Commonwealth in values and outcomes, it allows us to trace the true origins of modern Anglo feminism, misandry and usury to their true source.

To begin with, modern North America’s ongoing sexual witch hunt is really a puritanical war against physical pleasure itself: it is not ‘revolutionary’ at all, just a feminized restatement of traditional Anglo values. The real motivation behind such ‘abuse’ claims is reflexive hatred of male virility and indeed, sex itself; in short, the erotophobia of Cromwell’s Commonwealth. As Matt Damon opined, the accusations lack any notion of moral proportion; a slap on the ass or an unwanted verbal proposition is arbitrarily conflated with full-on rape, as though they were legally or morally commensurate misdemeanours. All sexual manifestations are equally heinous to the modern Anglo-feminist mind, just as they were to the Commonwealth puritans.

Closely allied to this systematic war on pleasure is a deep Anglo tendency to hysterical herd conformity. This moral socialism tries to drag everyone down to the lowest common psycho-sexual denominator: a hypocritical, repressed, embittered Anglo shit-heel. In sum, North America’s cultural Marxism is really the same old ‘Commonwealth’ moral equalism in modern guise.

Because of it, the Anglo masses will follow whatever they believe to be the ‘dominant ideology’ like a horse with blinders – even if that ideology works against them and their own interests. For example, some of the most fanatical modern sexual witch hunters are men who work in the entertainment industries. On course, this lemming-like hysteria is linked to and fed by sexual repression: hystericus means ‘womb’ in Latin, and the repressive Anglosphere is uniquely renowned for its frequent ‘moral crusades’.

The Puritan witch trials in 17th century England and North America are eerily similar in tone to their modern sexual counterparts: teenage girls making wild accusations are lionized by the authorities; the accused are duly removed and punished without a shred of evidence; and in a few years people will be scratching their heads and wondering what it was all about. But forever fixated on reflexive repression, the Anglo nations never, ever learn… Go figure.

As Lord Protector of England, Cromwell restored usury for the first time in centuries; he was the true architect of modern North American debt slavery. In truth, the definitive Anglo-Saxon obsession with material wealth while neglecting all else begins at this time in English history. And now, trans-generational social dysfunction is so rampant across the Anglosphere that its criminally-acquired wealth is largely wasted on costly public crime and welfare programmes. Moreover, trillions of dollars in unsecured debt generated by women pursuing useless college degrees have permanently wrecked the North American economies. Again, go figure.

As the English Commonwealth had no real ruler, just a Lord Protector (the tyrant Cromwell), so America lacks any coherent leadership. Despite his dynamic rhetoric and intentions, Trump is a toothless force who has been completely nullified by the Marxist Deep State. Whatever the expressed wishes of the American people, they might as well have Killary for President. A rudderless nation with no confident pilot is a ship adrift on stormy seas, at risk from every peril. Without a properly-defined psycho-social template emanating from a tried and trusted leader, no nation can hope to thrive.

Both the English Commonwealth and modern Anglo-America are defined by a futile hatred of reality itself. The Commonwealth was obsessed by banning pleasure in all its forms, whether visual, physical or sexual. Unfortunately for them, pleasure has too deep a root in the human genotype to ever be arbitrarily abolished in this manner. Meanwhile, the ‘progressive’ wing in modern Anglo America tries to deny the brute fact of human gender differences while promoting the LBGTXYZ fiction that anyone can self-identify as anything – even inanimate objects.

Aside from being obviously insane, these attitudes repudiate the classical Greek roots of western civilization. Just imagine applying such absolute semiotic relativism to activities beyond politics and society. What if scientists or engineers decided tin was iron, and iron was mercury? In a few days, half the population would be buried under rubble. Yet the Anglo ‘progressive’ brigade demand that such arbitrary values prevail in social and sexual affairs.

Although pleasure-repression and gender denial seem very different, their underlying motivation remains identical: deluded puritanical rage against reality itself. In sum, Anglo-American ‘progressives’ embody the same puritanical values they claim to challenge; and the same can be said for Anglo feminists.

Of course, there is one important difference between the Cromwell’s English Commonwealth and modern North America. The Commonwealth was a true patriarchy, not a gynocracy like modern Anglo-America. But if we replace Cromwell’s dusty Old Testament God with Anglo women – America’s new deities – the two regimes are essentially identical in their goals, aims and methods.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Legacy Media and Liam Neeson Now Say #MeToo Sexual Witch Trials Went Too Far

Neeson

Liam Neeson joins the chorus in the pushback against #MeToo witch trials

As TNMM has been stridently proclaiming ever since the #MeToo sexual witch trial insanity began, Anglo America is quick to lose all reason when it comes to the topic that terrifies it most culturally – sex and sensuality. And, its baked-in cultural biases against men (being the deeply misandrist culture it is) in favor of women only helped add to the raving lunacy whenever the “he touched my behind” train left the station.

Women started castigating men for supposed sexual advances and favors that often happened decades ago, and almost always without any proof except a woman’s word. We the public were expected to believe women – unquestioningly – throughout the entire event. For Anglo culture subconsciously believes women are perfect goddesses and men are nothing more than heathens and beasts of burden.

The latest batch of Neo-Puritan witch trials has gone so far it’s now provoking a backlash against feminism and the culture that fosters a fear of men, sex and sensuality. Narratives that first appeared here are now making their way into the Overton Window and therefore the mainstream consciousness. Andrew Sullivan, columnist for mainstream legacy New York Magazine put it this way:

The early exposure of Roger Ailes, Bill O’Reilly, and Harvey Weinstein — achieved by meticulous, scrupulous journalists and smart, determined women — quickly extended to more ambiguous and trivial cases.

Indeed, the vast majority of the sexual witch trials we witnessed were ambiguous and trivial as you would expect in a culture that has a history of irrational witch trials based on totally baseless female claims going back some 400 years. (Not to mention a prudish, grasping female attitude toward sex!)

Ailes, O’Reilly, and Weinstein may be assholes – but were the women who made the claims sterling individuals, as pure as the driven snow? Any man who knows female nature well knows how ridiculous it is to make that assumption.

Anglo culture remains blind to the fact that women, too, often use sex to get their way.  Not just men. They know men want it. And if it comes out an aspiring starlet laid down for one of these guys, who automatically comes out looking bad? Why, it’s the man in a culture that thinks women are above sex and sensuality. Who seduced who? Why didn’t she say no? As Dave Chapelle put it:

Sexual abuse is real and evil, but if you’re talking to someone on the phone who appears to be masturbating, you can always, you know, hang up.

Returning to the original story, we find New York Magazine echoing TNMM narratives:

Distinctions among many different types of offenses — from bad behavior at private parties to brutal assault and rape of employees and co-workers — were being instantly lost in the fervor. Punishment was almost always the same — social ostracism and career destruction.

Insert some militant feminism and it isn’t long before you have a clusterfuck on your hands. A wild prairie fire, running out of control with women able to totally destroy men’s lives with just the claim an ass was groped in 1975.

Within a few weeks, the righteous exposure of hideous abuse of power had morphed into a more generalized revolution against the patriarchy.

This kind of mania will always at some point exhaust itself and this kind of zeal will always overstep. In a free society, a pushback was inevitable, and healthy. The extraordinary journalist Masha Gessen led the way, with ruminations on sex panics.

The reality is “extraordinary” journalist Mesha Gessen was predictability plain vanilla as he discussed Anglo sex panics:

Of course, the balance of power favors men so much that it’s more likely that the guilty will get away with it than that the innocent will suffer. Still, we would do well to be aware of the risks to our perception of sex, and to this culture, as it grows ever more divided.

Notice, Gessen still blames men rather than the wanton, manipulative, and often predatory nature of female sexuality. In fact, his entire article reads like controlled opposition to #MeToo.

But Gessen wasn’t alone in questioning the motives of #MeToo. Even veteran actor Liam Neeson has been challenging the Neo-Puritan feminist brigade. The AP writes:

Actor Liam Neeson says the Hollywood sexual harassment scandal has sparked “a bit of a witch hunt.”

Neeson uses precisely the term TNMM used before the term was cool. Continuing from AP:

Asked about the issue on the Irish broadcaster RTE, Neeson said: “There’s some people, famous people, being suddenly accused of touching some girl’s knee or something and suddenly they’re being dropped from their program.”

He referred to U.S. radio presenter and writer Garrison Keillor, who was dropped by Minnesota Public Radio last year over an allegation of “inappropriate behavior.” Neeson said that wasn’t the same as the “other Harvey Weinstein stuff.” Neeson also said he was “on the fence” regarding sexual misconduct allegations against Dustin Hoffman.

Of course, Neeson couched his commentary with some brown nosing to perhaps avoid becoming a target himself.

But the 65-year-old “Taken” star also said in Friday’s Late Late Show that the “#MeToo” movement taking place “across every industry (is) healthy.”

As usual, the pushback against wanton female abuse of power is tepid and muted at best in a society that loves berating and castigating men with normal sexual urges and desires. But, at least these things are being said.

We only wish a complete firebombing of feminist narratives was coming out and getting the big titty headline treatment the #MeToo fiasco did.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

« Older Entries