Category Archives: The Matrix

Prostate Cancer Kills More Than Breast Cancer, But Receives Half the Funding

woman-2498725_1280

Prostate cancer is overtaking breast cancer in annual deaths – will another men’s issue go ignored?

The flood of pink we see each October reminds us of the tragedy that is breast cancer. Pink ribbons, wear it pink, pink everything. Breast cancer awareness is a worthy cause. However, another deadly disease – prostate cancer  – curiously doesn’t receive near the same amount of attention. This, even though prostate cancer is now killing more people each year. Some new medical data suggest we might need to instruct women to be a little more “inclusive” about men’s issues.

Illustrating Anglo culture’s gynocentrism and innate misandry, we don’t see nearly as many blue ribbons fluttering each Blue September. (Did you even know that’s what Prostate Cancer Awareness Month is called?) This needs to change in order to adhere to the much ballyhooed doctrine of “equality” in Anglo culture.

The script has flipped as prostate cancer is now deadlier than breast cancer, so we need to see Blue September elevated in a such a way it becomes more prominent than pink October. New statistics published in The Guardian show the doleful details:

New figures reveal that 11,819 men died in the UK from prostate cancer in 2015, overtaking breast cancer, which resulted in the deaths of 11,442 women.

These are long-term trends, and the number of prostate cancer deaths is likely to rise not only in the UK, but in other Western nations.

However, breast cancer receives more than twice as much research funding despite declining death rates.  The Daily Caller reported the lack of funding for men’s cancers a few years back:

In fiscal year 2009, breast cancer research received $872 million worth of federal funding, while prostate cancer received $390 million. It is estimated that fiscal year 2010 will end similarly, with breast cancer research getting $891 million and prostate cancer research receiving $399 million.

Prostate cancer researchers only wish they received the attention and financing breast cancer researchers do. From The Guardian:

Angela Culhane, chief executive of the charity Prostate Cancer UK which collated the figures, said the number of prostate cancer deaths had risen as a result of an ageing population, while improvements in research and screening meant the same effect was not seen for breast cancer.

“We want to learn from what they have been able to achieve [for breast cancer] and we can see the correlation between that investment in research and the progress that then follows in terms of reducing the number of deaths,” said Culhane.

Breast

Judging by the illustrations, breast cancer groups seem to think all nipples are pink

Surely, we wouldn’t be in a culture that actively discriminates against men, would we? A culture that is frequently the opposite of the patriarchal “hell” for women we’re told by the media it is? A culture that offers little sympathy or even acknowledgement for men who lead women in combat deaths, industrial deaths and accidents, homicide deaths, homelessness, length of jail terms, and now sex-specific cancer issues, among other unflattering statistics.

Further, holding modern women and feminists to their own standards, we might offer the criticism that pink ribbons for breast cancer are “inappropriate” in this day and age, the age of über political correctness. Pink has been traditionally associated with femininity, but that color association might be out of date in today’s “gender neutral” culture. Worse, it gives the impression that all nipples are pink, when only the pastiest Anglobitches have pink nipples.

It’s time for men to take a page out of the feminist playbook, put on some penis hats and go march in the streets demanding more funding for prostate cancer research. All exaggeration and righteous indignation aside, Anglo culture can never truly claim “equality” until serious men’s issues like prostate cancer are acknowledged and funded on par with women’s issues.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Advertisements

Anti-Hooker Lawmaker Uses Taxpayer Money for a Hooker

Brie

A Utah Republican paid $250 an hour for her – some might say he got ripped off

The hypocrisy of American lawmakers is astounding. Particularly in their neo-Puritan crusades against heterosexuality. Continuing their “Do as I say, not as I do” strategy, a Utah Republican who has been vocal about his opposition to prostitution has admitted to availing himself of the services of a prostitute himself. Rep. Joe Stanard of Utah is the latest man to go down in the unending stream of sex scandals that plague the American cultural landscape.

Joe

Rep. Joe Stanard: Using your tax dollars to pay for the very hookers he forbids you to use

The story only came to light as his call girl threw him to the wolves by ringing up a mainstream mierda propaganda rag and dishing on the self-righteous Republican.

The Beta, even Omega countenance of the Republican might explain his sexual desperation. But, there’s another side to this story. If a Congressman can’t get laid without using a rent-a-hole, what hope do the masses of working men have? If powerful men are using hookers, isn’t this a testament to the fact an extremely sexually repressed Anglo culture is leaving its men intolerably hard up, high and dry? That Puritan sexual mores should be eased up a bit?

Not in the minds of lawmakers. As corrupt politicians lock the masses into extreme sexual chastity by empowering law enforcement to go round up Johns and hookers, and the power structure genuflects on what models of morality they are – American lawmakers are renting the very whores they outlaw. (Stanard is not the first to do so. There’s Barney Frank, Bob Menendez, Eliot Spitzer, David Vitter and countless others.)

Lawmakers are even ratcheting up penalties for this victimless crime. Further illustrating their cognitive dissonance on the matter, they often use your tax money to pay for whores forbidden by their own laws. There’s that slight detail. From the NY Post:

A Utah lawmaker who voted for tougher penalties for prostitution has resigned amid allegations that he used taxpayer dough to pay for hotel rooms to hook up with an online escort, according to reports.

[Call girl] Brie Taylor [states] former GOP Rep. Jon Stanard paid her $250 for sex twice at the Fairfield Inn in Salt Lake City. Taylor claimed he paid her $250 for each of the one-hour sessions in June and August 2017 during which she said she performed oral sex on him and that they had intercourse.

This is an interesting plot twist, as call girls usually don’t throw their clients under the bus. Is that a new strategy in the ongoing Anglo-American War on Men? Or was she just pissed at his hypocrisy?

Of course, TNMM has absolutely no objections to two willing adults doing whatever they want to pleasure themselves with their own bodies, including sex for hire. But, sanctimonious lawmakers continue hypocritically imposing ever-harsher penalties for the world’s oldest profession:

Last year, Stanard voted in favor of stricter laws on prostitution, including hiking the penalty for soliciting sex to $2,500.

That’s a hefty fine for fucking. Not to mention the public shaming, probable job loss, and criminal record that comes with the so-called crime of having sex and leaving money on the nightstand. Why good, decent American men put up with this state of affairs is anyone’s guess.

Before resigning his office, typical GOP pablum could be found on Stanard’s web site. We’ve all heard this before, even as both parties work to do the opposite:

“I am a strong advocate for conservative family values. I am pro-life, as well as for traditional marriage.”

Position

A Facebook meme showcases the gullibility of the American taxpayer

Wouldn’t things be easier for everyone if the prohibition on sex for hire was lifted? And the 1950s ruse about family values ended if the GOP isn’t practicing it?

Ultimately, this is the problem with politics in modern America. The left wants to run your financial life while the right wants to run your personal life. Ever-diminishing liberty is occurring not as a result of the left vs. the right but the state vs. you.

With so many laws governing so many areas of daily life – even minute details of the sex lives of the citizenry, like how they can pleasure themselves and how they can’t –  America has become the epitome of Tacitus’ famous maxim: The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.

In many ways, America is even worse than a banana republic, as banana republics don’t destroy the lives of working men for getting their sexual needs taken care of. Numerous nations don’t bother themselves criminalizing prostitution, and those that do don’t enforce it in the jack-booted thug fashion America does. Not to mention, the nation that markets its “freedom” to the world is actually the world’s biggest prison state, with more men in prison than India and China combined despite having a fraction of those nations’ population. Many men are locked up for petty, nonviolent drug offenses and failure to pay their dues to Anglobitch masters, i.e. for child support and alimony arrears.

So, will Utah taxpayers get their money back? The press asked Utah Speaker of the House Greg Hughes:

Hughes said he didn’t yet know if the House would ask Stanard to return the money, adding that officials had not had any contact from Stanard.

This is where we find ourselves in the War on Sex in America. Even legislators can’t live up to their own self-righteous legislation enforcing a 21st century version of Victorian morality on the public.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Slavery Never Ended in America: It Still Exists in Family Courts

Couple

After the sex act, men have absolutely no reproductive rights and few legal rights

American politicians love to self-righteously pat themselves on the back, play the race card, and genuflect before audiences about the horrors of slavery. Oh, what backwards times those were. Surely, lessons have been learned after slavery died as the de facto labor system worldwide, and we will never again subject another human being to work under threat of imprisonment or other indignities.

Well…not so fast. Husbands and fathers that are dumped by Anglobitches in that misandrist nation are once again subject to enslavement.

As is the case with almost anything politicians say, the harsh truth shows just the opposite. Indeed, slavery was legally abolished in 1865, but it has been resurrected in the family court system. Men are being forced, by the vicious teeth of the Anglo legal system to make wealth transfer payments to women despite the fact that in the 21st century every female claims to be a Strong, Independent Woman™ who Don’t Need a Man™.

Evidence shows quite the opposite of these bold feminist claims. Women do need a man. At least, a man slave. And they especially need his child support and/or alimony check to clear every month. Meantime, the male prey item (referencing the apt term found in the classic book The Predatory Female) is reduced from father to sperm donor by the legal system if a relationshit or marriage doesn’t work out.

This predatory system has become big business in the world’s preeminent sellout culture. A National Fatherhood Initiative report exposes the big business child support has become in the U.S.:

From 2001-2012, the federal Office of Child Support Enforcement reports a whopping increase of 50 percent in child support collections from $21 billion to $31.6 billion.

That’s 50% growth over the course of a decade of the child support gravy train – outstripping the growth of most businesses. As we will see, men are being literally turned into financial slaves of ex-wives or ex-girlfriends. Worse, women initiate or cause 4 out of 5 divorces, so they hold the cards when it comes to male liberty and slavery.

Feminists and the misandrist Anglo legal system have succeeded in usurping male rights by implanting this toxic mentality into the minds of several generations of women in the Anglosphere: What woman needs the inconvenience a man represents (with his needs for food, love, and sex) when the fruits of his labor can be forcibly extracted and delivered by Big Daddy Government?

CS_Court

The family court system frequently turns men into servants

What is Slavery?

Let’s look at some definitions of slavery to see if forced child support and alimony payments fit the definition.

How much are men forced to pay into the system? Child support alone averages $500 a month per child, and alimony for a man who makes $5,000 a month would be an additional $1,600 a month payment in most states. These are payments that must be made whether or not the newly minted slave of the government gynocracy can afford them, whether or not he has a job, and with no regards to his personal health or well-being.

American men are being forced to make a wealth transfers to women under threat of imprisonment and/or having both professional and driver’s licenses revoked, with no accountability on the part of the mother to show that the funds are being spent exclusively for the benefit of the child, or if she even needs the alimony in this age of career girls. It would appear this scheme fits the textbook definition of slavery well:

  1. The state or condition of being a slave; a civil relationship whereby one person has absolute power over another and controls his life, liberty, and fortune
  2. the subjection of a person to another person, esp. in being forced into work
  3. work done in harsh conditions for low pay

The current child support and alimony system in the U.S. fits textbook slavery definitions #1 and #2 very well. When men lose driver’s and professional licenses after falling behind on court mandated wealth transfers to women, slavery definition #3 comes into play.

In fact, a recent expose by a prison guard turned expat on Rookh Kshatriya’s excellent blog illustrates how men who contribute to society are being betrayed by both women and their government. He tells the story of a surgeon whose life was destroyed by a predatory Anglobitch, a man who went from saving lives to doing work in harsh conditions for low pay:

The very worst case I saw as a prison guard was a surgeon, yes an American surgeon who was one of the most respectable guys I ever met, hard working, worked until 2 a.m. 6 days a week to save people’s lives. With all the work hours, his wife got “lonely” and started sleeping around, eventually having 2 kids that weren’t even his as he found out later. And then she filed for divorce so she could take the surgeon’s money, blow it on cocaine and stupid luxuries for herself without doing any work herself (that’s the real destination where the “child support” money goes) and sleep around with her favorite Chad of the week, all on her hard working surgeon ex-husband’s money. She won an insanely high judgment in a US family court, millions of dollars in child support and “alimony” that the poor surgeon would have to pay. Since by the court’s judgment, “she should be entitled to maintain the same standard of living after the divorce”, even though this greedy gold-digging Anglobitch is the one who filed for the divorce to steal from her hard-working husband who was actually saving people’s lives.

After a few years of doing this, and losing his house and his nice car, the poor surgeon threw out his back while helping a patient onto an operating table. He had to cut down his hours as a surgeon, and went to the divorce court asking for a reduction in the support demands, and ask that his lazy, spoiled brat bitch ex-wife get a damn job herself. But the court refused using the same delusion filled imputation bullshit they pull on other ex-husbands, claiming he could somehow make millions of extra dollars using his surgical wizard skills somehow. Which he couldn’t do in reality with his injured back, something the family court judge couldn’t or wouldn’t even try to understand. So then now the alimony and child support were demanding 120% of his income. You see, the family court system will never let you off the treadmill once they target you, especially if you earn a lot of money. Eventually he drained his savings and retirement, couldn’t make the payments at all—and he wound up in the prison where I was a corrections officer.

The corrupt American family court-media-feminist-academia cultural Marxist-big business-prison industrial complex had worked perfectly to ruin this poor man, and what a prize they had. A dedicated, hard working US surgeon, saving lives every day, drained of his money and reduced to poverty by a gold-digging, spoiled greedy bimbo who divorced him due to his very dedication, had kids with other men to force him to pay bullshit “child support” in addition to never-stopping alimony, his assets taken by his gold-digging ex wife and the state to grease their own corruption, the “child support” in actuality supporting the ex wife’s corrupt, hedonistic lifestyle after divorce. And then the poor surgeon himself made a literal slave in a US prison, stripped of his license and made a perpetual debtor, worked to the bone but never allowed to profit from his own efforts or hard work. That really is how it works in the US family court and prison system. That poor surgeon was the worst case we ever saw, made us so mad we were talking about how we were going to “free the Bastille” and start a revolution ourselves to stop all the corruption, Robespierre style. And free all the innocent men, and even some women, who were imprisoned this way, to feed more slaves to the machine.

As this case shows, women have absolute power over men in the court system. A man’s life, liberty and finances are subject to forfeiture by an oppressive, legalistic system simply because he had a failed relationship with an Anglobitch.

Let’s look at another definition of slavery.

Slavery is a legal or economic system in which principles of property law are applied to humans allowing them to be classified as property, to be owned, bought and sold accordingly, and they cannot withdraw unilaterally from the arrangement. While a person is enslaved, the owner is entitled to the productivity of the slave’s labor, without any remuneration.

Being forced to pay a woman in order to stay out of jail means men have become property owned by the state, as men are bought by the court system and sold by women into their bondage – and of course men cannot withdraw from the arrangement. A man’s owner, the state, entitles itself as well as his ex to the productivity of the newly minted slave’s labor for 18 years or even for a lifetime in the case of alimony, forcing payments to be made to a totally unaccountable “mother” or ex.

Legs

Women have the right to choose, therefore men must be given the right to choose in the interest of equality

Legal Abortion: Men’s Right to “Choose”

How do we remedy this situation in the interest of men’s rights? A start would be giving men the right to a legal abortion.

One of the conditions of slavery is the fact a party to the “agreement” cannot withdraw unilaterally from the arrangement. It’s is an interesting condition to elaborate on. Men in the United States have no legal rights to withdraw from being fathers after conception, even though women can physically abort their child anytime they choose. This means women have all the power over men and their children’s lives, and men have none. In effect, all a woman has to do is find an idiot who makes a good salary to impregnate her, then she gets a guaranteed income for 18 years. (If he marries her, potentially an income for life!)

At the very least, to give men the rights granted to slaves in 1865 – to unilaterally withdraw from the arrangement – American lawmakers need to follow the model recently proposed by the Swedish, reported by the Daily Mail. Interestingly,  the idea of “legal abortions” came from European liberals:

Expectant fathers in Sweden should have the right to ‘legally abort’ their unborn child up until the 18th week of pregnancy, the youth wing of the country’s Liberal Party has proposed. Swedish Liberal Youth argues that men should be given an equal say in whether or not they wish to become a parent, and be granted the option to cut any lawful responsibilities. The suggested ‘legal abortion’ would be irreversible and would see the man renounce all parental duties and rights to see the child once it has been born.

Men are currently given no say in whether or not they wish to become a parent after the sex act. Once again we see bias against men in society, while women play the victim card to their benefit.

Fathers

Statistically, women are more likely to become deadbeats than men

Deadbeat Moms

To illustrate one of the many hypocrisies of Anglo culture, let’s examine a term of scorn heaped upon men who can’t make the expected wealth transfers. The phrase Deadbeat Dads is a popular one on the left and in the media. But we never hear the term Deadbeat Moms, even though women have a higher percentage of child support defaults (i.e. falling behind or not paying) than men. Deadbeat moms occur at 1.2 times the rate of deadbeat dads in Anglo America:

  • 32% of custodial fathers did not receive child support payments from “mom”
  • 25% of custodial mothers did not receive child support payments from “dad”

Delving into the numbers, child support statistics get even more interesting. Mothers default more often even though they are not forced to pay as much as fathers by the court system.

  • The average due to custodial mothers is $4,800 annually
  • The average due to custodial fathers is $4,100 annually

So, even though women do not have to pay as much child support as men do, they become deadbeats more often. The media never discuss this, nor do lawmakers. Also, thanks to a gynocentric court system that displays the opposite of “equality” leftists and feminists claim to hold so dear:

  • 84% of the time women get custody
  • 16% of the time men get custody

If equality was truly a desired outcome, rather than women continuing to enjoy all legal rights and privileges men would get custody 50% of the time, or both parties would co-parent (as is done in Iceland) and neither would be forced by the legal system to make payments to the other.

sperium-2505952_1280

Men need to be more than sperm donors in the eyes of the law

A Rising Tide of Men Speaking Out

There is good news. Men are now throwing off the culturally-imposed prohibitions on speaking out against a system that abuses them.

Male utility is often cited as the only use women have for men in the modern age. In the long darkness before humanity became civilized, men were not given roles in society. After giving men roles in society, civilization flourished. By banishing fathers from the matriarchal kingdom, we have regressed, not progressed as a society.

As alluded to earlier, there has been some kickback to this model of female privilege and superiority, however. Daniela Carrigo posted this comment on the National Fatherhood Initiave’s page:

As a woman it infuriates me that dads’ sites always start with ‘respect the child’s mom’ and mom’s sites never mention dad. Dad sites say ‘pay child support’ or ‘be fiscally responsible for your child’ and mom sites, not so much – like – never.

You want to protect marriage? Make giving dads custody and making moms pay child support the NORM. All studies show moms start divorce proceedings or, in the majority of births today, never marry dad – why, alimony is on its way out but child support is tax free and GUARANTEED.

Cut off the free cow and women (as one I know) will stop raising kids dad free with free money. Get a damn job and stop expecting money from the man you keep the child from! You should be able to earn enough to not need child support OR you don’t DESERVE THE CHILD!!!!

Indeed, there is rarely if ever any question of accountability on the part of the mother. Men are blamed from the moment the sex act occurs, while women are not blamed for spreading their legs. Women receive government benefits for children they can’t afford, while men are sent to prison for children they can’t afford.

Men at Yahoo! Answers also give us a taste of the dirty underbelly of the Anglo American family court system:

Think about it, the man has his monthly income taken away from him. Not to mention he can go to jail for not paying this fine. This utterly DESTROYS any motivation the man may have to work harder/improve his performance or start a business for example, what’s the point if his hard-earned money is just stolen from him?

Meanwhile, the woman is free to mess around w/ other guys w/ the money she receives for free from her former victim. The financial needs of the child are almost always a small fraction of what she receives, and so she is free to spend the extra money on purses/shoes/jewelry, etc.

The saddest part is, the man is denied of seeing his child either by the woman or the Gov’t, despite any attempts he may try to make contact. Even worse is when the woman trains the kid to hate his dad by calling him a “deadbeat” or a “loser”, when in fact this is usually further from the truth (MOST fathers will not abandon their kid).

Child support is nothing but slavery. The fact that a few careless/manipulative women can exploit the system to deny honest men contact with their children WHILE stealing 50-60% of their hard-earned income is just wrong.

The Yahoo! discussion continues with this response:

I totally agree with you. That’s why more men are foregoing the marriage and staying single. I can tell you that if my wife and I divorced I would never get remarried. Divorces are slanted against men. Women are so vindictive when it comes to revenge that they can’t see how their actions are hurting men and their own kids. If the courts were a lot more fair and the lawyers a lot less greedy then men would not be so afraid of the marriage contract or the results of some woman with dollar bills in her eyes.

It’s true. Men are waking up to the fact that any dealing with an Anglo American women puts their entire lives in jeopardy. (A fact made even truer by the recent spate of #MeToo sexual witch trials in this Neo-Puritan, anti-male, anti-sex, anti-procreation, feminist culture.)

Rather than this unfortunate circumstance happening by accident, the outcome of enslaving men with their own children has long been the aim of the social engineers who have this nefarious goal: make sex and reproduction so risky for men they will not reproduce, which will lead to population control.

At least, that’s the idea in theory. In reality, it means that good, hardworking, law-abiding men are not reproducing because of the hell the legal system has created, but thugs and bad boys are reproducing because they are often in trouble with the law anyway and don’t give a damn. Statistics bear this out: Criminals have an average of 3.0 children per lifetime, while the average for the rest of the population is 1.75 children per lifetime.

The penalty for slaves who don’t pay once they are indentured by a state that meddles in family matters is discussed below, from the same Yahoo! Answers board.

If you come up short on child support you immediately get a warrant issued. The best solution I’ve seen for a more equitable solution for child support would be for the custodial parent to provide receipts to CSA and checks issued as valid reimbursements (just like a FSA account), any money not used out of that month gets returned. This will separate the good responsible parents from the not so responsible parents, unaccountable money leads to fraud and theft.

The stories of this waste of child support money are numerous among men I know. In one case, a friend of mine is forced to make $1,500 in child support payments each month. However, his kids go around in raggedy clothing while mommy dearest drives a Cadillac Escalade and always looks like she just walked out of the mall. And he’s powerless to do anything about it.

Finally, the breakup of family and subjugation of men also means the corporate-government complex will have more control over the minds of the next generation of children than ever before.

BallChain

The figurative ball and chain still exists in Anglo America’s family court system

Slavery Still Exists

As these facts show, slavery literally still exists for men of all colors in the United States of America. If women are truly seize the mantle of the empowerment they purport to desire so badly, they must not be given a legal crutch with which they can support their past bad choices, including choosing fathers they could not reasonably have expected to stay with until the children they create are raised.

We have discussed definitions of slavery. Here is a term women need to learn, as it comes with the territory of an empowered individual:

Accountability is an obligation or willingness to accept responsibility or to account for one’s actions.

To be Empowered™, women must also become accountable. Big Daddy Government and his welfare state, i.e. Uncle Sugar is an enabler of bad choices for women, and his enabling of reckless and predatory female behavior must be stopped. Men are already being held legally accountable for their actions, however men do not get the same privileges women do. There are four ways to rectify this injustice:

  • Men need to have reproductive rights which are on par with those of women. My body, my choice needs to have the legal equivalent of Me Being Enslaved, My choice. Men must be given the right to a legal abortion if women are given the rights to a physical abortion. This will force women to be prudent about reproductive decisions.
  • Gynocentrism in the courts must be eliminated. Men must be legally recognized as more than sperm donors and check-writers, and fathers must be given custody o children half the time; or, Anglo law should adopt a model in which custody is shared and no forced payments are created by the court system.
  • The no fault divorce system must be abandoned and Anglo law must return to a model in which fault must be proven to get a divorce.
  • Even better, the government needs to stay out of familial matters between two adults as much as possible and let them sort out the matters for themselves.

But we all know women don’t really want to be empowered. They want their cake and ice cream, rights AND privileges, and to eat them both. However, this system will utterly destroy the social fabric in the Anglosphere.

The current legal system makes men totally disposable rather than stakeholders in the family and society. Many of us feel this is by design of social engineers and Marxists rather than a result of any real concern about women’s rights. The true goal of such a system is to reduce mothers and fathers to squabbling factions who wage war on each other in the court system, allowing lawyers, judges, and those allied with this unjust system to make a living off the backs of the common man.

Leaving the family in the hands of a corrupt government is destroying it. As George Orwell put it: The real division is not between conservatives and revolutionaries but between authoritarians and libertarians. Authoritarians have created Big Daddy Government, an authoritarian monstrosity that has removed real fathers from society and enslaved them. Libertarians are trying, unfruitfully, to get the government out of our families.

Until then, the best options for men who know they’ve been betrayed by both their women and their government are to go MGTOW, Go Galt, or become an expat and leave the hateful Anglosphere altogether.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

The Face of Sex Offenders in America’s Public Schools

These are mug shots from some of the most well-known cases of predatory females sexually assaulting young male students while entrusted with educating them in public schools. Notice anything about all the teachers arrested for sexual misconduct in America’s schools?

All of those arrested in some of the most prominent sexual assault and/or rape cases (except for three by our admittedly hasty count) are Anglobitches i.e. white females, the supposedly asexual, sacred cows who comprise part of the “protected class” mainstream mierda, academia, and law enforcement regularly go to bat for. The very women #MeToo purports need saving from that awful, awful sex.

What to make of this? This thought crime fact, that women have sexual urges and can be just as rotten as men when it comes to gratifying themselves – with adolescents, no less – goes against the carefully constructed, feminist narrative that only men can be evil sexual predators. Statistics only further complicate the picture. A Department of Education research paper on educator sexual misconduct found some interesting facts:

  • 42.8% of sex offenders are female (American Association of University Women analysis)
  • 44% of victims are male
  • Average age of sex offenders is 28
  • Black and Latino children are more likely to be targeted

Interestingly, race/ethnicity of the offenders was not included in the Department of Education report. (But, we can glean from press reports many if not most of them are white females.)

What makes this deconstruction of the “only men can be evil sexual deviants” narrative all the more interesting is the fact culturally sanctified women are conducting sexual assaults on par with culturally villainized men. But, as always, Anglo culture turns a blind eye to sexual misdeeds conducted by women, since they have been the cultural “owners of sex” since Puritan days.

As one men’s rights organization puts it: “We are stuck in a generation where glorifying women and denigrating men is what people consider equality.” Even mainstream mierda rag USA Today reported on the hypocrisy of Anglo culture a few years back:

It’s a double standard brought by society, experts say, to female sex offenders — one that not only minimizes the victimization of young boys, who are left with lifelong emotional scars, but contributes to lighter sentences for the women involved.

Yep. The good old pussy pass means women only serve a fraction of the time men do when they have sex with minors. Even USA Today’s cherry-picked statistics say women commit 1 out of 5 sexual assaults, a whopping 20% of all cases. But, only men are serving hard time:

According to the Center for Sex Offender Management, a Department of Justice project, less than 1% of incarcerated rape and sexual assault offenders were females, or fewer than 800. By 2006, however, the FBI reported that females accounted for nearly 10% of sex crimes. And studies indicate that women commit approximately 20% of sex offenses against children.

There are a number of conclusions to be drawn. First, if your child is molested at school there’s a good chance the offender is a white female. Next, contrary to Anglo cultural narratives women are just as sexualized (and horny) as men are. They’re also quite capable of sexual deviancy and predatory behavior. And finally, we live in a culture that almost always turns a blind eye to the real sufferings of men to placate the imagined sufferings of women.

Worse, the corrupt media will often go to bat for women convicted of sexually assaulting young boys, as in the case of Mary Kay Letourneau. When is the last time we saw the media defending a male coach who diddled one of his female students?

Where’s a #HeToo movement directed at saving our boys? Don’t expect it in a misandrist culture. Where’s the “equality” in that?

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Keanu Reeves Discusses The Anglo-American Matrix

matrix-1735640_1280

Keanu Reeves draws parallels between The Matrix and the NWO with recent statements

Keanu Reeves, star of The Matrix (1999) recently said he believes the plot of the blockbusting film is “real.” Indeed, the film’s socioeconomic commentary is a foundational part of TNMM as well as a frequent meme in the manosphere. Of course, Reeves doesn’t believe we are literally living inside a computer program controlled by aliens. But he does touch on what the plot of the film represents. As he filmed an advertisement for Squarespace in the Mojave Desert, Reeves said:

The human race has been enslaved for thousands of years. We have been kept in a mental prison by shadowy elites and secret societies that have done all they can to suppress us and stop us reaching our potential.

Any thorough study of history is likely to yield this fact. That we are all human “sheep” living on a series of human farms. Religious, political, economic, and cultural.

Unfortunately, a nation of sheep often begets a government of wolves as is happening in the United States. As this dark reality was slowly exposed by Realtalk on the Internet, and the mainstream mierda propaganda model that controlled the minds of the world began to lose sway, the elite began to lose control of the very sheeple they hoped to lead to slaughter with the culmination of the New World Order. Reeves continues:

I think people were really scared the world was ending until, you know, very recently. It just felt like things had gotten out of control. We’d lost any hope of being able to save ourselves from the dark forces in the world.

Reeves even praises President Trump for exposing the Deep State and other secret societies working to undermine freedom around the world:

But just open your eyes for a minute and look around at what’s happening. It’s astonishing. People like Trump are lifting the veil on an astonishing web of interconnected manipulation.

Reeves even used a term previously relegated to the realm of “conspiracy theory” but one that is proving to be more apt with each passing year – the New World Order:

Love him or loathe him, he is allowing humanity to wake from its slumber and see that the same few people, the same secret societies, the f*cking New World Order, are actively controlling our lives and suppressing our true ability.

A “prison planet” is the ultimate aim of this cabal of totalitarians as electronic tyranny is foisted upon the world in ways never before possible. Reeves believe there’s hope, however.

But people are slowly waking up. It’s time to take back our infinite power and fling open the doors of the mental prison we have been encouraged to build for ourselves. It’s not an easy thing to do, but it’s time to walk into the light of freedom.

As always, TNMM works daily at freeing the minds of men. At waking up the flock. It’s nice to see that even in a town as twisted and corrupt as Hollyweird, there are a few like-minded souls who work towards the destruction of the matrix.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Police State USA Takes “Human Trafficking” Farce to the Super Bowl

people-2589817_1280

Police State USA is out in force at the Super Bowl to stop as many heterosexual hookups as possible

After a recent New Orleans “human trafficking” sting went door to door at Bourbon Street strip clubs right before Mardi Gras season trying to snare horny patrons in Police State USA’s anti-sexual gratification net – yet failed to net a single human trafficking case – American police forces are taking their circus on the road. In fact, they’re taking it to the Super Bowl. Reason magazine reports on the sexual prohibitionists and myth makers’ activities:

Dan Conboy, a police lieutenant in the Minneapolis suburb of Edina, said cops from all over the area would be focused on sex trafficking this weekend, with help from federal authorities. Their focus “won’t just be hotels, but also the airport, clubs and bars–any area where large groups will congregate,” reported the Minneapolis Sun Current.

First off, it’s amazing that this many resources are being deployed to try and stop heterosexual women from selling sexual services to lonely men. This is where we’re at in America, folks. The immoral government is on another classically neo-Puritan moral crusade, turning itself into the biggest cockblock possible. Continuing from Reason:

“This year’s Super Bowl will have the greatest deployment of federal resources yet, due to the city’s relatively small police department,” reported KTSA Minneapolis. Around 1,700 federal agents are expected in town, along with state and local police, the Minnesota National Guard, and officers from more than 60 police departments around Minnesota. In addition, “a 10,000-strong volunteer force has been trained to spot suspicious activity” around town.

You read that right. The latest angle from those planning a totalitarian, socialist state is getting citizens to spy on and tattle tale on each other.

“Hello, I saw some guy with what looked like a slut!”

“We’re on it. We’ll throw his ass to the ground, humiliate him, and give him a criminal record for having those disgusting urges!”

All these public resources and public relations bravado have been directed at a human trafficking problem that largely doesn’t exist, as the matrix lunges at the victimless crime of prostitution. (This is also the case with many other invented “problems” created out of whole cloth by The Anglo-American Matrix and its love affair with the Hegelian Dialectic, i.e. creating problems that don’t exist to create social hysteria and profit. Ultimately, the goal is to make the populace enslave themselves with constant, invented security threats like these.)

Even Reuters accidentally admitted the “human trafficking” campaign is largely a farce in one of their reports on the Super Bowl sex stings:

Although the attorney general of Texas dubbed the Super Bowl the “single largest human trafficking incident” in the United States in 2011, this is largely a myth, academics and anti-trafficking campaigners said.

The commercial sex market grows modestly during Super Bowls, but also during other large events, from the Las Vegas consumer electronics show to Memorial Day weekend, said Lauren Martin, a trafficking expert at the University of Minnesota.

Meaning, willing whores come to the Super Bowl and other big events to sell their “product” to willing men. It’s plain to see P4P (pay for play) is what the matrix wants to wipe out, not human trafficking.

Troublingly, operations like this illustrate the fact the American police state now likes to insert itself into every area of its citizens’ lives as possible. Including their private lives. And there’s nothing as private as sex. Our overlords are quite serious about the War on Sex. From Reason:

In other words, “sex trafficking” gives federal and local authorities an excuse for posting police anywhere and everywhere people are gathering—and for enlisting citizens as spies, too.

Just as TNMM has been reporting, the matrix is making a push to conflate “human trafficking” with regular old prostitution, in an effort to completely take sex away from heterosexual men who don’t agree to subjugate themselves under the gynocentric terms of marriage in feminist-dominated Anglo culture:

Even police willing to admit there’s no evidence for a surge in sex trafficking around the Super Bowl are still planning on using the game as an excuse to conduct prostitution stings. Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) Sgt. Grant Snyder explained the theory: More men than usual may be looking to pay for sex this weekend, and even though most of the people they’ll approach will be consenting adult sex workers, someone getting paid for sex could be a trafficking victim.

Note the typical logic pretzel Clancy Wiggins and Co. twists with the above statement. How long before the remnants of the Fourth Amendment (protections against illegal search and seizure) go out the window? After all, someone in your house might be a terrorist concealing a sizzling bomb. Probably not. But “you never know” in these days of government-fostered paranoia.

Reason magazine injects some reality into what the police will really be doing. Contrast this with the heroic language at officials’ self-congratulatory press conferences:

Therefore—rather than rescuing victims, or finding the people exploiting them—the police are going to arrest a tiny fraction of potential prostitution customers and publicly shame them. (It’s the thought that counts, right?)

In a misandrist culture, shaming men for having sexual desires is what the “human trafficking” campaign is all about. In fact, American police are daring people to sexually satisfy themselves:

For the 10 days leading up to the Super Bowl, MPD has been working with other agencies to conduct “Operation Guardian Angel,” in which police post online ads posing as adult sex workers and arrest those they lure to meet them.

It’s classic entrapment by the minions of Big Daddy Government.

“People who are coming to Minneapolis and are thinking about illegally buying sex know there’s a really good chance they’re talking to law enforcement, that we’ve infiltrated and embedded ourselves in the networks that are trying to sell sex,” Minneapolis City Council Member Steve Fletcher said.

Michelle Guelbart, of ECPAT, an organization that claims to have a mission to end the sexual exploitation of children (why this is being conflated with regular prostitution, nobody knows) gives us a hint at the truth behind all this bullshit in another mainstream media propaganda puff piece from mainstream mierda affiliate WTOP:

“The conversation is moving in the direction that we want it to,” she said.

The conversation is indeed going in the direction social engineers and tyrannical feminists want it to. Assailing the sex lives of Beta males in America.

Where does that leave us? French economist Frédéric Bastiat tried to warn us of the dangers of giving police too much power over the lives of citizens well over a century ago. The human trafficking farce is stark evidence we have descended into the type of society he wrote about:

To create crime, create laws. When there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.

When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.

Indeed, Police State USA glorifies itself in human trafficking narratives, while plundering and recklessly destroying the lives of men who dare leave a Benjamin on the nightstand after having sex with a willing woman.

The greatest tyranny ever known to mankind continues to take root, while a largely oblivious and passive American populace sit on their fat asses munching Cheetos and watching men throw a ball around. Bread and circuses, it seems, work every time.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

Downward Mobility: Retirees Are Also Becoming Nomads

motorhome-1206525_1280

A “precariat” class is the new norm in America as the middle class is squeezed out of existence; seniors are now adopting nomadic lifestyles – often living in campers

Downward mobility has become part and parcel of life in 21st century America. While life in general has become more uncertain for everyone in the so-called “new” economy, a misandrist Anglo culture is particularly targeting its men for economic disenfranchisement. Racial Bolshevists are targeting the white middle class in this era of the dissolution of the American Dream. And now, senior citizens are feeling the pinch.

In fact, a term has been coined by the elite classes to describe the new underclasses they’re creating: the precariat. What is the precariat? According to Wikipedia:

In sociology and economics, the precariat is a social class formed by people suffering from precarity, which is a condition of existence without predictability or security, affecting material or psychological welfare.

Reading between the lines, we can glean the moneyed classes are endeavoring to make the former middle classes live hand to mouth lives. People are easier to control when they don’t know where their next dollar or next meal is coming from.

This is why jobs are no longer reliable, even for college graduates. Predictably, the term precariat carries socialist overtones…fitting for a nation conducting a clandestine socialist revolution.

The term is a portmanteau obtained by merging precarious with proletariat. Unlike the proletariat class of industrial workers in the 20th century who lacked their own means of production and hence sold their labor to live, members of the precariat are only partially involved in labor and must undertake extensive “unremunerated activities that are essential if they are to retain access to jobs and to decent earnings”.

Here’s the real thrust of what the elite want to do to the public by combining precarious with the Soviet-era term proletariat:

Specifically, [the term precariat describes the] condition of lack of job security, including intermittent employment or underemployment and the resultant precarious existence. The emergence of this class has been ascribed to the entrenchment of neoliberal capitalism.

Actually, the economy we are in is not capitalism at all. More like corporatism, since 16 corporations control virtually everything we consume and all the images we get to see in the media.

As a result of the elite squeezing the economic life out of average Americans, senior citizens who either had their retirement blown out by the manufactered 2008 economic crisis, or who didn’t make enough money to save properly for retirement (once pensions were dropped for dubious 401k plans in the 1980s) are now adopting nomadic lifestyles, similar to the nomadic lifestyles displaced men have adopted.

A mainstreamer has caught on to this trend. From MarketWatch:

In her powerful new book, “Nomadland,” award-winning journalist Jessica Bruder reveals the dark, depressing and sometimes physically painful life of a tribe of men and women in their 50s and 60s who are — as the subtitle says — “surviving America in the twenty-first century.” Not quite homeless, they are “houseless,” living in secondhand RVs, trailers and vans and driving from one location to another to pick up seasonal low-wage jobs, if they can get them, with little or no benefits.

Bruder’s expose jives with what I saw while trucking, as I drove across 47 states and into virtually every major city.

The one impression I got from driving all over the nation after I left the ivory tower of lies (a career in mainstream media) to drive a truck was the fact the “image” America broadcasts of itself to the world certainly does not match the reality. The carefully constructed, public relations image of America is nothing short of full-on deceit and propaganda intended to convince Americans, and the world, that becoming a subject on the corporate plantation is the only way to live happily and prosperously when nothing could be farther from the truth.

The real-life image of America’s elders living precarious, nomadic lives in a camper is a far cry from the much-ballyhooed fantasy of every American owning their own home and retiring comfortably. (Much as the “college will get you a good job” fantasy is now crumbling.) Those who do own homes are often debt slaves mired in 30-year mortgages for them. Student loans have become tickets to debt slavery. And not many Americans are optimistic about the future, anymore. Retirement will be the next plank of American life to be swiped by the kleptomaniac elite, it seems.

Here’s some reality for you rather than the glossy image of retirement Americans are force-fed. Wage slavery well into retirement at companies like Amazon is becoming commonplace for gray-haired Americans:

The “workamper” jobs range from helping harvest sugar beets to flipping burgers at baseball spring training games to Amazon’s “CamperForce,” seasonal employees who can walk the equivalent of 15 miles a day during Christmas season pulling items off warehouse shelves and then returning to frigid campgrounds at night.

The numbers certainly paint a precarious existence:

Living on less than $1,000 a month, in certain cases, some have no hot showers. As Bruder writes, these are “people who never imagined being nomads.” Many saw their savings wiped out during the Great Recession or were foreclosure victims and, writes Bruder, “felt they’d spent too long losing a rigged game.” Some were laid off from high-paying professional jobs. Few have chosen this life. Few think they can find a way out of it. They’re downwardly mobile older Americans in mobile homes.

The only conclusion the rational man can draw from this juxtaposition of fact vs. fantasy is that America is completely full of shit country, just as George Carlin was telling us a generation ago:

Every time you’re exposed to advertising in America you’re reminded that this country’s most profitable business is still the manufacture, packaging, distribution, and marketing of bullshit. High-quality, grade-A, prime-cut, pure American bullshit.

And the sad part is that most people seem to believe bullshit only comes from certain predictable sources: advertising, politics, salesmen, and lawyers. Not true. Bullshit is everywhere. Bullshit is rampant. Parents are full of shit, teachers are full of shit, clergymen are full of shit, and law enforcement is full of shit. This entire country is completely full of shit—and always has been.

America has now thrown both its men and its elders overboard in mad pursuit of the Socialist fantasy of women ruling the nation – lording pussy and power over men in some sort of sick, twisted dystopian vision of the future. All while selling the fantasy of “progress” to the dim, 15-watt bulb masses.

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out a system like this is doomed to fail. And once again, we find feminism and liberalism as the root causes of the malaise. Feminism chose to destroy men and liberalism chose to destroy the productive classes to pacify the unproductive classes. All that’s left is playing out the string. Enjoy the decline.

Like this article? Has the blog helped change your life in a positive way? Buy one of my books from The New Modern Man Originals section of the Recommended Reading and Viewing page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also sponsor The New Modern Man or make a donation for as little as $1.

« Older Entries